Search

INTRODUÇÃO: O teste de supressão com 1 mg de dexametasona (TSDx) é amplamente empregado no rastreamento da síndrome de Cushing (SC) dada sua elevada acurácia diagnóstica. A SC é um distúrbio endocrinometabólico resultante do hipercortisolismo crônico com característica de ausência de supressão do cortisol no TSDx. OBJETIVO: Desenvolver um radioimunoensaio (RIE) para a dosagem de dexametasona (Dx) no soro para complementar o TSDx. MÉTODOS: Foram imunizados três coelhos com o conjugado dexametasona-21-hemissuccinato-BSA para escolha do melhor anticorpo e o RIE foi desenvolvido de acordo com as recomendações da RE 899/2003 da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). Analisamos 96 voluntários, sendo 67 submetidos ao TSDx e 29 não, e 12 pacientes com SC, estudados na Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) e na Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo. RESULTADOS: O anticorpo contra Dx selecionado mostrou boa especificidade, coeficiente de variação (CV%) intra e interensaio < 20%, exatidão de 93,8% e dose mínima detectada de 19,5 ng/dl. A concentração de Dx no soro foi semelhante nos voluntários e pacientes com SC (ausência/supressão do cortisol): 205 a 703 ng/dl e 174 a 661 ng/dl (intervalo de confiança [IC] 95%), respectivamente; os valores foram indetectáveis naqueles que não se submeteram ao teste. DISCUSSÃO: O anticorpo empregado apresenta boa afinidade e especificidade para quantificar a Dx no soro. O RIE mostrou reprodutibilidade e eficiência na determinação dos níveis séricos de Dx durante o TSDx. CONCLUSÃO: O presente RIE para a dosagem de Dx no soro é acurado e confiável, permitindo estabelecer uma faixa de referência de valores para subsidiar a interpretação do TSDx. INTRODUCTION: The 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DxST) is widely used to screen Cushing's syndrome (CS) due to its high diagnostic accuracy. CS is an endocrine-metabolic disorder caused by hypercorticism, which is characterized by the absence of cortisol suppression in DxST. OBJECTIVE: To develop a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for the measurement of serum dexamethasone (Dx) to complement DxST. METHODS: Three rabbits were inoculated with dexamethasone-21-hemisuccinate-BSA in order to choose the best antibody. Serum Dx RIA was performed according to RE 899/2003 (Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária [ANVISA]) regulations. Serum samples from 96 volunteers from Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) and Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo were analyzed, 67 of which were submitted to DxST and 29 were not. There were 12 patients with CS. RESULTS: The Dx antibody chosen showed good specificity. Intra- and interassay CV were < 20% with 93.8% accuracy and the lowest detection limit was 19.5 ng/dl. Serum Dx concentration was similar among both volunteers and CS patients (absence of cortisol suppression): 205 to 703 ng/dl and 174 to 661 ng/dl (95% CI), respectively. Values were undetectable among those that were not submitted to the test. Discussion: The anti-Dx antibody shows high specificity and reliability to quantify serum Dx in DxST. The Dx RIA presented reproducibility and reliability in the determination of serum Dx levels during DxST. CONCLUSION: The current RIA for serum Dx is accurate and reliable, which permits to establish a reference value range to substantiate DxST interpretation.

Summary Background Congenital adrenal hyperplasia caused by classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD) is an autosomal recessive disorder with a high prevalence of asymptomatic heterozygote carriers (HTZ) in the general population, making case detection desirable by routine methodology. HTZ for classic and nonclassic (NC) forms have basal and ACTH-stimulated values of 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) that fail to discriminate them from the general population. 21-Deoxycortisol (21DF), an 11-hydroxylated derivative of 17OHP, is an alternative approach to identify 21OHD HTZ. Objective To determine the discriminating value of basal and ACTH-stimulated serum levels of 21DF in comparison with 17OHP in a population of HTZ for 21OHD (n = 60), as well as in NC patients (n = 16) and in genotypically normal control subjects (CS, n = 30), using fourth generation tandem mass spectrometry after HPLC separation (LC-MS/MS). Results Basal 21DF levels were not different between HTZ and CS, but stimulated values were increased in the former and virtually nonresponsive in CS. Only 17·7% of the ACTH-stimulated 21DF levels overlapped with CS, when compared to 46·8% for 17OHP. For 100% specificity, the sensitivities achieved for ACTH-stimulated 21DF, 17OHP and the quotient [(21DF + 17OHP)/F] were 82·3%, 53·2% and 87%, using cut-offs of 40, 300 ng/dl and 46 (unitless), respectively. Similar to 17OHP, ACTH-stimulated 21DF levels did not overlap between HTZ and NC patients. A positive and highly significant correlation (r = 0·846; P

