Search

Most life-threatening diabetes-related complications involve the kidneys, eyes, cardiovascular system, and autonomic nervous system. Clinical islet transplantation (CITx) may be a therapeutic option for some patients. In this study, we analyzed the progression of diabetic complications after CITx and in patients waiting for islet transplantation.From 2008 to 2015, 67 patients were listed for pancreatic or islet transplantation. We compared beta scores, islet scores, and secondary complications between patients who underwent islet allotransplantation (CITx group, n = 6) and the patients awaiting islet transplantation (wait group, n = 19) at baseline and during the 1-year follow-up.In the CITx group, good islet function was observed in 80% of patients 1 month post-transplantation and 40% of patients 1 year post-transplantation; however, no patient achieved insulin independence. One patient who underwent simultaneous islet-kidney transplantation died on day 8 because of severe bleeding in the retroperitoneal space. In 1 case, islet primary nonfunction was observed. Mean islet score in the CITx group 1 year post-transplantation was significantly higher than the pretransplant score and wait group scores at enrollment and 1 year later (P .01). Increased albuminuria was observed in 3 of 11 (27%) patients in the wait group and 0 patients in the CITx group (P = .08). One patient (9%) in the wait group developed chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis. Ophthalmologic procedures were required by 47% of patients in the wait group and 0 patients in the CITx group in the first year after transplantation (P .01).Successful islet transplantation slows the progression of diabetic complications.

Patients with chronic pancreatitis have benefited from total pancreatectomy and autologous islet cell transplantation (TPAIT) since the 1970s. Over the past few decades, improvements have been made in surgical technique and perioperative management that have led to improved success of islet cell function, insulin independence and patient survival. This article focuses on recent updates and advances for the TPAIT procedure that continue to expand and innovate the impact on patients with debilitating disease.

Islet cell replacement therapies represent an effective way to restore physiologic glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and severe hypoglycemia. Despite being able to provide long-term insulin independence, patients still require lifelong immunosuppression, which has myriad detrimental effects including an increased risk for opportunistic infections and some types of cancer. This vital issue precludes widespread application of these therapies as a true cure for T1DM. Encapsulation of islets into immunoisolating/immunoprotective devices provides the potential of abrogating the requisite for lifelong immunosuppression. The field of cellular encapsulation lies at a complex intersection between the areas of chemistry, physics, bioengineering, cell biology, immunology, and clinical medicine. In diabetes, cellular encapsulation has existed for nearly 50 years, nevertheless, a resurgence of interest in the field has been motivated by promising results in small- and large-animal models. Recent studies have demonstrated that long-term diabetes reversal without immunosuppression is indeed routinely achievable. Future researchers interested in exploring cellular encapsulation strategies will require a clear understanding of the basic theoretical and practical principles, guiding this rapidly expanding field. This article will provide essential considerations concerning the physicochemical properties of the most commonly used biomaterials, relevant aspects of the immune response to bioencapsulation, current encapsulation strategies, potential implantation sites for encapsulated cell therapies and, finally, a comprehensive review on the current state of clinical translation. © 2020 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 10:839-878, 2020.

Pancreatic-islet transplantation is a safe and noninvasive therapy for type 1 diabetes. However, the currently applied site for transplantation, ie, the liver, is not the optimal site for islet survival. Because the human body has shortcomings in providing an optimal site, artificial transplantation sites have been proposed. Such an artificial site could consist of a polymeric scaffold that mimics the pancreatic microenvironment and supports islet function. Recently, remarkable progress has been made in the technology of engineering scaffolds. The polymer-islet interactions, the site of implantation, and scaffold prevascularization are critical factors for success or failure of the scaffolds. This article critically reviews these factors while also discussing translation of experimental studies to human application as well as the steps required to create a clinically applicable prevascularized, retrievable scaffold for implantation of insulin-producing cells for treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Important advances have been made in the design and testing of polymeric scaffolds for pancreatic islet transplantation, but some challenges remain to be solved before human application.

Restoration of insulin-independence and normoglycemia has been the overarching goal in diabetes research and therapy. While whole organ and islet transplantation have become gold standard procedures in achieving glucose control in diabetic patients, the profound lack of suitable donor tissues severely hampers the broad application of these therapies. Here, we describe current efforts aimed at generating a sustainable source of functional human stem cell-derived insulin-producing islet cells for cell transplantation and present state-of-the-art efforts to protect such cells via immune modulation and encapsulation strategies.

The transplantation of pancreatic islets, following the Edmonton Protocol, is a promising treatment for type I diabetics. However, the need for multiple donors to achieve insulin independence reflects the large loss of islets that occurs when islets are infused into the portal vein. Finding a less hostile transplantation site that is both minimally invasive and able to support a large transplant volume is necessary to advance this approach. Although the s.c. site satisfies both these criteria, the site is poorly vascularized, precluding its utility. To address this problem, we demonstrate that modular tissue engineering results in an s.c. vascularized bed that enables the transplantation of pancreatic islets. In streptozotocin-induced diabetic SCID/beige mice, the injection of 750 rat islet equivalents embedded in endothelialized collagen modules was sufficient to restore and maintain normoglycemia for 21 days; the same number of free islets was unable to affect glucose levels. Furthermore, using CLARITY, we showed that embedded islets became revascularized and integrated with the host’s vasculature, a feature not seen in other s.c. studies. Collagen-embedded islets drove a small (albeit not significant) shift toward a proangiogenic CD206 + MHCII − (M2-like) macrophage response, which was a feature of module-associated vascularization. While these results open the potential for using s.c. islet delivery as a treatment option for type I diabetes, the more immediate benefit may be for the exploration of revascularized islet biology.

JDRF is the leading global organization dedicated to type 1 diabetes (T1D) research, an autoimmune disease affecting millions worldwide and with increased incidence and prevalence each year. The foundation collaborates with strategic partners who share the mission of improving the lives of people with T1D by accelerating progress on the most promising opportunities for curing, better treating, and preventing the disease. One of the therapeutic goals at JDRF is to restore full glycemic control in T1D by replacing the loss of beta-cell function with an unlimited source of highly functional insulin-producing cells. To achieve this goal, the main priority is to support discovery, preclinical development, and provide clinical proof of concept for a beta-cell replacement product. Development and validation of renewable beta-cell sources, strategies to protect such cells from immune-mediated responses, and a transplant environment that supports long-term graft function is expected to overcome the limitation of donor pancreata and the need for systemic immunosuppression that restrict the benefits of islet transplantation to people living with unstable T1D. At JDRF, strategic roadmaps are developed based on current gaps and opportunities in the field and guides directing research funding in the most efficient manner, as well as better positioning our funded investigators and resources to succeed. The combination of research-focused programs with strengths in regulatory, health policy, and advocacy culminate into JDRF being a leader in the field and in a position to deliver clinically impactful and disease-modifying therapies for T1D, such as beta-cell replacement products. We review the strategy within this document.

Islet transplantation is an available option to treat brittle type 1 diabetes and to prevent pancreatogenic diabetes. Despite the remarkable improvements performed in the field, the successful rate of insulin independence at 5 years posttransplant is not fully satisfactory. One of the key players contributing to this poor outcome is inflammation. Indeed it has been recognized that the inflammation associated with the islet transplantation is one of the main cause of early damage to islets and graft loss. In this chapter, we have elucidated some of the relevant mechanisms that induce inflammation in islet transplantation from the donor to the recipient, passing through all steps of the islet isolation process (cold ischemia, dissociation, and culture conditions). Here, we provide a literature overview of the acquired knowledge and the latest findings, paying particular attention to the most promising anti-inflammatory strategies for intrahepatic islet transplantation.

Stresses encountered during human islet isolation lead to unavoidable β-cell death after transplantation. This reduces the chance of insulin independence in chronic pancreatitis patients undergoing total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation. We tested whether harvesting islets in carbon monoxide-saturated solutions is safe and can enhance islet survival and insulin independence after total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation. Chronic pancreatitis patients who consented to the study were randomized into carbon monoxide (islets harvested in a carbon monoxide-saturated medium) or control (islets harvested in a normal medium) groups. Islet yield, viability, oxygen consumption rate, β-cell death (measured by unmethylated insulin DNA), and serum cytokine levels were measured during the peri-transplantation period. Adverse events, metabolic phenotypes, and islet function were measured prior and at 6 months post-transplantation. No adverse events directly related to the infusion of carbon monoxide islets were observed. Carbon monoxide islets showed significantly higher viability before transplantation. Subjects receiving carbon monoxide islets had less β-cell death, decreased CCL23, and increased CXCL12 levels at 1 or 3 days post transplantation compared with controls. Three in 10 (30%) of the carbon monoxide subjects and none of the control subjects were insulin independent. This pilot trial showed for the first time that harvesting human islets in carbon monoxide-saturated solutions is safe for total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation patients.

This study aimed to evaluate whether the BETA-2 score is a reliable early predictor of graft decline and loss of insulin independence after islet allotransplantation. Islet transplant procedures were stratified into 3 groups according to clinical outcome: long-term insulin independence without islet graft decline (group 1, N = 9), initial insulin independence with subsequent islet graft decline and loss of insulin independence (group 2, N = 13), and no insulin independence (group 3, N = 13). BETA-2 was calculated on day 75 and multiple times afterwards for up to 145 months posttransplantation. A BETA-2 score cut-off of 17.4 on day 75 posttransplantation was discerned between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 (area under the receiver operating characteristic 0.769, P = .005) with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%. Additionally, BETA-2 ≥ 17.4 at any timepoint during follow-up reflected islet function required for long-term insulin independence. While BETA-2 did not decline below 17.4 for each of the 9 cases from group 1, the score decreased below 17.4 for all transplants from group 2 with subsequent loss of insulin independence. The reduction of BETA-2 below 17.4 predicted 9 (1.5-21) months in advance subsequent islet graft decline and loss of insulin independence (P = .03). This finding has important implications for posttransplant monitoring and patient care.

