1. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Endovenous Laser Ablation and Conventional Surgery in Patients with Lower Limb Varicose Veins: A Prospective Interventional Study
- Author
-
Mannam Viswateja, Deepak R Chavan, Vijaya Patil, and Vikram U Sindagikar
- Subjects
chronic venous hypertension ,chronic venous leg ulcers ,deep vein thrombosis ,laser treatment ,post thrombotic syndrome ,venous stasis ,Medicine - Abstract
Introduction: Dilated, convoluted, subcutaneous veins measuring more than 3 mm in diameter when measured while upright and exhibiting reflux are called varicose veins. Varicose veins present a significant financial burden on the healthcare system, causing morbidity and lost work hours. Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA), a minimally invasive endovenous intervention that uses heat energy to induce aseptic inflammation of the vessel wall, obstructs and eliminates reflux. This technique has gained more attention recently because it eliminates the need for open surgical incisions. In contrast, standard surgery entails making an incision in the groin and excising the great saphenous vein anatomically to eliminate the abnormal reflux. Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of both thermal and non thermal endovenous methods in treating reflux in patients with axial venous reflux. However, there are limited comparative studies between various endovenous therapy modalities and traditional surgery concerning postoperative clinical outcomes. Aim: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of patients with Clinical (C), Aetiological (E), Anatomical (A), and Pathophysiological (P) - CEAP class C2-C6 who underwent either Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) or conventional surgery for varicose veins. Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery at Shri BM Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapura, Karnataka, India, that included all patients with CEAP classes C2-C6, from July 2022 to July 2024. A block randomisation method was used to allocate patients into two groups to ensure an equal distribution of demographic variables. Group A (n=39) underwent EVLA and Group B (n=35) underwent flush ligation of the saphenofemoral junction and stripping. Data were collected with a particular focus on the duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and cosmetic acceptance, with a follow-up period of six months. Additionally, potential procedural complications and recurrence rates were assessed after the six-month follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. The Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi-square test/Fisher’s-exact test were used, with a p-value of
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF