1. Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
- Author
-
Yuko Iida, Kazushige Wakuda, Hirotsugu Kenmotsu, Kosei Doshita, Hiroaki Kodama, Naoya Nishioka, Eriko Miyawaki, Taichi Miyawaki, Nobuaki Mamesaya, Haruki Kobayashi, Shota Omori, Ryo Ko, Akira Ono, Tateaki Naito, Haruyasu Murakami, Takashi Sugino, Yasuhiro Gon, and Toshiaki Takahashi
- Subjects
Medicine ,Science - Abstract
Abstract The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary LCNEC. We retrospectively reviewed patients with pulmonary LCNEC or possible LCNEC (pLCNEC) who received platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Among these patients, we evaluated the efficacy of second-line treatment by comparing patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC group). Of the 61 patients with LCNEC or pLCNEC (LCNEC group) who received first-line chemotherapy, 39 patients were treated with second-line chemotherapy. Among the 39 patients, 61.5% received amrubicin monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the LCNEC groups were 3.3 and 8.3 months, respectively. No significant differences in the PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.924, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.647–1.320; P = 0.664) and OS (HR: 0.926; 95% CI 0.648–1.321; P = 0.670) were observed between the LCNEC and SCLC groups. In patients treated with amrubicin, the PFS (P = 0.964) and OS (P = 0.544) were not different between both the groups. Second-line chemotherapy, including amrubicin, may be considered as a treatment option for patients with pulmonary LCNEC.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF