Search

Background Health systems across the world have implemented reforms that call for a reconsideration of the role of management in hospitals, which is increasingly seen as important for performance. These reorganisation efforts of the hospitals have challenged and supplemented traditional profession-based management with more complex systems of management inspired by the business sector. Whereas there is emerging evidence on how medical professionals in their role as leaders and managers adapt to the new institutional logics of the health care sector with increasing demands for efficiency and budgetary discipline, no previous studies have investigated whether leaders’ emphasis on clinical or financial priorities is related to how hospital physicians’ view their working situation. The purpose of this study was therefore to examine the relationship between leadership style and hospital physicians’ organisational climate. Methods We utilised data from a survey among 3000 Norwegian hospital physicians from 2016. The analysis used three additive indexes as dependent variables to reflect various aspects of the organisational climate: social climate, innovation climate and engagement at the workplace. The variables reflecting leadership style were based on an item in the survey asking the respondents to rate the leadership qualities of their proximate leaders (department chair) on 11 specific dimensions. We used factor analysis to identify two types of leadership styles: a traditional profession-based leadership style that emphasises the promotion of professional standards and quality in patient treatment, and a leadership style that reflects the emerging management philosophy with focus on economic administration and budgetary control. Controlling for demographic background, leader role, foreign medical exam and specialty, the empirical model was estimated via multivariate regression. Results The results documented a clear relationship between leadership style and organisational climate: a ‘professional-supportive’ leadership style is associated with better social climate, innovation climate and engagement at the workplace, while an ‘economic-operational’ leadership style is associated with a poorer social climate. Conclusions The cross-sectional study design makes it impossible to draw inferences about direction of causality and causal pathways. However, the positive relationship between professional-supportive leadership and organisational climate is a matter, which should be seriously considered regardless of direction of causality.

Lifestyle-induced diseases are becoming a burden on healthcare, actualizing the discussion on health responsibilities. Using data from the National Association for Heart and Lung Diseases (LHL)’s 2015 Health Survey (N = 2689), this study examined the public’s attitudes towards personal and social health responsibility in a Norwegian population. The questionnaires covered self-reported health and lifestyle, attitudes towards personal responsibility and the authorities’ responsibility for promoting health, resource-prioritisation and socio-demographic characteristics. Block-wise multiple linear regression assessed the association between attitudes towards health responsibilities and individual lifestyle, political orientation and health condition. We found a moderate support for social responsibility across political views. Respondents reporting unhealthier eating habits, smokers and physically inactive were less supportive of health promotion policies (including information, health incentives, prevention and regulations). The idea that individuals are responsible for taking care of their health was widely accepted as an abstract ideal. Yet, only a third of the respondents agreed with introducing higher co-payments for treatment of ‘self-inflicted’ conditions and levels of support were patterned by health-related behaviour and left-right political orientation. Our study suggests that a significant support for social responsibility does not exclude a strong support for personal health responsibility. However, conditional access to healthcare based on personal lifestyle is still controversial. © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Background Physician turnover is a concern in many health care systems globally. A better understanding of physicians’ reasons for leaving their job may inform organisational policies to retain key personnel. The aim of this study was to investigate hospital physicians’ intention to leave their current job, and to investigate if such intentions are associated with how physicians assess their leaders and the organisational context. Methods Data was derived from a survey of 971 physicians working in public hospitals in Norway in 2016. The data was analysed using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis. Results We found that 21.0% of all hospital physicians expressed an intention to leave their current job for another job. An additional 20.3% of physicians had not made up their mind whether to stay or leave. Physicians’ perceptions of their leaders and the organisational context influence their intention to leave their hospital. Respondents who perceived their leaders as professional-supportive had a significantly lower probability of reporting an intention to leave their job. The analysis suggests that organisational context, such as department mergers, weigh in on physicians’ considerations about leaving their current job. Social climate and commitment are important reasons why physician stay. Conclusions A professional-supportive leadership style may have a positive influence on retention of physicians in public hospitals. Further research should investigate how retention of physicians is associated with performance related to organisational and leadership style.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether increased uptake of private health insurance (PHI) in a traditionally NHS type system is likely to affect support for the public healthcare system. Using the Norwegian healthcare system as our case, and building on a survey among 7500 citizens, with 2688 respondents, we employed multivariate analysis to uncover whether the preferences for public health services are associated with having PHI, controlling for key predictors such as socio-economic background, self-rated health and perceived health service quality, as well as age and gender. The basis for our analysis was the following two propositions related to the role of public healthcare, which the respondents were asked to score on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "totally disagree", 5 = "totally agree"): 1) "the responsibility of providing health services should mainly be public", and 2) "the activity of private commercial actors should be limited". The regression analyses showed that the willingness to increase the role of commercial private actors is positively associated with having a PHI. However, we found no relationship between holding a PHI and support for public provision of health services when other factors were controlled for.

Research on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that includes geographic information is important in order to improve care and appropriate allocation of resources to patients suffering from COPD. The purpose of this study is to investigate the geography of COPD and factors associated with the spatial patterns of COPD prevalence. Particular emphasis is put on the role of the local socioeconomic environment. Utilising information from the Norwegian Prescription Database on all lung medication prescribed in 2009 we identified 62,882 persons with COPD in the Norwegian population. Patterns of spatial clustering in the prevalence of COPD are clearly evident, even when age and gender are controlled for. Gender and age are strongly related to COPD risk. Socio-economic characteristics of the community such as education and unemployment are also significantly correlated with COPD risk. People living in rural parts of the country are generally associated with less risk than people in urban settings, and in particular people living in communities with high levels of farm and fisheries employment.

Objectives: Prescribed medication consumption for chronic, non-malignant pain may not be beneficial. This study investigated how self-reported treatment outcomes among individuals in a musculoskeletal pain rehabilitation program are related to the prevalence and trends in the dispensing of prescribed medications.Methods: Patients with musculoskeletal pain were recruited as they began a rehabilitation program. Each participant completed a self-administrated questionnaire on pain, health status and socioeconomic factors in the beginning and at the end of the rehabilitation period. Each individual’s baseline data from the rehabilitation sample was linked to the national Norwegian Prescription Database [2004–2010]. Dispensing prescribed medications in the groups of centrally acting analgesics [opioids], anxiolytics and hypnotics were studied.Results: A total of 1562 individuals participated, and there was no loss to follow-up. Controlled medications [Schedule 2] were prescribed in 36.4% [n = 569] of t...

Aims: It has been shown that referral letters from GPs often are of poor quality, but research in this field is scarce, and few efforts have been made to investigate the factors that may help explain the variation in referral quality. Methods: Combining a survey among 1298 Norwegian hospital physicians (response rate: 52%) with information on the hospitals and the communities they are serving, this study investigates how they view the general quality of patient referrals received from GPs, and the extent to which insufficient information in referrals and inappropriate referrals is considered a problem for cooperation with GPs. Results: Only 15.6% of the hospital physicians perceived the quality of the referrals to be “usually good”, and both lack of information in referrals and inappropriate referrals are seen as important barriers to cooperation with GPs. Of the individual factors, former GP practice is associated with a positive view on referral quality, while regular meetings between hospital physicians and GPs seem to reduce the problems of inappropriate and incomplete referrals. Furthermore, both average number of patients on GPs’ lists and lack of free capacity in nursing and care institutions in the hospital catchment area was found to be negatively associated with perceived referral quality. Conclusions: There is a need to increase the knowledge on how contextual, institutional and professional factors affect coordination of care. The main contribution of this study lies in the attempt to address the macro and micro barriers of obtaining good referral care.

The way in which hospital physicians and general practitioners (GPs) interact has important implications for any health care system, particularly in systems relying on gatekeeping through the GPs for moderating access to hospital and specialist services. Several individual, organisational and contextual factors may serve as potential barriers or facilitators of the interaction between specialists and GPs. Using a survey among 1229 Norwegian hospital physicians the paper tests the role of physician and community factors for hospital physicians’ satisfaction with their interaction with GPs, while also controlling for relevant hospital characteristics. The results indicate that the hospital physicians are only moderately satisfied with their interaction with GPs, and that there is certainly room for improvement. The multivariate analysis shows that the more satisfied the GPs are with their interaction with the hospital, the more satisfied are also the hospital physicians with their corresponding interaction with the GPs. Furthermore, a high GP coverage in the municipalities in the hospital catchment area is associated with a higher satisfaction among the hospital physicians. The results also suggest that meeting GPs face-to-face in meetings is associated with a more positive evaluation of the interaction with GPs.

The reorganisation efforts of the hospital sector in many Western countries in recent decades have challenged the role, identity and autonomy of medical professionals. This has led to increased focus on the role and impact of physicians who are also managers and on the unique discourse being formed through the integration of medical and managerial knowledge. Following the line of studies addressing the professional subcultures in medicine, we investigated whether assessments of health reform differ between medical doctors with managerial responsibilities and their colleagues at the clinical level as well as between those involved in direct patient care and those who are not. The analysis was performed within the context of the Norwegian hospital sector, where a major reform was implemented in 2002, and it was based on a survey of a representative sample of hospital physicians in 2006. The analysis focused on how the respondents viewed the overall effect of the reform and on the reform's effect on three central health policy goals: equity, quality and productivity. Combining data from the survey with organisational and financial data from the hospitals, we employed multilevel techniques to control for a number of individual and hospital-specific factors that could explain the physicians' views. As expected, respondents with managerial responsibilities were more positive in their evaluations of the reform, whereas respondents who spent time on direct patient-related work showed the opposite pattern. Of the hospital-specific factors of interest, the share of department managers with medical backgrounds and the economic situation positively affected the evaluations. Our findings support the view that, rather than managerialist values colonising the medical profession through a process of hybridisation, there is heterogeneity within the profession: some physician managers are adopting management values and tools, whereas others remain alienated from them.

Cream skimming can be defined as the selective treatment of patients that demand few resources while providing high economic refunds. We test whether cream skimming occurs after the introduction of DRG-based activity-based financing (ABF) in Norway in 1997 and if the problem further increased after the 2002 organizational reform when hospitals were turned into trusts. The DRG-system offers the same economic reimbursement for patients classified within day-surgical DRGs irrespective of whether the patient receives same-day treatment or in-patient care over several days. This provides potential for cream skimming and allows us to investigate cream skimming within the actual diagnoses. Patient data from the period 1999-2005 is analyzed. Waiting times are used as indicators of patient selection and analyzed as a function of severity within each diagnosis, controlling for age and gender of the patient, as well as institutional and time-dependent variables. The analysis gives some evidence of cream skimming in the first period of ABF, in particular within the lighter orthopaedic diagnoses. However, cream skimming does not increase after the 2002 organizational reform but is stable, and for some DRGs even reduced. The study indicates that cream skimming may occur if reimbursement systems are not particularly sophisticated. Softening of budget constraints after the hospital reform of 2002 may explain why cream skimming does not increase after the reform. However, further investigation into this mechanism is needed.

Background: During the last five years the Norwegian hospital sector has experienced massive reorganization efforts. The aim of this study is to establish whether two such initiatives — the introduction of ring fencing of elective surgery and activity-based budgets at department level — have had any effects on one of the most profiled objectives on the health political agenda: reduction in waiting time. Methods: The sample studied includes 41 hospitals observed at two points of time, 1999 and 2001. Waiting time is expected to be a result of imbalance between demand and supply. Measures representing the supply side (ring fencing, activity-based budgets at departmental level, physician rate, share of emergency admissions, technical efficiency, and hospital type) and the demand side (living conditions and share of persons aged 67 or older) are included in the operationalized model. The model is estimated via stepwise OLS regression. Results: The results document a negative relationship between ring fencing and waiting time, with the estimated waiting time reduction amounting to 22 days. Both the demand side variables also exert significant effects on waiting time. Conclusion: Although information on ring fencing, living conditions, and age distribution renders possible some predictions concerning waiting time, the current research topic should be revisited when a longer time period has elapsed. When the organizational changes have become more thoroughly embedded in the hospitals, more refined conclusions regarding hospital organizations' behaviour and effects of reorganization can be drawn.

Day surgery has gained increasing significance in Norwegian health care during the 1990s, and now constitutes more than 50% of all elective surgery. Although the underlying general assumption is that this mode of delivering surgery will increase the efficiency of hospitals, most former studies have focused only on the cost-efficiency for specific types of surgical operations. The present study therefore uses data from Norwegian hospitals to test whether the proposition that day surgery spells efficiency also holds true at the hospital level. Hospital efficiency is measured as the technical efficiency of hospitals. This indicator captures how efficient hospitals are in utilising their total resources, and builds on a variety of hospital inputs (inpatient care, outpatient care) and hospital outputs (physician full-time equivalents (FTEs), other labour equivalents, medical expenses). Our empirical analysis is based on a simple decision model where the hospitals maximise utility functions of income, patients and effort under the constraint of the budget and various structural characteristics. The empirical model thus controls for several other important determinants of efficiency, such as hospital budget, the outpatient revenue share, irregularly long length of stay, hospital type and the share of emergency admissions. After accounting for these variables, our results document significant effects of day surgery on technical efficiency. The results furthermore show that the positive effect of day surgery is contingent upon hospital budget, as hospitals with large budgets experience stronger efficiency effects of day surgery.