Search

Aberrant activation of β‐catenin has been implicated in a variety of human diseases, including cancer. In spite of significant progress, the regulation of active Wnt/β‐catenin‐signaling pathways is still poorly understood. In this study, we show that F‐box protein 16 (FBXO16) is a putative tumor suppressor. It is a component of the SCF (SKP1‐Cullin1‐F‐box protein) complex, which targets the nuclear β‐catenin protein to facilitate proteasomal degradation through the 26S proteasome. FBXO16 interacts physically with the C‐terminal domain of β‐catenin and promotes its lysine 48‐linked polyubiquitination. In addition, it inhibits epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) by attenuating the level of β‐catenin. Therefore, depletion of FBXO16 leads to increased levels of β‐catenin, which then promotes cell invasion, tumor growth, and EMT of cancer cells. Furthermore, FBXO16 and β‐catenin share an inverse correlation of cellular expression in clinical breast cancer patient samples. In summary, we propose that FBXO16 functions as a putative tumor suppressor by forming an SCFFBXO16 complex that targets nuclear β‐catenin in a unique manner for ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation to prevent malignancy. This work suggests a novel therapeutic strategy against human cancers related to aberrant β‐catenin activation. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Asthma is a complex airway allergic disease involving the interplay of various cell types, cytokines, and transcriptional factors. Though many factors contribute to disease etiology, the molecular control of disease phenotype and responsiveness is not well understood. Here we report an essential role of the matrix attachment region (MAR)-binding protein SMAR1 in regulating immune response during allergic airway disease. Conditional knockout of SMAR1 in T cells rendered the mice resistant to eosinophilic airway inflammation against ovalbumin (OVA) allergen with low immunoglobulin E (IgE) and interleukin-5 (IL-5) levels. Moreover, a lower IgE/IgG2a ratio and higher interferon-γ (IFN-γ) response suggested aberrant skewing of T-cell differentiation toward type 1 helper T cell (Th1) response. We show that SMAR1 functions as a negative regulator of Th1 and Th17 differentiation by interacting with two potential and similar MAR regions present on the promoters of T-bet and IL-17. Thus, we present SMAR1 as a regulator of T-cell differentiation that favors the establishment of Th2 cells by modulating Th1 and Th17 responses.

Genetic lesions that activate KRAS account for ∼30% of the 1.6 million annual cases of lung cancer. Despite clinical need, KRAS is still undruggable using traditional small-molecule drugs/inhibitors. When oncogenic Kras is suppressed by RNA interference, tumors initially regress but eventually recur and proliferate despite suppression of Kras Here, we show that tumor cells can survive knockout of oncogenic Kras, indicating the existence of Kras-independent survival pathways. Thus, even if clinical KRAS inhibitors were available, resistance would remain an obstacle to treatment. Kras-independent cancer cells exhibit decreased colony formation in vitro but retain the ability to form tumors in mice. Comparing the transcriptomes of oncogenic Kras cells and Kras knockout cells, we identified 603 genes that were specifically up-regulated in Kras knockout cells, including the Fas gene, which encodes a cell surface death receptor involved in physiological regulation of apoptosis. Antibodies recognizing Fas receptor efficiently induced apoptosis of Kras knockout cells but not oncogenic Kras-expressing cells. Increased Fas expression in Kras knockout cells was attributed to decreased association of repressive epigenetic marks at the Fas promoter. Concordant with this observation, treating oncogenic Kras cells with histone deacetylase inhibitor and Fas-activating antibody efficiently induced apoptosis, thus bypassing the need to inhibit Kras. Our results suggest that activation of Fas could be exploited as an Achilles' heel in tumors initiated by oncogenic Kras.

Aberrant NF-kappaB activity promotes tumorigenesis. However, NF-kappaB also inhibits tumor growth where tumor suppressor pathways remain unaltered. Thus, its role in tumorigenesis depends upon the function of other cellular factors. Tumor suppressor SMAR1 down-modulated in high grade breast cancers is regulated by p53 and is reported to interact and stabilize p53. Because both SMAR1 and NF-kappaB are involved in tumorigenesis, we investigated the effect of SMAR1 upon NF-kappaB activity. We show that SMAR1 induction by doxorubicin or overexpression produces functional NF-kappaB complexes that are competent for binding to NF-kappaB consensus sequence. However, SMAR1 induced p65-p50 complex is phosphorylation- and transactivation-deficient. Induction of functional NF-kappaB complexes stems from down-regulation of IkappaBalpha transcription through direct binding of SMAR1 to the matrix attachment region site present in IkappaBalpha promoter and recruitment of corepressor complex. Real time PCR array for NF-kappaB target genes revealed that SMAR1 down-regulates a subset of NF-kappaB target genes that are involved in tumorigenesis. We also show that SMAR1 inhibits tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced induction of NF-kappaB suggesting that activation of NF-kappaB by SMAR1 is independent and different from classical pathway. Thus, for the first time we report that a tumor suppressor protein SMAR1 can modulate NF-kappaB transactivation and inhibit tumorigenesis by regulating NF-kappaB target genes.

Genetic lesions that activate KRAS account for ~30% of the 1.6 million annual cases of lung cancer. Despite clinical need, KRAS is still undruggable using traditional small molecule drugs/inhibitors. When oncogenic Kras is suppressed by RNA interference, tumors initially regress but eventually recur and proliferate despite suppression of Kras. Here we show that tumor cells can survive CRISPR-mediated knockout of oncogenic Kras, indicating the existence of Kras-independent survival pathways. Thus even if clinical KRAS inhibitors were available, resistance would remain an obstacle to treatment. Kras-independent cancer cells exhibit decreased colony formation in vitro but retain the ability to form tumors in mice. Comparing the transcriptomes of oncogenic Kras cells and Kras knockout cells, we identified 603 genes that were specifically upregulated in Kras knockout cells, including the Fas gene, which encodes a cell surface death receptor involved in physiological regulation of apoptosis. Antibodies recognizing Fas-receptor efficiently induced apoptosis of Kras knockout cells but not oncogenic Kras expressing cells. Increased Fas expression in Kras knockout cells was attributed to decreased association of repressive epigenetic marks at the Fas promoter. Concordant with this observation, treating oncogenic Kras cells with histone-deacetylase inhibitor and Fas-activating antibody efficiently induced apoptosis, thus bypassing the need to inhibit Kras. Our results suggest that activation of Fas could be exploited as an Achilles’ heel in tumors initiated by oncogenic Kras. Citation Format: Haiwei Mou, Jill Moore, Sunil Malonia, Yingxiang Li, Deniz Ozata, Soren Hough, Chunqing Song, Jordan Smith, Has Yin, Andrew Fisher, Daniel Anderson, Shipping Weng, Michael Green, Wen Xue. Genetic disruption of Kras sensitizes lung cancer cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1028. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1028

Changes in the composition of nuclear matrix associated proteins contribute to alterations in nuclear structure, one of the major phenotypes of malignant cancer cells. The malignancy-induced changes in this structure lead to alterations in chromatin folding, the fidelity of genome replication and gene expression programs. The nuclear matrix forms a scaffold upon which the chromatin is organized into periodic loop domains called matrix attachment regions (MAR) by binding to various MAR binding proteins (MARBPs). Aberrant expression of MARBPs modulates the chromatin organization and disrupt transcriptional network that leads to oncogenesis. Dysregulation of nuclear matrix associated MARBPs has been reported in different types of cancers. Some of these proteins have tumor specific expression and are therefore considered as promising diagnostic or prognostic markers in few cancers. SMAR1 (scaffold/matrix attachment region binding protein 1), is one such nuclear matrix associated protein whose expression is drastically reduced in higher grades of breast cancer. SMAR1 gene is located on human chromosome 16q24.3 locus, the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of which has been reported in several types of cancers. This review elaborates on the multiple roles of nuclear matrix associated protein SMAR1 in regulating various cellular target genes involved in cell growth, apoptosis and tumorigenesis.

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an important first-line antituberculosis drug because of its sterilizing activity against semidormant tubercle bacilli. In spite of its very high in vivo activity, its in vitro activity is not apparent unless an acidic environment is available, which makes PZA susceptibility testing difficult by conventional methods. The present study was, therefore, planned to assess the performance of the colorimetric BacT/ALERT 3D system and compare the results with those from conventional tests, i.e., the Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) proportion method (pH 4.85) and Wayne's pyrazinamidase (PZase) assay, using 107 clinical isolates. The concordance among all of these tests was 89.71% after the first round of testing and reached 92.52% after resolution of the discordant results by retesting. Prolonged incubation of the PZase tube for up to 10 days was found to increase the specificity of the PZase test. The concordances between LJ proportion and BacT/ALERT 3D, LJ proportion and the PZase assay, and BacT/ALERT 3D and the PZase assay were found to be 99.06%, 93.46%, and 92.52%, respectively. Using the LJ results as the gold standard, the sensitivities of BacT/ALERT 3D and the PZase assay were 100 and 82.85%, respectively, while the specificity was 98.61% for both of the tests. The difference between the sensitivities of BacT/ALERT 3D and the PZase assay was significant ( P = 0.025). The mean turnaround times for the detection of resistant and susceptible results by BacT/ALERT 3D were 8.04 and 11.32 days, respectively. While the major limitations associated with the PZase assay and the LJ proportion method are lower sensitivity in previously treated patients and a longer time requirement, respectively, the BacT/ALERT 3D system was found to be rapid, highly sensitive, and specific.