Search

Introduction Hypertonicity of the pelvic floor (PFH) is a disabling condition with urological, gynecological and gastrointestinal symptoms, sexual problems and chronic pelvic pain, impacting quality of life. Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is a first-line intervention, yet no systematic review on the efficacy of PFPT for the treatment of PFH has been conducted. Objectives To systematically appraise the current literature on efficacy of PFPT modalities related to PFH. Methods PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until February 2020. A manual search from reference lists of included articles was performed. Ongoing trials were reviewed using clinicaltrial.gov. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective - and retrospective cohorts and case-study analyses were included. Outcome measures were pelvic floor muscle tone and function, pain reports, sexual function, pelvic floor symptom scores, quality of life and patients’ perceived effect. Results The literature search resulted in 10 eligible studies including 4 RCTs, 5 prospective studies, and 1 case study published between 2000 and 2019. Most studies had a high risk of bias associated with the lack of a comparison group, insufficient sample sizes and non-standardized interventions. Six studies were of low and 4 of medium quality. All studies were narratively reviewed. Three of 4 RCTs found positive effects of PFPT compared to controls on five out of 6 outcome measures. The prospective studies found significant improvements in all outcome measures that were assessed. PFPT seems to be efficacious in patients with chronic prostatitis, chronic pelvic pain syndrome, vulvodynia, and dyspareunia. Smallest effects were seen in patients with interstitial cystitis and painful bladder syndrome. Conclusion The findings of this systematic review suggest that PFPT can be beneficial in patients with PFH. Further high-quality RCTs should be performed to confirm the effectiveness of PFPT in the treatment of PFH. van Reijn-Baggen DA, Han-Geurts IJM, Voorham-van der Zalm PJ, et al. Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for Pelvic Floor Hypertonicity: A Systematic Review of Treatment Efficacy. Sex Med Rev 2021;XX:1–22.

Aim To assess the knowledge of adolescent girls and young women on pelvic-perineal disorders (PPD). Method We searched on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Kinedoc and Semantic Scholar databases using the MeSH keywords: "knowledge" "awareness" "surveys" "young women" "pelvic floor" "adolescent" "teenager" "athletic injury" "urinary incontinence". The articles had to have been published within the last 15 years, written in French or English, and deal with the state of knowledge of adolescents and young women concerning the perineal sphere using questionnaires. Results A total of 8 studies were included in the review, 5 cross-sectional studies and 3 intervention studies. The knowledge of adolescent girls and young women interviewed about the anatomy of the pelvic floor, its function, and risk factors for PPD was low. The majority of the participants wanted more information about the pelvic floor. Two studies that conducted an educational intervention showed a significant improvement in knowledge. Conclusion Knowledge of pelvic-perineal disorders and pelvic floor function is poor in adolescent girls and young women. To better assess them, it would be necessary to validate a questionnaire containing all the items about knowledge.

Made available in DSpace on 2022-04-29T08:38:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2022-01-01 Introduction: To investigate the influence of a training of mobility, gait speed and postural balance of pelvic floor muscles (PFM). Methods: A single-arm clinical trial study was approved and registered at the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (RBR-4rxhd4). Eighteen women over the age of 60 with pelvic floor dysfunction complaints were subjected to 10 sessions of functional electrical stimulation and digital palpation of PFM. Mobility and gait speed were evaluated by the Timed up and Go and the 10-m walk tests respectively. Standing balance was evaluated using a force plate. Results: No significant differences were found in mobility, gait speed, and standing balance. PFM contraction worsened mobility, gait speed, and standing balance performance. Conclusions: The training protocol enhanced PFM strength and endurance, but the improved ability to recruit PFM did not positively affect balance, mobility, and gait speed. Human Development and Technologies Program Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) Department of Tocogynecology Botucatu Medical School (FMB) São Paulo State University (UNESP) Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Faculty of Philosophy and Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) Human Development and Technologies Program Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) Department of Tocogynecology Botucatu Medical School (FMB) São Paulo State University (UNESP) Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Faculty of Philosophy and Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)

