1. Clinically Significant Discrepancy between Clinical and Pathologic Stage of Early Operable Cervical Cancer
- Author
-
Jennifer McEachron, Constantine Gorelick, Katherine Economos, Margaux J. Kanis, Nikita Malakhov, Victoria Hastings, and Yi-Chun Lee
- Subjects
Pathologic stage ,Cervical cancer ,Retrospective review ,Tumor size ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Significant difference ,Physical examination ,medicine.disease ,General Earth and Planetary Sciences ,Medicine ,Stage (cooking) ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,General Environmental Science - Abstract
Objectives: The cornerstone of the management of cervical cancer (CC) traditionally relies on clinical examination (CE) of tumor size (TS) and local extension of disease. The goal of this study is to determine the accuracy of CE in comparison to final pathology (FP) in early operable CC. Methods: This is a multi-center retrospective review of patients with early CC (FIGO 2009 Stage IB1, IIA1). CE of TS, parametrial invasion (PI), and vaginal involvement (VI) were compared to FP. Results: The final analysis included 135 patients. Overall, there was a significant difference between CE of TS compared to FP; mean error of 1.22 cm (p
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF