1. Shortening surgical training through robotics: randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus robotic surgical learning curves
- Author
-
N Soomro, Long R. Jiao, T M H Gall, W Alrawashdeh, and Steven A. White
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Robotics ,General Medicine ,Surgical training ,Standard technique ,law.invention ,Simulation training ,Surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,Randomized Clinical Trials ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Learning curve ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Randomized Clinical Trial ,Medicine ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Artificial intelligence ,General ,business ,Laparoscopy ,Cadaveric spasm - Abstract
Background Minimally invasive surgery is the standard technique for many operations. Laparoscopic training has a long learning curve. Robotic solutions may shorten the training pathway. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic with robotic training in surgical trainees and medical students. Methods Surgical trainees (ST group) were randomized to receive 6 h of robotic or laparoscopic simulation training. They then performed three surgical tasks in cadaveric specimens. Medical students (MS group) had 2 h of robotic or laparoscopic simulation training followed by one surgical task. The Global Rating Scale (GRS) score (maximum 30), number of suture errors, and time to complete each procedure were recorded. Results The median GRS score for the ST group was better for each procedure after robotic training compared with laparoscopic training (total GRS score: 27·00 (i.q.r. 22·25–28·33) versus 18·00 (16·50–19·04) respectively, P, Medical students and surgical trainees were randomized to robotic or laparoscopic simulator training followed by cadaveric surgical tasks. The robotic groups had a shorter learning curve with better task performance. Another advantage for robotic surgery
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF