Search

Background Mounting evidence suggests that RAF-mediated MEK activation plays a crucial role in paradox MAPK (re)activation, leading to resistance and therapeutic failure with agents hitting a single step along the MAPK cascade. Methods We examined the molecular and functional effects of single and combined BRAF (dabrafenib), pan-RAF (RAF265), MEK (trametinib) and EGFR/HER2 (lapatinib) inhibition, using Western Blot and conservative isobologram analysis to assess functional synergism, and explored genetic determinants of synergistic interactions. Immunoprecipitation based assays were used to detect the interaction between BRAF and CRAF. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparing quantitative variables. Results Here we demonstrated that a combination of MEK and BRAF inhibitors overcomes paradoxical MAPK activation (induced by BRAF inhibitors) in BRAF-wt/RAS-mut NSCLC and PDAC in vitro. This results in growth inhibitory synergism, both in vitro and in vivo, in the majority (65%) of the cellular models analyzed, encompassing cell lines and patient-derived cancer stem cells and organoids. However, RAS mutational status is not the sole determinant of functional synergism between RAF and MEK inhibitors, as demonstrated in KRAS isogenic tumor cell line models. Moreover, in EGFR-driven contexts, paradoxical MAPK (re)activation in response to selective BRAF inhibition was dependent on EGFR family signaling and could be offset by simultaneous EGFR/HER-2 blockade. Conclusions Overall, our data indicate that RAF inhibition-induced paradoxical MAPK activation could be exploited for therapeutic purposes by simultaneously targeting both RAF and MEK (and potentially EGFR family members) in appropriate molecular contexts. KRAS mutation per se does not effectively predict therapeutic synergism and other biomarkers need to be developed to identify patients potentially deriving benefit from combined BRAF/MEK targeting. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13046-018-0820-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Combined MAPK/PI3K pathway inhibition represents an attractive, albeit toxic, therapeutic strategy in oncology. Since PTEN lies at the intersection of these two pathways, we investigated whether PTEN status determines the functional response to combined pathway inhibition. PTEN (gene, mRNA, and protein) status was extensively characterized in a panel of cancer cell lines and combined MEK/mTOR inhibition displayed highly synergistic pharmacologic interactions almost exclusively in PTEN-loss models. Genetic manipulation of PTEN status confirmed a mechanistic role for PTEN in determining the functional outcome of combined pathway blockade. Proteomic analysis showed greater phosphoproteomic profile modification(s) in response to combined MEK/mTOR inhibition in PTEN-loss contexts and identified JAK1/STAT3 activation as a potential mediator of synergistic interactions. Overall, our results show that PTEN-loss is a crucial determinant of synergistic interactions between MAPK and PI3K pathway inhibitors, potentially exploitable for the selection of cancer patients at the highest chance of benefit from combined therapeutic strategies.

Phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten (PTEN) is a non-redundant lipid phosphatase that restrains and fine tunes the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway. PTEN is involved in inherited syndromes, which predispose to different types of cancers and is among the most frequently inactivated tumor suppressor genes in sporadic cancers. Indeed, loss of PTEN function occurs in a wide spectrum of human cancers through a variety of mechanisms, including mutations, deletions, transcriptional silencing, or protein instability. PTEN prevents tumorigenesis through multiple mechanisms and regulates a plethora of cellular processes, including survival, proliferation, energy metabolism and cellular architecture. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that PTEN is able to exit, exist, and function outside the cell, allowing for inhibition of the PI3K pathway in neighboring cells in a paracrine fashion. Most recently, studies have shown that PTEN is also critical for stem cell maintenance and that PTEN loss can lead to the emergence and proliferation of cancer stem cell (CSC) clones. Depending on the cellular and tissue context of origin, PTEN deletion may result in increased self-renewal capacity or normal stem cell exhaustion and PTEN-deficient stem and progenitor cells have been reported in prostate, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic tissues before tumor formation; moreover, reversible or irreversible PTEN loss is frequently observed in CSC from a variety of solid and hematologic malignancies, where it may contribute to the functional phenotype of CSC. In this review, we will focus on the role of PTEN expression and function and downstream pathway activation in cancer stem cell biology and regulation of the tumorigenic potential; the emerging role of PTEN in mediating the crosstalk between the PI3K and MAPK pathways will also be discussed, together with prospects for the therapeutic targeting of tumors lacking PTEN expression.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtypes are driven by specific genetic aberrations. For reasons such as this, there is a call for treatment personalization. The ability to instigate NSCLC fragmentation poses new methodological problems, and new 'driver' molecular aberrations are being discovered at an unprecedented pace.This article describes the clinical development of epidermal growth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and crizotinib for EGFR-mutant and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged NSCLC. Further, the authors briefly describe the emerging molecular targets in NSCLC, in terms of both rationale for therapeutic targeting and strategies, for clinical development.Target identification and validation in NSCLC still requires considerable effort, as not all of the molecular alterations are clear 'drivers' nor can they be efficiently targeted with available drugs. However, 50% of the NSCLC cases are without clear-defined molecular aberrations. Clinical trial methodology will need to develop novel paradigms for targeted drug development, aiming at the validation of an ideal 'biology-to-trial' approach. Despite significant challenges, a truly 'personalized' approach to NSCLC therapy appears to be within our reach.

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key protein kinase controlling signal transduction from various growth factors and upstream proteins to the level of mRNA translation and ribosome biogenesis, with pivotal regulatory effects on cell cycle progression, cellular proliferation and growth, autophagy and angiogenesis. The mTOR pathway, and its upstream regulators in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT cascade, are altered in a variety of experimental and human malignancies.This has led to the prediction that mTOR inhibitors may be used as anticancer agents. With the recent approval of two mTOR-targeted drugs (temsirolimus and everolimus) for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and mantle cell lymphoma, this paradigm has been effectively translated into the clinical setting. In this review, we discuss mTOR biology and regulation, the mode of action of mTOR inhibitors as anti-cancer agents, and current clinical evidence supporting the use of rapamycin-like mTOR inhibitors in cancer treatment.

Preclinical evidence shows that hitting a single point along the RAF/MEK/ERK cascade disrupts intra-pathway negative feedback loop, may cause paradoxical pathway activation and may lead to functional resistance. Thus, the “vertical” combination of agents simultaneously inhibiting RAF and MEK has been proposed as a strategy to synergistically inhibit tumor growth and delay resistance. Experimental procedures: Molecular and functional effects of single and combined MEK (using trametinib, T), BRAF (using dabrafenib, D), and RAF (using the pan-RAF inhibitor, RAF265, R) inhibition were dissected by WB analysis and conservative isobologram analysis to assess functional synergism, using a fixed dose-ratio experimental design. Summary data: We examined the in vitro molecular and functional consequences of D and T, alone or in combination, in a panel of different human BRAFV600E melanoma cell lines; both drugs inhibited cell growth and inactivated the MAPK pathway, but little or no synergistic growth inhibition was observed with their combination (CI: 0.7 - 1.3x106). Conversely, combined D+T suppressed malignant growth with highly synergistic effects in KRAS-mutant lung (2/5 cell lines tested) and pancreatic (4/6 cell lines tested) cancer models (CI: 0.1 - 0.7), in which selective BRAF inhibition induced hyperphosphorylation of MEK, ERK, and p90RSK (paradox effect). At concentrations inhibiting both BRAF and CRAF, R did not induce paradox MAPK activation and did not result in growth inhibitory synergism when combined with T. To define the role of RAS gene status in determining sensitivity/resistance to single and combined RAF and MEK blockade, we analyzed two isogenic tumor cell line models: H1299 expressing individual codon 12 KRAS mutants and isogenic HCT116 clones differing for the presence of a homo or heterozygous G13D KRAS mutation. Conversely, in lung cancer models driven by either EGFR mutations (HCC827, H1650) or HER-2 overexpression (Calu-3), selective BRAF inhibition also induced a paradox MAPK activation, which could be blocked using a reversible EGFR/HER-2 inhibitor (Lapatinib); in this context, combination (D+T) resulted in a non-synergic growth inhibitory effects. Conclusions: Overall, our data indicate that, in appropriate cellular contexts, vertical RAF/MEK inhibition-based combination strategies exert highly synergistic antitumor effects across different cancer models. Citation Format: Anais Del Curatolo, Ursula Cesta Incani, Ludovica Ciuffreda, Italia Falcone, Senji Shirasawa, Massimo Broggini, Isabella Sperduti, Adriana Eramo, Ruggero De Maria, Francesco Cognetti, Michele Milella. A vertical combination strategy hitting multiple steps along the MAPK cascade: Molecular mechanisms of action and putative genetic determinants of synergism. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 803. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-803

e13572 Background: BRAF-selective kinase inhibitors have potent antitumor effects in mutant BRAF(V600E) tumors; however, in BRAF-wt cells, they paradoxically activate MEK/ERK. In addition, MEK blockade may induce compensatory signaling through both upstream pathway elements (RAF) and parallel pathways (PI3K/AKT/mTOR). Methods: We set out to define molecular and functional effects of single and combined BRAF (GSK2118436A, BRAF-I) and MEK (GSK1120212B, MEK-I) inhibition, using WB analysis to dissect signaling and a fixed dose-ratio experimental design to assess functional synergism by conservative isobologram analysis. Results: In A549 lung adenocarcinoma (KRAS G12S), BRAF-I (10 μM) induces hyperphosphorylation of CRAF, MEK, ERK, and p90RSK, while MEK-I (10 nM), alone or in combination with BRAF-I, potently offsets MAPK activation. Combined BRAF-I and MEK-I suppress malignant growth and survival at 72 h with highly synergistic effects in the A549 (lung, KRAS G12S), H1299 (lung, NRAS), HCT116 (colon, KRAS G13D), and MIAPACA (pancreatic, KRAS G12V) models, with combination indexes (CI), ranging from 1.37 to 0.12. Conversely, in other lung cancer models (H460, Calu-1, Calu-3) the combination of BRAF-I and MEK-I produced modestly additive to highly antagonistic antitumor effects. In BRAF-mutant melanoma and colon carcinoma models (M14 and HT29), there was no paradoxical activation of the MEK/ERK module in response to BRAF-I and both BRAF-I and MEK-I had pronounced growth inhibitory effects as single agents, but were frankly antagonistic in combination. Similarly, the pan-RAF inhibitor RAF265 did not cause MAPK activation and did not result in synergistic growth inhibition when combined with the MEK-I in the A549 and MIAPACA cell lines. Conclusions: Overall, our data indicate that combined inhibition of multiple signaling elements along the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway results in strongly synergistic growth inhibition, particularly in tumors with RAS mutations. Additional studies to better define genetic determinants of sensitivity/resistance and molecular mechanisms of therapeutic synergism of combined BRAF-I and MEK-I are currently ongoing.