Search

Data availability: Our study uses two-sample MR. We used both published summary results (i.e. taking results from published research papers and websites) and individual participant cohort data: journal-published and website summary data were used for sample one of the two-sample MR (published GWAS of BMI and body fat percentage). The references to the published data sources are provided in the main paper. The data for the GWAS of BMI are available at https://portals.broadinstitute.org/collaboration/giant/index.php/GIANT_consortium_data_files. The data for the GWAS of body fat percentage are available at https://walker05.u.hpc.mssm.edu. We used individual participant data for the second MR sample and for undertaking sensitivity analyses from the UKB, ALSPAC, BiB, EFSOCH and HAPO cohorts. The data in UKB, ALSPAC and BiB are fully available, via managed systems, to any researchers. The managed system for both studies is a requirement of the study funders but access is not restricted on the basis of overlap with other applications to use the data or on the basis of peer review of the proposed science. Researchers have to pay for a dataset to be prepared for them. Full information on how to access UKB data can be found at www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/using-the-resource/. The ALSPAC data management plan (www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/data-access/documents/alspac-data-management-plan.pdf) describes, in detail, the policy regarding data sharing, which is through a system of managed open access. The following steps highlight how to apply for access to the data included in this paper and all other ALSPAC data: (1) please read the ALSPAC access policy (PDF, 627 kB), which describes the process of accessing the data and samples in detail, and outlines the costs associated with doing so; (2) you may also find it useful to browse the fully searchable ALSPAC research proposals database, which lists all research projects that have been approved since April 2011; (3) please submit your research proposal for consideration by the ALSPAC Executive Committee and you will receive a response within 10 working days to advise you whether your proposal has been approved. If you have any questions about accessing data, please e-mail alspac-data@bristol.ac.uk. Full information on how to access BiB data can be found at https://borninbradford.nhs.uk/research/how-to-access-data/. Requests for access to the original EFSOCH dataset should be made in writing in the first instance to the EFSOCH data team via the Exeter Clinical Research Facility (crf@exeter.ac.uk). Copyright © The Author(s) 2022. Aims/hypothesis: Higher maternal BMI during pregnancy is associated with higher offspring birthweight, but it is not known whether this is solely the result of adverse metabolic consequences of higher maternal adiposity, such as maternal insulin resistance and fetal exposure to higher glucose levels, or whether there is any effect of raised adiposity through non-metabolic (e.g. mechanical) factors. We aimed to use genetic variants known to predispose to higher adiposity, coupled with a favourable metabolic profile, in a Mendelian randomisation (MR) study comparing the effect of maternal ‘metabolically favourable adiposity’ on offspring birthweight with the effect of maternal general adiposity (as indexed by BMI). Methods: To test the causal effects of maternal metabolically favourable adiposity or general adiposity on offspring birthweight, we performed two-sample MR. We used variants identified in large, published genetic-association studies as being associated with either higher adiposity and a favourable metabolic profile, or higher BMI (n = 442,278 and n = 322,154 for metabolically favourable adiposity and BMI, respectively). We then extracted data on the metabolically favourable adiposity and BMI variants from a large, published genetic-association study of maternal genotype and offspring birthweight controlling for fetal genetic effects (n = 406,063 with maternal and/or fetal genotype effect estimates). We used several sensitivity analyses to test the reliability of the results. As secondary analyses, we used data from four cohorts (total n = 9323 mother–child pairs) to test the effects of maternal metabolically favourable adiposity or BMI on maternal gestational glucose, anthropometric components of birthweight and cord-blood biomarkers. Results: Higher maternal adiposity with a favourable metabolic profile was associated with lower offspring birthweight (−94 [95% CI −150, −38] g per 1 SD [6.5%] higher maternal metabolically favourable adiposity, p = 0.001). By contrast, higher maternal BMI was associated with higher offspring birthweight (35 [95% CI 16, 53] g per 1 SD [4 kg/m2] higher maternal BMI, p = 0.0002). Sensitivity analyses were broadly consistent with the main results. There was evidence of outlier SNPs for both exposures; their removal slightly strengthened the metabolically favourable adiposity estimate and made no difference to the BMI estimate. Our secondary analyses found evidence to suggest that a higher maternal metabolically favourable adiposity decreases pregnancy fasting glucose levels while a higher maternal BMI increases them. The effects on neonatal anthropometric traits were consistent with the overall effect on birthweight but the smaller sample sizes for these analyses meant that the effects were imprecisely estimated. We also found evidence to suggest that higher maternal metabolically favourable adiposity decreases cord-blood leptin while higher maternal BMI increases it. Conclusions/interpretation: Our results show that higher adiposity in mothers does not necessarily lead to higher offspring birthweight. Higher maternal adiposity can lead to lower offspring birthweight if accompanied by a favourable metabolic profile. US National Institute of Health (R01 DK10324); European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) / ERC grant agreement no 669545; British Heart Foundation (CS/16/4/32482 and AA/18/7/34219); NIHR Biomedical Centre at the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust; University of Bristol.

Aims/HypothesisHigher maternal BMI during pregnancy results in higher offspring birth weight, but it is not known whether this is solely the result of adverse metabolic consequences of higher maternal adiposity, such as maternal insulin resistance and fetal exposure to higher glucose levels, or whether there is any effect of raised adiposity through non-metabolic (e.g. mechanical) factors. We aimed to use genetic variants known to predispose to higher adiposity coupled with a favourable metabolic profile, in a Mendelian Randomisation (MR) study comparing the effect of maternal “metabolically favourable adiposity” on offspring birth weight with the effect of maternal general adiposity (as indexed by BMI).MethodsTo test the causal effects of maternal metabolically favourable adiposity or general adiposity on offspring birth weight, we performed two sample MR. We used variants identified in large genetic association studies as associated with either higher adiposity and a favourable metabolic profile, or higher BMI (N = 442,278 and N = 322,154 for metabolically favourable adiposity and BMI, respectively). We then used data from the same variants in a large genetic study of maternal genotype and offspring birth weight independent of fetal genetic effects (N = 406,063 with maternal and/or fetal genotype effect estimates). We used several sensitivity analyses to test the reliability of the results. As secondary analyses, we used data from four cohorts (total N = 9,323 mother-child pairs) to test the effects of maternal metabolically favourable adiposity or BMI on maternal gestational glucose, anthropometric components of birth weight and cord-blood biomarkers.ResultsHigher maternal adiposity with a favourable metabolic profile was associated with lower offspring birth weight (−94 (95% CI: −150 to −38) grams per 1 SD (6.5%) higher maternal metabolically favourable adiposity). By contrast, higher maternal BMI was associated with higher offspring birth weight (35 (95% CI: 16 to 53) grams per 1 SD (4 kg/m2) higher maternal BMI). Sensitivity analyses were broadly consistent with the main results. There was evidence of outlier SNPs for both exposures and their removal slightly strengthened the metabolically favourable adiposity estimate and made no difference to the BMI estimate. Our secondary analyses found evidence to suggest that maternal metabolically favourable adiposity decreases pregnancy fasting glucose levels whilst maternal BMI increases them.The effects on neonatal anthropometric traits were consistent with the overall effect on birth weight, but the smaller sample sizes for these analyses meant the effects were imprecisely estimated. We also found evidence to suggest that maternal metabolically favourable adiposity decreases cord-blood leptin whilst maternal BMI increases it.Conclusions/InterpretationOur results show that higher adiposity in mothers does not necessarily lead to higher offspring birth weight. Higher maternal adiposity can lead to lower offspring birth weight if accompanied by a favourable metabolic profile.Research in ContextWhat is already known about this subject?Studies in non-pregnant people with obesity suggest many people can have a “metabolically healthy” form of obesity, but effects in pregnancy and on offspring are not known.Multiple lines of evidence show that higher maternal BMI is causally associated with higher offspring birth weight, and that this may be mediated by the fetal insulin response to higher maternal gestational glucose.Recently, genetic variants have been identified, where one allele is associated with higher adiposity but lower risk of type II diabetes and favourable metabolic profile, including lower insulin and glucose levels, so called “metabolically favourable adiposity”; the mechanism is thought to be due to greater subcutaneous adipose storage capacity that leads to higher insulin sensitivity.What is the key question?What is the effect of maternal metabolically favourable adiposity on birth weight, and how does it compare with the effect of maternal BMI on birth weight?What are the new findings?Higher maternal adiposity can lead to lower, not higher birth weight, if it is also associated with a metabolically favourable profile; this contrasts with the effect of higher maternal general adiposity (BMI), on higher birth weight.Higher maternal metabolically favourable adiposity causes lower maternal fasting plasma glucose levels, most likely due to higher insulin sensitivity; in contrast higher maternal general adiposity leads to higher maternal fasting plasma glucose levels, most likely due to lower insulin sensitivity.How might this impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future?Identifying ways of stratifying overweight and obese pregnant women into those with and without metabolically favourable adiposity could allow for targeted management to obtain healthy fetal growth and birth weight.

