Search

Background Intracranial hemorrhage is a known complication after endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion, but the association between radiologic hemorrhage severity and outcome is controversial. Purpose To investigate the prevalence and impact on outcome of intracranial hemorrhage and hemorrhage severity after endovascular stroke treatment. Materials and Methods The Efficacy and Safety of Nerinetide for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE-NA1) trial enrolled participants with acute large vessel occlusion stroke who underwent endovascular treatment from March 1, 2017, to August 12, 2019. Evidence of any intracranial hemorrhage, hemorrhage multiplicity, and radiologic severity, according to the Heidelberg classification (hemorrhagic infarction type 1 [HI1], hemorrhagic infarction type 2 [HI2], parenchymal hematoma type 1 [PH1], and parenchymal hematoma type 2 [PH2]) was assessed at CT or MRI 24 hours after endovascular treatment. Good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin score of 0-2 at 90 days, was compared between participants with intracranial hemorrhage and those without intracranial hemorrhage at follow-up imaging and between hemorrhage subtypes. Poisson regression was performed to obtain adjusted effect size estimates for the presence of any intracranial hemorrhage and hemorrhage subtypes at good functional outcome. Results Of 1097 evaluated participants (mean age, 69 years ± 14 [standard deviation]; 551 men), any degree of intracranial hemorrhage was observed in 372 (34%). Good outcomes were less often achieved among participants with hemorrhage than among those without hemorrhage at follow-up imaging (164 of 372 participants [44%] vs 500 of 720 [69%], respectively; P < .01). After adjusting for baseline variables and infarct volume, intracranial hemorrhage was not associated with decreased chances of good outcome (adjusted risk ratio [RR] = 0.91 [95% CI: 0.82, 1.02], P = .10), but there was a graded relationship of radiologic hemorrhage severity and outcomes, whereby PH1 (RR = 0.77 [95% CI: 0.61, 0.97], P = .03) and PH2 (RR = 0.41 [95% CI: 0.21, 0.81], P = .01) were associated with decreased chances of good outcome. Conclusion Any degree of intracranial hemorrhage after endovascular treatment was seen in one-third of participants. A graded association existed between radiologic hemorrhage severity and outcome. Hemorrhagic infarction was not associated with outcome, whereas parenchymal hematoma was strongly associated with poor outcome, independent of infarct volume. © RSNA, 2021 Clinical trial registration no. NCT01778335 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Introduction: Carotid web is a putative mechanism of cryptogenic ischemic stroke. We aimed to determine the prevalence of carotid web based on assigned stroke mechanism, and hypothesized that carotid webs would be found more frequently in younger cryptogenic stroke patients. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study using institutional registry data from consecutive patients with confirmed anterior circulation ischemic stroke between July 2015-September 2017. We reviewed all available computed tomography angiogram (CTA) studies of the neck, and excluded patients who did not have a high-quality CTA of the neck performed. Carotid web was defined as a thin shelf of non-calcified tissue protruding into the lumen of the internal carotid artery immediately distal to the bifurcation, best visualized on sagittal oblique imaging and evident as a small septum on axial imaging. Stroke subtype was adjudicated a priori using validated methods, and we compared relevant risk factors in patients with cryptogenic stroke with and without carotid web. Results: We identified 882 patients with anterior circulation stroke who had a CTA neck available for review (49.3% male, 30% cryptogenic). A total of 7 patients (0.8%) were found to have carotid webs, of which 4 were ipsilateral to a patient’s stroke; all patients with ipsilateral carotid webs were adjudicated to have cryptogenic stroke. Patients with carotid web were younger than other patients in our cohort (age 49.0±14.6 vs. 72.2±14.9 years, p=0.003), and none of them had a history of hypertension (0% vs. 72%, p=0.04). In patients with cryptogenic stroke, overall prevalence of carotid webs was 1.5%, but the prevalence was significantly higher in younger cryptogenic stroke patients (age Discussion: Carotid web may represent an under-recognized occult mechanism of cryptogenic stroke, particularly amongst younger patients.