Although there are various definitions o/wellness, few conceptual definitions have addressed the contextual dimensions of wellness relative to African American counselors. The authors present an overview of generic models of wellness, discuss factors that both inhibit and promote wellness, offer some culture-specific models of wellness, and address implications for future research. ********** In recent years, the issue of promoting wellness has gained considerable interest among counseling, human development, and medical professionals (Constantine & Sue, 2006; J. E. Myers, 1992; J. E. Myers, Madathil, & Tingle, 2005; Prilleltensky & Prilleltensky, 2003). Although wellness does not constitute a new domain for counselors, it appears to be so because historically the profession has maintained a mental health orientation that emphasizes the treatment of pathology rather than the application of interventions that optimize human potential. The promotion of wellness has been linked to several populations, such as children (Cicchetti, Rappaport, Sandier, & Weissberg, 2000), patients with AIDS (Holt, Houg, & Romano, 1999), teachers (Queen & Queen, 2003), and persons with physical and mental illness (Sperry, Lewis, Carlson, & Englar-Carlson, 2005). However, for the past 2 decades, the holistic notion of wellness in counseling has received less attention and, consequently, the focus on developmental theories and wellness strategies have been underemphasized (J. E. Myers, 1992). J. E. Myers (1991) defined wellness as the "maximizing of human potential through positive life-style choices" (p. 183). In another definition, Ardell (1985) emphasized that wellness is a conscious and intentional approach to an advanced state of physical and psychological/spiritual health. In order to illustrate the distinction between health and wellness, Greenberg (1985) offered a definition of wellness that integrates social, mental, emotional, spiritual, and physical components, where a high level of wellness is exhibited when the components are balanced. He further commented that health is typically defined as the absence of illness, whereas wellness emphasizes a zest and enthusiasm for life. Within the counseling literature, two models of wellness have emerged: the Wheel of Wellness (J. E. Myers, Sweeney, & Witmer, 2000) and the Indivisible Self (J. E. Myers & Sweeney, 2005) models. These models characterize holistic constructions of wellness and prevention over the life span and encompass both a multidisciplinary focus and theoretical grounding in Adlerian individual psychology. The Wheel model is composed of five life tasks that are essential to optimal wellness: spirituality, self-direction, work and leisure, friendship, and love. The self-direction life task includes 12 additional tasks necessary for wellness: sense of worth, sense of control, realistic beliefs, emotional awareness and coping, problem solving and creativity, sense of humor, nutrition, exercise, self-care, stress management, gender identity, and cultural identity. The Wheel of Wellness highlights the overlaps of these various domains of wellness, which can ultimately help counselors understand clients as individuals and as part of their respective environments. The second model, the Indivisible Self, is more evidence-based and incorporates 17 wellness dimensions and five "selves": the essential sell social sell creative sell physical sell and coping self (J. E. Myers & Sweeney, 2005). The essential self is composed of four components: spirituality, self-care, gender identity, and cultural identity. The creative self consists of thinking, emotions, control, positive humor, and work. The coping self includes four components: realistic beliefs, stress management, self-worth, and leisure. The social self consists of two components: friendship and love. The physical self includes two components: exercise and nutrition. …