Search

Introduction Immunocompromised patients are at high-risk for severe influenza and invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPD). Despite the French Public Health Council (FPHC) and the 7th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL7) recommendations, vaccination coverage remains insufficient. This study aimed to estimate the coverage and determinants of influenza, pneumococcal and diphtheria-tetanus-poliomyelitis (dTP) vaccinations in hematological patients underlying chemotherapy. Methods A survey was distributed to all patients of the hematology day hospital assessing vaccine uptakes and general opinion about vaccination. Vaccine uptakes were collected from medical and vaccination records; knowledge of and attitudes towards vaccinations in immunocompromised patients were evaluated for each general practitioner (GP) by phone call. Adequacy between vaccine uptakes and indication or not to vaccinate according to ECIL7 guidelines was assessed. Factors associated with vaccine uptakes were assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Results Among 145 patients, 66 % were aged 65 years or older, 40 % were followed for lymphoma and 38 % for multiple myeloma, 39 % were treated with anti-CD20 antibodies. Vaccination coverage was suboptimal for influenza (45-56 %), dTP (44 %) and IPD (16-19 %) regardless of the guidelines followed, with a wide variation in rates by information source (19-76 %). Adequacy rate with ECIL7 recommendations were 63 % and 87 % for influenza and IPD respectively. Information of patients on specific vaccinations was positively associated with flu and IPD vaccinations, as well as favorable attitude toward vaccination and age ≥ 65 years for flu vaccination, and recommendation by hematologist for pneumococcal vaccination. Conclusion Despite vaccination opportunities, the complexity of these specific recommendations and the lack of communication between the health actors could explain the suboptimal vaccination coverage in this high-risk population. A proactive attitude of all actors in the city and hospital, including better patient information and a personalized and evolving vaccination schedule to help GPs to coordinate vaccination would allow to improve vaccine coverage.

International audience

Background: CASSIOPEIA part 1 showed superior depth of response and significantly improved progression-free survival with daratumumab, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-VTd) versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) as induction and consolidation in patients with autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT)-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. In part 2, we compared daratumumab maintenance versus observation only. Methods: CASSIOPEIA is a two-part, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial of patients aged 18–65 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2, done in 111 European academic and community practice centres. In part 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to induction and consolidation with D-VTd or VTd. Patients still on study who had a partial response or better were randomly assigned (1:1) by an interactive web-response system to daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously every 8 weeks (a reduced frequency compared with standard daratumumab long-term dosing) or observation only for up to 2 years. Stratification factors were induction treatment and depth of response in part 1. The part 2 primary endpoint was progression-free survival from second randomisation. This preplanned interim analysis of progression-free survival was done after 281 events and shall be considered the primary analysis of progression-free survival. Sponsor personnel and designees who were involved in the analysis were masked to treatment group until the independent data monitoring committee recommended that the preplanned interim analysis be considered the main analysis of progression-free survival in part 2. Otherwise, treatment assignments were unmasked. The interaction between induction and consolidation and maintenance was tested at a two-sided significance level of 0·05 by a stratified Cox regression model that included the interaction term between maintenance treatment and induction and consolidation treatment. Efficacy analyses were done in the maintenance-specific intention-to-treat population, which comprised all patients who underwent second randomisation. Safety was analysed in all patients in the daratumumab group who received at least one dose and all patients randomly assigned to observation only. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02541383. Long-term follow-up is ongoing and the trial is closed to new participants. Findings: Between May 30, 2016, and June 18, 2018, 886 patients (458 [84%] of 543 in the D-VTd group and 428 [79%] of 542 in the VTd group) were randomly assigned to daratumumab maintenance (n=442) or observation only (n=444). At a median follow-up of 35·4 months (IQR 30·2–39·9) from second randomisation, median progression-free survival was not reached (95% CI not evaluable [NE]–NE) with daratumumab versus 46·7 months (40·0–NE) with observation only (hazard ratio 0·53, 95% CI 0·42–0·68, p

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a rare autoimmune-mediated condition characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia (MAP2K1mutation, although peri-renal infiltration is highly suggestive of Erdheim-Chester disease. This overlapping association was described in men with mutation inMAP2K1gene. Macrophages are implicated in the pathophysiology of ITP in multiple ways, notably by the phagocytosis of opsonized platelets and their function of antigen-presenting cells able to stimulate autoreactive T cells. Histiocytic cells derivate from monocyte-macrophage lineage. Activation of macrophages in active histiocytosis is responsible for consequential platelet destruction in ITP associated histiocytosis. Finally, this case highlights a rare presentation of ITP revealing histiocytosis, both being efficiently treated with rituximab.

The transition to oral therapies in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) offers potential benefits to patients; however, they must self-manage their medication and adherence plays an important role in patient care. It has been shown that patient satisfaction with their medication has a strong positive correlation with adherence in chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to estimate adherence rate of oral antimyeloma therapies and to identify risk factors for medication non-adherence. This observational, prospective, and multicentre survey based on a self-report questionnaire enrolled MM patients with at least 3 months of oral therapy. The 6-item Girerd scale and the medication possession ratio (MPR) were used for measuring medication adherence and the SATMED-Q® questionnaire was used for measuring satisfaction. An analysis of risk factors for non-adherence to oral therapy was performed using univariate analysis. A total of 101 patients participated in the survey, yielding a response rate of 87%. The prevalence of adherence to oral antimyeloma therapy was estimated at 51.5% using the Girerd questionnaire. According to the MPR, adherence was evaluated at 96% (i.e. MPR ≥ 0.80). Both methods combined, adherence was estimated at 50.5%. One risk factor for medication non-adherence was identified: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status > 2 (p = 0.007). One predictive factor for high medication adherence was identified: high satisfaction with treatment (p = 0.01). Identifying patients at higher risk for non-adherence allows clinical pharmacists to personalise therapeutic information and education and to improve the quality of healthcare overall.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is rare in young patients, especially before age 40 years at diagnosis, representing

Despite tremendous improvements in the outcome of patients with multiple myeloma in the past decade, high-risk patients have not benefited from the approval of novel drugs. The most important prognostic factor is the loss of parts of the short arm of chromosome 17, known as deletion 17p (del(17p)). A recent publication (on a small number of patients) suggested that these patients are at very high-risk only if del(17p) is associated with TP53 mutations, the so-called “double-hit” population. To validate this finding, we designed a much larger study on 121 patients presenting del(17p) in > 55% of their plasma cells, and homogeneously treated by an intensive approach. For these 121 patients, we performed deep next generation sequencing targeted on TP53. The outcome was then compared with a large control population (2505 patients lacking del(17p)). Our results confirmed that the “double hit” situation is the worst (median survival = 36 months), but that del(17p) alone also confers a poor outcome compared with the control cohort (median survival = 52.8 months vs 152.2 months, respectively). In conclusion, our study clearly confirms the extremely poor outcome of patients displaying “double hit," but also that del(17p) alone is still a very high-risk feature, confirming its value as a prognostic indicator for poor outcome.

Background In recent years, large clinical trials have shown the superiority of L1 RD (lenalidomide-dexamethasone) over MPT, and then L1 VRD (lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone) over RD in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The EMMY study, a large-scale epidemiological study to assess the epidemiology and real-life management of multiple myeloma (MM), describes the real-life use and efficacy of RD and VRD regimens in first-line patients not eligible for ASCT (non ASCT-L1). Methods EMMY is a descriptive, multicenter, national, non-interventional study conducted in 72 IFM (Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome, sponsor) centers in France. Any patient initiating treatment for MM over a 3-month observation period, from October to December, is included, since 2017. It is a dynamic cohort with the inclusion of 1000 additional patients each year (2765 patients included at the end of 2019). Data are updated annually from hospital records up to 2020. The sample of patients receiving RD or VRD therapy in the non ASCT-L1 patient group, over the 2017-2019 period, was extracted to describe patient characteristics. The time to next treatment (TNT), and overall survival (OS) were estimated. The strategies were compared in the subgroup of patients aged of [65-75[ year-old (Wilcoxon test). Results Among the 773 EMMY patients initiating a non ASCT-L1 treatment during the period 2017-2019, 162 (21%) received RD and 158 (20%) VRD. The median follow-up was 22 months (RD) and 11 months (VRD). Other patients received MPV (26%, n=204), VCD (13%, n=101), VD (8%, n=61), VTD (5%, n=37) or other combinations (7%, n=50). Median age was 79.6 [73.7-83.1] and 69.3 [64.7-73.2] years at initiation of RD and VRD. When available, other characteristics were similar between the 2 groups: ECOG ≥ 2 for 31% (RD) (n= 23/ 74) and 26% (VRD) (n=17/65), high cytogenetic risk for 13% (RD) (n=9/67) and 12% (VRD) (n=9/77), ISS at 1/2/3 for 32, 28, and 40% (RD) (n= 83) and 33, 23, and 44% (VRD) (n= 87) of patients. ASCT was initially planned for 23 of 82 patients initiating VRD in late 2019. The mTNT was 29.1 months 95%IC [20.1-37.7] in RD patients and 34.1 months 95%IC [24.1 - NA] in VRD patients. For patients who received other combinaison in non ASCT-L1, mTTNT varied from 5.2 months 95%IC [3.6 - 12.6] (VRD) and 5.3 months 95%IC [3.9 -15.3] (VD) to 13 months 95%IC [9.2 - 24.7] (VCD), 13 months 95%IC [9.2 - 20.3] (other) and 20.3 months 95%IC [17.2 - 24] (MPV) (p The mTNT by age ( OS at 24 months was 86% [78; 91] and 85% [75; 91] for the RD and VRD groups, respectively. Of the 55 RD patients who relapsed and initiated L2, 46 (84%) received bortezomib (MPV 26%, DVD 16%, VD 18%, and VCD 11%). The 39 VRD patients with initiated L2 received IMID (72%) and/or anti CD38 (50%) in various strategies (DPomDex 17%, DRD 14%, DVD 6%). By focusing on the [65-75[ year old patient group (n=135, including 48 RD and 87 VRD patients), the 12 and 24 month TTNT rates were respectively 67% [54;85] and 55% [40;71] in the RD group (n=48) vs 85% [77-92] and 71% [58-84] in the VRD group (n=87) (p.0,01). In this subgroup RD patients were slightly older (72 vs 70 year-old) with ECOG≥2 in 41% vs 18%. Conclusion RD and VRD stragegies improve TTNT in non ASCT L1 patients. RD is predominantly prescribed to patients ≥75 years of age in whom it remains highly effective. For patients ≥75 years of age, prescription of VRD does not appear to provide significant benefit vs. RD. For those Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Decaux: Amgen BMS Celgene Janssen Sanofi Takeda: Honoraria. Perrot: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Moreau: Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene BMS: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria. Leleu: Roche: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Carsgen Therapeutics Ltd: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support; Amgen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria. Sanhes: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Jaccard: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria. Boccaccio: celgene: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Hulin: Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; abbvie: Honoraria.

International audience; Guidelines for monitoring multiple myeloma (MM) patients expressing light chains only (light-chain MM [LCMM]) rely on measurements of monoclonal protein in urine. Alternatively, serum free light chain (sFLC) measurements have better sensitivity over urine methods, however, demonstration that improved sensitivity provides any clinical benefit is lacking. Here, we compared performance of serum and urine measurements in 113 (72κ, 41λ) newly diagnosed LCMM patients enrolled in the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) 2009 trial. All diagnostic samples (100%) had an abnormal κ:λ sFLC ratio, and involved (monoclonal) FLC (iFLC) expressed at levels deemed measurable for monitoring (≥100 mg/L). By contrast, only 64% patients had measurable levels of monoclonal protein (≥200 mg per 24 hours) in urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP). After 1 and 3 treatment cycles, iFLC remained elevated in 71% and 46% of patients, respectively, whereas UPEP reported a positive result in 37% and 18%; all of the patients with positive UPEP at cycle 3 also had elevated iFLC levels. Importantly, elevated iFLC or an abnormal κ:λ sFLC ratio after 3 treatment cycles associated with poorer progression-free survival (P = .006 and P < .0001, respectively), whereas positive UPEP or urine immunofixation electrophoresis (uIFE) did not. In addition, patients with an abnormal κ:λ sFLC ratio had poorer overall survival (P = .022). Finally, early normalization of κ:λ sFLC ratio but not negative uIFE predicted achieving negative minimal residual disease, as determined by flow cytometry, after consolidation therapy (100% positive predictive value). We conclude that improved sensitivity and prognostic value of serum over urine measurements provide a strong basis for recommending the former for monitoring LCMM patients.

PURPOSE The wide heterogeneity in multiple myeloma (MM) outcome is driven mainly by cytogenetic abnormalities. The current definition of high-risk profile is restrictive and oversimplified. To adapt MM treatment to risk, we need to better define a cytogenetic risk classification. To address this issue, we simultaneously examined the prognostic impact of del(17p); t(4;14); del(1p32); 1q21 gain; and trisomies 3, 5, and 21 in a cohort of newly diagnosed patients with MM. METHODS Data were obtained from 1,635 patients enrolled in four trials implemented by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. The oldest collection of data were used for model development and internal validation. For external validation, one of the two independent data sets was used to assess the performance of the model in patients treated with more current regimens. Six cytogenetic abnormalities were identified as clinically relevant, and a prognostic index (PI) that was based on the parameter estimates of the multivariable Cox model was computed for all patients. RESULTS In all data sets, a higher PI was consistently associated with a poor survival outcome. Dependent on the validation cohorts used, hazard ratios for patients in the high-risk category for death were between six and 15 times higher than those of patients in the low-risk category. Among patients with t(4;14) or del(17p), we observed a worse survival in those classified in the high-risk category than in those in the intermediate-risk category. The PI showed good performance for discriminating between patients who died and those who survived (Harrell’s concordance index greater than 70%). CONCLUSION The cytogenetic PI improves the classification of newly diagnosed patients with MM in the high-risk group compared with current classifications. These findings may facilitate the development of risk-adapted treatment strategies.

Carfilzomib is a novel generation proteasome inhibitor. The Carmysap trial demonstrated that twice-weekly KMP (carfilzomib, melphalan, prednisone) might challenge the MPV (melphalan, prednisone, bortezomib) standard. We sought to study KMP weekly, allowing to increase carfilzomib's dose with maintained efficacy and improved safety profile., info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Background: Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) plus autologous stem-cell transplantation is standard treatment in Europe for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. We evaluated whether the addition of daratumumab to VTd before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation would improve stringent complete response rate in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Methods: In this two-part, randomised, open-label, phase 3 CASSIOPEIA trial, we recruited transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma at 111 European sites. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive four pre-transplant induction and two post-transplant consolidation cycles of VTd alone (VTd group) or in combination with daratumumab (D-VTd group). The primary endpoint of part 1 was stringent complete response assessed 100 days after transplantation. Part 2 (maintenance) is ongoing. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02541383. Findings: Between Sept 22, 2015, and Aug 1, 2017, 1085 patients were enrolled at 111 European sites and were randomly assigned to the D-VTd group (n=543) or the VTd group (n=542). At day 100 after transplantation, 157 (29%) of 543 patients in the D-VTd group and 110 (20%) of 542 patients in the VTd group in the intention-to-treat population had achieved a stringent complete response (odds ratio 1·60, 95% CI 1·21–2·12, p=0·0010). 211 (39%) patients in the D-VTd group versus 141 (26%) in the VTd group achieved a complete response or better, and 346 (64%) of 543 versus 236 (44%) of 542 achieved minimal residual disease-negativity (10−5 sensitivity threshold, assessed by multiparametric flow cytometry; both p

International audience; We present results of a prospective, multicenter, phase II study evaluating rituximab, bendamustine, bortezomib and dexamethasone as first-line treatment for patients with mantle cell lymphoma aged 65 years or older. A total of 74 patients were enrolled (median age, 73 years). Patients received a maximum of six cycles of treatment at 28-day intervals. The primary objective was to achieve an 18-month progression-free survival rate of 65% or higher. Secondary objectives were to evaluate toxicity and the prognostic impact of mantle cell lymphoma prognostic index, Ki67 expression, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and molecular minimal residual disease, in peripheral blood or bone marrow. With a median follow-up of 52 months, the 24-month progression-free survival rate was 70%, hence the primary objective was reached. After six cycles of treatment, 91% (54/59) of responding patients were analyzed for peripheral blood residual disease and 87% of these (47/54) were negative. Four-year overall survival rates of the patients who did not have or had detectable molecular residual disease in the blood at completion of treatment were 86.6% and 28.6%, respectively (P

International audience; Mucormycosis is an invasive mold infection, frequently fatal in immunocompromised patients. We report the case of a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia admitted to the hematology unit for febrile aplasia. Pulmonary lesions suggesting a fungal infection expanded/increased despite a combination of posaconazole and liposomal amphotericin B. The fungal biomarkers performed repeatedly were negative. At D65 after chemotherapy a bronchial biopsy was positive for Cunninghamella bertholletiae. The patient died despite appropriate antifungal management. A qPCR targeting Cunninghamella was developed a posteriori, and a retrospective analysis showed that a sample was positive more than 30 days before culture-based identification could be made.

BACKGROUND Real-world data on the use of pomalidomide (POM) for the treatment (Tx) of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are limited. The MIROIR study was designed to evaluate POM Tx in routine clinical practice in France. Here, we present results from a prespecified 4-year interim analysis. METHODS MIROIR is a multicenter, observational, ambispective, non-interventional study of POM in routine clinical practice. Adult patients (pts) with MM who initiated POM Tx in France between October 1, 2014, and September 30, 2018, were included. All pts were required to be enrolled in the French IMNOVID® registry. Data were collected from medical records of consenting pts. Key exclusion criteria included previous treatment with POM or simultaneous participation in a clinical trial. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Key secondary endpoints include time to next Tx (TTNT), overall survival (OS), and safety. This study is ongoing; targeted enrollment is 3000 pts (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02902900). RESULTS A total of 2099 pts were included in this analysis (median follow-up: 23.3 months; data cutoff: February 1, 2019). Median age was 70.0 years, and 655 pts (31.2%) were aged ≥ 75 years; 1134 pts (54.0%) were male. Median time from start of first-line Tx to POM initiation was 51.4 months. Pts had received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range: 0-9), with 914 (43.5%), 644 (30.7%), 312 (14.9%) and 229 pts (10.9%) receiving ≤ 2, 3, 4, and ≥ 5 prior lines, respectively. From 2014 to 2016, the median number of prior lines of therapy before POM initiation was 3, and from 2016 to 2018, the median was 2. Nearly all pts received prior lenalidomide (LEN; 97.0%) and bortezomib (96.7%). POM was initiated at 4 mg/day in 1635 pts (77.9%) overall and in 1216 pts (84.2%) aged < 75 years and in 419 pts (64.0%) aged ≥ 75 years. Dexamethasone was prescribed at 20 mg/day and 40 mg/day in 507 (35.1%) and 732 pts (50.7%) aged < 75 years and in 405 (61.8%) and 62 pts (9.5%) aged ≥ 75 years. Overall, the 6-month PFS rate was 51.7% (95% CI, 49.4%-54.1%). Other key PFS data in pt subgroups are reported in the Table. In the overall population, median TTNT, 12-month OS rate, and median OS were 10.4 months (95% CI, 9.7-11.2), 70.6% (95% CI, 68.5-72.6), and 24.6 months (95% CI, 22.9-not reached), respectively. Among 1164 pts (55.5%) with ≥ 1 adverse event (AE), the most common AEs were neutropenia (290 pts; 24.9%), infections (263 pts; 22.6%), thrombocytopenia (99 pts; 8.5%), and asthenia (87 pts; 7.5%). POM dose was reduced due to an AE in 20.7% of pts; POM Tx was interrupted or discontinued due to an AE in 36.2% and 15.2% of pts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The results of this interim analysis confirm the efficacy of POM reported in clinical trials and underscore its role in Tx of RRMM, including after LEN Tx. Median PFS in pts with ≤ 2 prior Tx lines was numerically longer than in pts who had more Tx lines, supporting earlier Tx with POM. PFS outcomes were similar regardless of the duration of LEN Tx (< or ≥ 6 months) before initiation of POM and whether pts had received LEN or another Tx as their most recent therapy. The latter finding suggests that POM can be used after relapse or resistance to LEN and that there is no need to replace an IMiD agent with another class of treatment. Disclosures Decaux: Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Takeda, Amgen: Honoraria. Macro:Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial Support. Gourgou:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lachenal:Celgene: Other: Scientific Comittee's. Stoppa:Celgene: Honoraria. Jaccard:Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Moreau:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Perrot:jannsen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria. Mohty:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Karlin:AMGEN: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fohrer:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Leleu:Carsgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Oncopeptide: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Hulin:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, AbbVie, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria.

