1. Predictors and outcomes of patients switching from maintenance haemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis in Australia and New Zealand: Strengthening the argument for ‘peritoneal dialysis first’ policy
- Author
-
Mukunda Prasad Kafle, Kamal Sud, Anh N. L. Nguyen, and Vincent W. Lee
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030232 urology & nephrology ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Group A ,Group B ,Peritoneal dialysis ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Renal Dialysis ,Internal medicine ,Diabetes mellitus ,medicine ,Humans ,Policy Making ,Dialysis ,Aged ,business.industry ,Vascular disease ,Maintenance haemodialysis ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Australia ,Patient Preference ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Treatment Outcome ,Nephrology ,Female ,Kidney Diseases ,business ,Peritoneal Dialysis ,New Zealand - Abstract
AIMS (1) To determine incidence and reasons for transfer from maintenance haemodialysis (HD) to peritoneal dialysis (PD); (2) To compare mortality of HD patients transferred to PD with those who initiated and remained on PD. METHODS A 1:2 matched cohort of ANZDATA included patients dialyzing over 3 months dividing into 2 groups. Group A (HD to PD) was compared to group B (initiated and remained on PD) and matched PD group (Group C). We compared mortality by total time on dialysis regardless of modality. RESULTS Of 20 882 patients, there were 911 in group A. The transfer rate from HD to PD was 5%, 6.7% and 7.4% at 1,4 and 8 years, respectively. Median time before switching of patients in Group A was 5.9 (4.0-10.9) months. The commonest reported reason for transfer was patient preference (63.8%). Mortality was significantly worse in Group A if dialysis vintage was ≤6 months and from 12-24 months (P
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF