Search

Figurierte Erytheme (FE) sind eine ätiopathophysiologisch heterogene Gruppe von Erkrankungen mit typischen anulären erythematösen Hautveränderungen. Die Diagnose wird in erster Linie aufgrund des klinischen Bildes in Verbindung mit histologischen Befunden gestellt; oft handelt es sich um Ausschlussdiagnosen. Während einige Autoren FE eher als Reaktionsmuster denn als eigenständige klinische Entitäten betrachten, identifizierten andere vier klassische FE: Erythema anulare centrifugum, Erythema gyratum repens, Erythema migrans und Erythema marginatum. Die Differenzialdiagnosen der FE sind vielfältig und oft schwierig. Wir schlagen daher einen diagnostischen Algorithmus für FE vor, der die Diagnosen nach zeitlicher Entwicklung und klinisch-histologischem Phänotyp der verschiedenen Subtypen unterscheidet. Da einige FE in Verbindung mit Malignomen auftreten können, sind umsichtige Ärzte beim Umgang mit diesen Entitäten gefragt.

Allergo journal international 30(5), 155-168 (2021). doi:10.1007/s40629-021-00178-2, Published by Urban & Vogel, München

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine BNT162b2 received approval and within the first few days of public vaccination several severe anaphylaxis cases occurred. An investigation is taking place to understand the cases and their triggers. The vaccine will be administered to a large number of individuals worldwide and concerns raised for severe adverse events might occur. With the current information, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) states its position for the following preliminary recommendations that are to be revised as soon as more data emerges. To minimize the risk of severe allergic reactions in vaccinated individuals, it is urgently required to understand the specific nature of the reported severe allergic reactions, including the background medical history of the individuals affected and the mechanisms involved. To achieve this goal all clinical and laboratory information should be collected and reported. Mild and moderate allergic patients should not be excluded from the vaccine as the exclusion of all these patients from vaccination may have a significant impact on reaching the goal of population immunity. Health care practitioners vaccinating against COVID-19 are required to be sufficiently prepared to recognise and treat anaphylaxis properly with the ability to administer adrenaline. A mandatory observation period after vaccine administration of at least 15 minutes for all individuals should be followed. The current data has not shown any higher risk for patients suffering from allergic rhinitis or asthma and this message should be clearly stated by physicians to give our patients trust. The benefit of the vaccination clearly outweighs the risk of severe COVID-19 development including the more than 30% of the population suffering from allergic diseases.

Hintergrund: Zur vorbeugenden Behandlung von COVID-19 (Coronaviruserkrankung 2019) wurden in einer beispiellosen weltweiten Forschungsanstrengung Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit neuer Impfstoffplattformen studiert, die noch nie zuvor am Menschen eingesetzt wurden. Weniger als ein Jahr nach der Entdeckung der SARS-CoV-2-Virussequenz (SARS-CoV-2, "severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2") wurden diese in zahlreichen Landern fur den Einsatz zugelassen und es wurde mit Massenimpfungen begonnen. Die bislang in der Europaischen Union (EU) zugelassenen mRNA-Impfstoffe (mRNA, "messenger"-RNA) gegen SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 und mRNA-1273 basieren auf einer ahnlichen lipidbasierten Nanopartikeltragertechnologie; die Lipidkomponenten unterscheiden sich jedoch. Schwere allergische Reaktionen und Anaphylaxien nach COVID-19-Impfungen sind sehr seltene unerwunschte Nebenwirkungen, die aber aufgrund potenziell letaler Ausgange viel Aufmerksamkeit erhalten und ein hohes Mas an Verunsicherung ausgelost haben. Methoden: Das aktuelle Wissen zu anaphylaktischen Reaktionen auf Impfstoffe und speziell zu den derzeit neuen mRNA-COVID-19-Impfstoffen wurde zusammengestellt mittels einer Literaturanalyse durch Recherchen in Medline, Pubmed sowie den nationalen und internationalen Studien- und Leitlinienregistern, der Cochrane Library und dem Internet unter besonderer Berucksichtigung offizieller Webseiten der World Health Oranization (WHO), der Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), der European Medicines Agency (EMA), des Robert-Koch-Instituts (RKI) und des Paul-Ehrlich-Instituts (PEI). Ergebnisse: Basierend auf der internationalen Literatur und bisheriger Erfahrungen zu schweren allergischen Reaktionen im Kontext der COVID-19-Impfungen werden von einem Expertengremium Empfehlungen fur Prophylaxe, Diagnostik und Therapie dieser allergischen Reaktionen gegeben. Schlussfolgerung: Vor einer COVID-19-Impfung mit den derzeit zugelassenen Impfstoffen sind Allergietests fur die allermeisten Allergiker nicht notwendig. Bei allergischer/anaphylaktischer Reaktion auf den verabreichten COVID-19-Impfstoff wird eine allergologische Abklarung empfohlen, wie auch fur eine kleine potenzielle Risikopopulation vor der ersten Impfung. Die Evaluierung und Zulassung von Testverfahren sollten hierfur erfolgen. Zitierweise: Klimek L, Bergmann K-C, Brehler R, Pfutzner W, Zuberbier T, Hartmann K, Jakob T, Novak N, Ring J, Merk H; Hamelmann E, Ankermann T, Schmidt S, Untersmayr E, Hotzenecker W, Jensen-Jarolim E, Brockow K, Mahler V, Worm M. Practical Handling of Allergic Reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. A Position Paper from German and Austrian Allergy Societies AeDA, DGAKI, GPA and OGAI. Allergo J Int 2021;30:79-95 https: //doi.org/10.1007/s40629-021-00165-7

