1. Validation of a Semiautomatic Image Analysis Software for the Quantification of Musculoskeletal Tissues
- Author
-
Jane A. Cauley, Ebrahim Bani Hassan, Mahdi Imani, Aaron Samuel Tze Nor Ch'Ng, Sara Vogrin, Gustavo Duque, and Nancy E Lane
- Subjects
Sarcopenia ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Clinical Sciences ,Osteoporosis ,Biomedical Engineering ,Fat infiltration ,Adipose tissue ,Bioengineering ,Human study ,Article ,Endocrinology & Metabolism ,Computer-Assisted ,Endocrinology ,Image processing ,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ,Genetics ,medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Femur ,Image analysis ,Observer Variation ,Semiautomatic segmentation ,business.industry ,Human Genome ,Reproducibility of Results ,Intramuscular fat ,X-Ray Microtomography ,medicine.disease ,Marrow adipose tissue ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Musculoskeletal ,Osteosarcopenia ,Orthopedic surgery ,Biochemistry and Cell Biology ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,Software - Abstract
Background: Accurate quantification of bone, muscle, and their components is still an unmet need in the musculoskeletal field. Current methods to quantify tissue volumes in 3D images are expensive, labor-intensive, and time-consuming; thus, a reliable, valid, and quick application is highly needed.Methods: Tissue Compass is a standalone software for semiautomatic segmentation and automatic quantification of musculoskeletal organs. To validate the software, cross-sectional micro-CT scans images of rat femur (n=19), and CT images of hip and abdomen (n=100) from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study were used to quantify bone, hematopoietic marrow (HBM), and marrow adipose tissue (MAT) using commercial manual software as a comparator. Also, abdominal CT scans (n=100) were used to quantify psoas muscle volumes and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) using the same software. We calculated Pearson's correlation coefficients, individual intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman limits of agreement together with Bland-Altman plots to show the inter- and intra-observer agreement between Tissue Compass and commercially available software.Results: In the animal study, the agreement between Tissue Compass and commercial software was r>0.93 and ICC>0.93 for rat femur measurements. Bland-Altman limits of agreement was -720.89 (-1.5e+04, 13074.00) for MAT, 4421.11 (-1.8e+04, 27149.73) for HBM and -6073.32 (-2.9e+04, 16388.37) for bone. The inter-observer agreement for QCT human study between two observers was r>0.99 and ICC>0.99. Bland-Altman limits of agreement was 0.01 (-0.07, 0.10) for MAT in hip, 0.02 (-0.08, 0.12) for HBM in hip, 0.05 (-0.15, 0.25) for bone in hip, 0.02 (-0.18, 0.22) for MAT in L1, 0.00 (-0.16, 0.16) for HBM in L1, 0.02 (-0.23, 0.27) for bone in L1. The intra-observer agreement for QCT human study between two applications was r>0.997 and ICC>0.99. Bland-Altman limits of agreement was 0.03 (-0.13, 0.20) for MAT in hip, 0.05 (-0.08, 0.18) for HBM in hip, 0.05 (-0.24, 0.34) for bone in hip, -0.02 (-0.34, 0.31) for MAT in L1, -0.14 (-0.44, 0.17) for HBM in L1, -0.29 (-0.62, 0.05) for bone in L1, 0.03 (-0.08, 0.15) for IMAT in psoas, and 0.02 (-0.35, 0.38) for muscle in psoas. Conclusion: Compared to a conventional application, Tissue Compass demonstrated high accuracy and non-inferiority while also facilitating easier analyses. Tissue Compass could become the tool of choice to diagnose tissue loss/gain syndromes in the future by requiring a small number of CT sections to detect tissue volumes and fat infiltration.
- Published
- 2021