1. [Dyslipidemia management in patients with high cardiovascular risk in Spain. ALMA study].
- Author
-
Pintó X, Trias Vilagut F, Rius Taruella J, and Mairal Sallán E
- Subjects
- Cardiovascular Diseases epidemiology, Cardiovascular Diseases etiology, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dyslipidemias complications, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Spain, Attitude of Health Personnel, Dyslipidemias therapy, Medicine, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Primary Health Care
- Abstract
Objective: To assess the attitude of primary care (PCPs) and specialized care (SCPs) physicians towards the general set of patients with dyslipidemia, particularly those with cardiovascular risk factors., Design: Observational, descriptive, multi-center study based on a survey., Location: Different healthcare regions in Spain., Participants: 1,402 PCPs, and 596 SCPs., Main Measurements: Physician's profile, routine practices in the management of patients with dyslipidemia., Results: 84.3% took the global cardiovascular risk into account when prescribing the treatment. Target LDL-C concentration in patients without cardiovascular risk factors was <130mg/dL and <160mg/dL for 51.9% and 29.0% of physicians, respectively. In smokers and patients with hypertension or diabetes, the LDL target was <100mg/dL for 49-55% of physicians, whereas in patients with cardiovascular complication, ischemic cardiopathy or stroke, target LDL-C was <70mg/dL in 71-88% of them. First-line treatment for patients without cardiovascular risk factors was atorvastatin (66%), whereas in patients with diabetes, kidney disease or metabolic syndrome, most physicians (80-89%) used pitavastatin. SCPs showed a greater trend than PCPs to establish a LDL-C target of <70mg/dL in patients with previous stroke (77.5% vs 66.8%) or coronary disease (92.1% vs 80.6%) (P<.0001), as well as to prescribe a combined treatment in patients not achieving the target LDL-C concentrations (58.1% vs 50.2%, P=.0013)., Conclusions: Although CVR assessment is generally accepted, there is broad disagreement in defining the objectives of LDL-C. Most often than PCPs, the SCPs consider more ambitious targets for LDL-C and the association of lipid-lowering drugs., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF