1. Multitime point pepsin testing can double the rate of the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux
- Author
-
Taotao Ran, Jinrang Li, Xiaoyu Wang, Jinhong Zhang, Jiang Xingwang, Xiaohuan Cui, Lina Li, Qian Nie, Hui Song, Yingying Wu, Yanping Zhang, Ran Zhang, Runze Wu, and Bi Xinxin
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,saliva ,biology ,RD1-811 ,consistency ,laryngopharyngeal reflux ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Gastroenterology ,Laryngology, Speech and Language Science ,Laryngopharyngeal reflux ,Pepsin ,Otorhinolaryngology ,RF1-547 ,Consistency (statistics) ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,biology.protein ,Point (geometry) ,Surgery ,Mathematics ,Original Research ,pepsin - Abstract
Objective To study the value of multitime point salivary pepsin testing (MTPSPT) for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Study Design Prospective noncontrolled. Methods For patients who met the enrollment criteria, the reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS) were calculated and salivary pepsin testing was performed. The pepsin test was performed every hour from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. by collecting fresh saliva samples. A single positive test result was needed for the diagnosis of LPR. The consistency in the diagnosis of LPR between the two methods was compared with the weighted Cohen's kappa statistic. Results A total of 204 patients were included. The kappa value between the two methods was 0.566 (p = .00). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MTPSPT were 76.43%, 85.94%, 92.24%, and 62.5%, respectively. We also compared a single pepsin measure at 7 a.m. with the screening results based on the RSI and RFS, and found a much lower kappa agreement value (0.223, p = .00). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and false‐negative rate of pepsin testing at 7 a.m. (fasting) were 37.86%, 92.18%, 91.38%, 40.41%, and 58.57%, respectively. Conclusion The use of the result of a single salivary pepsin test in the morning yields a relatively higher rate of missed diagnosis of LPR, and multitime point testing through a day increased the accuracy and sensitivity of detection of LPR twofold compared to a single morning fasting sample. Level of Evidence 3
- Published
- 2021