Increasing evidence has suggested that pelvic floor exercises and manual physical therapy may improve premature ejaculation (PE) and erectile dysfunction (ED) in males.To examine the effects of pelvic floor physical therapy treatment in men suffering from PE and ED.We searched Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, PEDro databases from inception till January 2020 applying the following keywords: pelvic floor, erectile dysfunction, impotence, physiotherapy, exercises, rehabilitation, and pelvic floor muscle exercises.The review included 37 papers reporting on PE and ED, of which 5 were randomized controlled trials, 2 meta-analyses, and 4 observational studies. Pelvic floor physical therapy treatment included education and rehabilitation. The rehabilitation part encompassed manual therapy techniques that contribute to the normalization of muscle tone and improvement of muscle relaxation. Moreover, exercises, according to the patients' clinical assessment were presented. Most of the studies reported that by strengthening the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs), ED and PE can be improved if manual physical therapy treatments are combined with PFM training.A multifaceted approach should be chosen by physical therapists when evaluating and treating ED and PE and contending with both musculoskeletal dysfunction and behavioral contributions. It is recommended that exercises be monitored and situations involving, that is, hyperactivity/increased tone of the PFMs should be avoided. PFM training is simple, safe, and noninvasive; therefore, it should be a preferred approach in the management of ED and PE. This paper presents narrative reviews with a potential bias that systematic reviews or meta-analyses do not have, however, we strove to be all-encompassing and unbiased. There is a demand for high-quality scientific reviews examining the effectiveness of PFM training, manual therapy, and the rationale of pelvic floor physical therapy, in general, in treating individuals with PE and ED. Yaacov D, Nelinger G, Kalichman L. The Effect of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation on Males with Sexual Dysfunction: A Narrative Review. Sex Med Rev 2022;10:162-167.

Objectives To establish the impact of pelvic floor (PF) symptoms (urinary incontinence [UI], anal incontinence [AI] and pelvic organ prolapse [POP]) on exercise participation in women. Design Observational, cross-sectional survey. Methods Australian, 18- to 65-year-old women with self-identified PF symptoms during exercise (current, past or fear of) were included. This survey included validated questionnaires: Questionnaire for female Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis, Incontinence Severity Index, Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire and purpose-designed questions on the impact of PF symptoms on sport/exercise participation. Analysis utilised descriptive statistics. Chi-square tests for independence and t-tests were used to explore differences between groups. Results Of 4556 women, 46% stopped exercise they had previously participated in due to their PF symptoms. Urinary incontinence had the largest impact; 41% with UI, followed by 37% with POP and 26% with AI stopped at least one form of exercise. Forty-two percent of women who experienced symptoms in high-impact sports stopped participation (versus low-impact: 21%). Sports commonly ceased included volleyball (63%), racquet-sports (57%) and basketball (54%). Exercise cessation was reported amongst younger (18–25 years: 35%) and nulliparous women (31%). Common exercise modifications included lowering the intensity (58%) or frequency (34%) of participation or changing to a low-impact form of sport/exercise (45%). Conclusions Pelvic floor symptoms stop women of all ages and levels of participation from exercising. High-impact sports were most affected but low-impact sports were also ceased. Symptomatic women also modify exercise to less vigorous/frequent participation, which may place them at risk of physical inactivity, and chronic illness.

Objectives Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), which include urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, sexual dysfunction and gastrointestinal disorders, affect over 20% of the adult population. Prevalence may also be underestimated, since a certain portion of patients may be reluctant to talk to physicians about PFDs due to embarassment. Consequently, there is a need for self-assessed diagnostic tools with the capability to screen population and collect clinical information. Symptom and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires - also identified as patient-reported outcomes (PROs) - have been developed with this purpose. Despite the large number of questionnaires available for the assessment of PFDs and QoL-related issues in the English language, few of them have been validated for the Italian language. The objective of this article is to update the list of Italian-validated PROs for PFDs along with practical information concerning literature references and suggestions on how to obtain every single questionnaire. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE databases and websites were used to update the list of available Italian-validated questionnaires about PFDs. Once identified, the possibility to get a copy of the questionnaire was verified and steps to obtain it are reported in the tables. Results eight additional questionnaires validated into the Italian language, for diagnosis and overall management of common urinary, vaginal, sexual and bowel conditions, were retrieved. The complete list of PFDs PROS is reported in a modular format for consultation. Conclusions This format is intended to serve as a tool to promote appropriateness in PROs adoption while investigating PFDs in Italian patients.

Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) include a series of conditions that can be poorly tolerated, negatively affecting the quality of life. Current treatment options show unsatisfactory results and new ones are therefore needed. Stem cell (SC) therapy might be an alternative treatment strategy. This systematic review aims to define the state of art of SC therapy for PFDs in clinical trials, by systematically reviewing the available evidence. A systematic search strategy was conducted up to November 7, 2020, in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science. Preclinical studies on animal models were not considered. Studies were included when the patients were affected by any PFDs and cells were isolated, cultured, and characterized as SC. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020216551). A total of 11 prospective clinical studies were included in the final assessment, specifically 7 single-arm studies dealing with SC therapy for stress urinary incontinence and 4 with anal incontinence. Among the latter, there were two prospective, single-arm studies and two randomized controlled trials. No papers concerning the use of SC for prolapse repair were retrieved. Due to the great heterogeneity, data pooling was not possible. Stem cell injection resulted in a safe procedure, with few mild adverse side effects, mostly related to harvesting sites. However, a clear beneficial impact of SC treatment for the treatment of pelvic floor disorders could not be demonstrated. Further larger targeted studies with control arms are needed before any conclusions can be made.

The Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium (PFDC) is a multidisciplinary organization of colorectal surgeons, urogynecologists, urologists, gynecologists, gastroenterologists, radiologists, physiotherap...

Objectives There does not currently exist a complication scale to evaluate pelvic reconstructive surgery (PRS) that takes in account patient-centered outcomes. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare patient and surgeon responses to a simplified, patient-centered version of the previously described Pelvic Floor Complication Scale (PFCS). Methods This is a multicenter (4 female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practices) cross-sectional study of patients and surgeons. Using focus groups and telephone surveys, the original PFCS questionnaire was simplified. One hundred and twenty-four patients were recruited 6-12 months after PRS. Fifty-seven surgeons were recruited via electronic questionnaires. Surgeons and patients were asked to rank the severity and bother of each complication on a scale of 0 to 5 (0, none; 1, mild; 3, moderate; 5, major). Results Patients rated bother higher than severity for 36 of 38 complications (all differences ≤0.5 points). For statistical analysis, the highest response to patient bother/severity was chosen to weigh in favor of the patient. Patient bother/severity scores were significantly different (±0.5 points) for 27 of 38 complications compared with surgeon responses. Surgeon scores were higher for 5 complications (0.5-1.9 point differences) related to major injury requiring repair and wound breakdown. Patient scores were higher for 22 complications with the highest differences related to dyspareunia, constipation, or new/persistent urinary incontinence. Conclusions This mixed methods investigation revealed key differences between how patients and surgeons value PRS complications. Surgeons scored major surgical injuries higher than patients, whereas patients rated issues that many surgeons consider quality-of-life outcomes higher due to potential long-term bother. These data will be used to create a simplified, patient-centered PFCS.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW Pelvic floor disorders are common among gynecologic cancer survivors. With improvements in survivorship, quality of life conditions in these women need greater attention and care. This review focuses specifically on vulvovaginal symptoms, which are common and have a negative impact on sexual health and quality of life in women affected by gynecologic cancer. RECENT FINDINGS We review publications on treatment-specific sexual health outcomes, screening and treatment of vulvovaginal symptoms and sexual pain, and surgical management options. Recent evidence regarding the safety of concomitant prolapse repair at the time of surgery for gynecologic malignancies and CO2 laser therapy is discussed and areas needing further research and innovation are highlighted. SUMMARY Pelvic floor disorders, including vaginal and sexual health concerns, are common in women affected by gynecologic cancer due to both common risk factors and as a side effects of cancer treatment. Gynecologists play a critical role in screening, treatment, and collaboration with other specialists to provide comprehensive care for these women throughout their lifetime.

Among the various risk factors of pelvic floor disorders, pregnancy has been reported to affect the pelvic floor structure; however, not all these effects have been understood yet. The aim of this study is to elucidate how pregnancy affects pelvic floor structure via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).We conducted a retrospective study between January 2010 and December 2019 to extract clinical records of pregnant and non-pregnant women, who underwent MRI for obstetrical diseases and ovarian benign tumors, respectively. The data on age, body mass index (BMI), complications, gravida, parity, gestational age, and obstetrical history were collected, and pubo-coccygeal line (PCL), pubo-rectal line (PRL), and M line (ML) on their MR images were measured. Statistical analyses were performed with Wilcoxon test, chi-square test, and Kruskal-Wallis test with Steel-Dwass post hoc test as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at P 0.05.We analyzed the reports of 56 (pregnancy group) and 106 women (non-pregnancy group). There was no significant difference in age or BMI, while the obstetric history was significantly different between these groups. Median PCL, PRL, and ML in the pregnancy group were significantly longer than those in the non-pregnancy group (114.1 mm vs. 110.0 mm, P = 0.018; 48.6 mm vs. 41.6 mm, P0.0001 and 21.7 mm vs. 10.0 mm, p0.0001. respectively). The subgroup analysis of the effect of pregnancy and vaginal delivery (VD) history on changes in these lines revealed that pregnancy-induced PRL increase tended to recover to the reference level of "non-pregnant without VD," but ML increase did not fully recover.MRI revealed a strong effect of pregnancy on pelvic floor structure.

This article discusses various pelvic floor ultrasonographic modalities and the clinical applications of ultrasonography of the pelvic floor. Ultrasonography provides a detailed anatomic assessment of the muscles and surrounding organs of the pelvic floor. Different anatomic variabilities and pathologic conditions, such as prolapse, fecal incontinence, urinary symptoms, vaginal wall cysts, synthetic implanted material, and pelvic pain, are assessed with pelvic floor ultrasonography. This imaging modality is an important adjunct to the evaluation and diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders.

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore associations between relative and maximal intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on pelvic floor outcomes in primiparas delivered vaginally. METHODS At 5-10 weeks and 1 year postpartum, we measured absolute IAP by vaginal sensor while participants lifted a weighted car seat (IAPLIFT) and performed isometric trunk flexion endurance (IAPTFE) and seated maximal strain (IAPSTRAIN). Primary outcomes, completed 1 year postpartum, included worse pelvic floor support (descent to or beyond the hymen) and positive symptom burden (bothersome symptoms in ≥2 of 6 domains on the Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire). We calculated relative IAP (as absolute IAP/IAPSTRAIN). RESULTS Of 542 participants, 9.7% demonstrated worse support and 54.3% demonstrated symptom burden at 1 year postpartum. In multivariable analyses, absolute IAPLIFT and absolute IAPTFE at 5-10 weeks postpartum were not associated with worse support. As relative IAP at 5-10 weeks increased, the prevalence of worse support decreased (prevalence ratio [PR] of 0.77 [95% confidence intervals (CIs), 0.63-0.94] and PR of 0.79 [95% CI, 0.67-0.93]) per 10% increase for relative IAPLIFT and relative IAPTFE, respectively. This was largely due to IAPSTRAIN, which increased the prevalence of worse support (PR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.06-1.25]) per 10 cm H2O increase. One year postpartum, only IAPSTRAIN increased the prevalence of worse support (PR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.02-1.20]) per 10 cm H2O. Of all IAP measures at both time points, only absolute IAPLIFT at 1 year significantly increased the prevalence of symptom burden (PR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.18]) per 10 cm H2O. CONCLUSIONS This exploratory analysis suggests that postpartum IAPSTRAIN may increase the prevalence of worse support in primiparas delivered vaginally.

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 is revolutionizing healthcare delivery. The aim of this study was to reach a consensus among experts as to the possible applications of telemedicine in the proctologic field. Methods A group of 55 clinical practice recommendations was developed by a clinical guidance group based on coalescence of evidence and expert opinion. The Telemedicine in Proctology Italian Working Group included 47 Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery nominated experts evaluating the appropriateness of each clinical practice recommendations based on published RAND/UCLA methodology in 2 rounds. Results Stakeholder median age was 53 years (interquartile range limits 40–60), and 38 (81%) were men. Nine (19%) panelists reported no experience with telemedicine before the pandemic. Agreement was obtained on a minimum of 3 to 5 years of practice in the proctologic field before starting teleconsultations, which should be regularly paid, with advice and prescriptions incorporated into a formal report sent to the patient by e-mail along with a receipt. Of the panelists, 35 of 47 (74%) agreed that teleconsultation carries the risk of misdiagnosis of cancer, thus recommending an in-person assessment before scheduling any surgery. Fifteen additional clinical practice recommendations were re-elaborated in the second round and assessed by 44 of 47 (93.6%) panelists. The application of telemedicine for the diagnosis of common proctologic conditions (eg, hemorrhoidal disease, anal abscess and fistula, anal condylomas, and anal fissure) and functional pelvic floor disorders was generally considered inappropriate. Teleconsultation was instead deemed appropriate for the diagnosis and management of pilonidal disease. Conclusion This e-consensus revealed the boundaries of telemedicine in Italy. Standardization of infrastructures, logistics, and legality remain to be better elucidated.