Summary The optimal management of relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is not standardized. The Groupe Ouest Est des Leucet aAutres Maladies du Sang developed a combination of vinorelbine, ifosfa- mide, mitoxantrone and prednisone (NIMP) for the treatment of relapsed DLBCL, and assessed its efficacy and safety in association with rituximab (R). This multicentric phase II study included 50 patients with DLBCL in first relapse, aged 18-75 years. Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m² day 1, ifosfamide 1000 mg/m² days 1-5, vinorelbine 25 mg/m² days 1 and 15, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m² day 1, and prednisone 1 mg/kg days 1-5, every 28 days for three cycles. Responding patients underwent autologous trans- plantation or received three additional R-NIMP cycles. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 49 for response. Centralized pathology review confirmed DLBCL in all cases. Toxicities were mainly haematological with infectious events needing hospitalization in nine cases. Two toxic deaths were observed. After three cycles, 22 patients (44%) achieved complete response/unconfirmed complete response, 11 achieved partial response (24%), 2 had stable disease and 13 progressed. The non-germinal centre B immunophenotype was associated with shorter progression-free survival. in conclusion, the R-NIMP regimen displayed significant activity in relapsed DLBCL, with acceptable toxicity and should be considered a candidate for combination with new agents.

The feasibility and efficacy of high-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed elderly patients with multiple myeloma was analyzed prospectively. Fifty-six multiple myeloma patients, aged 65 years or over, from 6 French centers were studied. The induction therapy was bortezomib-based in combination with dexamethasone and either thalidomide, cyclophosphamide or lenalidomide, for 4-6 cycles. Peripheral blood stem cells were collected after high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone, with plerixafor if needed. The conditioning regimen consisted of melphalan at 140 mg/m2 in 18 patients (36%) and 200 mg/m2 in 32 (64%). Three months post autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, a 2-month consolidation phase with either lenalidomide plus dexamethasone or bortezomib-based combination therapy was allowed, but maintenance treatment was not given. All but 6 patients underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and 3 had tandem transplantations. The treatment-related mortality was 0% at 100 days post transplantation. Sixty-eight percent received consolidation therapy following transplantation. The best response achieved was 40% complete response, 36% very good partial response, and 18% partial response. After a median follow up of 21 months (range 6-31), the estimated progression-free and overall survival rates at two years were 76% [95%CI: (61.6-94.1)] and 88% [95%CI: (76.7-100)], respectively. The higher dose of melphalan (200 mg/m2) afforded superior progression-free and overall survival rates. This prospective study provides evidence for the safety and efficacy of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a first-line treatment approach in elderly multiple myeloma patients. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01671826).

The Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome conducted a randomized trial to compare bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) with bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) as induction before high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Overall, a total of 340 patients were centrally randomly assigned to receive VTD or VCD. After 4 cycles, on an intent-to-treat basis, 66.3% of the patients in the VTD arm achieved at least a very good partial response (primary end point) vs 56.2% in the VCD arm (P = .05). In addition, the overall response rate was significantly higher in the VTD arm (92.3% vs 83.4% in the VCD arm; P = .01). Hematologic toxicity was higher in the VCD arm, with significantly increased rates of grade 3 and 4 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. On the other hand, the rate of peripheral neuropathy (PN) was significantly higher in the VTD arm. With the exception of hematologic adverse events and PN, other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were rare, with no significant differences between the VTD and VCD arms. Our data support the preferential use of VTD rather than VCD in preparation for ASCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01564537 and at EudraCT as #2013-003174-27.

Purpose This prospective multicenter phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of a triple combination (bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone [VTD]) versus a dual combination (thalidomide-dexamethasone [TD]) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) progressing or relapsing after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients and Methods Overall, 269 patients were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 intravenous bolus) or no bortezomib for 1 year, in combination with thalidomide (200 mg per day orally) and dexamethasone (40 mg orally once a day on 4 days once every 3 weeks). Bortezomib was administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 with a 10-day rest period (day 12 to day 21) for eight cycles (6 months), and then on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 with a 20-day rest period (day 23 to day 42) for four cycles (6 months). Results Median time to progression (primary end point) was significantly longer with VTD than TD (19.5 v 13.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.80; P = .001), the complete response plus near-complete response rate was higher (45% v 21%; P = .001), and the median duration of response was longer (17.9 v 13.4 months; P = .04). The 24-month survival rate was in favor of VTD (71% v 65%; P = .093). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was more frequent with VTD (29% v 12%; P = .001) as were the rates of grades 3 and 4 infection and thrombocytopenia. Conclusion VTD was more effective than TD in the treatment of patients with MM with progressive or relapsing disease post-ASCT but was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 neurotoxicity.

Background. New standards with increasing efficacy that are also characterized with improving the quality of life are needed for elderly myeloma patients. Although MPT and MPV regimens are remarkable in terms of efficacy, quality of life while on treatment with these 2 regimens remain an issue. The Carmysap twice weekly carfilzomib-based phase 2 study has demonstrated that Carfilzomib at the MTD of 36mg/m² might challenge bortezomib in the VMP standard. However, it has become routine practice to use bortezomib on a weekly schedule, with maintained efficacy and an improved safety profile. We sought to demonstrate that Carfilzomib Weekly plus Melphalan and Prednisone will prove strongly efficacious with acceptable safety profile and quality of life to newly diagnosed elderly multiple myeloma (eNDMM). Methods . IFM2012-03 (also called carmysap weekly) is a phase 1/2 multicenter open label single arm study to determine MTD during the phase 1 part and VGPR+CR rate during the phase 2 part of the study. The inclusion/exclusion criteria of interest were eNDMM (65 and older), with symptomatic and measurable disease, with absolute neutrophils ≥1 G/L, untransfused platelet count ≥75 G/L, hemoglobine ≥8.5 g/dL and clairance creatinine ≥ 30ml/min. We report herein the phase 1 part of the study which last cohort was completed at ASH abstract deadline. For the phase 1 part of the study, each cohort was 6 patients based, and started at 36mg/m² of carfilzomib on days 1, 8, 15, 22 using IV, 30 minutes infusion, route followed by a 13-day rest period per 35-days cycles, melphalan given at 0.25mg/kg/j and oral prednisone 60mg/m², both on days 1 to 4. The subsequent cohorts' doses for carfilzomib were 45, then 56 and finally 70mg/m². 9 cycles were planned as induction followed by a maintenance phase of weekly carfilzomib monotherapy given at 36mg/m² weekly for one year. The MTD was determined when ˃2 DLTs were observed. DLTs were considered during cycle 1 if any hematologic toxicity of grade 4 intensity or preventing administration of 2 or more of the 4 carfilzomib doses of the first treatment cycle, grade ≥3 febrile neutropenia, grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicities, any other grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicity considered related to CMP by the principal investigator, grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy persisting for more than 3 weeks after discontinuation of study drugs. Results. 26 NDMM patients recruited, 24 treated in the study, 6 per cohort at 36 mg/m² carfilzomib +MP, then 45 then 56, and finally at 70mg/m² which cohort cycle 1 is up and running. The median age was 74 with 10 patients older than 75 and sex ratio M/F 65. There was a DLT at 36 mg/m² carfilzomib (grade 4 lymphopenia), one at 45 (lysis syndrome complicated with grade 4 renal insufficiency, two at 56 (cardiac insufficiency grade 3 and febrile neutropenia grade 3). At ASH deadline, all patients from cohort 36 of carfilzomib have completed induction and maintenance up to cycle 6, 5/6 of cohort 45 have completed induction and started the maintenance phase, 5/6 of cohort 56 have completed cycle 6 of induction and pursue within the induction phase, and finally all patients from cohort 70 of carfilzomib are undergoing cycle 1. There are 22 SAE reported for a total of 171 cycles administered of carfilzomib +MP. So far, 3 patients (out of 24) have stopped treatment, including the 2 patients with DLTs, lysis syndrome and cardiac failure, and one patient that presented with pulmonary hypertension later in the disease course on cycle 5 of the 56mg/m² carfilzomib +MP cohort. And, an extra 3 patients have had Carfilzomib dose reduction, 2 patients at 36 from 45 and one at 45 from 56, for neutropenia grade 4, thrombocytopenia grade 4, and Dyspnea grade 3, respectively. Conclusion. The MTD of weekly carfilzomib in the combination to Melphalan and Prednisone could be determined at 70mg/m² in elderly NDMM, demonstrating the good safety profile of carfilzomib in this regimen and fragile population. The complete dataset of the entire study will be updated at ASH with response rate, survival and safety profile. Disclosures Leleu: Chugai: Honoraria; LeoPharma: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; TEVA: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Karlin:Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria. Fitoussi:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

In the 2005-01 trial, we have demonstrated that bortezomib-dexamethasone as induction therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation was superior to vincristine-adriamycin-dexamethasone. We conducted a post-hoc analysis to assess the prognostic impact of initial characteristics as well as response to therapy in patients enrolled in this study. Multivariate analysis showed that ISS stages 2 and 3 and achievement of response less than very good partial response (VGPR) both after induction therapy and after autologous stem cell transplantation were adverse prognostic factors for progression-free survival, the most important one being achievement of response less than VGPR after induction. Progression-free survival was significantly improved with bortezomib-dexamethasone induction therapy in patients with poor-risk cytogenetics and ISS stages 2 and 3 compared with vincristine-adriamycin-dexamethasone. In these 2 groups of patients, achievement of at least VGPR after induction was of major importance. This study is registered with EudraCT (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu; EUDRACT 2005-000537-38) and http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00200681).

Background. Progression by serum free light chain (sFLC) test without or preceding progression with intact immunoglobulin (Ig) is called light chain escape. This event alone is not considered a progression for patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) according to International guidelines, although it is often considered a progression in real life and by clinical trials' investigators. We therefore sought to determine whether light chain escape would be a predictor of relapse and thus question a possible need to modify the current criteria for progression according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG). Material and method. We have reviewed 325 (323 for analysis) patients that presented with a progression in the IFM/DFCI2009 phase 3 study (Attal et al. NEJM 2017). Among these 323 patients, 260 had initial tumor bulk measurement with intact Ig by serum protein electrophoresis test (SPEP; Ig ≥ 10 g/L) and 63 light chain MM (Ig < 10 g/L) measured using urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP). All progressions were validated in the central laboratory of CHU de Nantes (Dr T. Dejoie) and followed IMWG recommendations. sFLC increase was determined by absolute increase ≥ 100 mg/L and ≥ 25% from nadir value of the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC (ΔiFLC). Light chain escape was defined as sFLC increase without progression by SPEP (Ig increase ≥ 5 g/L and ≥ 25%) or UPEP (increase ≥ 200 mg/24h and ≥ 25%). Results. Among the 260 patients with intact Ig at diagnosis, 3 (1.15%) patients presented a light chain escape: progression by sFLC test without progression by SPEP. In parallel, 228 patients (87.7%) progressed by SPEP, of whom 18/228 (6.25%) showed a sFLC increase preceding the increase of intact Ig, with a median delay of 63 days. Among the 63 light chain MM, 6 (9.5%) patients presented a light chain escape: progression by sFLC test without progression by UPEP. Interestingly, 6 other patients (9.5%) progressed by SPEP even though Ig was < 10 g/L at diagnosis. Of the remaining 46 patients, 38 (60.3%) showed sFLC increase before progression by UPEP. Finally, 8 patients (12.7%) progressed but with intact Ig pauci-secreting MM meeting none of the M spike based progression criteria. Median time from iFLC nadir to ΔiFLC ≥ 100 mg/L was 280 days for light chain MM, 496 days for intact Ig MM, and 651 days for light chain escape. Median time from ΔiFLC ≥ 100 mg/L to follow-up visit to assess progression was 402 days light chain MM, 536 days for intact Ig MM, and 713 days for light chain escape. Overall, 9 (3%) patients had true light chain escape with progression by sFLC test without any other progression criteria. In parallel, in 56 (17%) patients, sFLC increase preceded progression to MM by standard test (SPEP or UPEP). Still the vast majority of patients had a regular relapse using the standard markers for progression. Conclusion. Based on a large study of patients treated into a phase 3 clinical trial with centralized assessment of response and progression, we showed that 20% of patients had progression by sFLC without meeting standard progression markers, of whom 3% had true light chain escape and 17% early light chain increase. Even though true light chain escape seems to be a rare phenomenon, analysis of sFLC test could help to avoid delayed or missed diagnosis of progression in 20% of patients in this clinical trial. This data should be confirmed in another database to assess whether a modification in the progression criteria in MM International guidelines should be proposed. Disclosures Hulin: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Roussel:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Hebraud:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Lecture fees; travel and accommodation for congress, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Lecture fees, Research Funding. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Belhadj:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Decaux:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Garderet:Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Facon:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Avet-Loiseau:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Moreau:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Attal:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janseen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy. Leleu:Karyopharm: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership steering committee membership ; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Merk: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; BMS: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Janssen: Honoraria, Other.

BACKGROUND Pomalidomide (POM; Imnovid) in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDex) demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS; median, 4.0 vs 1.9 months; P < .0001) and overall survival (OS; median, 12.7 vs 8.1 months; P = .0285) vs high-dose dexamethasone in a phase 3 study of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM; MM-003; San Miguel et al. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:1055-1066). This trial led to the European approval of POM + LoDEX in patients with RRMM previously treated with ≥ 2 regimens, including lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT), and who had disease progression on their last therapy. However, data on the use of POM in the real-world setting are limited. The goal of the MIROIR study is to investigate the usage, efficacy, and tolerability of POM in current clinical practice in France. Results from a pre-specified 3-year interim analysis are presented. METHODS MIROIR is a multicenter, non-interventional study of POM in routine clinical practice. Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with multiple myeloma who initiated POM treatment in France between October 1, 2014, and September 30, 2017, were included (data cutoff, February 1, 2018). All patients were required to be enrolled in the Imnovid registry (a non-interventional post-marketing authorization registry) and to provide consent. Key exclusion criteria included previous treatment with POM or simultaneous participation in a clinical trial. Patients were followed up for ≤ 24 months after treatment initiation. Data were collected from patient medical files. The primary endpoint is PFS at 6 months. PFS is defined as the time from POM treatment initiation to the first progression according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria or death from any cause. Key secondary endpoints include OS, time to next treatment (TTNT), and safety. This study is ongoing; targeted enrollment is 3000 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02902900). RESULTS A total of 1581 patients were included in this analysis (median follow-up, 19.1 months). The median age was 69.8 years, and 480 patients (30.4%) were aged ≥ 75 years; 844 patients (53.4%) were male. The median time from first-line treatment to POM initiation was 52.6 months. Patients had received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range, 0-9), with 628 (39.7%), 509 (32.2%), and 444 patients (28.1%) receiving ≤ 2, 3, and ≥ 4 prior lines, respectively. The most common prior treatments included BORT (97.3%), LEN (97.0%), melphalan (80.3%), and autologous/allogeneic stem cell transplant (50.0%). POM was prescribed at 4 mg/day in 923 patients (83.8%) aged < 75 years and in 300 patients (62.5%) aged ≥ 75 years. Dexamethasone was prescribed at 20 mg/day and 40 mg/day in 382 (34.7%) and 566 patients (51.4%) aged < 75 years and at 20 mg/day and 40 mg/day in 287 (59.8%) and 49 patients (10.2%) aged ≥ 75 years. The 6-month PFS rate was 50.5% (95% CI, 47.7%-53.3%). Other key PFS data are reported in the Table. Median TTNT was 9.8 months (95% CI, 9.0-10.6 months). The 12-month OS rate was 68.7% (95% CI, 66.1%-71.0%), with a median OS of 22.4 months (95% CI, 21.0-24.6 months). A total of 233 serious adverse events (AEs) related to POM were reported; 26 (11.2%) were neutropenia, 13 (5.6%) were pancytopenia, and 13 (5.6%) were thrombocytopenia. POM dose was reduced due to an AE in 20.0% of patients; treatment was discontinued or interrupted due to an AE in 14.9% and 35.2% of patients, respectively. Many patients received concomitant treatments and supportive care in the form of thromboprophylaxis (81.2%), antiviral prophylaxis with valacyclovir (63.3%), antibiotic prophylaxis (55.8%), bisphosphonates (20.9%), erythropoietin (20.1%), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (8.8%). CONCLUSIONS The results of this interim analysis of the real-world MIROIR study confirm the efficacy of POM reported in clinical trials and underscore its role as a treatment in RRMM. Median PFS was numerically longer in patients who had received only 1 to 2 prior lines of therapy, supporting earlier initiation of POM. The results also indicate that POM is effective in patients whose disease has relapsed or developed resistance to LEN; PFS outcomes were similar regardless of whether patients had received LEN or another treatment as their most recent therapy. This suggests that there is no need to switch from an immunomodulatory agent to another class of treatment after relapse or resistance to LEN. Disclosures Hulin: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Macro:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress. Gourgou:Roche: Other: Expertise methodological seminar Force 1 since 2007 and real-life study ; Celgene Corporation: Other: Expertise methodological mirror . Lachenal:Celgene: Other: Scientific Committees . Stoppa:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Moreau:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Perrot:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Mohty:MaaT Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Karlin:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Fohrer:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sylvain:Gilead: Other: scientific advisor board. Leleu:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Janssen: Honoraria, Other; BMS: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Merk: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership steering committee membership ; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Roche: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Other: steering committee membership ; Karyopharm: Honoraria. Decaux:Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Purpose Until recently, melphalan and prednisone were the standards of care in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. The addition of thalidomide to this combination demonstrated a survival benefit for patients age 65 to 75 years. This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial investigated the efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed myeloma. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and December 2006, 232 previously untreated patients with myeloma, age 75 years or older, were enrolled and 229 were randomly assigned to treatment. All patients received melphalan (0.2 mg/kg/d) plus prednisone (2 mg/kg/d) for 12 courses (day 1 to 4) every 6 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg/d of oral thalidomide (n = 113) or placebo (n = 116), continuously for 72 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. Results After a median follow-up of 47.5 months, overall survival was significantly longer in patients who received melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide compared with those who received melphalan and prednisone plus placebo (median, 44.0 v 29.1 months; P = .028). Progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group (median, 24.1 v 18.5 months; P = .001). Two adverse events were significantly increased in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group: grade 2 to 4 peripheral neuropathy (20% v 5% in the melphalan and prednisone plus placebo group; P < .001) and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (23% v 9%; P = .003). Conclusion This trial confirms the superiority of the combination melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide over melphalan and prednisone alone for prolonging survival in very elderly patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Toxicity was acceptable.

In patients with multiple myeloma (MM) not eligible for high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the 2 following options are recommended as part of front-line treatment and approved based on data from randomized phase III trials: melphalan/prednisone/thalidomide (MPT), or

To the editor: We describe a successful salvage treatment with intensive chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation for a relapse of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) after single umbilical cord blood transplantation with a reduced intensity-conditioning regimen (RIC).[1][1],[2][2] The originality of this

Deletions of the 1p region appear as a pejorative prognostic factor in multiple myeloma patients (especially 1p22 and 1p32 deletions) but there is a lack of data on the real impact of 1p abnormalities on an important and homogeneous group of patients. To address this issue we studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) the incidence and prognostic impact of 1p22 and 1p32 deletions in 1195 patients from the IFM (Institut Francophone du Myelome) cell collection. Chromosome 1p deletions were present in 23.3% of the patients (271): 15.1% (176) for 1p22 and 7.3% (85) for 1p32 regions. In univariate analyses, 1p22 and 1p32 appeared as negative prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS): 1p22: 19.8 months vs 33.6 months (P

Background Induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma less than 66 years old. The quality of response to the induction treatment is an important prognostic factor and is predictive of progression free survival (PFS) following ASCT. The triplet combinations bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) and bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) have demonstrated high response rates in prospective phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials, they are 2 of the most commonly used induction regimens prior to ASCT, and are both recommended in the International guidelines. To date, no comparative data from prospective randomized trials of the safety and efficacy of VTD vs VCD are available. This provided the rationale for the phase 3 investigation of VTD vs VCD prior to ASCT in patients with de novo MM in this randomized multicenter study (NCT01564537). Methods Patients with de novo symptomatic MM less than 66 years old were prospectively randomized to receive either 4 cycles of VTD (arm A) or 4 cycles of VCD (arm B) followed by ASCT. The VTD regimen consisted of four 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m²/d, subcutaneously (SC) D1, 4, 8 and 11, Dexamethasone 40 mg/d, PO D1 to 4, D9 to 12 and Thalidomide 100 mg/d, PO D1 to D21. The VCD regimen consisted of four 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m²/d, SC D1, 4, 8 and 11, Dexamethasone 40 mg/d, PO D1 to 4, D9 to 12 and Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m²/d, PO D1, 8, 15. Patients were stratified according to ISS (1-2 versus 3) and cytogenetics (high-risk defined by 17p deletion and t(4;14) versus other).The primary endpoint was very good partial response (VGPR) rate following 4 cycles. Response was assessed in a central lab according to the IMWG criteria. Assuming a VGPR rate of 60% in the VTD arm versus 45% in the VCD arm (15% difference), the possibility to detect a statistically significant difference required the enrolment of 340 patients overall (170 per arm). Adverse events were graded using the NCI CTCAE catalogue, version 4.0. Results From 11/2013 to 02/2015, 358 patients were enrolled into the study. 18 were screening failures, and 170 were randomized each to arm A (VTD) and arm B (VCD). The median age was 60 years (range, 26-65), 62% of the patients were male, and overall, the patient characteristics were well-balanced across the 2 arms of the study. The median number of induction cycles administered in both arms was 4 (1-4). On an intent-to-treat basis, the overall response rate (> partial response [PR]) was 92.3% in arm A, including a 10.7% complete response (CR) rate and a VGPR rate of 66.7%, while in arm B the overall response rate was 84%, with a 9.5% CR and a 56.2% VGPR rate. VGPR and PR rates were significantly higher in the VTD arm with p-values of 0.04 and 0.02, respectively. Seven patients died during induction therapy (2%), 3 in arm A from infections (2) and pulmonary embolism (1), and 4 in arm B from progression to extramedullary myeloma (2) and infections (2). Grades 3 / 4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 4% and 2.2% in Arm A and B, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 11.9% vs 22.5% in Arm A and B, respectively. Conclusion This trial is the first prospective randomized comparison of 4 cycles of VTD versus 4 cycles of VCD administered as induction therapy prior to ASCT. VTD was shown to be significantly superior to VCD in terms of VGPR and PR rates. Neuropathy rates low in both arms, while neutropenia was more frequent with VCD. Disclosures Moreau: Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hulin:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. MACRO:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garderet:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Stoppa:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Facon:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pierre Fabre: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laribi:Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Avet-Loiseau:jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Attal:jansen: Honoraria; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction: Previous trials have shown that autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is superior to conventional chemotherapy in terms of remission rate and PFS in younger MM patients. Concerns about toxicity and potential efficacy of ASCT in older MM patients lead most centers to limit ASCT indications to patients aged Patients and Methods: We prospectively analyzed the outcomes of 56 consecutive MM patients who had received ASCT between September 2012 and September 2014 in 6 institutions in France (protocol ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01671826). Patients were newly diagnosed MM. For induction therapy, all patients received a bortezomib-based induction regimen (VD, VTD, VCD, or VRD, 4 to 6 cycles) according to center's local guidelines. Mobilization was performed with G-CSF or G-CSF+cyclophosphamide and plerixafor whenever needed. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of either 140 mg/m2 or 200 mg/m2 Melphalan. A short two months consolidation phase post ASCT was allowed (lenalidomide-dexamethasone, VD, VTD, VCD or VRD). No maintenance treatment was given. Response, disease progression and relapse were defined according to the IMWG uniform response criteria. All patients signed an informed consent form according to the EBMT guidelines. Results: At time of diagnosis, median age was 67 (range, 64-74) years with 23% of patients being >70 years. There were 30 males and 26 females. The immunoglobulin subtype was IgG (n=29), IgA (n=15), light chain (n=10), other (n=2). The Salmon and Durie stage was III in 89% of cases (n=47), and the ISS score was I (n=18; 35%), II (n=19; 37%), III (n=14; 27%). Patients had high risk cytogenetics features (t(4;14) and/or del17p) in 9 cases (16%). 10% of patients had a serum creatinine level >176 micromol/L. None of the patients underwent hemodialysis. The Sorror comorbidity score was 0 (34), 1 (6), 2 (2), 3 (6), 6 (1), unknown (7). The median age at time of ASCT was 68 years, and the median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 5 months. In an intention to treat analysis, out of 56 patients, 6 patients could not proceed to ASCT because of an early infectious death (n=1), serious comorbidity (n=2), disease refractoriness to induction (n=1), and failure to collect an adequate PBSC graft (n=2). A median of 5.31x106/Kg CD34+ cells could be collected. Disease status at time of ASCT was: CR (n=12; 24%), VGPR (n=19; 38%), PR (n=17; 34%), and SD/non-responding (n=2; 4%). The conditioning regimen consisted of 140mg/m² melphalan in 18 cases (36%) and 200mg/m2 in 32 patients (64%). Moreover, 4 patients (8%) received a tandem ASCT. The median time for neutrophils and platelets engraftment was 12 days. The day-100 post ASCT non-relapse mortality was 0% and the 2-year NRM was 4.2% (95% CI:[0.3-18.3]). The overall response rate at day 100 was 96% (CR: 34%, VGPR: 47%, PR: 15%, SD/non-responsive: 4%). At 3 months post ASCT, 82% patients were able to receive the planned post ASCT consolidation treatment. After a median follow-up of 12 months, the estimated progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 2 years were 76% (95%CI: [61.6-94.1]) and 88% (95%CI: [76.7-100]), respectively. The incidences of infectious complications post ASCT, and response rates were comparable between the two melphalan dose levels (p=0.28). However, in the univariate analysis, the 200 mg/m2 melphalan conditioning group showed a better OS rate compared to the 140 mg/m2 group (1-year OS: 100% vs. 67%; p=0.012). Conclusion: These prospective multicenter results indicate that ASCT is a safe and effective treatment modality for elderly, but fit MM patients at the era of novel induction agents. Of note, patients above age 70 did not experience a worse prognosis. Thus, age per se should not be used as an exclusion criterion for ASCT. Longer follow-up data will be presented, but these results already set the frame for a randomized comparison to the non-transplant approaches in this patients' subgroup. Disclosures Garderet: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Touzeau:AbbVie: Research Funding. Stoppa:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

The Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome conducted a randomized trial to compare bortezomib-dexamethasone (VD) as induction before high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to a combination consisting of reduced doses of bortezomib and thalidomide plus dexamethasone (vtD) in patients with multiple myeloma. Overall, a total of 199 patients were centrally randomly assigned to receive VD or vtD. After 4 cycles, the complete response (CR) rate was the same in both groups (13% in the vtD arm, 12% in the VD arm, P = .74). However, the CR plus very good partial response (VGPR) rate was significantly higher in the vtD arm (49% vs 36%, P = .05). After ASCT, the CR plus VGPR rate was significantly higher in the vtD arm (74% vs 58%, P = .02). The reduced doses of bortezomib and thalidomide translated into a reduced incidence of peripheral neuropathy (PN): grade ≥ 2 PN were reported in 34% in the VD arm versus 14% in the vtD arm (P = .001). vtD, including reduced doses of bortezomib and thalidomide, yields higher VGPR rates compared with VD and can be considered a new effective triplet combination before HDT/ASCT. This study was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00910897 and EudraCT as #2007-005204-40.

International audience; BACKGROUND: There is limited information regarding the efficacy and long term safety of intrathecal injection of liposomal cytarabine in leukemic or lymphomatous meningitis. DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 20 consecutive HIV-negative patients with leukemic or lymphomatous meningitis who were treated with intrathecal liposomal cytarabine between 2004 and 2007. We focused on efficacy and on any late effects of the drug. RESULTS: Twenty patients who received intrathecal liposomal cytarabine injection as part of their treatment; of these, 9 were alive and in complete remission at the end of the study. Median survival from the time of the first injection was 22.7 months (range, 0.5 to 64 months). Short-term toxicity related to intrathecal of liposomal cytarabine was observed in 2 cases; headache in 1 case and regressive facial palsy and diplopy in 1 case. Long-term toxicity was seen in 2 cases; clinical symptoms were urinary and fecal dysfunction with confusion in 1 case, and urinary dysfunction in 1 case. Both patients had been heavily pre-treated with neurotoxic drugs and neuraxis irradiation. CONCLUSION: In our experience, intrathecal liposomal cytarabine injections were convenient in the management of leukemic and lymphomatous meningitis, and can lead to long-term survival. Although neurotoxicity was rare, clinicians should exercise caution when retreatment is required in relapsing patients.

National audience; Intravesical instillations of bacillus Calmette-Guérin are frequently used for treating superficial bladder carcinoma which is considered a safe treatment. We describe an unusual complication with hemophagocytosis and granulomatous hepatitis. Prompt diagnosis and treatment with corticosteroids, anti-tuberculous agents and intravenous immunoglobulins led to a rapid recovery.

Background: Eight RCHOP/21 cycles followed by Rituximab maintenance is considered the standard of care for first line therapy in elderly MCL patients in Europe (1). However,complete clinical (CR) and molecular responses (MR) to therapy remain suboptimal(CR rate 30-35%, MR after 8 cycles 67 %). Regimen combining Rituximab and Bendamustine and more recently proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib (Velcade®) with CHOP regimen (VcR-CAP) demonstrated superior CR rates and PFS compared to R-CHOP. We have investigated the RiBVD regimen (Rituximab, Bendamustine,Velcade® and Dexamethasone) in a prospective phase II trial by the LYSA group. Aims of the study: The primary objective was to improve the median PFS by 6 months over the current 18 months PFS obtained with RCHOP when given without maintenance (ref Lenz, JCO 2005). The secondary objectives were to investigate the prognostic impact of molecular and FDG-PET responses on survival.. Methods and Material: All patients aged 65 or older with a diagnosis of MCL were treated by the RiBVD regimen if they fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: AAstage II-IV, PS < 3, no other neoplasm, no active HIV or HBV or HCV infections, no renal (creatinin clearance > 20ml/mn) or cardiac dysfunction, no diabetes. The RiBVD regimen was administered every 4 weeks with Rituximab 375 mg/m² IV on day(D)1, Bendamustine 90 mg/m² IV on D1, 2, Dexamethasone 40 mg IV on D2 and Bortezomib (Velcade®) 1.3 mg/m² subcutaneously on D1, 4, 8 and 11. Primary prophylaxis with valacyclovir was mandatory for Herpes virus reactivation, but there was no recommendation for bacterial prevention. Patients were scheduled to receive a total of 6 cycles, if they achieved at least PR at 4 cycles. The IWG criteria, with and without FDG-PET, were used to define responses after 4 and 6 cycles. FDG-PET response was evaluated in each center with the five-point scale visual method of Deauville. Molecular responses (MR) were evaluated centrally by RQ-PCR using patient specific IGH VDJ targets as previously described (2). Results: Seventy six patients were recruited in one year (from November 2011 to December 2012), 74 were evaluable [2 patients were excluded because HBV positivity (n=1) or misdiagnosis (n=1)]. Fifty four samples were centrally reviewed for diagnosis, 45 were classic form of MCL, 9 pleomorphic variant and one patient had a DLBCL. Clinical characteristics of the 74 patients were: Median age 73 yo (64-83), sex ratio M/F = 2 (49/25), AAstage II/III-IV = 4/70, PS 0-1/2 = 63/11, MIPIscore low/intermediate/high= 3/19/50 (2 undetermined). The median follow-up is 21 months. Thirteen patients died because of lymphoma progression (n=7), cardiac arrest (n=2) or in one case each,pneumonia, Progressive Multifocal LeukoEncephalopathy, pancreatic carcinoma or of unknown causes. After 4 cycles the ORR was 86% (n=64) and CR/CRu 57% (n=42). After 6 cycles, the CR/CRu raised to 74% (n=55) the PR rate was 9% (n=7), 2 patients had a stable disease, 4 progressed and 5 had died during the treatment. The complete MR rate after 6 months on blood samples or bone marrow was respectively 83% (43/50) and 74 % (32/43). At 24 months, the PFS was 69% and the OS 80%. The MIPI score (high vs low/int) and the blood MR after 6 cycles were the only two statistically prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Toxicities were essentially hematologic with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 51% and 36% of the cases, respectively. The main grade 3 or 4 extra-hematologic toxicities were fatigue (19%), neuropathy (14%), cardiac (7%) or febrile neutropenia (5%). Conclusion: The RiBVD regimen can be safely administered as first line therapy to elderly patients with MCL. Toxicities are mild and manageable. With 74% of CR/CRu, a 2 year PFS of 69% and 86% of patients achieving an MRD negative status in the blood after 6 cycles, without maintenance therapy, the RiBVD regimen is identified as a highly effective, well tolerated, first line treatment for elderly MCL patients. Reference : 1 - Kluin Nelemans HC et al, NEJM 2012, 2 - Gimenez E et al, BJH 2012 Disclosures Gressin: mundipharma: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Bendamustine and Bortezomib did not have authorization to their use in first line for MCL in France. Karlin:Janssen: Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy. Le Gouill:Mundipharma: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy.

