Search

Background Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is associated with acute pancreatitis (AP) in some cases, however its causes have not been fully elucidated. We investigated the association of the incidence of AP with epithelial subtypes and pancreatic volume in IPMN. Methods This retrospective study included 182 consecutive surgically resected IPMN patients between January 2000 and December 2018. The relationship between the incidence of AP and epithelial subtypes of IPMN and pancreatic volume was investigated. Epithelial subtypes of IPMN were classified into gastric (G type: N = 116), intestinal (I type: N = 49), pancreatobiliary (PB type: N = 14), and oncocytic types (O type: N = 3). Pancreatic volume of the contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan was measured using Ziostation2 software. Histological pancreatic parenchymal atrophy was also evaluated. Results AP occurred more frequently in I-types (I-type vs. G-type, 22.4% [11/49] vs 3.4% [4/116], P = 0.003) and PB-types (PB type vs. G-type, 35.7% [5/14] vs. 3.4% [4/116], P = 0.007) in comparison with G-types, which constituted the majority of the resected IPMNs. AP occurred more frequently in I-type patients with high pancreatic volumes (I-type with high pancreatic volume vs. I-type with low pancreatic volume, 37.0% [10/27] vs. 4.7% [1/21], P = 0.02). However, histological atrophy did not show an additional influence on the association between the incidence of AP and epithelial subtypes. The elevation of serum pancreatic enzymes was not significantly related to epithelial subtypes. Conclusion Epithelial subtypes and the degree of pancreatic volume may be closely associated with the incidence of AP in IPMN.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasms is a useful treatment globally. However, postoperative bleeding after gastric ESD is a serious, and sometimes life-threatening complication in patients receiving antithrombotic drugs, because antithrombotic drugs are considered to increase the risk of postoperative bleeding after gastric ESD. In contrast, withdrawal of antithrombotic drugs during the perioperative period increases the risk of thrombotic complications. Guidelines for the management of antithrombotic drugs during the periendoscopic period have been published by different countries, and recent guidelines place greater emphasis on the risk of thromboembolism with the discontinuation of antithrombotic drugs than on the risk of bleeding with the continuation of antithrombotic drugs. Several studies have reported on the validity of these guidelines, and clinical evidence is being established. Most studies reported that gastric ESD under continuation of aspirin or cilostazol did not increase the risk of bleeding, whereas heparin replacement was strongly associated with a higher risk of bleeding. However, the data regarding some clinical issues about the management of antithrombotic drugs, such as the safety of gastric ESD under continuation of thienopyridine, administration of multiple antithrombotic drugs including dual antiplatelet and anticoagulants (warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant), and effective prophylactic methods for postoperative bleeding after gastric ESD are lacking. Larger clinical data are needed to resolve the remaining issues in the future.