1. Online training on how to diagnose anoperineal lesions of Crohn's disease: Do pictures matter? A nationwide randomized study
- Author
-
Laurent Siproudhis, P. Roumeguère, Paul Benfredj, C. Bord, E. Pommaret, A Nouts, Laurent Abramowitz, Guillaume Bonnaud, Dominique Bouchard, C Geffrier, F Devulder, V. de Parades, J M Didelot, T. Higuero, Ghislain Staumont, Jean-David Zeitoun, Guillaume Bouguen, P Marteau, F. Pigot, X. Lesage, P Petit, Nadia Fathallah, Clinique Beau Soleil [Montpellier], Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive [Rennes] = Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery [Rennes], CHU Pontchaillou [Rennes], Clinique Saint Augustin, CHU Saint-Antoine [AP-HP], and Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Perineum ,law.invention ,Education, Distance ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Crohn Disease ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Medical Illustration ,Skin Ulcer ,Photography ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Rectal Fistula ,Medicine ,In patient ,Anus Diseases ,Crohn's disease ,Electronic Mail ,Hepatology ,business.industry ,Gastroenterology ,medicine.disease ,Abscess ,3. Good health ,Erythema ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Physical therapy ,Online teaching ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Educational Measurement ,France ,business - Abstract
Summary Any gastroenterologist must be trained to properly diagnose anoperineal lesions in patients with Crohn's disease (APLOC). The aim of this study was to establish whether adding pictures would improve teaching effectiveness of the diagnosis of APLOC to French gastroenterology trainees. Method Trainees were asked to answer a first web-based survey consisting of evaluating 12 pictures of APLOC with a closed answer questionnaire. They were then randomized in 2 groups. Group A received an online teaching with typical pictures and APLOC definitions and group B definitions only. Trainees were asked again seven days later to answer a second survey with 12 other pictures of APLOC and 14 experts also answered this survey. Diagnostic scores were expressed in %. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the score of survey 2 between the two groups of trainees. Secondary endpoints were to compare results of survey 2 between trainees of both groups and experts, and assess diagnosis of each lesion. Results Two hundred fourty eight trainees among 465 answered survey 1, and 195 survey 2. The diagnostic score was 71.9% for groups A and B and 74.6% for experts (differences NS). After training diagnosis of ulceration was 72% for group A and 72.9% for group B, fistulae 85.2% versus 85.8%, erythema 44.1% vs. 55.6%, anoperineal scars 67.5% vs. 65.6%, and abscess 100% (differences NS). Conclusion There was no difference between the two teaching methods. Further research should be performed aiming at improving teaching material and quotation baremes.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF