Search

To evaluate the predictive value of a bedside index in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).We studied the association of leuko-platelet index (LPI: platelet count * leukocyte count/10In the derivation cohort we included 1100 patients with non STEM-ACS, GRACE score of 133 ± 52, Crusade score 24,3 ± 14, 66% male, 65 + 11 years. LPI was 17 (12-24). LPI was higher (19 (13-25)) in patients with MI than in patients with unstable angina (16 (12-22) in (p 0.001)). A total of 115 patients (10.5%) had the CEP. CEP was associated to LPI (OR 1.04 (1.002-1.08), p = 0.03), age (OR 1.01 (0.97-1.05), p = 0.62) and GRACE140 (OR 8.1 (2.2-29), p = 0.02). LPI (OR 1.04 (1.004-1.07) p = 0.03) and GRACE score (OR 1.02 (1.01-1.03) p 0.01) were associated to cardiovascular mortality. We confirmed these results in the validation cohort #1 (686 patients, 61 + 11 years old, 47% nonST-ACS, 53% ST-ACS, 21% had CEP) and in validation cohort #2 (218 patients, 56.8% males, 73 + 7 years old, 79% nonST-ACS, GRACE score 136 + 30) and 8.3% with CEP. We used the cutoff points of LPI obtained in the derivation cohort (24).LPI 24 was associated to CEP (OR (1.7-5.2), p 0.01), independently of age (OR 1 (0.98-1.02), p = 0.8), and GRACE score (OR 1.01 (0.99-1.01), p 0.69), and It was associated to antiplatelet resistance (OR 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.06) p = 0.05).

e16059 Background: Several biomarkers were tested in mRCC but only outcome scores showed prognostic significance. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has shown prognostic significance for OS in a number of cancer types but value and cutoff in mRCC is unknown. Methods: The aim of this study was to evaluate NLR as prognostic factor and find a cutoff in mRCC pts. The medical records of 103 pts with mRCC were reviewed. Analysis included adjusting for baseline disease and patient characteristics and investigating potential interaction effects between NLR status and significant BL predictors of outcome. Overal Survivall (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed by Cox regression. Results: Total pts reviewed were 103, MSKCC risk groups (37% Good, 47% Intermediate,16% Poor).Median follow up were 50 months and median OS 29 months. Nephrectomy was performed in 81% of cases.Ninety six percent received treatment (tki – mTor inhibitors). The optimal cutoff was 4, pts with NLR ≤4 vs ≥4 have higher OS 32m vs 10m HR 3,38 (IC95%: 2,60- 4,50 p:0,0001) univariate and HR: 4,32 (IC 95%: 3,35-5,4 p:0,003) in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Our series show MSKCC score and RLN were prognostic factors in univariable and multivariable analisys. NRL ≥ 4 identify a group of patients with poor overall survival. The NLR provides independent prognostic information for patients with mRCC and could be useful in academic and community setting. [Table: see text]

242 Background: Tumor stage, Gleason score, PSA, Performance Status have been identified as important predictors of survival in prostate cancer. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is a validated score used to stratify patients according to comorbidities. To evaluate the prognostic role of CCI in patients with CPRC. Methods: A retrospective study based on an analysis of medical records of 212 patients with CRPC treated at Durand Hospital between 2010-2015. The CCI was calculated for each patient and a correlation with overall survival was performed. Statistical analysis included univariate analysis and multivariate analysis (Cox regression). Patients were stratified according CCI ≤ 7.6 or ≥ 7.6. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier curve. Results: We analyzed records of 212 patients with prostate cancer, of which 59 were resistant to castration. Median age 69 years, the PFS with androgen blockade was 32.4 months. Patients with CPRC 54% perform chemotherapy as first-line treatment of castration resistance and 46% performed treatment of hormonal manipulation (Enzalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate). Median overall survival of patients with CCI < 7.6 was 75 months versus 62 months for those with CCI > 7.6 HR: 1.19 (1.03 to 1.36) p: 0.01. In multivariate analysis the ICC was an independent predictor of mortality in these patients HR: 1.23 (1.03 to 1.48) p: 0.02. (Table 1) CCI ≤ 7,6 was predictor to subsequent lines in CPRC setting. Gleason score, PS were independent predictors of survival. Conclusions: Based on our results we can consider the CCI as an independent predictor of survival in CPRC patients. CCI could be an useful tool useful to select patients in clinical trial and community settings. [Table: see text]