1. Term pregnant patients have similar gastric volume to non-pregnant females: a single-centre cohort study
- Author
-
L. Vernieuwe, Anahi Perlas, and P. Van de Putte
- Subjects
Adult ,Percentile ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Ultrasonography, Prenatal ,Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18] ,Gastric Content ,Young Adult ,All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center ,Pregnancy ,Pyloric Antrum ,medicine ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,reproductive and urinary physiology ,Cesarean Section ,business.industry ,Obstetrics ,Stomach ,Retrospective cohort study ,Fasting ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Gastrointestinal Contents ,Confidence interval ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Pulmonary aspiration ,Gastric Emptying ,Case-Control Studies ,Cohort ,Female ,Human medicine ,business ,Cohort study - Abstract
Background: The physiological changes of pregnancy can increase the risk of peri-partum pulmonary aspiration. There is limited objective information regarding gastric volumes in pregnant patients. The aim of this cohort study was to characterise prospectively the range of gastric-fluid volume in term non-labouring pregnant patients compared with a historical cohort of non-pregnant females. Methods: Fasted non-labouring term pregnant patients scheduled for elective Caesarean delivery underwent a standardised gastric ultrasound examination. Gastric content was evaluated qualitatively (type of content), semiquantitatively (Perlas grades), and quantitatively (volume). The antral cross-sectional area and volume were compared with those of a retrospective cohort of non-pregnant females from the same institution. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the central tendency through mean and median values. Dispersion was evaluated with standard deviation and inter-quartile range, and the higher end of the distribution as 95th percentile. Results: Non-labouring pregnant (59) and non-pregnant (81) subjects were studied. The range of estimated total gastricfluid volume (P = 0.96) and volume per body weight (P = 0.78) was not significantly different between cohorts. An estimated volume of 115 ml (102-143) vs 136 ml (106-149) and volume per body weight of 1.4 ml kg(-1) (1.2-2.8) vs 2.0 ml kg(-1) (1.5-2.7) corresponded to the 95th percentile (95% confidence interval) values in the pregnant and non-pregnant cohort, respectively. Conclusions: Baseline gastric volume of non-labouring pregnant patients at term is not significantly different from that of non-pregnant females. This information will be helpful to interpreting findings of gastric point-of-care ultrasound in obstetric patients.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF