1. Improving Standardization of Paging Communication Using Quality Improvement Methodology
- Author
-
Rachel M. Weigert, Anna Schmitz, Michael Weisgerber, Kelsey Porada, and Paula Soung
- Subjects
Male ,Quality management ,Standardization ,media_common.quotation_subject ,03 medical and health sciences ,Patient safety ,0302 clinical medicine ,Wisconsin ,030225 pediatrics ,Outcome Assessment, Health Care ,Medicine ,Humans ,Quality (business) ,Operations management ,Communication source ,Child ,media_common ,Academic Medical Centers ,End user ,business.industry ,Infant ,Reference Standards ,Statistical process control ,Hospitals, Pediatric ,Quality Improvement ,Child, Preschool ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Paging ,Female ,Interdisciplinary Communication ,Hospital Communication Systems ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Paging is a primary mode of communication in hospitals, but message quality varies. With this project, we aimed to standardize paging, thus improving end user (EU) satisfaction, patient safety, and efficiency. Objectives were to increase the percent of pages containing 6 critical elements (CEs) (ie, the sender’s first and last name, a 7-digit callback number, patient name, room number, and urgency indicator [information only, call, or come] to 90%); improve EU satisfaction to 80% rating paging communication as good or excellent; and decrease the frequency of safety events related to paging. METHODS: This multidisciplinary, system-wide quality improvement study was conducted at our stand-alone academic children’s hospital. CEs were determined by EU consensus. Outcome measures were inclusion of all 6 CEs, provider satisfaction, and frequency of safety events. Process measures were inclusion of individual CEs and appropriateness and timeliness of response to pages. Balancing measures included number of work-arounds (WAs). Interventions included education, engineering a platform with required fields, and optimization enhancements. Statistical process control charts (p-charts; XmR) were used to track the impact of interventions. RESULTS: Special-cause improvement was noted in use of all 6 CEs (4.4%–79.7%) and individual CEs. EU satisfaction improved from 50% to 85% rating paging communication as good or excellent. Safety events related to paging remain infrequent. Specific WA use decreased by 60%. CONCLUSIONS: System-wide use of required fields produced significant improvement in inclusion of all 6 CEs and EU satisfaction. WAs were curbed by improving the ease of CE incorporation. Required fields should be considered at institutions seeking improved paging communication.
- Published
- 2019