Background Sarcopenia is a determinant of age-related skeletal muscle weakness. In this sense, it is believed that there may be a pathophysiological association between pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) and sarcopenia; however, few articles investigating an association between these two pathologies have been published. Objectives To identify the prevalence of sarcopenia in older women with PFD and verify the association between the severity of PFD and the severity of sarcopenia. Methods This cross-sectional study was undertaken in urogynaecology outpatient clinics in Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil. Women with PFD aged ≥ 60 years were included. Women with cognitive impairments, amputations and/or limb fractures were excluded. Sociodemographic, anthropometric and PFD data were evaluated, and tests for measuring muscle strength, muscle mass and physical performance were performed. Results In total, 217 women were included in this study; of these, 121 (55.8%) presented without sarcopenia, 71 (32.7%) presented with probable sarcopenia, 23 (10.6%) presented with confirmed sarcopenia, and two (0.9%) presented with severe sarcopenia. Regarding sarcopenia related to PFD, a higher prevalence of probable sarcopenia was observed in women with urinary incontinence (UI) (n = 55, 77.5%). Confirmed sarcopenia was more prevalent in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) (n = 19, 82.6%); among these cases, most women had POP of the anterior, posterior and apical compartments (n = 8, 42.1%). All the women with severe sarcopenia had UI and POP and, considering the specific types of these dysfunctions, the prevalence of severe sarcopenia was 50.0% in the women with UI and POP of the anterior and apical wall. The most severe stages of POP were associated with sarcopenia (p = 0.002). Conclusion The prevalence of sarcopenia in women with PFD was high. Healthcare providers who assist women with PFD should consider the possibility of assessing sarcopenia, especially when faced with more extensive POP in older women. The evaluation of sarcopenia may play a role in the management of women with PFD.

OBJECTIVES: Colocated services in a team-based integrated practice unit (IPU) optimize care of pelvic floor disorders. Our goal was to compare ancillary service utilization in a multidisciplinary IPU between patients covered by a bundled payment model (BPM) versus a traditional fee-for-service model (FFSM). METHODS: Medical records of women attending an IPU for pelvic floor disorders with colocated services, including nutrition, social work, psychiatry, physical therapy, and subspecialty care between October 2017 and December 2018, were included in this retrospective chart review. All patients were offered treatment with ancillary services according to standardized care pathways. Data extracted included patient demographics, pelvic floor disorder diagnoses, baseline severity measures, payment model, and ancillary services used. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified variables predicting higher uptake of ancillary services. RESULTS: A total of 575 women with pelvic floor disorders presented for care during the study period, of which 35.14% attended at least 1 appointment with any ancillary services provider. Ancillary service utilization did not differ between patients in the BPM group and those in the FFSM group (36.22 vs 33.47%; P = 0.489). Social work services were more likely to be used by the BPM compared with the FFSM group (15.95 vs 6.28%; P < 0.001). The diagnosis of fecal incontinence was associated with a higher chance of using any ancillary service (odds ratio, 4.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.81–13.33; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: One third of patients with pelvic floor disorders receiving care in an IPU used colocated ancillary services. Utilization does not differ between payment models.

The levator plate descent angle (LPDA) quantifies the levator plate position with reference to the pubic bone and perineal body at rest. Unfortunately, research on this notable new parameter is lacking, but it is clear that levator ani deficiency (LAD) will undermine the fundamental role of the levator ani muscle (LAM) in organ support. The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between the LPDA and LAD in patients with pelvic floor disorders. This retrospective study was conducted at Seoul Songdo Hospital, Korea between August 2019 and August 2020 on women with symptoms of pelvic floor disorder such as urinary incontinence, constipation, and fecal incontinence. In all cases, three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound was performed for LAD scoring, minimal levator hiatus, and LPDA evaluation. We evaluated LAD using a scoring system that graded levator injury according to the insertion point of each subdivision scored unilaterally. For the entire LAM group, a cumulative LAD score that ranged between 0 and 18 was possible. Scores were categorized as mild (0–6 points), moderate (7–12 points), and severe (13–18 points) deficiency A total of 93 patients were included in the study (mean age 65.89 ± 11.12 [range, 34–86] years). Thirteen participants had mild LAD scores (14.0%), 42 had moderate LAD scores (45.2%), and 38 had severe LAD scores (40.9%). There was a significant difference in mean age (59.23 ± 12.55 years vs. 64.43 ± 10.03 vs. 69.79 ± 10.55 years, p = 0.005) and mean parity (1.85 ± 0.90 vs 2.48 ± 1.15 vs 2.76 ± 1.10, p = 0.038) of patients between groups. There was also a significant difference in the mean Wexner incontinence score (7.14 ± 3.63 vs 7.24 ± 5.76 vs 11.41 ± 5.54, p = 0.028) and in the mean fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQOL) score (12.91 ± 3.11 vs 14.10 ± 3.87 vs 10.41 ± 3.65, p = 0.014). The mean value of the LPDA in the group with mild LAD scores was 14.65° (SD ± 3.54) and in the group with moderate LAD scores was 9.66° (SD ± 3.36). In the group with severe LAD scores, the mean LPDA was 1.83° (SD ± 4.71). The mean value for minimal levator hiatus (MLH) area in the mild LAD score group was 14.16cm2 (SD ± 2.72), that in the moderate LAD score group was 15.82cm2 (SD ± 2.30), and that in the severe LAD score group was 17.99cm2 (SD ± 2.81). There were significant differences between the three groups both in decreasing LPDA (p