SummaryAlmost all anaphylactic reactions are associated with subjective symptoms, which are also referred to “prodromi”, and are often not taken seriously. In 100 patients categorized with different severity grades, subjective symptoms were investigated in a personal interview with free/open questions regarding subjective feelings and symptoms (duration 5–90 min). After the interview, the patients were asked to complete a questionnaire about the exact occurrence of the reaction. Special focus was given to near-death experiences in severe reactions. Patients described feelings of “elevation”, “looking at themselves from outside”, “tunnel experiences” and “bright light”. In the kinetics of the anaphylactic reaction, cutaneous symptoms were most often reported as the first or second symptom, while cardiovascular and airway symptoms were also reported as the 3rd, 4th or 5th symptom. In 37% of the patients with severe reactions, everyday life has changed since suffering the anaphylactic episode.

Zwei Mitarbeiter des National Health Service (NHS) in England entwickelten nach der Verabreichung des BNT162b2-Impfstoffs von BionNTech gegen COVID-19 schwere allergische Reaktionen. Die britische Fachinformation fur den BNT162b2-Impfstoff enthalt bereits Hinweise auf eine Kontraindikation zur Anwendung bei Personen, die allergisch auf den Impfstoff oder einen seiner Bestandteile reagiert haben. Als Vorsichtsmasnahme hat die englische Regulationsbehorde fur Arzneimittel und Gesundheitsprodukte (MHRA) eine vorlaufige Anleitung herausgegeben, "Patienten mit schweren Allergien" grundsatzlich nicht zu impfen. Allergische Reaktionen auf Impfstoffe sind sehr selten, aber Impfstoffkomponenten verursachen bekanntermasen allergische Reaktionen. BNT162b2 ist ein Impfstoff, der auf einer in Lipidnanopartikel eingebetteten mRNA basiert und mit weiteren Substanzen angereichert wird, um den Transport in die Zellen zu ermoglichen. In der zentralen klinischen Phase-III-Studie wurde der BNT162b2-Impfstoff im Allgemeinen gut vertragen. Impfstoffe gelten als eine der wirksamsten Masnahmen im Bereich der offentlichen Gesundheit. Schwere allergische Reaktionen auf Impfstoffe sind selten, konnen jedoch lebensbedrohlich sein. Es ist ratsam, die Impfteams auf diese Gefahr aufmerksam zu machen und angemessene Vorsichtsmasnahmen zu treffen, wahrend mehr Erfahrungen mit dem neuen Impfstoff gesammelt werden.

International audience

Die Anzahl der von Allergien betroffenen Patienten nimmt weltweit zu. Hiermit gehen erhebliche Kosten fur die Gesundheits- und Sozialsysteme durch allergische Erkrankungen einher. Integrierte Versorgungskonzepte sind erforderlich, die innerhalb der nationalen Gesundheitssysteme eine umfassende Versorgung ermoglichen. Die ARIA-Initiative entwickelt international gultige Leitlinien fur allergische Atemwegserkrankungen. ARIA dient der verbesserten Versorgung von Patienten mit Allergien und chronischen Atemwegserkrankungen. In Zusammenarbeit mit anderen internationalen Initiativen, nationalen Fachgesellschaften und Patientenorganisationen im Bereich Allergien und Atemwegserkrankungen wurde eine realitatsnahe, integrative Versorgungsleitlinie („integrated care pathways“, ICPs) fur eine digital unterstutzte, integrative, individualisierte Behandlung von allergischer Rhinitis (AR) mit komorbidem Asthma entwickelt, die in der vorliegenden Arbeit auf das deutsche Gesundheitssystem ubertragen wird. Die vorliegende ICP-Versorgungsleitlinie umfasst wesentliche Bereiche der Versorgung von Patienten mit AR mit und ohne Asthma einschlieslich der Sicht von Patienten und weiterer versorgungsnaher Gesundheitsdienstleister. Eine umfassende ICP-Leitlinie kann die Versorgungsrealitat wesentlich besser abbilden als herkommliche Leitlinienmodelle.

Background: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the treatment of patients with allergic and atopy-associated diseases has faced major challenges. Recommendations for “social distancing” and the fear of patients becoming infected during a visit to a medical facility have led to a drastic decrease in personal doctor-patient contacts. This affects both acute care and treatment of the chronically ill. The immune response after SARS-CoV-2 infection is so far only insufficiently understood and could be altered in a favorable or unfavorable way by therapy with monoclonal antibodies. There is currently no evidence for an increased risk of a severe COVID-19 course in allergic patients. Many patients are under ongoing therapy with biologicals that inhibit type 2 immune responses via various mechanisms. There is uncertainty about possible immunological interactions and potential risks of these biologicals in the case of an infection with SARS-CoV-2. Materials and methods: A selective literature search was carried out in PubMed, Livivo, and the internet to cover the past 10 years (May 2010 – April 2020). Additionally, the current German-language publications were analyzed. Based on these data, the present position paper provides recommendations for the biological treatment of patients with allergic and atopy-associated diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: In order to maintain in-office consultation services, a safe treatment environment must be created that is adapted to the pandemic situation. To date, there is a lack of reliable study data on the care for patients with complex respiratory, atopic, and allergic diseases in times of an imminent infection risk from SARS-CoV-2. Type-2-dominant immune reactions, as they are frequently seen in allergic patients, could influence various phases of COVID-19, e.g., by slowing down the immune reactions. Theoretically, this could have an unfavorable effect in the early phase of a SARS-Cov-2 infection, but also a positive effect during a cytokine storm in the later phase of severe courses. However, since there is currently no evidence for this, all data from patients treated with a biological directed against type 2 immune reactions who develop COVID-19 should be collected in registries, and their disease courses documented in order to be able to provide experience-based instructions in the future. Conclusion: The use of biologicals for the treatment of bronchial asthma, atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and spontaneous urticaria should be continued as usual in patients without suspected infection or proven SARS-CoV-2 infection. If available, it is recommended to prefer a formulation for self-application and to offer telemedical monitoring. Treatment should aim at the best possible control of difficult-to-control allergic and atopic diseases using adequate rescue and add-on therapy and should avoid the need for systemic glucocorticosteroids. If SARS-CoV-2 infection is proven or reasonably suspected, the therapy should be determined by weighing the benefits and risks individually for the patient in question, and the patient should be involved in the decision-making. It should be kept in mind that the potential effects of biologicals on the immune response in COVID-19 are currently not known. Telemedical offers are particularly desirable for the acute consultation needs of suitable patients.

No abstract available.

Introduction: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have several potential stressors including the symptoms of the disease itself, the stigmatization due to their appearance, and emotional and psychological strain. Psychological factors and stress can trigger and exacerbate the symptoms of skin diseases and there is evidence that stress has a relevant clinical effect on the function of skin cells in vivo. Our objective was to evaluate in a pilot study the feasibility, acceptance, and effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) programme in AD patients in a clinical setting. Methods: 10 patients took part in an 8-week MBSR programme, which included, e.g., mindful and conscious awareness of the body and bodywork, and seated meditation. We assessed sociodemographics and disease related variables with standardized measures at predefined time points including Score of Atopic Dermatitis, Patient Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index, Perceived Stress Questionnaire, Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI), and others. Participants also gave qualitative feedback regarding the effects of the intervention. Results: The mean age was 53.10 years (SD = 15.04), seven patients were female, and disease duration was 36.6 years (SD = 25.5). Calculating pre-post effect sizes (Cohen’s d), the FMI indicated significant improvement in the “presence” and “acceptance” subscales. There was also tendency for less stress. This was confirmed by the qualitative statements of the participants. Conclusions: The MBSR programme is feasible and acceptable for AD patients. Considering the long disease history and the severity of disease burden, the effects of this intervention seem promising as an adjunct to conventional treatments for patients with AD.

Background\ud \ud Food anaphylaxis is commonly elicited by unintentional ingestion of foods containing the allergen above the tolerance threshold level of the individual. While labeling the 14 main allergens used as ingredients in food products is mandatory in the EU, there is no legal definition of declaring potential contaminants. Precautionary allergen labeling such as “may contain traces of” is often used. However, this is unsatisfactory for consumers as they get no information if the contamination is below their personal threshold. In discussions with the food industry and technologists, it was suggested to use a voluntary declaration indicating that all declared contaminants are below a threshold of 0.5 mg protein per 100 g of food. This concentration is known to be below the threshold of most patients, and it can be technically guaranteed in most food production. However, it was also important to assess that in case of accidental ingestion of contaminants below this threshold by highly allergic patients, no fatal anaphylactic reaction could occur. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to assess whether a fatal reaction to 5mg of protein or less has been reported, assuming that a maximum portion size of 1kg of a processed food exceeds any meal and thus gives a sufficient safety margin.\ud \ud \ud \ud Methods\ud \ud MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched until 24 January 2021 for provocation studies and case reports in which one of the 14 major food allergens was reported to elicit fatal or life-threatening anaphylactic reactions and assessed if these occurred below the ingestion of 5mg of protein. A Delphi process was performed to obtain an expert consensus on the results.\ud \ud \ud \ud Results\ud \ud In the 210 studies included, in our search, no reports of fatal anaphylactic reactions reported below 5 mg protein ingested were identified. However, in provocation studies and case reports, severe reactions below 5 mg were reported for the following allergens: eggs, fish, lupin, milk, nuts, peanuts, soy, and sesame seeds.\ud \ud \ud \ud Conclusion\ud \ud Based on the literature studied for this review, it can be stated that cross-contamination of the 14 major food allergens below 0.5 mg/100 g is likely not to endanger most food allergic patients when a standard portion of food is consumed. We propose to use the statement “this product contains the named allergens in the list of ingredients, it may contain traces of other contaminations (to be named, e.g. nut) at concentrations less than 0.5 mg per 100 g of this product” for a voluntary declaration on processed food packages. This level of avoidance of cross-contaminations can be achieved technically for most processed foods, and the statement would be a clear and helpful message to the consumers. However, it is clearly acknowledged that a voluntary declaration is only a first step to a legally binding solution. For this, further research on threshold levels is encouraged.

Allergy is an alteration of immunological reactivity leading to hypersensitivity disease with inflammation of skin and mucous membranes up to life-threatening generalized reactions (anaphylaxis). Allergies have increased in prevalence worldwide to an estimated 20% of the population affected. The reasons for this increase are explained mainly by two hypotheses: (1) decrease of early life immune stimulation (“hygiene hypothesis”) and (2) increase of environmental pollutants in the environment (“pollution hypothesis”). The most marked increase in allergy prevalence occurred in the Northern hemisphere in the decades 1960–1990 together with reduction of rural environments and increased traffic exhaust exposure and urbanization. These changes occurred at a slower rate in Eastern European former communist countries leading to the well-known East–West differences in allergy prevalence. Climate change with increasing pollination periods and intrusion of allergenic neophytes additionally contributes to the increased allergy prevalence. Other sequels of climate change like heavy weather events (thunderstorms) lead to exacerbations of asthma by exposure to small respirable allergenic particles and long distance allergen transport. Allergies therefore represent an indirect health outcome parameter of climate change. Psychosocial factors connected with the acceleration of daily life and increasing psychologic stress may also play a role. Allergies have been called the “epidemic of the twenty-first century”. Allergies have been called the “epidemic of the twenty-first century.” There is no doubt that apart from genetic susceptibility, civilization-associated environmental factors with the so-called modern lifestyle play a critical role in the development of allergies.

Correction to: Allergo J Int 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-019-00110-9 Affiliation and disclaimer have been misrepresented and are hereby corrected: Vera Mahler: Affiliation: Med. Faculty, Friedrich-Alexander-University (FAU) Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this …

Auch wenn anaphylaktische Reaktionen in der Hautarztpraxis eher selten sind, erfordern sie ein effizientes Eingreifen. Wie Sie im Ernstfall am besten vorgehen und woran Sie nach Bewaltigung der Akutsituation denken sollten, erfahren Sie in diesem Beitrag.

Die Anzahl der von Allergien betroffenen Patienten nimmt weltweit zu. Hiermit gehen erhebliche Kosten fur die Gesundheits- und Sozialsysteme durch allergische Erkrankungen einher. Integrierte Versorgungskonzepte sind erforderlich, die innerhalb der nationalen Gesundheitssysteme eine umfassende Versorgung ermoglichen. Die ARIA-Initiative entwickelt international gultige Leitlinien fur allergische Atemwegserkrankungen. ARIA dient der verbesserten Versorgung von Patienten mit Allergien und chronischen Atemwegserkrankungen. In Zusammenarbeit mit anderen internationalen Initiativen, nationalen Fachgesellschaften und Patientenorganisationen im Bereich Allergien und Atemwegserkrankungen wurde eine realitatsnahe, integrative Versorgungsleitlinie („integrated care pathways“, ICPs) fur eine digital unterstutzte, integrative, individualisierte Behandlung von allergischer Rhinitis (AR) mit komorbidem Asthma entwickelt, die in der vorliegenden Arbeit auf das deutsche Gesundheitssystem ubertragen wird. Die vorliegende ICP-Versorgungsleitlinie umfasst wesentliche Bereiche der Versorgung von Patienten mit AR mit und ohne Asthma einschlieslich der Sicht von Patienten und weiterer versorgungsnaher Gesundheitsdienstleister. Eine umfassende ICP-Leitlinie kann die Versorgungsrealitat wesentlich besser abbilden als herkommliche Leitlinienmodelle.

Allergien gehoren zu den grosen gesundheitlichen Herausforderungen unserer Zeit in fast allen Landern der Welt — eine neue Entwicklung, die vor 60 Jahren noch nicht galt [1]. Wie sich allergische Erkrankungen inzwischen darstellen und wie es um die Versorgung der Patienten bestellt ist, beleuchtet Prof. Dr. Dr. Johannes Ring im ersten Kapitel der Neuauflage des „Weisbuch Allergie in Deutschland“, das hier wiedergegeben wird.

Die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie (AIT) durch subkutane Injektionen (SCIT) des relevanten Allergens ist die klassische kausale Behandlungsmethode IgE-vermittelter allergischer Atemwegserkrankungen und wird bereits seit uber 100 Jahren erfolgreich eingesetzt. Fur die vorliegende Publikation wurde eine selektive Literaturrecherche in Pubmed und Medline durchgefuhrt. Zusatzlich wurden aktuelle Publikationen deutschsprachiger Zeitschriften analysiert, die nicht in Literaturdatenbanken verfugbar sind. Diese Literaturrecherche erfasste Original- und Reviewarbeiten in deutscher oder englischer Sprache. Fur die SCIT wurden primare, sekundare und tertiare Praventionseigenschaften nachgewiesen, die aber noch weiter evaluiert werden mussen. In Kombination mit Biologika kann die Sicherheit der SCIT gesteigert werden, teilweise auch die Wirksamkeit. Adjuvanzien scheinen ein enormes Entwicklungspotenzial fur die SCIT zu bergen. Bereits heute werden Aluminiumsalze, Mikrokristallines Tyrosin (MCT) und Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) in kommerziellen SCIT-Praparaten eingesetzt. Parallel wird an weiteren Adjuvanzien geforscht, beispielsweise Liposomen, Mikrospharen, CpG-Motiven oder „virus-like particles“ (VLPs). Auch die Therapieextrakte selbst werden weiterentwickelt, unter anderem als rekombinante Allergene, hypoallergene Varianten wie „site-directed mutants“ (SDM), Konformationsvarianten, Allergenfragmentierungen, Allergenoligomeren, Deletionsmutanten oder Hybridallergene/Mosaikantigene. SCIT-Praparationen gehoren zu den innovativsten Therapiemoglichkeiten in der Immuntherapie allergischer Erkrankungen. Aufgrund zahlreicher immunologischer Ansatze werden sie die Therapie in Zukunft effektiver und sicherer machen, und das bei reduziertem Aufwand.

Allergen immunotherapy with subcutaneous injection (SCIT) of the relevant allergen is the classic causal treatment method for IgE-mediated allergic respiratory disease and has already been successfully used for over 100 years. This publication is based on a selective literature search in PubMed and MEDLINE. Recent publications in German-language journals that are not available in literature databases were also analyzed. This literature search included original and review articles both in German and in English. Primary, secondary and tertiary prevention characteristics have been demonstrated for SCIT; however, these require further evaluation. In combination with biologic agents, the safety, and in some cases the efficacy, of SCIT can be increased. Adjuvants seem to offer enormous development potential for SCIT. Aluminum salts, microcrystalline tyrosine (MCT), and monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) are already used in commercial SCIT preparations. At the same time, other adjuvants are being researched, e.g., liposomes, microspheres, CpG motifs (C: nucleotide cytosine, p: phosphate, G: nucleotide guanine), or virus-like particles (VLPs). The therapeutic extracts themselves are also undergoing further development, for instance as recombinant allergens, hypoallergenic variants such as site-directed mutants (SDM), conformational variants, allergen fragmentation, allergen oligomers, deletion mutants, and hybrid allergens/mosaic antigens. SCIT preparations are among the most innovative treatment options in the immunotherapy of allergic diseases. Due to the numerous immunological approaches, they will make treatment safer and more effective in the future with reduced effort.

Die Allergen-Immuntherapie durch subkutane Injektionen (SCIT) des relevanten Allergens ist die klassische kausale Behandlungsmethode IgE-vermittelter allergischer Atemwegserkrankungen, und wird bereits seit uber 100 Jahren erfolgreich eingesetzt. Das wachsende Verstandnis immunologischer Grundlagen erweitert fortlaufend das Wissen uber Wirkmechanismen der SCIT. Hinsichtlich verwendeter Therapieschemata und Art der Therapieextrakte finden standig Weiterentwicklungen statt. Derzeit sind zur SCIT in Deutschland nicht modifizierte Allergenpraparate als wassrige oder physikalisch gekoppelte (Semidepot-)Extrakte sowie chemisch modifizierte Extrakte (Allergoide) als Semidepotextrakte kommerziell verfugbar. Fur die Vielfalt an Allergenen sind Daten zur Wirksamkeit aus klinischen Studien in unterschiedlicher Anzahl und Qualitat vorhanden. Fur die vorliegende Publikation wurde eine selektive Literaturrecherche in Pubmed und Medline durchgefuhrt, und zusatzlich wurden die aktuellen Publikationen nicht in Literaturdatenbanken verfugbarer deutschsprachiger Zeitschriften analysiert. Diese Literaturrecherche erfasste Original- und Reviewarbeiten in deutscher oder englischer Sprache. Die SCIT ist ein langjahrig etabliertes und auserordentlich gut dokumentiertes Therapieverfahren fur Inhalations- und Insektengiftallergien mit guter Wirksamkeits- und Sicherheitsdokumentation sowohl bei Erwachsenen, als auch im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Am Markt befindliche Praparate werden kontinuierlich weiterentwickelt und vor allem im Rahmen der Therapieallergeneverordnung klinisch evaluiert. Sie konnen in kontinuierlich ganzjahrig (perennialen), prasaisonalen und kombiniert pra-/kosaisonalen Therapieschemata als Standard-, Cluster-, Rush- und Boostertherapieverfahren angewendet werden. Die SCIT ist vor allem gut etabliert fur haufig vorkommende Inhalationsallergene wie Pollen aus der Familie der Susgraser, Betula sp. (Birke, Erle, Hasel), Dermatophagoides sp. (Arten der Gattung Hausstaubmilbe) und fur Insektengifte (Bienen- und Wespengift). Jedoch existieren auch fur einige andere Therapieallergene gute Daten: zum Beispiel Krauterpollen („Ragweed“, Beifus etc.), Schimmelpilze (u. a. Alternaria, Cladosporium etc.), Vorratsmilben und Tierepithelien (u. a. Katze). Klinische Untersuchungen in weiteren Indikationen wie dem oralen Allergiesyndrom und der atopischen Dermatitis werden durchgefuhrt. SCIT-Praparate sind bei sachgerechter Applikation durch allergologisch erfahrene Arzte sicher sowie gut vertraglich anwendbar und hinsichtlich vielfaltiger Indikationen gut dokumentiert.

As the international refugee crisis has reached new proportions,1 survivors of torture increasingly present to treating physicians with an array of acute or chronic skin lesions. Physicians should be aware of common presentations and likely differential diagnoses in order to avoid mislabeling or underrecognizing torture. Survivors of torture also frequently suffer from psychological sequelae, such as post- traumatic stress disorder, and appropriate referrals are essential in order to improve recovery trajectory. Skin sequelae are the most common physical findings of torture. Not all skin lesions seen in tortured survivors are due to perpetrator inflicted injuries, and many dermatological conditions can mimic lesions typical of torture, as can scars as a result of folk remedies or cultural practices specific to geographical regions. Medical documentation of torture includes injury and lesion description. While forensic dermatology and other forensic specialties use an injury description taxonomy, and the standard dermatologic taxonomy uses an anatomic description, they are complementary sciences for lesions inflicted by torture. This results in an opportunity for learning across disciplines in order to improve evidence documentation for survivors of torture. This article describes features of common skin lesions consistent with torture, including their clinical appearances, differential diagnoses, patterns of injury and appropriate clinical descriptions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Purpose: Allergic reactions to Hymenoptera venoms represent potentially life-threatening conditions. However, studies on their prevalence in Germany and their relation to specific IgE sensitization are rare. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Hymenoptera venom allergy as well as the frequency of venom-specific IgE sensitization in a large population-based adult German cohort. Methods: Questionnaire data were collected from the participants of the German population-based KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg) S4 baseline study population (n = 4261) and the follow-up F4 study population (n = 3074), which was conducted seven years later. Moreover, sIgE antibodies to honeybee (HBV) and yellow jacket venom (HJV) as well as to common aeroallergens were measured in the S4 study population. Results: The prevalence of systemic sting reactions ranged between 2.3% and 2.6%. sIgE sensitization (≥0.35kUA/L) to HBV and YJV was demonstrated in 23.1% and 31.7% of the population, respectively (41.6% to HBV and/or YJV). Double-sensitization to both venoms occurred in 13.2% of the individuals. Approximately 53% and 77% of the individuals who reported shock symptoms after honeybee and yellow jacket stings, respectively, exhibited sIgE ≥ 0.35kUA/L to the culprit venom. In contrast, only 2.8% of the venom-sensitized individuals reported symptoms exceeding local reactions. Local reactions were reported by 4.4 to 4.8% of the population. Conclusions: Self-reported Hymenoptera sting reactions and venom sensitization are frequent in the general German population. In many cases, sensitization and clinically relevant allergy are not observed in the same individual, indicating that comprehensive diagnostic approaches are a prerequisite for the identification of patients at risk for severe reactions.

Angiotensins (ANG) I and II were measured in the plasma of patients with hymenoptera venom allergy and found to be significantly decreased as compared to controls. An inverse correlation between the plasma levels of ANG I and ANG II and the intensity of clinical symptoms of anaphylaxis was observed. In a separate study, ANG I and ANG II were measured in urine from healthy volunteers and from patients with anaphylactic reactions to drugs, food, and additives. An increase in both peptides was observed in patients with anaphylactic reactions during oral provocation. These findings suggest a possible involvement of ANG peptides in anaphylactic reactions.

The presence of IgE-bearing epidermal Langerhans cells (LC) has been reported not only in patients with atopic eczema (AE) but also in patients with various inflammatory dermatoses unrelated to atopic diathesis. We have shown very recently that normal LC express the high-affinity receptor for IgE (FceRI) which accounts for the binding of monomeric IgE on these cells. In the present study, we investigated the IgE-binding capacity of resident LC on cryosections from skin of normal individuals and from uninvolved and involved skin of patients with atopic eczema, psoriasis, lupus erythematosus and mycosis fungoides. When compared to LC from uninvolved or normal skin, an increased binding of IgE was observed in LC from lesional skin of all four diseases studied here. This binding could be blocked by anti-FceRI mAb. Furthermore, increased IgE binding capacity of LC correlated to an increased expression of FceRI on these cells. These results clearly demonstrate that the expression of FceRI on LC is increased in inflammatory skin areas. Since this phenomenon is observed in several unrelated diseases, it suggests the presence in these conditions of a similar microenvironment which up-regulates the FceRI expression on LC.

Whilst the importance of keratinocytes as a first-line defense has been widely investigated, little is known about their interactions with non-resident immune cells. In this study, the impact of human keratinocytes on T cell effector functions was analyzed in an antigen-specific in vitro model of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to nickel sulfate. Keratinocytes partially inhibited T cell proliferation and cytokine production. This effect was dependent on the keratinocyte/T cell ratio and was partially reversible by increasing the number of autologous dendritic cells. The inhibition of T cell proliferation by keratinocytes was independent of the T cell subtype and antigen presentation by different professional antigen-presenting cells. Autologous and heterologous keratinocytes showed comparable effects, while the fixation of keratinocytes with paraformaldehyde abrogated the immunosuppressive effect. The separation of keratinocytes and T cells by a transwell chamber, as well as a cell-free keratinocyte supernatant, inhibited T cell effector functions to the same amount as directly co-cultured keratinocytes, thus proving that soluble factor/s account for the observed suppressive effects. In conclusion, keratinocytes critically control the threshold of inflammatory processes in the skin by inhibiting T cell proliferation and cytokine production.

Background: Under natural exposure conditions, pollen grains function as allergen carriers that release allergens from internal binding sites on contact with the aqueous phase of mucosa membranes. In addition, we recently demonstrated that pollen are a rich source of eicosanoid-like mediators, which are rapidly released on contact with the aqueous phase. Objective : The current study was designed to characterize the biochemical nature of pollen-derived lipid mediators in more detail and to delineate their biologic activity on polymorphonuclear granulocytes (PMNs). Methods : Aqueous and lipid extracts from Phleum pratense L and Betula alba L pollen were analyzed by means of HPLC. PMNs were exposed to aqueous extracts or lipid fractions from pollen or to HPLC-purified lipid mediators identified in pollen extracts. Effects on PMNs were tested with transwell migration, calcium mobilization, and surface expression of CD11b. Results : Aqueous pollen extracts (APEs) contained predominantly monohydroxylated products derived of linoleic acid and linolenic acid. In chemotaxis assays PMNs displayed significant migration to APEs. Lipid extracts from pollen and the HPLC fraction containing 13-hydroxy-octadecadienoic acid/hydroxy-linoleic acid and 13-hydroxy-octadecatrienoic acid/hydroxy-linolenic acid induced migratory responses, although to a lesser degree than the APEs. In addition, APE, as well as lipid, extracts induced PMN activation, as documented by means of calcium mobilization and upregulation of CD11b. Conclusion : Pollen grains release mediators that recruit and activate PMNs in vitro. Similar mechanisms may be effective in vivo, suggesting that pollen-derived lipid mediators may act as adjuvants in the elicitation phase of allergic reactions. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109:831-8.)