Introduction Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare form of plasma cell malignancy with poor prognosis (usually less than 12 months survival with conventional chemotherapy). Only one prospective study with Lenalidomide-Dex before high dose therapy has been recently reported1. Bortezomib-based regimens and high dose Melphalan/ autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM/ASCT) have shown promising results in small retrospective studies. We report here the first prospective multicenter phase II trial for pPCL patients (pts) treated with Bortezomib-Doxorubicine-Dexamethasone (PAD) / Bortezomib-Cyclosphosphamide-Dexamethasone (VCD) as induction before HDM/ASCT. With the aim to improve response and survival, allograft or second ASCT plus consolidation/maintenance with Lenalidomide-Bortezomib-Dex (VRD) were proposed. Patients and method Non-previously treated pts with a diagnosis of pPCL were enrolled in this phase II study of the IFM group from April 2010 to July 2013. PAD (dexa 40 mg + bortezomib 1,3 mg/m2 on day 1, 4, 8, 11 + doxorubicine 30 mg/m2 day 4) and VCD (dexa + bortezomib + cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 day 1, 8) were administrated alternatively each 21 days for 4 cycles. For responding patients with circulating plasma cell < 1%, peripheral stem cells were collected after Cyclophosphamide + G-CSF. Either (i) double HDM/ASCT was performed followed by consolidation/maintenance íVDR (dexa 40mg + bortezomib 1,3 mg/m2 on day 1, 4, 8, 11 + lenalidomide 15 mg day 1-15) each 3 months and Lenalidomide 15 mg 21/28 days on others months, for 1 yearý or (ii) tandem HDM/ASCT-reduced intensity conditioning-allograft if there were < 66 years-old. Primary end-point was progression free survival (PFS); secondary end-points were responses rates, overall survival (OS), feasibility, and toxicity. We evaluated the disease response to therapy with the IMWG criteria and the percentage of circulating plasma cells; minimal residual disease (MRD) was evaluated during follow-up. Peripheral circulating plasma cells and bone marrow plasmocytes were collected at diagnosis for centralized FISH and SNP array analysis. Results 40 pts were enrolled with a median age of 55y (27-71). Median follow-up was 12.6 months (7.6-24.8). At diagnosis, the median number of circulating plasma cell was 5.2 G/L (1.3-66). Twenty-two percent had creatinine clearance < 50 ml/min, and 11% < 30 ml/min, 44% had an ISS score of 2 and 37% ISS 3. After induction 35 pts are evaluable. In the intent to treat analysis, 25 (72%) responded (VGPR+CR 37%, PR 28%, SD 5%) and 10/35 (28%) were refractory (pts having circulating plasma cell ≥ 1%) and did not continue the study. Twenty-three of the 25 responding pts underwent HDM/auto and 20 pts are evaluable at 3 months: CR+VGPR 14/20 (70%), PR 4/20 (20%), 1/20 (5%) and PD 1/20 (5%). Second HDM/auto was performed in 6 pts and allograft in 12. Ten of the 14 (72%) evaluable pts achieved VGPR or better and 4/14 (28%) PR. Six pts are currently on consolidation/maintenance phase with VRD. Median PFS was 17.8 months. Median OS was not reached. Genomic data are shown in Table I. MDR evaluation will be presented later. Major toxicities were hematological and infections. Eight pts died: 5 during induction, 1 at HDM/ASCT and 2 post allograft while in relapse. Of note, 2 pts had meningeal involvement at relapse. Conclusion This first large study for pPCL patients with PAD/VCD as induction and HDM/ASCT is effective and induce high responses rates. Consolidation with Allograft or bortezomib-lenalidomide-dex is currently investigated. 1Musto P et al. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2011; 118 Abstract2925Table I: genomic Disclosures: Leleu: CELGENE: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Honoraria. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Avet-Loiseau:CELGENE: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract 2796 Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse prognosis is poor, and the optimal salvage treatment is not known. In a previous pilot study, vinorelbine, ifosfamide, mitoxantrone, and prednisone (NIMP) without rituximab has shown a promising efficacy in the setting of relapsed DLBCL. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of rituximab and NIMP in the treatment of DLBCL in first relapse. Methods: This multicentric, single-arm phase II study included patients 18 to 75 years old, with CD20-positive DLBCL in first relapse (defined as having obtained at least a PR of more than 50% to an anthracycline-based front-line regimen) occurring more than 30 days after the last chemotherapy cycle or more than one year after an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first line. Other inclusion criteria were a performance status ≤ 2, absence of CNS involvement, and having signed an informed consent form. Patients with evidence of transformation from indolent lymphoma, primary refractory disease, or positive HIV tests were excluded. Initial and relapse biopsies were centrally reviewed. Patients received intravenous (IV) rituximab 375 mg/m2 D1, ifosfamide 1000 mg/m2 as a continuous infusion from D1 to D5, IV vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 D1 and D15, IV mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 D1, and oral prednisone 1 mg/kg D1 to D5, repeated every 28 days for three cycles. Pegfilgrastim support (6 mg at D7) was recommended. The primary endpoint was CR/CRu after 3 cycles, and was assessed by computed tomography according to the IWG criteria. Mobilization, consolidation or subsequent salvage therapy was decided at the discretion of the investigator. All the monitoring and data management were performed by the GOELAMS clinical research assistants, with a database lock on July 27, 2010. Results: Fifty patients (21[42%] women and 29[58%] men) were included in 18 centers between December 2004 and accrual closure in April 2010. All patients received at least 1 cycle of R-NIMP. Forty-five patients were available for central pathology review, toxicity and response. The central review of all patient samples confirmed DLBCL histology. Median age at study entry was 62.9 years (range: 34.8–75.6). Median time between first diagnosis of DLBCL and relapse was 18.0 months (range: 2.4–208). The following tumor responses were observed: 67.9 % overall response rate with 20 CR/CRu (43.5%), 11 PR (24.4%), 2 SD (4.4%), and 12 (26.7%) progressed under therapy. Toxicity information was available for 109/120 (91 %) of the first 3 cycles of R-NIMP administered. The following toxicities were observed (all grades, ≥ grade 3 for all cycles): anemia (87%, 8%), neutropenia (66%; 46%), thrombopenia (65%, 14%), elevated liver tests (39%, 0%), constipation (25%, 0%), kidney failure (7%, 0%), nausea (14%, 0%), vomiting (6%, 0%), allergic reactions (5%, 0%), and mucositis (5%, 0%). Twenty-nine infectious events (27%) were observed needing hospitalization in 9 cases. Twenty-nine patients received consolidation therapy at the discretion of the investigator. Of the 11 patients who received 3 additional cycles of R-NIMP, 3 remained in CR/CRu, 1 remained in PR, 4 converted from PR to CR/CRu, and 3 progressed. Among the 11 patients who underwent ASCT, 9 were in CR at the end of the procedure, one patient died of toxicity and 1 progressed. For the 12 patients mobilized after a R-NIMP cycle, a median of 1 apheresis (range 1–4) was necessary to harvest a median of 3.85 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The median time to second progression or relapse (TTP2) was 11.4 months, and the median survival of 55.5 months. On multivariate analysis, the variable associated with a longer TTP2 was the achievement of CR/Cru (RR: 0,12; CI95%: 0.03–0,39; p=0.0006). Within the subgroup of patients having received a consolidation treatment, having received an ASCT was associated with a longer TTP2 (RR: 0.20; CI95%: 0.04–0.98; p=0.047). Time to first relapse or previous rituximab exposure did not affect TTP2 nor OS, whereas relapse-IPI (as a continuous variable, by 1 additional risk factor) was associated with a poor survival (RR: 2.59; CI95%: 1.25–4.45; p=0.008). Conclusions: R-NIMP is a well-tolerated regimen, yields a high complete response rate, and allows for successful mobilization of CD34+ cells. This regimen is a suitable salvage treatment for relapsed DLBCL prior to appropriate consolidation. Further investigation is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00842595 Disclosures: Off Label Use: Vinorelbine in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (Off-label in France).

Abstract 3043 Introduction: The Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (TD) regimen has provided encouraging results in relapsed MM. To improve results, bortezomib (Velcade) has been added to the combination in previous phase II studies, the so called VTD regimen. In January 2006, the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) initiated a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label phase III, multicenter study, comparing VTD (arm A) with TD (arm B) for MM patients progressing or relapsing after autologous transplantation. Patients and Methods: Inclusion criteria: patients in first progression or relapse after at least one autologous transplantation, including those who had received bortezomib or thalidomide before transplant. Exclusion criteria: subjects with neuropathy above grade 1 or non secretory MM. Primary study end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points included safety, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment was scheduled as follows: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 was given as an i.v bolus on Days 1, 4, 8 and 11 followed by a 10-Day rest period (days 12 to 21) for 8 cycles (6 months) and then on Days 1, 8, 15, 22 followed by a 20-Day rest period (days 23 to 42) for 4 cycles (6 months). In both arms, thalidomide was scheduled at 200 mg/Day orally for one year and dexamethasone 40 mg/Day orally four days every three weeks for one year. Patients reaching remission could proceed to a new stem cell harvest. However, transplantation, either autologous or allogeneic, could only be performed in patients who completed the planned one year treatment period. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria, with additional category of near complete remission (nCR). Adverse events were graded by the NCI-CTCAE, Version 3.0.The trial was based on a group sequential design, with 4 planned interim analyses and one final analysis that allowed stopping for efficacy as well as futility. The overall alpha and power were set equal to 0.025 and 0.90 respectively. The test for decision making was based on the comparison in terms of the ratio of the cause-specific hazards of relapse/progression, estimated in a Cox model stratified on the number of previous autologous transplantations. Relapse/progression cumulative incidence was estimated using the proper nonparametric estimator, the comparison was done by the Gray test. PFS and OS probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curves, the comparison was performed by the Log-Rank test. An interim safety analysis was performed when the first hundred patients had been included. The safety committee recommended to continue the trial. Results: As of 1st July 2010, 269 patients had been enrolled in the study, 139 in France (IFM 2005-04 study), 21 in Italy, 38 in Germany, 19 in Switzerland (a SAKK study), 23 in Belgium, 8 in Austria, 8 in the Czech republic, 11 in Hungary, 1 in the UK and 1 in Israel. One hundred and sixty nine patients were males and 100 females; the median age was 61 yrs (range 29–76). One hundred and thirty six patients were randomized to receive VTD and 133 to receive TD. The current analysis is based on 246 patients (124 in arm A, 122 in arm B) included in the second interim analysis, carried out when 134 events were observed. Following this analysis, the trial was stopped because of significant superiority of VTD over TD. The remaining patients were too premature to contribute to the analysis. The number of previous autologous transplants was one in 63 vs 60 and two or more in 61 vs 62 patients in arm A vs B respectively. The median follow-up was 25 months. The median TTP was 20 months vs 15 months respectively in arm A and B, with cumulative incidence of relapse/progression at 2 years equal to 52% (95% CI: 42%-64%) vs 70% (95% CI: 61%-81%) (p=0.0004, Gray test). The same superiority of arm A was also observed when stratifying on the number of previous autologous transplantations. At 2 years, PFS was 39% (95% CI: 30%-51%) vs 23% (95% CI: 16%-34%) (A vs B, p=0.0006, Log-Rank test). OS in the first two years was comparable in the two groups. Conclusion: VTD resulted in significantly longer TTP and PFS in patients relapsing after ASCT. Analysis of response and safety data are on going and results will be presented at the meeting. Protocol EU-DRACT number: 2005-001628-35. Disclosures: Niederwieser: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau.

