1. Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacodynamics of Tremelimumab Plus Durvalumab for Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Randomized Expansion of a Phase I/II Study
- Author
-
Philip He, Robin Kate Kelley, Ho Yeong Lim, Takuji Okusaka, Thomas Yau, David Wai-Meng Tai, Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, Masafumi Ikeda, Bruno Sangro, Yoon-Koo Kang, Silvia Damian, Johanna C. Bendell, Mitesh J. Borad, William P. Harris, Tae-You Kim, Shukui Qin, Alejandra Negro, Mallory Makowsky, Nathan Standifer, Masatoshi Kudo, Ann-Lii Cheng, Jordi Bruix, Antonio Gasbarrini, and Wei Peng Yong
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,Durvalumab ,0302 clinical medicine ,Monoclonal ,80 and over ,Humanized ,6.2 Cellular and gene therapies ,Cancer ,Aged, 80 and over ,Liver Disease ,Liver Neoplasms ,Middle Aged ,6.1 Pharmaceuticals ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Hepatocellular carcinoma ,HIV/AIDS ,Female ,Patient Safety ,Biotechnology ,medicine.drug ,Liver Cancer ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ,medicine.drug_class ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Clinical Sciences ,Oncology and Carcinogenesis ,Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ,Monoclonal antibody ,Antibodies ,03 medical and health sciences ,Rare Diseases ,Clinical Research ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Oncology & Carcinogenesis ,Aged ,business.industry ,Carcinoma ,Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions ,Hepatocellular ,medicine.disease ,Orphan Drug ,030104 developmental biology ,Phase i ii ,Pharmacodynamics ,Digestive Diseases ,business ,Tremelimumab - Abstract
PURPOSE This phase I/II study evaluated tremelimumab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 monoclonal antibody) and durvalumab (antiprogrammed death ligand-1 monoclonal antibody) as monotherapies and in combination for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including a novel regimen featuring a single, priming dose of tremelimumab (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02519348 ). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with HCC who had progressed on, were intolerant to, or refused sorafenib were randomly assigned to receive T300 + D (tremelimumab 300 mg plus durvalumab 1,500 mg [one dose each during the first cycle] followed by durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks), durvalumab monotherapy (1,500 mg once every 4 weeks), tremelimumab monotherapy (750 mg once every 4 weeks [seven doses] and then once every 12 weeks), or T75 + D (tremelimumab 75 mg once every 4 weeks plus durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks [four doses] followed by durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks). Safety was the primary end point. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 and overall survival; exploratory end points included circulating lymphocyte profiles. RESULTS A total of 332 patients were enrolled (T300 + D, n = 75; durvalumab, n = 104; tremelimumab, n = 69; and T75 + D, n = 84). Tolerability was acceptable across arms, with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurring in 37.8%, 20.8%, 43.5%, and 24.4%, respectively. Confirmed ORRs (95% CI) were 24.0% (14.9 to 35.3), 10.6% (5.4 to 18.1), 7.2% (2.4 to 16.1), and 9.5% (4.2 to 17.9), respectively. An early expansion of CD8+ lymphocytes was associated with response across arms, with highest proliferating CD8+ lymphocyte levels occurring in the T300 + D arm. The median (95% CI) overall survival was 18.7 (10.8 to 27.3), 13.6 (8.7 to 17.6), 15.1 (11.3 to 20.5), and 11.3 (8.4 to 15.0) months in the T300 + D, durvalumab, tremelimumab, and T75 + D arms, respectively. CONCLUSION All regimens were found to be tolerable and clinically active; however, the T300 + D regimen demonstrated the most encouraging benefit-risk profile. The unique pharmacodynamic activity and association with ORR of the T300 + D regimen further support its continued evaluation in HCC.
- Published
- 2021