Search

Except the widely accepted use of immune Checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) CRCs representing about 5% of all metastatic (m)CRC patients, new strategies are applied to cure MMR-proficient (MMRp) mCRC patients. Tumor microenvironment (TME) is decisive for cancer development. The determination of some immunoeffective and immunosuppressive immune cells and some cytokines, chemokines and growth factors in the TME gives Information about the use of immune Checkpoint inhibitors in MMRp CRCs. The increased level of IL-6 in the serum and increased number of IL-6+ immune cells in TME, the increased number of IL-17+ Th17 cells, and of FoxP3+ cells are used to determine the use of anti-IL-6 antibody and of anti-FoxP3 antibody for treatment. The determination of high CD8+, high PD-1 expression and little or no Th17 cells appoint better response to anti-PD-1 therapy. The used combination therapies are: combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy, with radiation therapy, with targeted therapy, with vaccines, oncolytic viruses and bispeeifie antibodies. Classical treatment of CRC patients has included chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. Recently, immunotherapy has been added as a mainstay for therapy of CRC. The main checkpoint inhibitors used in CRC immunotherapy are pembrolizumab and nivolumab (anti-PD-1), durvalumab (anti-PD-L1), ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4), favezelimab (anti-LAG3), etc. They are applied after fluorapyrimidine, oxaliplain, and irinotecan therapy. In conclusion, we may state that the future treatment of MSS CRC is in combination therapies, i.e. conventional and immunotherapies. We consider that immune infiltrate in TME must be assessed in order to determine combination therapies.

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are anticancer drugs that activate the immune response against cancer cells. This type of treatment is highly effective, but also associates with many immunoinflammatory complications, including musculoskeletal. This review presents the current understanding of the clinical manifestations, pathogenesis and therapy of immune-mediated arthropathy in patients receiving CPI.

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized therapy of advanced and metastatic cancers. However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors or develop resistance. Therefore, novel therapies or combinations of therapies that may act synergistically are needed. It has been suggested that induction of trained immunity may increase the response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, through reprogramming myeloid cells toward an antitumor phenotype. On the other hand, activation of the immune system also carries the risk of potentially sustaining tumorgenicity and increasing immune- related toxicity. Case presentation We report the case of a 37-year-old Dutch male suffering from gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma with liver metastases and high risk for an unfavorable outcome, who was treated with a combination of programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor nivolumab and the trained immunity-inducer Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccine as a salvage therapy. Three doses of BCG vaccine were administered at 3-month intervals, in conjunction with the immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen. At a certain point, radiation therapy was added to the treatment regimen. During the combination of these therapies, the patient developed immune-mediated colitis, which necessitated discontinuation of all treatments. Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccination induced a trained immune response with elevated monocyte-derived interleukin-6 and interleukin-1β production capacity. From the first vaccination with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin until 3 months after the last vaccination with Bacillus Calmette–Guérin, the patient displayed only mild progression of the primary tumor and no progression of the metastases. Conclusion In this study, we show the feasibility to combine checkpoint inhibitor therapy with inducers of trained immunity in a patient with an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor. Autoimmune side effects are common under programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor therapy, which was considered the most likely cause of colitis, although an additive effect of Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccination or radiotherapy cannot be excluded. The patient displayed only mild progression during the combination therapy, but larger studies are warranted to fully explore the potential benefit of trained immunity inducers as an adjuvant to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Cancer is one of the most complex and challenging human diseases, with rising incidences and cancer-related deaths despite improved diagnosis and personalized treatment options. Targeted alpha therapy (TαT) offers an exciting strategy emerging for cancer treatment which has proven effective even in patients with advanced metastatic disease that has become resistant to other treatments. Yet, in many cases, more sophisticated strategies are needed to stall disease progression and overcome resistance to TαT. The combination of two or more therapies which have historically been used as stand-alone treatments is an approach that has been pursued in recent years. This review aims to provide an overview on TαT and the four main pillars of therapeutic strategies in cancer management, namely external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), cytostatic chemotherapy (CCT), and brachytherapy (BT), and to discuss their potential use in combination with TαT. A brief description of each therapy is followed by a review of known biological aspects and state-of-the-art treatment practices. The emphasis, however, is given to the motivation for combination with TαT as well as the pre-clinical and clinical studies conducted to date.

We previously reported that dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccines targeting antigens expressed by tumor-associated vascular endothelial cells (VECs) and pericytes effectively control tumor growth in translational mouse tumor models. In the current report, we examined whether the therapeutic benefits of such tumor blood vessel antigen (TBVA)-targeted vaccines could be improved by the cotargeting of tumor antigens in the s.c. B16 melanoma model. We also evaluated whether combination vaccines incorporating anti-PD-L1 checkpoint blockade and/or a chemokine-modulating (CKM; IFNα + TLR3-L [rintatolimod] + Celecoxib) regimen would improve T cell infiltration/functionality in tumors yielding enhanced treatment benefits. We report that DC–peptide or DC–tumor lysate vaccines coordinately targeting melanoma antigens and TBVAs were effective in slowing B16 growth in vivo and extending survival, with superior outcomes observed for DC–peptide-based vaccines. Peptide-based vaccines that selectively target either melanoma antigens or TBVAs elicited a CD8+ T cell repertoire recognizing both tumor cells and tumor-associated VECs and pericytes in vitro, consistent with a treatment-induced epitope spreading mechanism. Notably, combination vaccines including anti-PD-L1 + CKM yielded superior therapeutic effects on tumor growth and animal survival, in association with the potentiation of polyfunctional CD8+ T cell reactivity against both tumor cells and tumor-associated vascular cells and a pro-inflammatory TME.