This prospective phase II trial (Nov 2011- Dec 2012), supported by the LYSA group, aimed to evaluate the impact on PFS of the RiBVD regimen in newly diagnosed, previously untreated, elderly MCL patients (>65 years or not eligible for ASCT) (NCT01457144). Inclusion criteria were: WHO 2008 MCL not previously treated, CD20 positive, ECOG 0-2, AA stage II-IV, no CNS involvement or active HBV/HCV/HIV infection. Patients were scheduled to receive a total of 6 cycles of the RiBVD regimen, if they responded (IWG criteria) after 4 cycles. The regimen was administered every 4 weeks with Rituximab 375 mg/m² IV on day(D)1, Bendamustine 90 mg/m² IV on D1 and 2, Dexamethasone 40 mg/m² IV on D2 and bortezomib (Velcade®) 1.3 mg/m² subcutaneously on D1, 4, 8 and 11. Primary prophylaxis with acyclovir was mandatory for Herpes virus reactivation, but there was no recommendation for bacterial prevention. Herein we present preliminary analysis of the trial after 4 RiBVD cycles. Results: A total of 76 patients were included, one was excluded because of HBV active disease and 5 had insufficient data reported in the database. To date we analyzed 70 patients. Patients characteristics: sex ratio M/F 49/21, median age 72 years (y) [64-83] (2 patients were 64 y old), AAstage II/III-IV 5/65, ECOG 0-1/2 59/11, MIPI score low/intermediate/high 3/19/48. Response: 61 responded (ORR=87%), with 19 in PR (26%) and 42 in CR/CRu (60%). Four patients died from pneumonia (n=1), cardiac arrest (n=2) and one following Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy. Three patients have progressed after 3 cycles. Sixty one patients were analysed by PETscan after 4 cycles, 39 (64%) reached a CR (30 were in CR/CRu and 9 in PR) and 22 remained PET positive (11 patients were in CR/CRu, 10 in PR and 1 stable). RiBVD cycles: 271 cycles were administered out of 280 planned (97%). Twenty four (9%) were delayed, 10 for toxicity. All but one planned Bendamustine doses (n=542) were administered with dosing modified 17 times (3%), mostly for hematological toxicity (n=14). Regarding Bortezomib, 79% (1028/1084) of planned doses were administered, it was prematurely stopped (56, 4%) for neurotoxicity (10 instances) or hematological side effects (46). Rituximab was not administered in 4 instances. Hematologic toxicities: Over the 271 cycles administered, neutropenia was reported in 104 cycles [56 grade 3/4 (g3/4) (21%)], 2.5% with fever; thrombopenia in 181 cycles [41 g3/4 (15%)]; anemia in 210 cycles, [6 g3/4 (2%)]. Non-hematologic toxicities:Reported in >10% of the cycles were : allergic reactions (10.3%, g3/4 Conclusion Despite 4 toxic deaths (6%), toxicity appears acceptable and manageable. In particular, subcutaneous bortezomib shows markedly decreased neurotoxicity compared to the IV form. This interim analysis shows that four cycles of RiBVD are very effective for untreated elderly MCL patients (ORR 87%) with a high response rate (CR/CRu 60%) which has been shown to be predictive of a long duration of response. An update of these results will be presented at the ASH meeting together with the molecular response rates after 4 cycles. Disclosures: Gressin: Pfizer: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy. Cartron:Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract 933 Cytogenetics findings are the most important pronostic factor in multiple myeloma (MM) with age and ISS. IMW recommends to test t(4-14), del17p and t(14-16) for all patients at diagnosis. However this initial screening doesn't represent patientÕs heterogeneity and many others cytogenetic abnormalities may impact on prognosis as shown in recent studies with SNParrays. Chromosome 1 appeared as a critical region in MM pathogenesis: 1q gain is associated with a poor outcome and few studies have analyzed 1p deletions as a pejorative prognostic factor (especially 1p22 and 1p32 deletions). There's a lack of data on the real impact of 1p abnormalities on an important and homogeneous group of patients. To address this issue we studied the incidence and prognosis impact of 1p22 and 1p32 deletions in 1195 patients from the IFM (Institut Francophone du Myélome) cell collection, homogeneously treated with induction (VAD or VD) and autologous transplantation. We used BAC/PAC clones for screening by FISH method 1195 patients from the IFM cell collection. Data for del17p, t(4;14) del13, ISS, survival data were from the IFM database. Patients were treated with VAD or VD induction followed by autologous transplantation. Survival analysis were performed by Kaplan-Meier curves (logrank test), Cox logistic regression (adjusted to age at diagnosis, induction treatment, initial beta2M, del17p and t(4;14)). Median PFS was 30.9 months (Mo) and median OS was 88.2 Mo. ISS distribution was ISS1 :33.6%, ISS2 :37.4% and ISS3 29%, median age at diagnosis was 56.5 years. Chromosome 1p deletion was present in 23.3% of the patients (271) : 15.1% (176) for 1p22 and 7.3% (85) for 1p32 deletions. Both deletions were simultaneously present for only 1 patient. In contrast we found a statistic link by chi2 test between presence of 1p22 or 1p32 and t(4;14), del17p and high beta2M. Incidence of other cytogenetic abnormalities was: 18.2% (178) for del17p, 12.5% (126) for t4;14) and 58.5% (529) for del13. In univariate analyses, 1p22 and 1p32 appeared as negative prognostic factors for : - PFS : for 1p22 : 22 Mo vs 35 Mo p - OS : for 1p22: 69.6 Mo vs 108.3 Mo p=0.002 and for 1p32: 25.9 Mo vs 109.1 Mo p Presence of del17p, t(4;14) or patients with ISS3 were associated with a poor outcome as commonly admitted in the literature. In multivariate analyses 1p22 and 1p32 deletions appear as independent negative prognostic factors regarding to t(4;14), del17p, del13, ISS or treatment arm. Hazard ratio adjusted to cytogenetic data, ISS and treatment show that progression risk is increased 1.7 times for 1p22 and 2.8 times for 1p32, and death risk was increased 2 times for 1p22 and 4.2 times for 1p32. In multivariate analysis the negative impact of 1p22 decreased during the time, it may be explained by a lack of follow-up for those patients. Interestingly, when del17p and 1p32 were both present, 1p32 deletion appear to worsen the prognosis of patient. Conclusion: our data show that 1p22 and 1p32 deletions are major negative prognostic factors for PFS and OS for patients with MM independently of t(4;14), del17p, del13, ISS or treatment arm. We thus suggest that 1p22 and 1p32 deletions should be tested for all patients at diagnosis even if prospective studies are necessary to confirm these data. Disclosures: Roussel: celgene: Honoraria; janssen: Honoraria. Hulin:celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Facon:onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Attal:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract 3340 Background. Immunomodulator drugs (IMiDs) are promising oral agents in Multiple Myeloma (MM); and MM that cannot benefit from novel agents, including IMiDs, only have 9 months survival. On the other hand IMiDs are associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events (TE) in MM, and must be stopped when TE occurs with a potential shortened life expectancy. Although DVT (Deep Venous Thrombosis), including PE (Pulmonary Embolism), was primarily observed, arterial events were also described. Guidelines have proposed LWMH for VTE prophylaxis for patients that displayed greater than 2 risk factors of VTE. Studies have showed a decrease incidence of TE since a prophylaxis was mandatory; however TE remained despite use of LMWH. We sought to characterize and study the incidence of TE in MM treated with an IMiDs-based regimen and having LMWH as TE prophylaxis, and to determine risk factors for patients to develop TE. Method. MMVAR/IFM 2005–04 is a large multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, phase 3, EBMT and IFM combined study that compared VTD to TD for MM patients in first progression after autologous transplantation. Treatment comprised 8 cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV bolus on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-days cycle and then on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 42-days cycle for 4 more cycles. In both arms, oral thalidomide was administered at 200 mg/day for 1 year with dexamethasone at 40 mg/day for 4 days every 3 weeks for 1 year. A TE prophylaxis was mandatory in both arms using enoxaparin 40 mg/day during one year. TTP was the primary end point. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria. Adverse events were graded by the NCI-CTCAE, Version 3.0. Results. The MMVAR trial was stopped because of superiority of VTD over TD at first interim analysis, as 157 relapsed were recorded out of 267 patients randomized in arm VTD (n=135) and arm TD (n=132), respectively. With a median follow-up of 27 months, the probability of achieving CR and CR+PR during the first year, the median TTP and PFS were greater in the VTD arm, although it did not translate into a better OS, yet. In the VTD and TD arms, the mean number of treatment cycles for the 12 cycles was 7.56 vs 9.93, respectively. Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 48 patients, including 8 (17%) related to occurrence of TE, and 33 patients died during the treatment period. There were 24 (8.9%) TE recorded, 12 in either arm; we have then decided to pool the 2 groups for the subsequent analysis. The characteristics of the MM with TE were not different from the overall population, 14 male/10 female, median age (range) was 63 (42–76) with 25% patients older than 65. The median (min-max) time from start of MMVAR to occurrence of TE was 3.4 months (0.3–11.9), not different in either arm. TE occurred in 16 (66%) vs. 8 (33%) patients in the first 4 months and after 4 months, respectively. 15 (62.5%) pts had at least some tumor burden reduction (minor response and better) at time of occurrence of TE, while 12.5% had progression of MM, 12.5% stable disease, and 12.5% were non evaluable. All TE occurred while pts were on LMWH prophylaxis since the initiation of the study treatment but one. The occurrence of TE impacted the treatment of MM as 16 (67%) pts did stop their IMiDs-based treatment, either transiently for 8 (33%) pts or definitely for 8 (33%) pts. The doses of the IMiDs were reduced for 5 pts when IMiDs were reintroduced. Overall only 5 pts had no change applied to their MM treatment while TE occurred. The occurrence of TE might have impacted response rate, CR rate, and the survival end points, TTP, PFS and OS. An update of this sub analysis will be presented at ASH with multivariate analysis to determine risk factors for occurrence of TE while on LMWH prophylaxis. Conclusion. Although LMWH is recommended to patients with high risk of TE, the optimal dose and duration of LMWH remains to be determined. More studies are needed to determine risk factors of TE in MM patients treated with IMiDs-based regimen, and to guide physician in their routine practice with the optimal TE prophylaxis. On behalf of the Myeloma Subcommittee of the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT (European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation) and the IFM (Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome). Disclosures: Leleu: Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; LeoPharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Masszi:Centocor Ortho Biotech Research & Development: Research Funding. Hajek:Merck:; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.