Introduction: The goal of the study was using BETA-2 to define suboptimal islet allograft function, which precedes clinical need of the insulin support and to discriminate it from the optimal function which allows for persistent insulin independence after islet allotransplantation. Material: Thirty five islet transplants were performed in 16 patients with T1DM. BETA-2 trends over the time were assessed in 3 transplant groups depending on the clinical outcome: Group 1 (N=9) persistent insulin independence; Group 2 (N=13) insulin independence loss preceded by the gradual islet graft decline; Group 3 (N=13) no insulin independence. Day 75 was a surrogate day of accomplished islet engraftment. Results: None of the transplants with BETA-2 < 17.4 on Day 75 resulted in persistent insulin independence (ROC AUC=17.4 for BETA-2 Group 1 vs. Group 2+ Group 3 with 100% sensitivity). Moreover, afterwards BETA-2 always oscillated above 17.4 and never dropped below after each transplant from Group 1 with up to 12 years follow-up. In contrast BETA-2 dropped below 17.4 in every case from Group 2, 9 months (3-24) prior to the loss of insulin independence (Kaplan-Meyer, p=0.03). Based on above, we defined that optimal islet function at any time point was represented by BETA-2 >=17.4, whereas suboptimal when BETA-2 was below that. Once BETA-2 dropped below 17.4 at any time point, islet function never recovered, instead gradually deteriorated with subsequent need for insulin support in every patient from group 2. Optimal vs. suboptimal islet graft function could be also discriminated based on individual fasting glucose, c-peptide or A1c values but with lower sensitivity and specificity. BETA-2 values never reached 17.4 at any time point after each transplant from Group 3. Conclusion: BETA-2 with cut off 17.4 allowed to define and discriminate optimal vs. suboptimal islet allograft function before need for insulin support. Disclosure P.J. Bachul: None. J.E. Golebiewska: None. F. Antic: None. M. Para: None. L. Basto: None. K. Golab: None. L. Perea: None. L. Wang: None. M.L. Tibudan: None. C.C. Thomas: None. P. Witkowski: None. Funding State of Illinois; Dompé

Purpose of Review Ketosis-prone diabetes or Flatbush diabetes has been widely recognized as a clinical entity since 1984. Most of the early clinical studies focused on African American or Afro-Caribbean individuals. It is now being recognized as an important clinical entity in sub-Saharan Africans, Asian and Indian populations, and Hispanic populations. Major questions remain as to its pathogenesis and whether it is a unique type of diabetes or a subset of more severe type 2 diabetes with greater loss of insulin action in target tissues. This review summarizes the main clinical and mechanistic studies to improve the understanding of ketosis-prone (Flatbush) diabetes. Recent Findings Little data are available on the magnitude of KPD in the different susceptible populations. It is relatively common in black populations. KPD is defined as a syndrome in which diabetes commences with ketoacidosis in individuals who are GAD and anti-islet cell antibody negative and have no known precipitating causes. The patients present during middle age, are overweight or mildly obese, and in many reports are more likely to be male. After intensive initial insulin therapy, many patients become insulin independent and can be well controlled on diet alone or diet plus oral medications. Summary The clinical course of KPD is like that of patients with type 2 diabetes rather than that of type 1 diabetes. Little differences are found in the clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes between patients presenting with KPD and those presenting with severe hyperglycemia with no ketoacidosis. The mechanisms responsible for the development of ketosis-prone diabetes as well its remission remain unknown.

While there has been a growing utilization of total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) for patients with medically refractory chronic pancreatitis over the past few decades, there remains a lack of consensus clinical guidelines to inform the counseling and management of patients undergoing TPIAT. In this article, we review the current clinical practice and published experience of several TPIAT centers, outline key aspects in managing patients undergoing TPIAT, and discuss the glycemic outcomes of this procedure. Aiming for lower inpatient glucose targets immediately after surgery (usually 100–120 mg/dl), maintaining all patients on subcutaneous insulin for at least 3 months to “rest” islets before an attempt is made to wean insulin, and close outpatient endocrinology follow-up after TPIAT particularly in the first year is common and related to better outcomes. Although TPIAT procedures and glycemic outcomes may differ across surgical centers, overall, approximately one third of patients are insulin independent at 1 year after TPIAT. Higher islet yield and lower preoperative glucose levels are among the strongest predictors of short-term post-operative insulin independence. Beyond 1 year post-operatively, the clinical management and long-term glycemic outcomes of patients after TPIAT are more variable. A multidisciplinary approach is essential in optimizing the preoperative, inpatient, and post-operative management and counseling of patients about the expected glycemic outcomes after surgery. Consensus guidelines for the clinical management of diabetes after TPIAT and harmonization of data collection protocols among TPIAT centers are needed to address the current knowledge gaps in clinical care and research and to optimize glycemic outcomes after TPIAT.

Islet cell transplantation is a promising functional cure for type 1 diabetes; however, maintaining long-term islet graft function and insulin independence is difficult to achieve. In this short report we present a patient with situs inversus, who at the time of islet transplantation had a 26-year history of type 1 diabetes, complicated by hypoglycemic unawareness and severe hypoglycemic events. After a single allogeneic islet transplant of a low islet mass, and despite developing de novo anti-insulin and anti-GAD65 autoantibodies, the patient has remarkably maintained insulin independence with tight glycemic control and normal metabolic profiles for 10 years, after receiving prolonged non-T-cell depleting immunosuppression.

Milestones in the history of diabetes therapy include the discovery of insulin and successful methods of beta cell replacement including whole pancreas and islet cell transplantation options. While pancreas transplantation remains the gold standard for patients who have difficulty controlling their symptoms with exogenous insulin, islet allotransplantation is now able to provide similar results with some advantages that make it an attractive potential alternative. The Edmonton Protocol, which incorporated a large dose of islets from multiple donors with steroid-free immunosuppression helped to establish the modern era of islet transplantation almost 20 years ago. While islet allotransplantation is recognized around the world as a powerful clinical therapy for type 1 diabetes it is not yet recognized by the Federal Drug Administration of the United States. Large-scale clinical trials administered by the Clinical Islet Transplantation Consortium have recently demonstrated that the well-regulated manufacture of a human islet product transplanted into patients with difficult to control type 1 diabetes and with a history of severe hyperglycemic episodes can safely and efficaciously maintain glycemic balance and eliminate the most severe complications associated with diabetes. The results of these clinical trials have established a strong basis for licensure of clinical islet allotransplantation in the US. Recognition by the Federal Drug Administration would likely lead to third party reimbursement for islet allotransplantation as a therapeutic option in the United States and would make the treatment available to many more patients. The high costs of rampant diabetes justify the expense of the treatment, which is in-line with the costs of clinical pancreas transplantation. While much enthusiasm and hope is raised toward the development and optimization of stem cell therapy, the islet transplantation community should push toward licensure, if that means broader access of this procedure to patients who may benefit from it. Even as we prepare to take the first steps in that direction, we must acknowledge the new challenges that a shift from the experimental to clinical will bring. Clinical islet allotransplantation in the United States would be a game-changing event in the treatment of type 1 diabetes and also generate enthusiasm for continued research.

On 11 January 1922 insulin injection was used for the first time in the treatment of diabetes. Even today, daily insulin injections are the life-saving treatment for patients with Type 1 diabetes and advanced Type 2 diabetes. However, insulin injections often fail to achieve full glucose control, which in the long-term leads to multiple complications and mortality. Beta-cells, the natural producers and secretors of insulin, remain the gold-standard in regulating blood glucose levels. In this review, we focus on three strategies aiming at counteracting beta-cell loss in order to gain insulin independence: replacement, replication and protection. The three approaches, together termed as the triumvirate of beta-cell regeneration, may constitute the basis for a future cure for diabetes.

Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is characterized by the presence of islet autoantibodies and initial insulin independence, which can lead to misdiagnosis of type 2 diabetes (T2D). As such, understanding the genetic etiology of LADA could aid in more accurate diagnosis. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the exact definition of LADA, so understanding its impact in different populations when contrasted with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D is one potential strategy to gain insight into its etiology. Unfortunately, the lack of consistent and thorough autoantibody screening around the world has hampered well-powered genetic studies of LADA. This review highlights recent genetic and epidemiological studies of LADA in diverse populations as well as the importance of autoantibody screening in facilitating future research.

Islet transplantation is currently the only minimally invasive therapy available for patients with type 1 diabetes that can lead to insulin independence, however, it is limited to only a small number of patients Although clinical procedures have improved in the isolation and culture of islets, a large number of islets are still lost in the pretransplant period, limiting the success of this treatment Moreover, current practice includes islets being prepared at specialized centers, which are sometimes remote to the transplant location Thus, a critical point of intervention to maintain the quality and quantity of isolated islets is during transportation between isolation centers and the transplanting hospitals, during which 20-40% of functional islets can be lost The current study investigated the use of an oxygen-permeable PDMS microwell device for long-distance transportation of isolated islets. We demonstrate that the microwell device protected islets from aggregation during transport, maintaining viability and average islet size during shipping. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

Whole-organ pancreas transplantation, either alone or combined with a kidney transplant, is the only definitive treatment for many patients with type 1 diabetes that restores normal glucose homoeostasis and insulin independence. Pancreas transplantation delays, or potentially prevents, secondary diabetes complications and is associated with improvement in patient survival when compared with either patients remaining on the waiting list or those receiving kidney transplant alone. Pancreas transplantation is safe and effective, with 1-year patient survival >97 % and graft survival rates of 85 % at 1 year and 76 % at 5 years in recent UK data. This review focuses on some current areas of interest in pancreas transplantation.

Background Human islet allotransplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes is in phase III clinical trials in the U.S. and is the standard of care in several other countries. Current islet product release criteria include viability based on cell membrane integrity stains, glucose-stimulated insulin release, and islet equivalent (IE) dose based on counts. However, only a fraction of patients transplanted with islets that meet or exceed these release criteria become insulin independent following 1 transplant. Measurements of islet oxygen consumption rate (OCR) have been reported as highly predictive of transplant outcome in many models. Method In this article we report on the assessment of clinical islet allograft preparations using OCR dose (or viable IE dose) and current product release assays in a series of 13 first transplant recipients. The predictive capability of each assay was examined and successful graft function was defined as 100% insulin independence within 45 days post-transplant. Results OCR dose was most predictive of CTO. IE dose was also highly predictive, while glucoses stimulated insulin release and membrane integrity stains were not. Conclusion OCR dose can predict CTO with high specificity and sensitivity and is a useful tool for evaluating islet preparations prior to clinical human islet allotransplantation.

Islet transplantation (IT) is a promising therapy for the treatment of diabetes. The large number of islets required to achieve insulin independence limit its cost-effectiveness and the number of patients who can be treated. It is believed that >50% of islets are lost in the immediate post-IT period. Poor oxygenation in the early post-IT period is recognized as a possible reason for islet loss and dysfunction but has not been extensively studied. Several key variables affect oxygenation in this setting, including (1) local oxygen partial pressure ( pO2), (2) islet oxygen consumption, (3) islet size (diameter, D), and (4) presence or absence of thrombosis on the islet surface. We discuss implications of oxygen-limiting conditions on intraportal islet viability and function. Of the 4 key variables, the islet size appears to be the most important determinant of the anoxic and nonfunctional islet volume fractions. Similarly, the effect of thrombus formation on the islet surface may be substantial. At the University of Minnesota, average size distribution data from clinical alloislet preparations (n = 10) indicate that >150-µm D islets account for only ~30% of the total islet number, but >85% of the total islet volume. This suggests that improved oxygen supply to the islets may have a profound impact on islet survivability and function since most of the β-cell volume is within large islets which are most susceptible to oxygen-limiting conditions. The assumption that the liver is a suitable islet transplant site from the standpoint of oxygenation should be reconsidered.

Summary The β-cell replacement by islet transplantation is an attractive approach for normalizing blood glucose without hypoglycaemia in patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). A pioneer study by the Edmonton group more than a decade ago showed that alloislet transplantation may result in insulin independence for at least 1 year after transplantation. This breakthrough excited researchers, physicians and patients, who felt that the ultimate goal of cure for T1D was at hand. Longer follow-up of patients who underwent islet transplantation showed less favourable results, with only approximately 10% of the patients remaining insulin-free 5 years after transplantation. In the last few years, progress has been made, and the success rate of islet transplantation has steadily increased. Important hurdles, however, related to limited tissue supply and need for life-long immunosuppressive drugs have yet to be overcome. Herein, we review recent achievements in islet transplantation and the challenges that still need to be addressed before this procedure can become a standard therapy for T1D. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Widespread application of β cell replacement to obtain insulin independence in people with type 1 diabetes requires an unlimited source of insulin-producing cells and the ability to block the pathological immune response. Recent reports in Nature Medicine and Nature Biotechnology present a creative bioengineering strategy for achieving these goals.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW The dramatic results of the Edmonton Protocol in 2000 triggered tremendous excitement over the application of pancreatic islet transplantation as a viable approach to achieving consistent insulin independence in type 1 diabetic patients. However, this optimism in the field was tempered by follow-up studies showing frequent attrition of graft function commonly requiring a return to exogenous insulin therapy within 1-3 years after transplant. The purpose of this review is to put these initial studies in perspective and to highlight progress and challenges in this important field. RECENT FINDINGS Recent clinical and experimental findings demonstrate a progressive improvement in the function and durability of islet allografts. Induction therapies targeting T lymphocytes and costimulatory pathways have been highly effective at promoting islet transplant function. It is also apparent that islet injury associated with metabolic distress provides a nonimmune barrier to islet transplant outcomes. SUMMARY Newer therapeutic interventions show great promise for attenuating the adaptive immune response to islet allografts. Also, clarifying the mechanisms of metabolic-related tissue distress may provide additional potential targets for improving islet graft outcomes.

Slowly Progressive Type 1 Diabetes (SPT1D) is characterized by the absence of insulin dependence at the onset of diabetes and persistent detection of islet cell autoantibodies. These patients with high titers of glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA) are known to progress to insulin dependence within several years. Low-dose insulin injections have been reported to prevent or delay the decline of insulin secretion in SPT1D patients. We experienced the case of an SPT1D patient with preserved endogenous insulin secretion and good glycemic control achieved with α-glucosidase inhibitor (α-GI) treatment alone for 10 years despite having continuously elevated GADA titers. The details of this case suggest that α-GI treatment might have preventive effects on SPT1D progression.

Pancreatic islet transplantation requires multiple transplants to achieve insulin independence. Only one third of the islet mass is stably engrafted; one of the causes of which is ascribed to oxidative stress. We confirmed the hypothesis that administration of edaravone, a free radical scavenger, in the early posttransplantation period promotes islet cell engraftment.Islet isograft from a single donor was intraportally transplanted into streptozotocin-diabetic F344 rats, and intravenous edaravone (3 mg/kg) was administered immediately and 24 hours after the transplantation. Plasma glucose concentrations were monitored for 28 days. Serum insulin levels were obtained on the second week. Morphologic studies were performed on insulin-immunostained and TUNEL-stained sections of the recipient liver.In the edaravone-treated group, hyperglycemia was ameliorated, and 50% of rats achieved normoglycemia (200 mg/dL). All rats in the control group remained hyperglycemic (400 mg/dL). Insulin secretion of the edaravone-treated group was superior to the controls. Morphologically, the number and size of the islet β cells of the edaravone-treated group were larger than those of the controls. The number of TUNEL-positive cells in each islet of the edaravone-treated group were fewer than those of the controls.In streptozotocin-diabetic rats, edaravone administration in the early posttransplantation period promotes engraftment of intraportally transplanted islet cells.

Die funktionellen Ergebnisse der Insel(zell)-Transplantation haben sich kontinuierlich verbessert. Eine mogliche Indikation zur Transplantation besteht bei Patienten mit Typ-1-Diabetes (ohne signifikante Insulin-Restsekretion) mit Hypoglykamiesyndrom bzw. schwerst einstellbarem Diabetes (Brittle-Diabetes) oder mit terminaler Niereninsuffizienz und geplanter simultaner Nierentransplantation bzw. bereits vorangegangener Nierentransplantation. Durch eine Insel(zell)-Transplantation kann das primare Therapieziel einer guten und stabilen Stoffwechseleinstellung unter Vermeidung schwerer Hypoglykamien in der Mehrzahl der Falle erreicht werden. Nach Registerdaten betragt das Insel(zell)-Transplantatuberleben ein Jahr nach Transplantation 82%, nach 3 Jahren 75% und die Insulinunabhangigkeitsraten zum Einjahreszeitpunkt 43–50%, nach 3 Jahren 35%. Damit einher geht eine signifikante Verbesserung der Lebensqualitat und eine gegenuber alleiniger intensivierter Insulintherapie starkere Progressionshemmung diabetischer Folgekomplikationen. Patienten mit einem Typ-1-Diabetes mit Transplantationsindikation sollten eine Insel(zell)- oder Pankreastransplantation angeboten und dabei die Vor- und Nachteile beider Therapieverfahren sorgfaltig individuell abgewogen werden.

Alloislet transplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes enjoyed highly favorable status in the first half of the last decade but declined in favor during the second half. In this Perspective, I will briefly review the literature published in this area from 2000 to 2010 for the purposes of extracting lessons we have learned, considering whether the procedure should be deemed a partial success or a partial failure, and offering several strategies to improve alloislet transplantation outcomes in the future. In the end, I hope to strike a positive note about where this procedure is going, and how it will be applied to establish insulin independence in patients with type 1 diabetes.

The ability to culture porcine islets for extended times allows for both their functional assessment and the assurance of their microbiological safety prior to transplantation. We have previously shown that agarose-encapsulated porcine islets can be cultured for at least 24 weeks. In the current study, porcine islet agarose macrobeads cultured for up to 67 weeks were assessed for their ability to restore normoglycemia, respond to an intraperitoneal glucose challenge, maintain spontaneously diabetic BB rats free of insulin therapy for more than 6 months, and for their biocompatibility. Porcine islets were encapsulated in agarose macrobeads and subjected to weekly static perifusion assays for the assessment of insulin production. After in vitro culture for either 9, 40, or 67 weeks, 56–60 macrobeads were transplanted to each spontaneously diabetic BB rat. Transplanted rats were monitored daily for blood glucose levels. Glucose tolerance tests and assessments for porcine C-peptide were conducted at various intervals throughout the study. Normoglycemia (100–200 mg/dl) was initially restored in all islet transplanted rats. Moderate hyperglycemia (200–400 mg/dl) developed at around 30 days posttransplantation and continued throughout the study period of 201–202 days. Importantly, all rats that received encapsulated porcine islets continued to gain weight and were free of exogenous insulin therapy for the entire study. Porcine C-peptide (0.2–0.9 ng/ml) was detected in the serum of islet recipients throughout the study period. No differences were detected between recipient animals receiving islet macrobeads of various ages. These results demonstrate that the encapsulation of porcine islets in agarose macrobeads allows for extended culture periods and is an appropriate strategy for functional and microbiological assessment prior to clinical use.

本実験では，肥満モデル動物であるZucker Fattyラットに対し，APを混合した飼料の摂取がどのような影響を及ぼすかを検討した．AP摂取は内臓脂肪蓄積を抑制し，血清および肝臓トリグリセライド濃度を低減した．また，血漿インスリン濃度と血糖値を低減した．これらの結果より，AP摂取が脂質代謝とインスリン抵抗性の改善を示すことが明らかとなった．

More than 500 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus have now received islet transplants at over 50 institutions worldwide in the past 5 years. Rates of insulin independence at 1 year with current protocols are impressive. However, inexorable decay of islet function over time indicates that there are many opportunities for improvement. Improved control of glycosylated hemoglobin and reduced risk of recurrent hypoglycemia are seen as important benefits of islet transplantation, irrespective of the status regarding insulin independence. For the use of islet transplantation to expand it is essential that the donor-to-recipient ratio be reliably reduced to 1 : 1. Enormous opportunities lie ahead for the development of successful living donor islet transplantation, single donor protocols, improved engraftment, islet proliferation in vitro and in the recipient, alternative islet sources, and novel tolerizing drugs. With these emerging opportunities, islet transplantation may expand to include more patients with type 1 diabetes, including children, and will not be restricted to the most unstable forms of the disease, as it is today.

Insulin independence after conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in islet transplantation

Although islet transplantation is emerging as a critical solution for type I diabetes, it faces several problems like long-term independence of insulin, donor supply, immune rejection, and cell viability. Around two-thirds of the transplanted islets die in the first few days of the posttransplant and during the time in which remaining islets become functional, hyperglycemia eventually returns as islets are lost. The infused islets may coagulate and may lead to instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction that causes extensive islet damage during transplantation. The researchers are now focusing on developing three-dimensional scaffolds that promote islet survival and growth and to achieve prolonged insulin independence for patients suffering from type I diabetes. This chapter focuses on the recent developments in 3D scaffolding to support pancreatic islet transplantation.

Islet transplantation is considered an advanced therapy in the treatment of type-1 diabetes, with a progressive improvement of clinical results as seen in the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) report. It is an accepted method for the stabilization of frequent hypoglycemia, or severe glycemic lability, in patients with hypoglycemic unawareness, poor diabetic control, or a resistance to intensive insulin-based therapies. Worldwide data confirm a positive trend in this field, with the integrated management of pivotal factors: adequate islet mass, immunosuppressive protocols, additional anti-inflammatory therapy, and pre-transplant allo-immunity assessment. Insulin independence has been observed in several clinical trials with different rate, ranging 100-65% of patients; the maintenance of this condition during the follow-up progressively decreased, actually arranged on 44% 3 years after the last infusion, according to data reported from the CITR. Successful duration is progressively increasing, with ≥13 years being the longest reported insulin-free condition on record. The immediate results of functioning islet transplantation are an improvement in hypoglycemic awareness and a reduction in the glycated hemoglobin level. Furthermore, many studies have shown its influence on the chronic complications of diabetes, such as peripheral neuropathy, retinopathy, and macroangiopathy. Pre-transplant nephropathy remains an exclusion criterion as immunosuppressive therapy can exacerbate kidney-function deterioration. The problems linked to immunosuppression following islet transplantation for the treatment of type-1 diabetes need to be considered in order to achieve the correct risk/benefit ratio for each patient.

Islet allotransplantation can provide prolonged insulin independence in selected individuals with type 1 diabetes. Whether islet transplantation also restores hypoglycemic counterregulation is unclear. To determine if hypoglycemic counterregulation is restored by islet transplantation, we studied hormone responses and hypoglycemic symptom recognition in seven insulin-independent islet transplant recipients using a 3-h stepped hypoglycemic clamp, and compared their responses to those of nontransplanted type 1 diabetic subjects and nondiabetic control subjects. Glucagon responses of islet transplant recipients to hypoglycemia were significantly less than that observed in control subjects (incremental glucagon [mean ± SE]: −12 ± 12 vs. 64 ± 22 pg/ml, respectively; P < 0.05), and not significantly different from that of nontransplanted type 1 diabetic subjects (−17 ± 10 pg/ml). Epinephrine responses and symptom recognition were also not restored by islet transplantation (incremental epinephrine [mean ± SE]: 195 ± 128 [islet transplant recipients] vs. 238 ± 73 [type 1 diabetic subjects] vs. 633 ± 139 pg/ml [nondiabetic control subjects], P < 0.05 vs. control; peak symptom scores: 3.3 ± 0.9 [islet transplant recipients] vs. 3.1 ± 1.1 [type 1 diabetic subjects] vs. 6.7 ± 0.8 [nondiabetic control subjects]). Thus the results indicate that despite providing prolonged insulin independence and near-normal glycemic control in these patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemic hormonal counterregulation and symptom recognition were not restored by intrahepatic islet transplantation.

Islet transplantation as a procedure to induce insulin independence is still a long way from benefitting the population of more than I million type I diabetic patients in the United States. In addition to the problems involved with immune suppression, the most significant obstacle is a scarcity of human organs for transplantation. In 1999, only 5882 donated pancreases were available, of which only 50% could be expected to produce islet yields suitable for clinical purposes. In this article, we review various sources with the potential to provide tissue for transplantation. These sources include islet and nonislet cells derived from both human and nonhuman sources, with an emphasis on human cells.

Pancreatic islet transplantation is a minimally invasive procedure that can restore normoglycemia and insulin independence in Type 1 diabetics without the surgical complications associated with vascularized pancreas transplantation. The advances made in this field over the past decade have dramatically improved patient outcomes, and the procedure is now transitioning from an experimental treatment to a clinical reality. Nonetheless, a number of important issues continue to hamper the success of islet transplantation and must be addressed before there is widespread clinical acceptance. These include the relative inefficiency of the islet isolation process, the progressive loss of islet function over time and the need for multiple donors to achieve insulin independence. Here, we discuss the current status of islet transplantation and examine its future as a treatment for Type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND Islet transplantation is a recognized treatment option for select patients with type I diabetes mellitus. However, islet infusions from multiple donors are often required to achieve insulin independence. Ideally, insulin independence would be achieved routinely with only a single donor. Identification of factors associated with insulin independence after single-donor islet transplantation may help to select recipient-donor combinations with the highest probability of success. METHODS Subjects undergoing islet transplantation at a single center (Edmonton, Canada) between March 1999 and August 2013 were included. Recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics were collected and compared between recipients who became insulin independent after one islet transplantation and those who did not. RESULTS Thirty-one patients achieved insulin independence after a single-donor islet transplantation, and 149 did not. Long-term insulin-free survival was not different between the groups. Factors significantly associated with single-donor success included recipient age, insulin requirement at baseline, donor weight, donor body mass index, islet transplant mass, and peritransplant heparin and insulin administration. On multivariate analysis, pretransplantation daily insulin requirements, the use of peritransplantation heparin and insulin infusions, and islet transplant mass remained significant. CONCLUSION We have identified clinically relevant differences defining the achievement of insulin independence after single-donor transplantation. Based on these differences, a preoperative insulin requirement of less than 0.6 U/kg per day and receiving more than 5,646 islet equivalents (IEQ)/kg have a sensitivity of 84% and 71% and specificity of 50% and 50%, respectively, for insulin independence after single-donor islet transplantation. With ideal patient selection, this finding could potentially increase single-donor transplantation success and may be especially relevant for presensitized subjects or those who may subsequently require renal replacement.

Islet xenotransplantation is a prospective treatment to bridge the gap between available human cells and needs of patients with diabetes. Pig is the ideal candidate to obtain such available islet cells. However, potential clinical application of pig islet transplantation still faces obstacles such as inadequate yield of high-quality functional islets and xenorejection of the transplants. Adequate amounts of available islets can be obtained based on selection of a suitable pathogen-free source herd and the development of isolation and purification methods. Several studies demonstrated feasibility of successful pre-clinical pig islet xenotransplantation and provided insights and possible mechanisms of xenogeneic immune recognition and rejection. Particularly promising is the achievement of long-term insulin independence in diabetic models by means of distinct islet products and novel immunotherapeutic strategies. Nonetheless, further efforts are needed to obtain much more data on safety and efficacy to translate these findings into clinical practice

Background: Pancreas transplantation is the only treatment of IDDM (Type I diabetes) that consistently establishes insulin independence with complete normalization of HbAlc levels.

A type 1-diabetes results from autoimmune destruction of the insulin producing ß-cells in the pancreas. Today there is no cure to the disorder, and the patients require life-long insulin medication to survive. Treatment with exogenous insulin cannot mimic the second-by second regulation of blood glucose levels achieved by the ß-cells, and the current regimen presents a difficult navigation between the Scylla of life-threatening hypoglycemia and the Charybdis of hyperglycemic tissue glycosylation and late-complications.