Abstract The discovery and development of novel treatments that harness the patient’s immune system and prevent immune escape has dramatically improved outcomes for patients across cancer types. However, not all patients respond to immunotherapy, acquired resistance remains a challenge, and responses are poor in certain tumors which are considered to be immunologically cold. This has led to the need for new immunotherapy-based approaches, including adoptive cell transfer (ACT), therapeutic vaccines, and novel immune checkpoint inhibitors. These new approaches are focused on patients with an inadequate response to current treatments, with emerging evidence of improved responses in various cancers with new immunotherapy agents, often in combinations with existing agents. The use of cell therapies, drivers of immune response, and trends in immunotherapy were the focus of the Immunotherapy Bridge (November 30th–December 1st, 2022), organized by the Fondazione Melanoma Onlus, Naples, Italy, in collaboration with the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

Summary: Background: Cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) can cause immune-related adverse events in the central nervous system (CNS irAE). There are no blood biomarkers to detect CNS irAE. We investigated if concentrations of S100-calcium-binding protein B (S100B) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) in blood can be used as biomarkers for CNS irAE and assessed the incidence of CNS irAE in a cohort of ICI-treated patients. Methods: In this single-centre, retrospective cohort study, we examined medical records and laboratory data of 197 consecutive patients treated with combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibition (ipilimumab; ipi + nivolumab; nivo) for metastatic melanoma or renal cell carcinoma. CNS irAE was diagnosed using established criteria. Concentrations of S100B and NfL in blood were measured in patients with CNS irAE and in 84 patients without CNS irAE. Findings: Nine of 197 patients (4.6%) fulfilled criteria for CNS irAE. S100B and NfL in blood increased during CNS inflammation and normalized during immunosuppression. CNS irAE was detected with a sensitivity of 100% (S100B) and 79% (NfL) and a specificity of 89% (S100B) and 74% (NfL). Patients with CNS irAE had simultaneous increased concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) (9/9) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in blood (8/9). Interpretation: Analysis of S100B, NfL and CRP in blood facilitates the diagnosis of CNS irAE. CNS irAE may be more common than previously reported. There may be shared immune mechanisms between CNS and hepatitis irAE. Funding: Supported by funding from the Swedish Cancer Foundation, the ALF-agreement, and Jubileumsklinikens Cancerfond.

Abstract Purpose To evaluate a new class of blood-based biomarkers, anti-frameshift peptide antibodies, for predicting both tumor responses and adverse immune events to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies in advanced lung cancer patients. Experimental design Serum samples were obtained from 74 lung cancer patients prior to palliative PD-(L)1 therapies with subsequently recorded tumor responses and immune adverse events (irAEs). Pretreatment samples were assayed on microarrays of frameshift peptides (FSPs), representing ~ 375,000 variant peptides that tumor cells can be informatically predicted to produce from translated mRNA processing errors. Serum-antibodies specifically recognizing these ligands were measured. Binding activities preferentially associated with best-response and adverse-event outcomes were determined. These antibody bound FSPs were used in iterative resampling analyses to develop predictive models of tumor response and immune toxicity. Results Lung cancer serum samples were classified based on predictive models of ICI treatment outcomes. Disease progression was predicted pretreatment with ~ 98% accuracy in the full cohort of all response categories, though ~ 30% of the samples were indeterminate. This model was built with a heterogeneous sample cohort from patients that (i) would show either clear response or stable outcomes, (ii) would be administered either single or combination therapies and (iii) were diagnosed with different lung cancer subtypes. Removing the stable disease, combination therapy or SCLC groups from model building increased the proportion of samples classified while performance remained high. Informatic analyses showed that several of the FSPs in the all-response model mapped to translations of variant mRNAs from the same genes. In the predictive model for treatment toxicities, binding to irAE-associated FSPs provided 90% accuracy pretreatment, with no indeterminates. Several of the classifying FSPs displayed sequence similarity to self-proteins. Conclusions Anti-FSP antibodies may serve as biomarkers for predicting ICI outcomes when tested against ligands corresponding to mRNA-error derived FSPs. Model performances suggest this approach might provide a single test to predict treatment response to ICI and identify patients at high risk for immunotherapy toxicities.

The incidence and prevalence of drug-induced liver injury appear to be increasing globally, for example, with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors. Several reviews have been published in the last decade on the epidemiology of DILI, both among hospitalized patients and in the general population, as well as from retrospective and prospective studies on DILI. Most of these reviews have not focused on newly recognized agents that have recently changed the landscape of DILI. Apart from liver injury associated with antibiotics, oncological agents, particularly checkpoint inhibitors, are increasingly being recognized as causing liver injury. The type of liver injury associated with these agents is not idiosyncratic but rather an indirect type of injury. Furthermore, recently, COVID-19 vaccines and green tea extract have been found to lead to liver injury. Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of many malignancies, such as malignant melanoma, lung cancer, and renal cancer. Via the activation of T cells, they can increase immune activity against malignant cells, but at the same time, they can decrease immune tolerance and therefore lead to immune-related adverse effects in many organs. The most common adverse effect in clinical practice is liver injury. A recent prospective study demonstrated an 8% frequency of DILI due to the use of checkpoint inhibitors among patients with malignant melanoma and renal cancer. This rate is much higher than observed with drugs, leading to idiosyncratic liver injury. Shortly after the implementation of the worldwide vaccination program against COVID-19, several case reports were published on suspected vaccination-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis occurring shortly after the vaccination. At first, these reports were met with skepticism, but currently, around 100 reports have been published, and cases of positive recurrence have been reported. The clinical, biochemical, immunological, and histological features are indistinguishable from classic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). These reactions are very similar to drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH) due to drugs such as nitrofurantoin, minocycline, and infliximab, which do not relapse after a short course of corticosteroids, which is the general rule in classic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Green tea extract has been found to be a well-documented cause of acute hepatocellular liver injury with jaundice. A strong HLA association has been reported, showing a high prevalence of HLA-B*35:01 among patients suffering from green tea-induced liver injury. Overall, 3% of patients recruited in the DILIN study were supplemented with green tea extract as one of the ingredients. In a prospective population-based study from Iceland, green tea was implicated in approximately 8% of patients with DILI.

Abstract Tumor microenvironment (TME) is a specialized ecosystem of host components, designed by tumor cells for successful development and metastasis of tumor. With the advent of 3D culture and advanced bioinformatic methodologies, it is now possible to study TME’s individual components and their interplay at higher resolution. Deeper understanding of the immune cell’s diversity, stromal constituents, repertoire profiling, neoantigen prediction of TMEs has provided the opportunity to explore the spatial and temporal regulation of immune therapeutic interventions. The variation of TME composition among patients plays an important role in determining responders and non-responders towards cancer immunotherapy. Therefore, there could be a possibility of reprogramming of TME components to overcome the widely prevailing issue of immunotherapeutic resistance. The focus of the present review is to understand the complexity of TME and comprehending future perspective of its components as potential therapeutic targets. The later part of the review describes the sophisticated 3D models emerging as valuable means to study TME components and an extensive account of advanced bioinformatic tools to profile TME components and predict neoantigens. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive account of the current knowledge available to target TME.