Objective Salivary cortisol measurement plays an important role in the evaluation of adrenal function. Its high correlation with free serum cortisol, the easy of sampling and the limited presence of interfering steroids, generated multiple recent studies of its application, in special in the screening of adrenal hyperfunction. In this paper we present our experience in the development of a high pressure liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method for salivary cortisol and cortisone measurement. Materials and methods For this study we used 181 saliva samples from our routine diagnostic laboratory. The HPLC-MS/MS method was based on a Waters Quattro Premier tandem mass spectrometer with an electrospray probe. After derivatization with hydroxylamine transitions monitored included cortisol and cortisone. An in-house radioimmunoassay (RIA) was used for salivary cortisol results comparison. Results Functional sensitivity was 24 ng/dL for cortisol and linearity from 24 to 1929 ng/dL. Saliva cortisol values obtained in the 181 samples presented a median of 52 ng/dL with 5‐95% percentile of 24 and 374 ng/dL. With the RIA the results were 86, 25 and 436 ng/dL, respectively, with values for RIA being significantly higher (P

A dosagem de testosterona sérica, total ou fração livre, é metodologia de alto valor diagnóstico e encontra-se disponível na maioria dos laboratórios clínicos. Esta disponibilidade foi possível pelo desenvolvimento de metodologias simples e diretas, adaptáveis a plataformas de dosagem automatizada. Uma série de publicações recentes tem alertado quanto às limitações destas metodologias, em especial em amostras com baixas concentrações, como mulheres e crianças. Neste trabalho serão apresentados os resultados do emprego de uma metodologia de referência, fundamentada em cromatografia líquida de alta performance e espectrometria de massa em tandem (HPLC/MS-MS), e sua comparação com uma dosagem de rotina (ensaio eletroquimioluminescente - ECLIA). Os métodos são comparados tanto na dosagem de testosterona total (n = 213) quanto na determinação de testosterona livre calculada com base na determinação da testosterona total e da proteína carregadora de hormônios sexuais (SHBG) (n = 135). Os valores obtidos com o ECLIA são significativamente mais elevados, sendo a dispersão mais nítida em soros com baixas concentrações. Tal fenômeno fica mais claro quando apresentado na forma de gráficos de Bland-Altman. Neste trabalho são discutidas as dificuldades de implementação de uma metodologia de referência, como a apresentada, e a convivência com as metodologias de rotina, bem como a literatura recente sobre o assunto.

Quantitation of endogenous steroids is important in the diagnosis of several endocrine disorders. In this study we present a new method for simultaneous quantitation of cortisol, cortisone, 11-desoxycortisol, 21-desoxycortisol, corticosterone, 17-hydroxyprogesterone and 11-desoxycorticosterone in human serum by on-line extraction and LC-MS/MS. Analytes extraction was performed on-line using a 2-position and 6-port valve equipped with a monolithic silica cartridge. After chromatographic separation of all analytes, detection was performed in the multiple reaction monitoring mode using positive atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mode. Total imprecision of the assay ranged from 5.5 to 15.5%. Comparison with immunoassays yielded coefficients of 0.893 for cortisol, 0.848 for 11-desoxycortisol and 0.924 for 17-hydroxyprogesterone. The sensitivity of this method provides meaningful data for patients within normal and elevated range and it may be useful for the diagnosis of a variety of adrenal dysfunctions.