Over the last century, eosinophils have been regarded ambiguously either as 'friends' or 'foes'. Recent developments have greatly enhanced our understanding of the role and function of eosinophils in health and disease. Pathogenic eosinophilic inflammation can lead to severe diseases in various organs, such as the gastrointestinal tract, airways, heart and skin. In a 2-day focus workshop of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the state of the art was discussed and practical recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic diseases, with a particular focus on new biologics, such as anti-interleukin 5 and anti-interleukin 5R, were derived.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an itchy, non-contagious relapsing and chronic inflammatory skin disease that usually develops in early childhood. This pathology is associated with food allergy, allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis and anaphylaxis which may persist in adulthood. The underlying mechanisms of AD (endotypes) are just beginning to be discovered and show a complex interaction of various pathways including skin barrier function and immune deviation. Immune reactions to self-proteins (autoantigens) of the skin have been identified in patients with inflammatory skin diseases, such as chronic spontaneous urticaria, connective tissue disease, pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid. IgE antibodies and T cells directed against epitopes of the skin were observed in adult patients with severe and chronic AD as well. This was associated with disease severity and suggests a progression from allergic inflammation to severe autoimmune processes against the skin. IgE-mediated autoimmunity and self-reactive T cells might accelerate the ongoing skin inflammation or might contribute to the relapsing course of the disease. However, to date, the exact mechanisms of IgE-mediated autoimmunity and self-reactive T cells in the pathophysiology of AD are still unclear. The aim of this review is to evaluate the development of (autoreactive) T cells and their response to (auto)antigens, as well as the role of the peripheral tolerance in autoimmunity in the pathophysiology of AD, including the unmet needs and gaps.

Peanuts are Leguminosae, commonly known as the legume or pea family, and peanut allergy is among the most common food allergies and the most common cause of fatal food reactions and anaphylaxis.The prevalence of peanut allergy increased 3.5-fold over the past two decades reaching 1.4–2% in Europe and the United States. The reasons for this increase in prevalence are likely multifaceted. Sensitization via the skin appears to be associated with the development of peanut allergy and atopic eczema in infancy is associated with a high risk of developing peanut allergy.Until recently, the only possible management strategy for peanut allergy was strict allergen avoidance and emergency treatment including adrenaline auto-injector in cases of accidental exposure and reaction.This paper discusses the various factors that impact the risks of peanut allergy and the burden of self-management on peanut-allergic children and their caregivers.

Allergy has shown a dramatic increase in prevalence in the last decades. However, allergic diseases are probably not new. Asthma and eczema have been described in ancient societies like Egypt, China and in the Greco-Roman culture. In the middle-ages descriptions of hay fever can be found in Persian-Arabian literature (called "rose fever"). Scientific allergology started in the nineteenth century with descriptions of hay fever and experimental studies showing pollen as elicitors. Milestones in the twentieth century comprise the description of anaphylaxis, the creation of the terms "allergy" and "atopy", the Prausnitz-Kustner test and finally the discovery of IgE and the development of the Radio-Allergo-Sorbent-Test (RAST) for routine detection of specific IgE antibodies. Progress in cellular immunology led to the description of T-cell subsets Th1 and Th2. Mast cell and basophil research progressed since the first description to histamine release studies. Leukotrienes were detected. Pharmacotherapy started in the early twentieth century with adrenaline (epinephrine) followed by antihistamines and cortisone. Allergen-specific immunotherapy was introduced. Epidemiologic studies pointed to a role of environmental pollutants as allergy enhancing factors and protective influences from farm environment. Through the progress in experimental allergology and immunology targeted therapeutics have been developed for various atopic conditions.

Wie führt man die SARS-CoV-2-Impfungen mit möglichst minimalem Risiko für allergische Reaktionen durch? Tatsächlich können die aktuellen mRNA-Impfstofe selbst bei Allergikern meist ohne Weiteres verabreicht werden. Der folgende Beitrag legt dar, wann ein erhöhtes Risiko für schwere Anaphylaxien besteht und gibt praktische Tipps für die sichere Durchführung der Impfung.

Summary Background For the preventive treatment of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) an unprecedented global research effort studied the safety and efficacy of new vaccine platforms that have not been previously used in humans. Less than one year after the discovery of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral sequence, these vaccines were approved for use in the European Union (EU) as well as in numerous other countries and mass vaccination efforts began. The so far in the EU approved mRNA vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 are based on similar lipid-based nanoparticle carrier technologies; however, the lipid components differ. Severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination are very rare adverse events but have drawn attention due to potentially lethal outcomes and have triggered a high degree of uncertainty. Methods Current knowledge on anaphylactic reactions to vaccines and specifically the new mRNA COVID-19 vaccines was compiled using a literature search in Medline, PubMed, as well as the national and international study and guideline registries, the Cochrane Library, and the Internet, with special reference to official websites of the World Health Organization (WHO), US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Robert Koch Institute (RKI), and Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI). Results Based on the international literature and previous experience, recommendations for prophylaxis, diagnosis and therapy of these allergic reactions are given by a panel of experts. Conclusion Allergy testing is not necessary for the vast majority of allergic patients prior to COVID-19 vaccination with currently licensed vaccines. In case of allergic/anaphylactic reactions after vaccination, allergy workup is recommended, as it is for a small potential risk population prior to the first vaccination. Evaluation and approval of diagnostic tests should be done for this purpose.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine BNT162b2 received approval and within the first few days of public vaccination several severe anaphylaxis cases occurred. An investigation is taking place to understand the cases and their triggers. The vaccine will be administered to a large number of individuals worldwide and concerns raised for severe adverse events might occur. With the current information, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) states its position for the following preliminary recommendations that are to be revised as soon as more data emerges. To minimize the risk of severe allergic reactions in vaccinated individuals, it is urgently required to understand the specific nature of the reported severe allergic reactions, including the background medical history of the individuals affected and the mechanisms involved. To achieve this goal all clinical and laboratory information should be collected and reported. Mild and moderate allergic patients should not be excluded from the vaccine as the exclusion of all these patients from vaccination may have a significant impact on reaching the goal of population immunity. Health care practitioners vaccinating against COVID-19 are required to be sufficiently prepared to recognise and treat anaphylaxis properly with the ability to administer adrenaline. A mandatory observation period after vaccine administration of at least 15 minutes for all individuals should be followed. The current guidelines, which exclude patients with severe allergies from vaccination with BNT162b2, should be re-evaluated after more information and experience with the new vaccine develops.

Figurate erythemas (FE) represent an etiopathophysiologically heterogeneous group of diseases defined by their characteristic annular erythematous skin lesions. Diagnosis is made primarily by clinical examination together with histological findings; often it is a diagnosis made by exclusion. While some authors discuss FE as clinical reaction pattern rather than distinct clinical entities, others identify four classic FE: erythema annulare centrifugum, erythema gyratum repens, erythema migrans and erythema marginatum. The differential diagnoses of FE are numerous and often challenging. We therefore present a potential diagnostic algorithm for FE that discriminates the differentials according to their temporal evolution and the clinical/histological phenotype of the various subtypes. Since some FE may present with an underlying malignancy, diligent clinicians are needed when dealing with those entities.

The pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis (AD) is highly complex and understanding of disease endotypes may improve disease management. Immunoglobulins E (IgE) against human skin epitopes (IgE autoantibodies) are thought to play a role in disease progression and prolongation. These antibodies have been described in patients with severe and chronic AD, suggesting a progression from allergic inflammation to severe autoimmune processes against the skin. This review provides a summary of the current knowledge and gaps on IgE autoreactivity and self-reactive T cells in children and adults with AD based on a systematic search. Currently, the clinical relevance and the pathomechanism of IgE autoantibodies in AD needs to be further investigated. Additionally, it is unknown whether the presence of IgE autoantibodies in patients with AD is an epiphenomenon or a disease endotype. However, increased knowledge on the clinical relevance and the pathophysiologic role of IgE autoantibodies and self-reactive T cells in AD can have consequences for diagnosis and treatment. Responses to the current available treatments can be used for better understanding of the pathways and may shed new lights on the treatment options for patients with AD and autoreactivity against skin epitopes. To conclude, IgE autoantibodies and self-reactive T cells can contribute to the pathophysiology of AD based on the body of evidence in literature. However, many questions remain open. Future studies on autoreactivity in AD should especially focus on the clinical relevance, the contribution to the disease progression and chronicity on cellular level, the onset and therapeutic strategies.

International audience; Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly pruritic, chronic inflammatory skin disease. The diagnosis is made using evaluated clinical criteria. Disease activity and burden are best measured with a composite score, assessing both objective and subjective symptoms, such as SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD). AD management must take into account clinical and pathogenic variabilities, the patient's age and also target flare prevention. Basic therapy includes hydrating and barrier-stabilizing topical treatment universally applied, as well as avoiding specific and unspecific provocation factors. Visible skin lesions are treated with anti-inflammatory topical agents such as corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus), which are preferred in sensitive locations. Topical tacrolimus and some mid-potency corticosteroids are proven agents for proactive therapy, which is defined as the long-term intermittent anti-inflammatory therapy of frequently relapsing skin areas. Systemic anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive treatment is a rapidly changing field requiring monitoring. Oral corticosteroids have a largely unfavourable benefit-risk ratio. The IL-4R-blocker dupilu-mab is a safe, effective and licensed, but expensive, treatment option with potential ocular side-effects. Other biologicals targeting key pathways in the atopic immune response, as well as different Janus kinase inhibitors, are among emerging treatment options. Dysbalanced microbial colonization and infection may induce disease exacerbation and can justify additional antimicrobial treatment. Systemic antihistamines (H1R-blockers) only have limited effects on AD-related itch and eczema lesions. Adjuvant therapy includes UV irradiation, preferably narrowband UVB or UVA1. Coal tar may be useful for atopic hand and foot eczema. Dietary recommendations should be patient-specific, and elimination diets should only be advised in case of proven food allergy. Allergen-specific immunotherapy to aeroallergens may be useful in selected cases. Psychosomatic counselling is recommended to address stress-induced exacerbations. Efficacy-proven 'Eczema school' educational programmes and therapeutic patient education are recommended for both children and adults.