Immune checkpoints (ICs) are molecules implicated in the fine-tuning of immune response via co-inhibitory or co-stimulatory signals, and serve to secure minimized host damage. Targeting ICs with various therapeutic modalities, including checkpoint inhibitors/monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and CAR-T cells has produced remarkable results, especially in immunogenic tumors, setting a paradigm shift in cancer therapeutics through the incorporation of these IC-targeted treatments. However, the large proportion of subjects who experience primary or secondary resistance to available IC-targeted options necessitates further advancements that render immunotherapy beneficial for a larger patient pool with longer duration of response. B7-H3 (B7 Homolog 3 Protein, CD276) is a member of the B7 family of IC proteins that exerts pleiotropic immunomodulatory effects both in physiologic and pathologic contexts. Mounting evidence has demonstrated an aberrant expression of B7-H3 in various solid malignancies, including tumors less sensitive to current immunotherapeutic options, and has associated its expression with advanced disease, worse patient survival and impaired response to IC-based regimens. Anti-B7-H3 agents, including novel mAbs, bispecific antibodies, ADCs, CAR-T cells, and radioimmunotherapy agents, have exhibited encouraging antitumor activity in preclinical models and have recently entered clinical testing for several cancer types. In the present review, we concisely present the functional implications of B7-H3 and discuss the latest evidence regarding its prognostic significance and therapeutic potential in solid malignancies, with emphasis on anti-B7-H3 modalities that are currently evaluated in clinical trial settings. Better understanding of B7-H3 intricate interactions in the tumor microenvironment will expand the oncological utility of anti-B7-H3 agents and further shape their role in cancer therapeutics.

Abstract After the success of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced metastatic cancer, further evaluation in earlier settings, including high-risk, surgically-resectable disease is underway. Potential benefits of a neoadjuvant immunotherapeutic approach include presurgical tumor shrinkage, reduced surgical morbidity, early eradication of micrometastases and prevention of distant disease, and greater antigen-specific T cell response. For some cancers, pathologic response has been established as a surrogate measure for long-term outcomes, therefore offering the ability for early and objective assessment of treatment efficacy and the potential to inform and personalize adjuvant treatment clinical decision-making. Leveraging the neoadjuvant treatment setting offers the ability to deeply interrogate longitudinal tissue in order to gain translatable, pan-malignancy insights into response and mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy across cancers was a focus of discussion at the virtual Immunotherapy Bridge meeting (December 1–2, 2021). Clinical, biomarker, and pathologic insights from prostate, breast, colon, and non-small-cell lung cancers, melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers were discussed and are summarized in this report.

Abstract Over the past decade, immunotherapy has become an increasingly fundamental modality in the treatment of cancer. The positive impact of immune checkpoint inhibition, especially anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1 blockade, in patients with different cancers has focused attention on the potential for other immunotherapeutic approaches. These include inhibitors of additional immune checkpoints, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), and therapeutic vaccines. Patients with advanced cancers who previously had limited treatment options available may now benefit from immunotherapies that can offer durable responses and improved survival outcomes. However, despite this, a significant proportion of patients fail to respond to immunotherapy, especially those with less immunoresponsive cancer types, and there remains a need for new treatment strategies. The virtual Immunotherapy Bridge (December 1st–2nd, 2021), organized by the Fondazione Melanoma Onlus, Naples, Italy in collaboration with the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer addressed several areas of current research in immunotherapy, including lessons learned from cell therapies, drivers of immune response, and trends in immunotherapy across different cancers, and these are summarised here.

The development of a new area of antitumor drug therapy, immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1, has significantly changed approaches to the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical benefit as well as the long-term effect of these drugs. Currently, the problem of treatment of patients after disease progression against the background of the use of checkpoint inhibitors is relevant. Equally relevant is the issue of choosing the correct and most effective treatment tactics for NSCLC patients with oligoprogression, as well as with abscopal effect. This paper describes a clinical case of a patient with lung adenocarcinoma without driver mutations with PD-L1-positive status, who was treated with nivolumab after second-line chemotherapy for disease progression, and after oligoprogression of the disease into the brain was given stereotactic radiotherapy of metastatic lesion and continued therapy with nivolumab. Partial regression of metastases was achieved with a prolonged effect on the background of continued treatment with nivolumab for 24 months. Tolerability of therapy was satisfactory: no adverse events were observed. The patient retained the result for 1.5 years.

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors with the highest mortality, with about 85% of cases of the disease being non-small cell lung cancer. To date, adjuvant chemotherapy based on platinum preparations remains the standard of treatment for patients with radically operated stage II or III non-small cell lung cancer. However, a large proportion of patients still have a risk of developing a recurrence of lung cancer even after complete resection of the tumor. That is why there is a need to search for new methods of treatment of early stages of NSCLC, which will minimize the likelihood of postoperative relapses and improve survival in a potentially curable group of patients. Already today, clinical trials are beginning to advance the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the early stages beyond the standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. Immunotherapy, represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors, is being investigated in an increasing number of clinical trials in patients with operable NSCLC at early stages, gradually enriching existing treatment methods. At the same time, some issues related to adjuvant immunotherapy have yet to be considered. The choice of the drug, the use of monotherapy or combined treatment regimens remain unclear. This review examines the progress of research aimed at improving adjuvant therapy through the inclusion of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of early stages of resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Adjuvant immunotherapy can improve relapse-free survival in individual patients with resectable lung cancer, and current or planned studies using biomarkers and immunotherapy may also ultimately lead to an improvement in the overall survival of this group of patients.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a common type of liver malignancy and one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. In the Russian Federation, according to statistical reports, there is also an increase in the incidence. For over 10 years, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib has been the only approved treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Lenvatinib was registered as the second drug for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the first line. In the era of checkpoint inhibitors, the possibility of such therapy in the first and subsequent lines of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma remains relevant. The combination of atezolizumab with bevacizumab in a phase III study (IMbrave150) improved treatment outcomes such as overall survival and progression-free survival. The results of the phase III randomized trial IMbrave 150 showed undoubtedly better efficacy of the atezolizumab + bevacizumab combination compared to sorafenib in terms of a median progression-free survival of 6.8 vs 4.3 months. The above clinical observation demonstrates the result of treatment of a patient with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with a combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. After verification of the diagnosis, since January 2021, therapy with a combination of atezolizumab 1200 mg, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg was started with an interval of 21 days.At present, 20 courses of therapy have been carried out in this regimen, and the stabilization of the disease is maintained. Against the background of the ongoing therapy, no adverse events were noted, including immune-mediated ones that required the abolition or reduction of doses of drugs. In the above clinical observation, a patient with severe comorbidity achieved stabilization of the disease in the first three months of therapy. Combination therapy showed a favorable tolerability profile.

