Search

Biologics have transformed the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Biosimilars—biologic medicines with no clinically meaningful differences in safety or efficacy from licensed originators—can stimulate market competition and have the potential to expand patient access to biologics within the parameters of treatment recommendations. However, maximizing the benefits of biosimilars requires cooperation between multiple stakeholders. Regulators and developers should collaborate to ensure biosimilars reach patients rapidly without compromising stringent quality, safety, or efficacy standards. Pharmacoeconomic evaluations and payer policies should be updated following biosimilar market entry, minimizing the risk of imposing nonmedical barriers to biologic treatment. In RA, disparities between treatment guidelines and national reimbursement criteria could be addressed to ensure more uniform patient access to biologics and enable rheumatologists to effectively implement treat-to-target strategies. In IBD, the cost-effectiveness of biologic treatment earlier in the disease course is likely to improve when biosimilars are incorporated into pharmacoeconomic analyses. Patient understanding of biosimilars is crucial for treatment success and avoiding nocebo effects. Full understanding of biosimilars by physicians and carefully considered communication strategies can help support patients initiating or switching to biosimilars. Developers must operate efficiently to be sustainable, without undermining product quality, the reliability of the supply chain, or pharmacovigilance. Developers should also facilitate information sharing to meet the needs of other stakeholders. Such collaboration will help to ensure a sustainable future for both the biosimilar market and healthcare systems, supporting the availability of effective treatments for patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40265-020-01256-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) places a significant burden on health-care systems because of its chronicity and need for expensive therapies and surgery. With increasing use of biological therapies, contemporary data on IBD health-care costs are important for those responsible for allocating resources in Europe. To our knowledge, no prospective long-term analysis of the health-care costs of patients with IBD in the era of biologicals has been done in Europe. We aimed to investigate cost profiles of a pan-European, community-based inception cohort during 5 years of follow-up.METHODS: The Epi-IBD cohort is a community-based, prospective inception cohort of unselected patients with IBD diagnosed in 2010 at centres in 20 European countries plus Israel. Incident patients who were diagnosed with IBD according to the Copenhagen Diagnostic Criteria between Jan 1, and Dec 31, 2010, and were aged 15 years or older the time of diagnosis were prospectively included. Data on clinical characteristics and direct costs (investigations and outpatient visits, blood tests, treatments, hospitalisations, and surgeries) were collected prospectively using electronic case-report forms. Patient-level costs incorporated procedures leading to the initial diagnosis of IBD and costs of IBD management during the 5-year follow-up period. Costs incurred by comorbidities and unrelated to IBD were excluded. We grouped direct costs into the following five categories: investigations (including outpatient visits and blood tests), conventional medical treatment, biological therapy, hospitalisation, and surgery.FINDINGS: The study population consisted of 1289 patients with IBD, with 1073 (83%) patients from western Europe and 216 (17%) from eastern Europe. 488 (38%) patients had Crohn's disease, 717 (56%) had ulcerative colitis, and 84 (6%) had IBD unclassified. The mean cost per patient-year during follow-up for patients with IBD was €2609 (SD 7389; median €446 [IQR 164-1849]). The mean cost per patient-year during follow-up was €3542 (8058; median €717 [214-3512]) for patients with Crohn's disease, €2088 (7058; median €408 [133-1161]) for patients with ulcerative colitis, and €1609 (5010; median €415 [92-1228]) for patients with IBD unclassified (pINTERPRETATION: Overall direct expenditure on health care decreased over a 5-year follow-up period. This period was characterised by increasing expenditure on biologicals and decreasing expenditure on conventional medical treatments, hospitalisations, and surgeries. In light of the expenditures associated with biological therapy, cost-effective treatment strategies are needed to reduce the economic burden of inflammatory bowel disease.FUNDING: Kirsten og Freddy Johansens Fond and Nordsjællands Hospital Forskningsråd.

International audience; Background The long-term efficacy of infliximab as rescue therapy in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis is not well described. Aim We report a 3-year follow-up of a previous placebo-controlled trial of infliximab in acute steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Method In the original study, 45 patients were randomised to a single infusion of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo, and at three months 7/24 patients given infliximab were operated versus 14/21 patients given placebo. Three years or later patients were asked to participate in a clinical follow-up. Results Another 7 patients underwent colectomy during follow-up; 5 in the infliximab group and 2 in the placebo group. After 3 years, a total of 12/24 (50 %) patients given infliximab and 16/21 (76 %) given placebo (p=0.012) had had a colectomy. None of 8 patients in endoscopic remission at 3 months later had a colectomy compared with 7/14 (50%) patients not being in remission (p=0.02). There was no mortality. Conclusion The benefit of rescue therapy with infliximab in steroid-refractory acute ulcerative colitis remained after 3 years. The main advantage of infliximab treatment occurred during the first 3 months, whereas subsequent colectomy rates were similar in the two groups. Mucosal healing at 3 months influenced later colectomy risk.

International audience; OBJECTIVES: Anti-S. cerevisiae mannan antibodies (ASCA) are human antibodies associated with Crohn's disease (CD) reacting with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) mannan polymer. As mannan is a complex and variable repertoire of oligomannoses acting as epitopes, we chemically synthesized (Sigma) two major oligomannose epitopes, Man alpha-1,3 Man alpha-1,2 Man (SigmaMan3) and Man alpha-1,3 Man alpha-1,2 Man alpha-1,2 Man (SigmaMan4), and then explored how antisynthetic mannoside antibodies (ASigmaMA) compare with ASCA as markers of CD. METHODS: The study involved different cohorts of CD and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and healthy controls who had been studied previously in several medical centers in Europe, the United States, and North Africa to determine the clinical value of ASCA in terms of differential diagnosis, evolution of indeterminate colitis (IC), and serotype-phenotype correlations. The comparison of ASigmaMA and ASCA included a total of 1,365 subjects: 772 CD, 261 UC, 43 IC, and 289 controls. RESULTS: The specificity of ASigmaMA was similar to that of ASCA (89% vs 93%), although the sensitivity was lower (38% vs 55%). Unexpectedly, 24% of the CD patients who were negative for ASCA and/or other CD-associated serologic markers were positive for ASigmaMA. ASigmaMA were associated with colonic involvement in CD (odds ratio [OR] 1.609, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.033-2.506, P = 0.03) and were 100% predictive of CD in patients with IC. CONCLUSIONS: ASigmaMA reveal the heterogeneity of the antioligomannose antibody response in CD patients and increase the sensitivity of CD diagnosis when combined with ASCA. The subset of ASCA-negative CD patients diagnosed by ASigmaMA had preferentially a colonic involvement, which confirms the high predictive value of ASigmaMA for determining IC evolution toward CD.