Search

The influence of BRCA1/2 variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) on the cancer risk and their association with the response to treatment is uncertain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of BRCA VUS in patients with breast cancer. A total of two cases of breast cancer patients with the BRCA VUS were described. The complete coding sequence of BRCA1/2 genes was analyzed from the genomic DNA material by next generation sequencing on the Ion Torrent platform. The presence of c.3454G>A (p.Asp1152Asn) VUS in the BRCA1 gene was reported in a 64-year-old woman with invasive breast carcinoma. The characteristics of the breast tumors were the following: moderately differentiated-intermediate grade (NG-2 G-2), HER2 (+), estrogen receptor (ER) (+++), progesterone receptor (PR) (+++), luminal A subtype and pT2 N1a Mx. The second detected VUS was the c.2374T>C (p.Tyr792His) variant in the BRCA2 gene. This variant was reported in a 33-year-old woman who was diagnosed with right breast cancer (cT2N1M0). The invasive breast carcinoma was characterized as follows: NG-2 G-2, ER (+++), PR (+++), Ki-67 10%, HER2 (+++) and luminal B subtype. The data demonstrated that patients with VUSs should be managed based on their family history of cancer and clinicopathological characteristics. The clinical significance of the VUS in BRCA1/2 may change over time and reclassification of the variant to ‘pathogenic’ or ‘benign’ should be undertaken. Patients with VUS should be followed up regularly.

Objective: The suppressor gene CHEK2 encodes a cell cycle checkpoint kinase, involved in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis and response to DNA damage. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences between CHEK2 mutation carriers (CHEK2*1100delC/I157T) and noncarriers with respect to clinicopathological factors. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 100 early breast cancer patients (46 mutation carriers and 54 noncarriers) who were treated with chemotherapy, hormonotherapy or trastuzumab. Results:CHEK2 mutation carriers were older (>65 years) than noncarriers (17 vs. 7%; p = 0.215). Twenty-five (54%) of them had a history of cancer in the family. Gastric cancer in the family history was detected in 11% of mutation carriers and in 2% of noncarriers (p = 0.092). There was a trend for more frequent lymph node metastases in patients without the mutation in comparison to mutation carriers (46 vs. 28%; p = 0.098). Luminal B type breast cancer was detected more often in carriers (39 vs. 20%; p = 0.048). Breast-conserving treatment was also conducted more often in mutation carriers (57 vs. 31%; p = 0.015). Histologic grades G1/G2 were detected more frequently in mutation carriers (82 vs. 70%; p = 0.212). Conclusion: Mutation carriers were characterized by older age, a history of gastric cancer in the family, locally advanced disease, lower histologic grade and luminal B type breast cancer.

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play a significant role in at least two key processes underlying neoplastic progression: angiogenesis and immune surveillance. TAMs phenotypic changes play important role in tumor vessel abnormalization/ normalization. M2-like TAMs stimulate immunosuppression and formation of defective tumor blood vessels leading to tumor progression. In contrast M1-like TAMs trigger immune response and normalize irregular tumor vascular network which should sensitize cancer cells to chemo- and radiotherapy and lead to tumor growth regression. Here, we demonstrated that combination of endoglin-based DNA vaccine with interleukin 12 repolarizes TAMs from tumor growth-promoting M2-like phenotype to tumor growth-inhibiting M1-like phenotype. Combined therapy enhances tumor infiltration by CD4+, CD8+ lymphocytes and NK cells. Depletion of TAMs as well as CD8+ lymphocytes and NK cells, but not CD4+ lymphocytes, reduces the effect of combined therapy. Furthermore, combined therapy improves tumor vessel maturation, perfusion and reduces hypoxia. It caused that suboptimal doses of doxorubicin reduced the growth of tumors in mice treated with combined therapy. To summarize, combination of antiangiogenic drug and immunostimulatory agent repolarizes TAMs phenotype from M2-like (pro-tumor) into M1-like (anti-tumor) which affects the structure of tumor blood vessels, improves the effect of chemotherapy and leads to tumor growth regression.