Abstract As part of the 2021 Immunotherapy Bridge virtual congress (December 1–2, Naples, Italy), the Great Debate sessions featured experts who were assigned counter opposing views on four important questions in immunotherapy today. The first topic was whether oncolytic viruses or other specific immunomodulators were the more promising approach for intralesional therapy. The second was whether early surrogate endpoints, such as response rate or progression-free survival, correlate with long-term overall survival was considered. Thirdly, whether vaccines can transform cold into hot tumors was discussed and, finally, broad versus deep analytic profiling approaches to gain insights into immune-oncology development were compared. As with previous Bridge congresses, presenters were invited by the meeting Chairs and positions taken during the debates may not have reflected their respective personal view. In addition, the views summarised in this article are based on available evidence but may reflect personal interpretation of these data, clinical experience and subjective opinion of the speaker.

Abstract Background To evaluate the capability of basal and one-month differed white blood cells (WBC), neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet values and their ratios (neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio, NLR, and platelets-to-lymphocytes ratio, PLR) in predicting the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic melanoma (MM). Methods We performed a retrospective study of 272 BRAF wild-type MM patients treated with first line ICI. Bivariable analysis was used to correlate patient/tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes. Variations between time 1 and time 0 (Δ) of blood parameters were also calculated and dichotomized using cut-off values assessed by ROC curve. Results At baseline, higher neutrophils and NLR negatively correlated with PFS, OS and disease control rate (DCR). Higher PLR was also associated with worse OS. In multivariable analysis, neutrophils (p = 0.003), WBC (p = 0.069) and LDH (p = 0.07) maintained their impact on PFS, while OS was affected by LDH (p

Objective(s): One of the important interactions in controlling the human immune system is the reaction between checkpoint proteins such as programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand, PD-L1. These are negative immunoregulatory molecules that promote immune evasion of tumor cells. PD-L1 expression is an immune-mediated mechanism used by various malignant cells in order to down-regulate the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are a new class of anti-cancer agents that stimulate immune cells to elicit an antitumor response by blocking the ligand and receptor interactions. Nanobody (Nb) as a new type of antibody fragment, has some potential as CPI.Materials and Methods: A female camel was immunized with recombinant PD-L1 protein, nanobody library was constructed and PD-L1 specific Nb was selected. The selected Nb was characterized in terms of affinity, specificity, and binding potency in ELISA, Western blotting, and flow cytometry. Results: Developed nanobody, A22 binds to its cognate target with high specificity and affinity. Western blot and flow cytometry techniques showed that nanobody A22 was able to specifically detect and attach to human PD-L1 protein on the cell surface and in the cell lysate. MTT assay showed the inhibitory effect of PD-L1 by specific Nb on A431 and HEK293 cells, with no cytotoxic effect on cell growth.Conclusion: The results highlighted the potential of anti-PD-L1 Nb as a novel therapeutic in cancer therapy without undesirable cytotoxicity.

Abstract Background Mononeuritis multiplex is a rare autoimmune peripheral neuropathy that typically presents in the context of vasculitis, diabetes, infection, or as a paraneoplastic syndrome. Adverse immune-related neurological conditions have been increasingly reported with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and/or the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand-1 axis. Mononeuritis multiplex has only been reported twice from treatment of cancers with immunotherapy. Case presentation Here we report a case of mononeuritis multiplex as a complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for melanoma. An 80-year-old non-Hispanic white female with recurrent melanoma was treated with combination ipilimumab and nivolumab and subsequently presented with progressive leg weakness, back pain, and difficulty ambulating. The diagnosis of mononeuritis multiplex was made, which was resistant to steroid pulses, chronic steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab. She developed progressive neurologic dysfunction and elected for hospice care. We found only two other cases reported in the literature. Conclusions Increased awareness, prompt recognition, and aggressive treatments are likely the best opportunity for improved outcomes in this severe side effect.

The optimal hepatocellular cancer (HCC) therapy remains a challenge. Due to checkpoint inhibitors patients with intolerance to the targeted therapy and or those with the impaired liver function can get an appropriate drug therapy. This clinical observation illustrates the long-term effect of pembrolizumab as the 2-line therapy in a patient diagnosed with. Sorafenib in standard doses as first line therapy led to severe toxicity and necessitated the withdrawal of therapy. Although subsequently the doses were reduced and concomitant medications used, sorafenib therapy was discontinued due to pronounced side effects typical of kinase inhibitors. From August 2017 to September 2019, as a part of a clinical study, the patient received 35 courses of immunotherapy with pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks, with satisfactory tolerance. The best response - partial tumor regression – was achieved at 84 weeks of therapy and continues to this day. Favorable toxicity profile makes checkpoints inhibitors a good treatment option in patients with impaired liver function (Child-Pugh 7–8 points) or with intolerable toxicity of kinase inhibitors.

Summary: Background: Inflammation can modulate tumour growth and progression, and influence clinical response to treatment. We investigated the potential of circulating inflammatory proteins for response stratification of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced melanoma. Methods: Study subjects were 87 patients with unresectable stage III or IV cutaneous melanoma from the multiple centres across the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) who received ipilimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab, or a combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab. Serum samples were collected before and during ICI therapy at follow-up visits scheduled every third week over a 12-week period. We performed targeted quantification of 92 proteins involved in inflammation and tested for association of their pre-treatment and on-treatment levels, as well as longitudinal changes, with overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Findings: We observed consistently higher pre-treatment levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and monocyte chemotactic protein 2 (MCP-2), in non-responders compared to responders (meta-analysis p=3.31 × 10−4, 2.29 × 10−4, and 1.02 × 10−3, respectively). Patients' stratification according to the median value of IL-6, HGF, and MCP-2 highlighted a cumulative negative effect of pre-treatment levels of the three proteins on response (p=1.13 × 10−2), with overall response rate among patients presenting with combined elevated IL-6, HGF, and MCP-2 levels being three-fold lower (26.7%) compared to patients with none of the three proteins elevated (80.0%, p=9.22 × 10−3). Longitudinal data analysis showed that on-treatment changes in circulating inflammatory proteins are not correlated with response. Interpretation: Our findings are in line with an increasing body of evidence that the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 can influence response to ICI in advanced melanoma, and further support a role of circulating HGF and MCP-2 levels as prognostic biomarkers as suggested by previous smaller studies. Inflammatory proteins may serve as predictive biomarkers of ICI response and valuable targets for combination therapy. Funding: This work was supported by the Seerave Foundation and Dutch Cancer Society.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract, with aggressive behavior, and portends a poor prognosis. Traditionally, it is classified according to its site of involvement as intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma. A host of genetic and epigenetic factors have been involved in its pathogenesis. Chemotherapy has remained the standard first-line treatment over the last decade, with a disappointing median overall survival of 11 months for locally advanced and metastatic CCA. The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of many pancreaticobiliary malignancies, offering durable responses with a safe therapeutic profile. To date, there have been no significant advances in the management of CCA. Novel immunotherapeutic methods, such as cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy, and combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with other agents, are currently under investigation and may improve prognosis with overall survival. Efforts to find robust biomarkers for response to treatment along with multiple clinical trials are also ongoing in this regard. In this review, we present an overview of the current advances and the future perspectives of immunotherapy in the management of CCA.

Introduction. Lung cancer remains the one of the most common and fatal cancers in the world. For a long time, chemotherapy was the only treatment option for metastatic lung cancer. Currently, immunotherapy became the one of the preferred options of treatment.The purpose of our work was to evaluate the long-term results of using the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab in real-world settings.Materials and methods. 108 pretreated patients with metastatic NSCLC were included in this non-randomized, observational study. The median follow-up time was 54.5 months.Results. Median overall survival was 8.8 months (6-12, 95% CI). The five-year overall survival rate was 19.4%. Median progressionfree survival was 3.9 months (3-5, 95% CI). The five-year progression-free survival rate was 7.7%. Overall response rate (ORR) was 18%. In patients with ORR, the median overall survival was not achieved. Prolongation of immunotherapy after disease progression had a positive effect on the overall survival of patients. Clinically significant immuno-related adverse events developed in 21% of patients, but only 7.3% showed the development of adverse events grade 3-4 that required discontinuation of immunotherapy. A rare complication that we met was a case of encephalopathy, to which the patient achieved durable complete response despite discontinuation of immonotherapy.Conclusion. Received survival, efficacy and safety data may inform treatment decisions for patients with metastatic NSCLC in real world settings.

Abstract Improved understanding of tumor immunology has enabled the development of therapies that harness the immune system and prevent immune escape. Numerous clinical trials and real-world experience has provided evidence of the potential for long-term survival with immunotherapy in various types of malignancy. Recurring observations with immuno-oncology agents include their potential for clinical application across a broad patient population with different tumor types, conventional and unconventional response patterns, durable responses, and immune-related adverse events. Despite the substantial achievements to date, a significant proportion of patients still fail to benefit from current immunotherapy options, and ongoing research is focused on transforming non-responders to responders through the development of novel treatments, new strategies to combination therapy, adjuvant and neoadjuvant approaches, and the identification of biomarkers of response. These topics were the focus of the virtual Immunotherapy Bridge (December 2nd–3rd, 2020), organized by the Fondazione Melanoma Onlus, Naples, Italy, in collaboration with the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer and are summarised in this report.

Aim: To study the role of check point inhibitors (CPI) in sarcoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Materials & methods: Retrospective data of 15 patients diagnosed with advanced sarcoma or gastrointestinal stromal tumors and treated with CPI. Results: 3/14 patients (21.4%) responded to treatment with a disease control rate of 42.8% (6/14). After a median follow-up of 14 months (range: 2–24 months), 11 (73.3%) patients progressed, the median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI: 1.7–6.3) and median overall survival was 14 months (95% CI: 2.6–25.7). Only one patient experienced a grade IV adverse event. Conclusion: Our data represent the first real-world application of CPI in sarcoma from India. We believe that CPI should be further evaluated in clinical trials.

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective therapies for a wide range of malignancies. Their increased use has led to a wide range of immune-related adverse effects including skin, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, endocrine, cardiac, and neurologic complications. Case presentation We present the case of a 72-year-old Caucasian man with non-small cell lung cancer who was admitted for dyspnea after two cycles of durvalumab. He was found to have significantly elevated levels of serum creatinine kinase and troponin with a negative cardiac catheterization. During his hospitalization, he developed progressive dyspnea and new-onset axial weakness, ultimately leading to the diagnosis of durvalumab-induced myocarditis, myasthenia gravis, and myositis. Conclusion This is, to our knowledge, the first reported case of anti-programmed cell death ligand 1-induced combination of myocarditis, myasthenia gravis, and myositis. While the use of immunologic agents has resulted in overall improved cancer outcomes, their increased use has led to a vast spectrum of immune-related adverse effects. We review the diagnostic workup and management of patients with these immune-related adverse effects, underscoring the importance of early identification given the potential for rapid deterioration.

Abstract As part of the 2020 Immunotherapy Bridge virtual congress (December 2nd–3rd, Italy), the Great Debate session featured counterpoint views from leading experts on three clinical questions in immunotherapy today. The first of these was whether antitumoral vaccination is still a treatment option. The second topic debated whether anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1 blockade should be the backbone for immunotherapy combination. Finally, the use of innovative study designs and surrogate endpoints was considered from both an academic and industry perspective. For each topic, two experts presented the argument and counter-argument in support of two different points of view. As with previous Bridge congresses, the debates were assigned by meeting Chairs and positions taken by experts during the debates may not have necessarily reflected their respective personal view. The views summarised in this article are based on available evidence but may reflect personal interpretation of these data, clinical experience and subjective opinion of the speaker.

Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels are inversely related with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with metastatic melanoma. LDH is a key regulator of glycolysis, a pathway known to be upregulated in malignant tumors and to negatively affect antitumor immunity. We hypothesized that LDH isotype distribution in peripheral blood better reflects tumor glycolytic activity than total LDH levels and might therefore contribute to immunotherapy response prediction. LDH isotyping was performed in blood of 40 patients with metastatic melanoma and elevated LDH levels, of which 22 were treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab. LDH-1 levels were decreased in 57.5% of patients. The percentage of LDH-2, -3 and -4, on the other hand, was elevated in 35%, 67.5% and 37.5% of patients, respectively. There was no difference in LDH isotype distribution between patients with versus patients without clinical benefit of ICIs, except for a numerically lower percentage of LDH-1 in patients without clinical benefit (median 13.3% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.1295). The percentage of LDH-1 correlated with total LDH levels and tumor burden and is therefore not likely to have strong, independent predictive value for response to ICIs. In conclusion, LDH isotyping does not contribute to ICI response prediction in melanoma patients with elevated LDH levels.

Checkpoint inhibitors can be a highly effective antitumor therapy but only to a subset of patients, presumably due to immunotherapy resistance. Fluoxetine was recently revealed to inhibit the NLRP3 inflammasome, and NLRP3 inhibition could serve as a target for immunotherapy resistance. Therefore, we evaluated the overall survival (OS) in patients with cancer receiving checkpoint inhibitors combined with fluoxetine. A cohort study was conducted among patients diagnosed with lung, throat (pharynx or larynx), skin, or kidney/urinary cancer treated with checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Utilizing the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure, patients were retrospectively evaluated during the period from October 2015 to June 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Patients were followed until death or the end of the study period. There were 2316 patients evaluated, including 34 patients who were exposed to checkpoint inhibitors and fluoxetine. Propensity score weighted Cox proportional hazards demonstrated a better OS in fluoxetine-exposed patients than unexposed (HR: 0.59, 95% CI 0.371–0.936). This cohort study among cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitor therapy showed a significant improvement in the OS when fluoxetine was used. Because of this study’s potential for selection bias, randomized trials are needed to assess the efficacy of the association of fluoxetine or another anti-NLRP3 drug to checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Therapeutic vaccination is one of the most effective immunotherapeutic approaches, second only to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have already been approved for clinical use. Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are heterogenous epithelial tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract, and a significant proportion of these tumors tend to exhibit unfavorable therapeutic responses to the existing treatment options. Comprehending the immunopathology of these tumors and choosing an appropriate immunotherapeutic maneuver seems to be a promising avenue for solving this problem. The current review provides a detailed overview of the strategies, targets, and candidates for therapeutic vaccination in HNSCC. The classical principle of inducing a potent, antigen-specific, cell-mediated cytotoxicity targeting a specific tumor antigen seems to be the most effective mechanism of therapeutic vaccination, particularly against the human papilloma virus positive subset of HNSCC. However, approaches such as countering the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of HNSCC and immune co-stimulatory mechanisms have also been explored recently, with encouraging results.

Abstract Over the last few years, numerous clinical trials and real-world experience have provided a large amount of evidence demonstrating the potential for long-term survival with immunotherapy agents across various malignancies, beginning with melanoma and extending to other tumours. The clinical success of immune checkpoint blockade has encouraged increasing development of other immunotherapies. It has been estimated that there are over 3000 immuno-oncology trials ongoing, targeting hundreds of disease and immune pathways. Evolving topics on cancer immunotherapy, including the state of the art of immunotherapy across various malignancies, were the focus of discussions at the Immunotherapy Bridge meeting (4–5 December, 2019, Naples, Italy), and are summarised in this report.

For more than 10 years, there have been no significant improvements in treatment outcomes for patients with inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. At the moment, the standard of treatment for this category of patients is concurrent chemoradiation therapy. At the same time, the 5-year overall survival rate varies in the range of 15–25%. This indicator contributes to the modernization of existing approaches, as well as the search for new ways in the treatment of patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.One of the promising areas is the combination of chemoradiation therapy with immunotherapy. Thus, the use of Imfinzi (durvalumab, AstraZeneca) as a consolidation therapy in the Phase III clinical trial PACIFIC demonstrated a reduction in the risk of death by about one third in comparison with the standard approach.We present a clinical case study of a patient with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer who received treatment in the framework of concurrent chemoradiation therapy followed by immunotherapy with durvalumab, continuing until now. The result of the therapy is the complete response to the specific treatment, recorded according to PET-CT.Thus, the use of immunotherapy as consolidation therapy represents a promising strategy for improving outcomes after concurrent chemoradiation therapy in patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Malignant tumors of the stomach and esophagogastric junction in advanced stages progress quite aggressively, and the prospects for treatment of these patients remain unpromising. The use of checkpoint-inhibitors has proven to be an advanced treatment method for various types of cancer around the world. In theRussian Federation, nivolumab has been successfully registered as a monotherapy for common or recurrent stomach or esophagogastric junction cancer after two or more lines of systemic antitumor drug therapy. This literature review focuses on the use of registered checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab) as mono- and/or combined therapy in tumors of the stomach and esophagogastric junction, including tumors with high microsat- ellite instability (MSI-high). This review includes a description of the main therapeutic approaches using checkpoint inhibitors: prescription in mono-mode, in combination with other checkpoint inhibitors (ipilimumab) and cytotoxic drugs, and in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (regorafenib). Issues of efficiency and tolerability of these combinations in patients in different therapeutic lines are considered. The role of possible predictors of therapy response is analyzed: biomarkers such as PD-Ll, MSI, dMMR and TMB expression in tumor tissues as well as immunofenotyping in fresh biopsy samples are evaluated. This article reviews and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of checkpoint inhibitors and their possible uses.

Pre-clinical models and human clinical trials have confirmed the ability of cancer vaccines to induce immune responses that are tumour-specific and, in some cases, associated with clinical response. However, cancer vaccines as a targeted immunotherapy strategy have not yet come of age. So, why the discordance after so much research has been invested in cancer vaccines? There are several reasons for this that include: limited tumour immunogenicity (limited targeted antigen expression, antigen tolerance); antigenic heterogeneity in tumours; heterogeneity of individual immune responses; multiple mechanisms associated with suppressed functional activity of immune effector cells, the underlying rationale for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors; and immune system exhaustion. The success of checkpoint therapy has refocussed investigations into defining relationships between tumours and host immune systems, appreciating the mechanisms by which tumour cells escape immune surveillance and reinforcing recognition of the potential of vaccines in the treatment and prevention of cancer. Recent developments in cancer immunotherapies, together with associated technologies, for instance, the unparalleled achievements by immune checkpoint inhibitors and neo-antigen identification tools, may foster potential improvements in cancer vaccines for the treatment of malignancies.

Recently immune checkpoint inhibitors amazingly changed the landscape of cancer therapy worldwide. The number of immune checkpoint molecules in clinical practice is constantly increasing. There are some monoclonal antibodies recently registered in the Russian Federation: anti-PD1 antibodies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab), anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab). Immune-mediated endocrinopathies are some of the most common complications of immunotherapy. According to the results of clinical studies, the incidence of serious endocrine immuno-mediated adverse events with anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies is low (3.5–8%). The use of anti-CTLA4 antibodies, combined regimens, and the use of immunotherapy after chemoradiotherapy significantly increase the incidence of serious adverse events to 30%. In clinical practice of N.N. Blokhin Cancer Research Center among 245 non-small cell lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immunotherapy, 22 (8,9%) developed an immune-mediated endocrinopathy. Most patients developed adverse events of 1–2 degrees, in two patients – 3 degrees, requiring discontinuation of treatment. The aim of this article was to provide useful information and recommendations regarding the management of common immuno-related endocrine adverse events (including hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, pituitary, adrenal insufficiency) for clinical oncologists.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of death from cancer worldwide. Despite the success over recent years in the treatment of NSCLC it has not yet been able to achieve good long-term survival. The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has altered the landscape of treatment of advanced cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nivolumab is the PD-1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of NSCLC to show a survival benefit in a randomised phase III trials. The experience of physicians in routine clinical practice is often different from those in a controlled clinical trial setting. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate nivolumab use in real world setting. Results: The general survival at 76 patients by metastatic NSLC receiving an immunotherapy nivolumab during the period from 2015 to 2019 is analysed. The minimum time of observation was 1.6 months. The median of the general survival made 7.6 months (5.92-9.41. DI 95%). The one-year survival - 35%, at the same time 3-year survival was 25%. At patients with the objective answer the median of the general survival was not reached. Immunomediated adverse events developed in 42% of patients, but only 6.6% showed the development of adverse events of 3-4 degrees, which indicates a favorable toxicity profile. Conclusion: the results received by us correlate with data of clinical trials.

Nowadays neoadjuvant immunotherapy is one of the main research areas in oncology. This interest is supported by the success of check-point inhibitors in treatment of advanced and metastatic lung cancer. The postulate that neoadjuvant immunotherapy achieves tumor devitalization before surgery is confirmed by a morphological assessment of surgical material with a gradation of the antitumor effect. In addition to affecting directly to the tumor, it also affects at potential micrometastases. A morphological assessment with a gradation of the antitumor effect (MPR – a major pathomorphological response, CPR – a complete pathomorphological response) provides a unique opportunity to identify predictors of effectiveness and adjust the treatment tactic. A major morphological response (MPR – less than 10% of viable tumor cells in the tumor tissue) is associated with better overall survival. Currently, there is evidence that the appointment of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in mono mode allows you to achieve MPR in 18–45%, and the use of a combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy increases it to 32–92%. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy or combination with chemotherapy does not postpone surgical treatment but allows us to achieve the better result.

Recent advances in cancer immunology have enabled the discovery of promising immunotherapies for various malignancies that have shifted the cancer treatment paradigm. The innovative research and clinical advancements of immunotherapy approaches have prolonged the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic cancers. Since the U.S. FDA approved the first immune checkpoint inhibitor in 2011, the field of cancer immunotherapy has grown exponentially. Multiple therapeutic approaches or agents to manipulate different aspects of the immune system are currently in development. These include cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapies (such as CAR-T or NK cell therapy), monoclonal antibodies, cytokine therapies, oncolytic viruses, and inhibitors targeting immune checkpoints that have demonstrated promising clinical efficacy. Multiple immunotherapeutic approaches have been approved for specific cancer treatments, while others are currently in preclinical and clinical trial stages. Given the success of immunotherapy, there has been a tremendous thrust to improve the clinical efficacy of various agents and strategies implemented so far. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of the development and clinical implementation of various immunotherapy approaches currently being used to treat cancer. We also highlight the latest developments, emerging trends, limitations, and future promises of cancer immunotherapy.

Nivolumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against programmed cell death-1 receptor. It has an increasing application in the treatment of various advanced metastatic cancers. The incidence of autoimmune side effects associated with such agents is expected to increase. New-onset autoimmune diabetes mellitus associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment is rare, occurring in less than 1% of patients. Nivolumab-induced diabetes often presents as diabetic ketoacidosis, which could be life-threatening if not recognized and treated promptly. We present the case of a patient who developed severe diabetic ketoacidosis concomitant with hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state (HHS) after receiving nivolumab for metastatic testicular lymphoma. Pre-nivolumab blood glucose levels were normal, apart from transient hyperglycaemia related to steroids as part of the chemotherapy protocol. The diagnosis was confirmed with extremely low C-peptide in the clinic.

The existence of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) with normal inflammatory indices at the time of diagnosis still represents a diagnostic conundrum. According to the literature, some patients with PMR following immune checkpoint inhibitory therapy had normal values of both erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein concentrations at the time of diagnosis. In this short communication we investigated the possibility that in some patients with PMR the main pathogenic mechanism is constituted by inhibition of some checkpoints, such as programmed death receptor-1, programmed death ligand 1, and “cytotoxic” lymphocyte antigen 4. In these patients, the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying PMR can act much more upstream than commonly suggested. Also, we addressed the question of whether these patients should be considered as affected by PMR-like syndromes or by PMR subset.

Abstract Background Several accomplishments have been achieved in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) research over the last year. The phase III IMpassion130 trial comparing chemotherapy plus atezolizumab versus chemotherapy plus placebo brought breast cancer into the immunotherapy era. Nevertheless, despite encouraging results being obtained in this trial, many open questions remain. Main body A positive overall survival outcome was achieved only in PD-L1+ TNBC patients, suggesting a need to enrich the patient population more likely to benefit from an immunotherapeutic approach. Moreover, it remains unknown whether single-agent immunotherapy might be a good option for some patients. In this context, the discovery and implementation of novel and appropriate biomarkers are required. Focusing on the early onset of TNBC, neoadjuvant trials could represent excellent in vivo platforms to test immunotherapy agents and their potential combinations, allowing the performance of translational studies for biomarker implementation and improved patient selection. Conclusion The aim of our review is to present recent advances in TNBC treatment and to discuss open issues in order to better define potential future directions for immunotherapy in TNBC.

AIMS OF THE STUDY Our aim was to explore drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in Switzerland using the real-world data of the global pharmacovigilance database VigiBase™, with a special focus on the new drug class of checkpoint inhibitors. This is the first study investigating drug-related hepatic disorders in Switzerland in a global pharmacovigilance database. METHODS This was a retrospective study analysing the ICSRs (individual case safety reports) of the global pharmacovigilance database VigiBase™. We explored all ICSRs submitted in Switzerland within the last 10 years (1 July 2010 to 30 June 2020). For data extraction, the standardised MedDRA query (SMQ) “narrow drug-related hepatic disorders – severe events only” was applied. The ICSRs, drug-reaction pairs and adverse drug reactions were analysed descriptively, including a special focus on checkpoint inhibitors. For comparing the hepatic adverse drug reactions of pembrolizumab, nivolumab and ipilimumab, the reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated in a disproportionality analysis. RESULTS In total, 2042 ICSRs could be investigated, comprising 10,646 drugs and 6436 adverse drug reactions. Gender was equally distributed between male and female. Patients were on average 57 years old. The mortality rate was high, with fatal adverse reactions in over 10% of cases. On average, patients used five drugs including two suspected drugs. Paracetamol, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, esomeprazole and atorvastatin ranked among the most frequently suspected drugs for severe drug-related hepatic disorders. However, Vigibase™ data are not appropriate for judging causality and these results should be interpreted with caution owing to the possible influences of comedication or comorbidity. An average of three adverse drug reactions per ICSR were reported, most frequently including hepatocellular injury, cholestatic liver injury, and liver injury. For checkpoint inhibitors, hepatitis was the most frequently reported hepatic adverse drug reaction. In comparison with nivolumab and ipilimumab, pembrolizumab had a significantly higher ROR for hepatitis (2.41, p = 0.016), but also a lower ROR for autoimmune hepatitis (0.11, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION Our findings highlight the importance for healthcare providers in Switzerland to pay special attention to possible drug-induced liver injuries because of their high mortality rate. The analysis of real-world data confirms the previous assumption that hepatitis is the most frequent hepatic adverse event for checkpoint inhibitors. Further clinical studies are warranted to directly compare hepatic adverse drug reactions to different checkpoint inhibitors.

Background: Oncolytic virotherapy with vaccinia virus (VV) can lead to effective anti-tumor immunity by turning “cold” tumors into “hot” tumors. However, its therapeutic potential is affected by the tumor's local immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Therefore, it is necessary to explore the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors to arm oncolytic VVs to enhance their anti-tumor efficacy. Methods: A novel recombinant oncolytic VV, VV-α-TIGIT, which encoded a fully monoclonal antibody against T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) was generated by homologous recombination with a shuttle plasmid. The anti-tumor efficacy of the VV-α-TIGIT was investigated in several subcutaneous and ascites tumor models. Findings: The functional α-TIGIT was sufficiently produced and secreted by tumor cells infected with VV-α-TIGIT, which effectively replicated in tumor cells leading to significant oncolysis. Intratumoral injection of VV-α-TIGIT improved anti-tumor efficacy in several murine subcutaneous tumor models compared to VV-Control (without α-TIGIT insertion). Intraperitoneal injection of VV-α-TIGIT achieved approximately 70% of complete tumor regression in an ascites tumor model. At the same time, treatment with VV-α-TIGIT significantly increased the recruitment and activation of T cells in TME. Moreover, the in vivo anti-tumor activity of VV-α-TIGIT was largely dependent on CD8+ T cell-mediated immunity. Finally, the tumor-bearing mice cured of VV-α-TIGIT treatment resisted rechallenge with the same tumor cells, suggesting a long-term persistence of tumor-specific immunological memory. Interpretation: The recombinant oncolytic virus VV-α-TIGIT successfully combines the advantages of oncolytic virotherapy and intratumorally expression of immune checkpoint inhibitor against TIGIT. This novel strategy can provide information on the optimal design of novel antibody-armed oncolytic viruses for cancer immunotherapy. Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773255, 81472820, and 81700037), the Science and Technology Innovation Foundation of Nanjing University (14913414), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK20171098).

Objectives: The presence of autoimmune events were recorded in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Materials & Methods: Retrospective study in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) during the period of 2012–2019. Results: A total of 554 patients received ICIs of which 123 developed an immune related adverse event. Twenty one (17%) with toxicity were identified as having a pre-existing autoimmune disease and 88 required treatment with corticosteroids or hormone replacement. Thirty two (26%) out of 123 had to temporarily discontinue ICIs due to autoimmune manifestations. Endocrine and skin manifestations were the most prevalent immune disorders in our cohort. In melanoma better efficacy was seen in patients with immune toxicity. Conclusion: Autoimmune diseases appear in patients receiving ICIs in this real world experience. Our results differ from other series on the frequency of autoimmunity. Complete discontinuation of ICIs due to autoimmunity was rare.

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) represent a novel therapeutical strategy with a high efficacy both in solid and hematological cancers. They act by reactivating the immune system against neoplastic cells but may, in turn, cause immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) involving several organs with variable frequency and severity. Up to 10% of CPI-treated patients experience hematological IRAEs, mainly cytopenias. The differential diagnosis is challenging due to underlying disease, previous treatments and the variable liability of available tests (i.e., the direct antiglobulin test, anti-platelet antibodies, etc.). Among extra-hematological IRAEs, cutaneous and endocrine ones are the most frequent (up to 30–50%), ranging from mild (pruritus, eczema and thyroid dysfunctions) to severe forms (bullous disorders, hypophysitis and diabetes), mostly requiring topic or replacement therapy. Gastroenteric and kidney toxicities occur in about 5% of patients, biopsies may support the diagnosis, and immunosuppressive treatment is required in severe cases. Finally, neurologic and cardiologic IRAEs, although rare, may be life-threatening and require prompt intervention. By reviewing the most recent literature on post-CPI IRAEs, it emerged that clinical suspicion and monitoring of laboratory markers of organ damage is pivotal to a prompt diagnosis. In severe cases, CPI should be discontinued and immunosuppressive therapy started, whilst rechallenge is anecdotal and should be carefully evaluated.

Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy has only recently been introduced in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer. However, later line monotherapy CPI efficacy in a subset of patients was presented about four years prior. Here, we present three cases of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma cancers treated with CPI in early lines years prior to the availability of randomized first line data. All three patients remain in remission without gastrectomy, with the median time from initial diagnosis of approximately 52 months. With long-term follow-up of more than four years, we present a proof of concept that, with early integration of CPI therapy, highly durable responses are possible even in the absence of surgery in patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers.

Background: Immune-related adverse events are associated with efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We hypothesize that immune-mediated thrombocytopenia could be a biomarker for response to ICIs. Materials & methods: This retrospective study included 215 patients with metastatic malignancies treated with ICIs. Patients were stratified by nadir platelet count. Outcomes of interest were progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: On multivariate analysis, grade 1 thrombocytopenia was positively associated with overall survival compared with patients who did not develop thrombocytopenia (hazard ratio [HR]= 0.28 [95% CI: 0.13–0.60]; p = 0.001), while grade 2–4 thrombocytopenia was not (HR= 0.36 [95% CI: 0.13–1.04]; p = 0.060). There was no association between degree of thrombocytopenia and progression-free survival. Conclusion: Follow-up studies are warranted to substantiate the predictive significance of thrombocytopenia in patients receiving ICIs.

Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer type and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. According to the last GLOBOCAN estimate of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), lung cancer accounted for approximately 13% of cancer diagnoses in 2012, and an estimated 1.8 million new lung cancer cases were diagnosed. First-line treatment for Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed considerably, primarily as a result of a better patient selection on the basis of histology, molecular markers, and innovative treatment approaches. Recent data have highlighted the advent of immunotherapy as the major shift in treatment of advanced NSCLC. Three checkpoint inhibitors of the programmed death-1–programmed death-ligand 1 interaction, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, have already received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for treatment of advanced NSCLC patients; however, despite impressive treatment responses in many patients who received immunotherapy, a cohort of patients failed to obtain significant results. This review summarises the emerging role of immunotherapy in NSCLC, emphasising the current unanswered questions about predictive biomarkers for treatment response, current treatments, and possible treatment combinations.