Background Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested that maternal vitamin D (25[OH]D) and calcium supplementation increase birth weight. However, limitations of many trials were highlighted in the reviews. Our aim was to combine genetic and RCT data to estimate causal effects of these two maternal traits on offspring birth weight. Methods and findings We performed two-sample mendelian randomisation (MR) using genetic instrumental variables associated with 25(OH)D and calcium that had been identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS; sample 1; N = 122,123 for 25[OH]D and N = 61,275 for calcium). Associations between these maternal genetic variants and offspring birth weight were calculated in the UK Biobank (UKB) (sample 2; N = 190,406). We used data on mother–child pairs from two United Kingdom birth cohorts (combined N = 5,223) in sensitivity analyses to check whether results were influenced by fetal genotype, which is correlated with the maternal genotype (r ≈ 0.5). Further sensitivity analyses to test the reliability of the results included MR-Egger, weighted-median estimator, ‘leave-one-out’, and multivariable MR analyses. We triangulated MR results with those from RCTs, in which we used randomisation to supplementation with vitamin D (24 RCTs, combined N = 5,276) and calcium (6 RCTs, combined N = 543) as an instrumental variable to determine the effects of 25(OH)D and calcium on birth weight. In the main MR analysis, there was no strong evidence of an effect of maternal 25(OH)D on birth weight (difference in mean birth weight −0.03 g [95% CI −2.48 to 2.42 g, p = 0.981] per 10% higher maternal 25[OH]D). The effect estimate was consistent across our MR sensitivity analyses. Instrumental variable analyses applied to RCTs suggested a weak positive causal effect (5.94 g [95% CI 2.15–9.73, p = 0.002] per 10% higher maternal 25[OH]D), but this result may be exaggerated because of risk of bias in the included RCTs. The main MR analysis for maternal calcium also suggested no strong evidence of an effect on birth weight (−20 g [95% CI −44 to 5 g, p = 0.116] per 1 SD higher maternal calcium level). Some sensitivity analyses suggested that the genetic instrument for calcium was associated with birth weight via exposures that are independent of calcium levels (horizontal pleiotropy). Application of instrumental variable analyses to RCTs suggested that calcium has a substantial effect on birth weight (178 g [95% CI 121–236 g, p = 1.43 × 10−9] per 1 SD higher maternal calcium level) that was not consistent with any of the MR results. However, the RCT instrumental variable estimate may have been exaggerated because of risk of bias in the included RCTs. Other study limitations include the low response rate of UK Biobank, which may bias MR estimates, and the lack of suitable data to test whether the effects of genetic instruments on maternal calcium levels during pregnancy were the same as those outside of pregnancy. Conclusions Our results suggest that maternal circulating 25(OH)D does not influence birth weight in otherwise healthy newborns. However, the effect of maternal circulating calcium on birth weight is unclear and requires further exploration with more research including RCT and/or MR analyses with more valid instruments., William Thompson and colleagues, using mendelian randomisation methods, reveal no association between levels of maternal circulating vitamin D and birth weight of newborns., Author summary Why was this study done? Birth weight that is lower or higher than average has been associated with poor health outcomes across the life span, including infant mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes. If we can identify modifiable maternal factors in pregnancy that are causally related to birth weight, we may be able to reduce the number of babies that are born with lower or higher than optimal birth weight. This may in turn help to reduce the associated poor health outcomes. Previous studies have suggested that higher maternal 25(OH)D and calcium in pregnancy are associated with higher birth weight. However, many of those studies used conventional multivariable regression in observational studies and may be subject to residual confounding. Few of them estimated the size of the effect of either maternal 25(OH)D or calcium levels on birth weight. What did the researchers do and find? We estimated the effects of maternal gestational 25(OH)D and calcium levels on offspring birth weight using mendelian randomisation, a method that uses genetic data to overcome certain limitations of traditional observational studies—for example, residual confounding. We analysed genetic data on 190,406 women from the UK Biobank who reported the birth weight of their first child, along with the results from published studies of genetic associations with 25(OH)D and calcium levels in 122,123 and 61,275 individuals, respectively. We checked that the results were not biased by offspring genotype using data from two UK birth cohorts, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC; n = 4,576 mother–child pairs) and Exeter Family Study of Childhood Health (EFSOCH; n = 647 mother–child pairs), respectively. To strengthen our causal understanding, we triangulated the mendelian randomisation results with findings from randomised controlled trials in which we used randomised status (to vitamin D or calcium supplementation) as an instrumental variable to estimate the effect of 25(OH)D or calcium on birth weight. We found no evidence of a strong effect of maternal 25(OH)D on birth weight. We found inconsistent evidence of effects of maternal calcium on birth weight. What do these findings mean? Our findings do not support using vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy or preconceptually to influence offspring birth weight. The effect of calcium on birth weight is still unclear and needs further investigation in well-powered genetic studies and/or well-conducted randomised controlled trials.

SummaryFibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) is a hormone that induces weight loss in model organisms. These findings have led to trials in humans of FGF21 analogues with some showing weight loss and lipid lowering effects. Recent genetic studies have shown that a common allele in the FGF21 gene alters the balance of macronutrients consumed but there was little evidence of an effect on metabolic traits. We studied a common FGF21 allele (A:rs838133) in 451,099 people from the UK Biobank study. We replicated the association between the A allele and higher percentage carbohydrate intake. We then showed that this allele is more strongly associated with body fat distribution, with less fat in the lower body, and higher blood pressure, than it is with BMI, where there is only nominal evidence of an effect. These human phenotypes of naturally occurring variation in the FGF21 gene will inform decisions about FGF21’s therapeutic potential.

20 male albino rats were used as Ss in determining behavioral effects of ultra high frequency radiation. Experimental Ss were exposed to low intensity (50,000 mV), low frequency (300 mc to 920 mc) UHF radio waves for 47 consecutive days. Radiated rats were more active than non-radiated rats during the early part of the experiment, but became less active as the days of radiation increased. The UHF group was more emotional than the non-UHF group and showed a gradual increase in the latency of recovery from electroshock convulsion. No differences were found for weight, audiogenic seizures, and water consumption. Results suggest that (a) some time is required for UHF to have a consistent effect on behavior, and (b) the effects on behavior may be non-thermal and related to neurophysiological substrates.