Objectives The objectives of this study were to describe trajectories of pelvic floor symptoms and support from the third trimester to 1 year postpartum in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and to explore factors associated with their resolution between 8 weeks postpartum and 1 year postpartum. Methods Five hundred ninety-seven nulliparous women 18 years or older who gave birth vaginally at term completed the Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examination at the third trimester, 8 weeks postpartum, and 1 year postpartum. Results At 1 year postpartum, 41%, 32%, and 23% of participants reported stress urinary incontinence, nocturia, and flatus incontinence, respectively, and 9% demonstrated maximal vaginal descent (MVD) ≥ 0 cm. For more common symptoms, incidence rates between the third trimester and 8 weeks postpartum ranged from 6% for urinary frequency to 22% for difficult bowel movements, and resolution rates between 8 weeks postpartum and 1 year postpartum ranged from 23% for stress urinary incontinence to 73% for pain. Between the third trimester and 8 weeks postpartum, 13% demonstrated de novo MVD ≥ 0 cm. For most symptoms, the presence of the same symptom before delivery decreased the probability of resolution between 8 weeks postpartum and 1 year. However, the sensitivities of predelivery vaginal bulge and MVD of 0 cm or greater for those outcomes at 1 year postpartum was overall low (10-12%). Conclusions One year postpartum, urinary and bowel symptoms are common in primiparous women who gave birth vaginally. A substantial portion of this burden is represented by symptoms present before delivery, while most of the prevalence of worse anatomic support is accounted for by de novo changes after delivery.

The objective of this study was to compare the impact of different modes of delivery, especially forceps delivery (FD), on pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) through vaginal surface electromyography (sEMG) in primiparous women at early (6–8 weeks) postpartum. A total of 1259 primiparous women with full-term singleton births were included in this cross-sectional study. Of these, 98 were delivered by forceps, 865 underwent spontaneous vaginal delivery (SD) and 296 underwent elective cesarean delivery (CD). Clinical demographic characteristics and vaginal sEMG variables of parturients 6–8 weeks after birth were collected and analyzed using SPSS software. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, Chi-square test or Student’s t-test was used according to the variable type. Spearman correlation and binary logistic regression analyses were also used. P/α ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Amplitude of fast and sustained contractions on sEMG in the FD group was significantly lower compared with the CD and SD groups. The sEMG amplitude of all contractions was significantly higher in the CD group compared with the FD and SD groups (P

OBJECTIVE To determine whether all three components of the levator ani muscle (pubovisceral [= pubococcygeal], puborectal and iliococcygeal) and the external anal sphincter are equally affected by oedema associated with muscle injury after vaginal birth. DESIGN Observational cross-sectional study. SETTING Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan. POPULATION Primiparous women classified as high risk for levator ani muscle injury during childbirth. METHOD MRI scans obtained 6-8 weeks postpartum were analysed. Muscle oedema was assessed on axial and coronal fluid-sensitive magnetic resonance (MRI) scans. Presence of oedema was separately determined in each levator ani muscle component and in the external anal sphincter for all subjects. Descriptive statistics and correlation with obstetric variables were obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Oedema score on fluid-sensitive MRI scans. RESULTS Of the 78 women included in this cohort, 51.3% (n = 40/78) showed muscle oedema in the pubovisceral (one bilateral avulsion excluded), 5.1% (n = 4/78) in the puborectal and 5.1% (n = 4/78) in the iliococcygeal muscle. No subject showed definite oedema on external anal sphincter. Incidence of oedema on the pubovisceral muscle was seven times higher than on any of the other analysed muscles (all paired comparisons, P

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether oxytocin for induction or augmentation of labor impacts the incidence or persistence of pelvic floor symptoms and support 5–10 weeks after first vaginal delivery. METHODS: Participants in this prospective cohort study were nulliparous women ≥ 18 years that delivered vaginally at ≥ 37 weeks gestation, completed the Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire (EPIQ) and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examination (POP-Q) in third trimester and 5–10 weeks postpartum. We compared the incidence and persistence of symptomatic EPIQ domains and worse vaginal support (maximal vaginal descent ≥ 0 cm) between women who received oxytocin to those that did not (with or without prostaglandin or mechanical methods in both groups). We performed modified binomial regression to calculate adjusted relative risks of each outcome with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Mean age of the 722 participants was 28.3 (SD 5.2) years; 20% were Hispanic. There were no significant differences according to oxytocin exposure in either incidence or persistence of symptomatic EPIQ domains or worse vaginal support. We found similar results in sensitivity analyses comparing women who received oxytocin as the sole pharmacologic agent to women who received no pharmacologic agent. After adjusting for demographic and obstetric factors associated with incidence and persistence of symptoms and support, oxytocin exposure continued to have no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Oxytocin during labor does not significantly increase the risks for the incidence or persistence of pelvic floor symptoms or worse vaginal support in the early postpartum period, though power for less frequent outcomes was limited. SINGLE SENTENCE SUMMARY: Oxytocin during labor does not significantly increase the risks for the incidence or persistence of pelvic floor symptoms or worse vaginal support in the early postpartum period.

Introduction and hypothesis There is still no consensus on definitions of detrusor underactivity; therefore, it is difficult to estimate the prevalence. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of detrusor underactivity in a cohort of patients with pelvic floor disorders according to different proposed urodynamics definitions. The secondary objectives were to estimate the association between detrusor underactivity and symptoms, anatomy and urodynamic findings and to build predictive models. Methods Patients who performed urodynamic evaluation for pelvic floor disorders between 2008 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Detrusor underactivity was evaluated according to Schafer’s detrusor factor, Abrams’ bladder contractility index and Jeong cut-offs. The degree of concordance between each method was measured with Cohenʼs kappa, and differences were tested using Student’s t test, Wilcoxon test and Pearson’s chi-squared test. Results The prevalence of detrusor underactivity among a cohort of 2092 women, concerning the three urodynamic definitions, was 33.7%, 37.0% and 4.1%, respectively. Age, menopausal status, voiding/bulging symptoms, anterior and central prolapse, first desire to void and positive postvoid residual were directly related to detrusor underactivity. Conversely, stress urinary incontinence, detrusor pressures during voiding and maximum flow were inversely associated. Final models for detrusor underactivity resulted in poor accuracy for all considered definitions. Conclusions The prevalence of detrusor underactivity varies depending on the definition considered. Although several clinical variables resulted as independent predictors of detrusor underactivity, instrumental evaluation still plays a key role in the diagnosis.

The multifactorial pathophysiology of pelvic floor disorder accounts for the coexistence of several pelvic floor disorders in many women. Up to 54% of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) report concurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI). While POP is a risk factor for coexistent SUI, apical and anterior prolapse can also conceal SUI symptoms that are unmasked by POP repair, resulting in de novo SUI postoperatively. It is important for pelvic reconstructive surgeons to consider the relationship between POP and urinary incontinence in presurgical planning and to discuss with patients the risks and advantages of concurrent versus staged anti-incontinence procedures.

This study is aimed at evaluating the readability and quality of Wikipedia articles on pelvic floor disorders (PFD) and comparing their content with International Urogynecological Association patient education leaflets. Readability was assessed using six different readability scales, including the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, which is considered superior for scoring healthcare information. Quality was assessed by three female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellows using the modified DISCERN instrument. DISCERN is validated to evaluate the quality of written consumer health information; it was subsequently modified by health education researchers to enable the evaluation of Wikipedia articles. We evaluated 30 Wikipedia articles that correlated with 29 International Urogynecological Association leaflets. The mean SMOG score of the Wikipedia articles was 12.0 ± 2.1 (12th-grade reading level) whereas the mean SMOG score of the International Urological Association (IUGA) leaflets was 3.4 ± 0.3 (third-grade reading level, p

Objectives To determine the wait times to see an academic Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) urologist or gynecologist and to identify factors that may impact these wait times. Methods We reviewed all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accredited urology and gynecology residency programs. Offices of FPMRS providers were called to ascertain the earliest available new patient visit for a fictional female patient with “urine leakage.” Programs without FPMRS faculty (18.7%) were excluded. FPMRS providers that did not accept Medicaid (15.6%) were also excluded. Negative binomial regression was performed using SPSS v24. Results Final analysis included 362 FPMRS providers. Median wait time for a patient with Medicaid was 30 days (interquartile range [IQR] 15-51) and 26 days (IQR 14-42) for Medicare. The median wait time to see an FPMRS-trained gynecologist was 28 days (IQR 15-50) while FPMRS-trained urologists had a median wait time of 25 days (IQR 13.8-43.3). Female providers had longer median wait times when compared to male providers (30 vs 25 days). On regression analysis, only female gender of the provider was significant (P Conclusion Our study found that nearly 1 in 5 academic departments did not have an FPMRS-trained provider. We found that new patients with urinary incontinence encountered substantial wait times to see FPMRS providers at academic institutions. As we project increased demand for the FPMRS workforce, our findings reflect a challenging landscape where training additional FPMRS providers may be needed to meet demand.

This study was to translate and validate self-reported questionnaires, the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) into Sinhala, the language spoken by the majority of Sri Lankans. A total of 270 patients were enrolled in this study. Two groups were selected with pelvic organ prolapse (POP)—cases and without POP—controls in a ratio of 1:2 respectively. Psychometric properties of the questionnaires were assessed using content validity, face validity, convergent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and reliability. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) was used as the test to quantify POP. Excellent content validity was demonstrated by a content validity ratio for all items by experts. Face validity was confirmed by non-experts using a five-point Likert scale and Mann–Whitney U test for all items. Internal consistency was found to be high for both questionnaires (Cronbach’s alpha >0.8) in all items. Construct validity was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve is above 0.5 in all items in both questionnaires. Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson coefficient correlation, which was above 0.8 for all subscales. Reliability was low for all subscales in the paired t test. The Sinhala versions of PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7 were valid, consistent, responsive, but have low reliability in the Sri Lankan setting.

Pelvic floor dysfunction is prevalent, with multifactorial causes and variable clinical presentations. Accurate diagnosis and assessment of the involved structures commonly requires a multidisciplinary approach. Imaging is often complementary to clinical assessment, and the most commonly used modalities for pelvic floor imaging include fluoroscopic defecography, magnetic resonance defecography, and pelvic floor ultrasound. This collaboration opinion paper was developed by representatives from multiple specialties involved in care of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction (radiologists, urogynecologists, urologists, and colorectal surgeons). Here, we discuss the utility of imaging techniques in various clinical scenarios, highlighting the perspectives of referring physicians. The final draft was endorsed by the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR), American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS), and the American Urological Association (AUA).

Aim: Discussions regarding sex after colorectal and pelvic floor surgery are often overlooked by clinicians. This is the first patient designed and delivered study to explore sexual function and practices after colorectal surgery. The aim was to explore the questions about sex that matter to patients and their partners following colorectal or pelvic floor surgery through a patient and public involvement survey. The results of this work will underpin the creation of a sex patient reported outcome measure. Methods: An anonymous online survey tool (Survey Monkey™) was disseminated via social media (Twitter, Facebook). Thematic analysis was applied to 130 free text comments posted by participants to identify key themes. Results: Some 632 individuals completed the survey. Most respondents were women (80% n = 507), 49.5% (n = 312) were married and 14% (n = 87) identified as LGBT+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender +). Indications for surgery varied: 34% were treated for ulcerative colitis (n = 214); 31% Crohn's (n = 196); 17% (n = 109) cancer; and 17% (n = 110) for perianal fistula. For patients who had a stoma formed (85%, n = 540), over half (51%, n = 324) lived with their stoma for 1–5 years. Respondents reported substantial alterations to their preferences for sexual positions, sexual activity and body confidence following surgery. Most respondents indicated that they were not offered advice about sex by a healthcare professional. Conclusions: The survey showed a substantial impact on the mechanics of sex following colorectal surgery. Few patients were offered preoperative information regarding sex, which has implications for informed consent. This study demonstrates a clear unmet need, voiced by patients, that open dialogue is necessary preoperatively to discuss sexual (dys)function.

The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and PFDI-20 have been translated and validated into several languages ​​with different measurement property values ​​and are recommended by the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI) as grade A for assessing pelvic floor dysfunction. Thus, the aim of the current study was to investigate the measurement properties of the PFDI and PFDI-20. Systematic review conducted in August 2020 through a search performed in PubMed, SCOPUS, WoS, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for studies that evaluated the measurement properties of the PFDI and PFDI-20. The data were analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Initially, 2857 studies were found, and 7 studies on PFDI and 25 on PFDI-20 were analyzed. The PFDI presented high quality of evidence for hypothesis testing, moderate for test-retest reliability and responsiveness, and very low quality of evidence for content validity. The PFDI-20 presented high quality of evidence for criterion validity, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness, moderate quality for test-retest reliability and measurement errors, and very low quality of evidence for content validity. It was not possible to rate the quality of evidence of the internal consistency of the PFDI and PFDI-20. No studies assessed the cross-cultural validity. Only the hypothesis testing presented high quality of evidence for the PFDI. Criterion validity, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness presented a high quality of evidence for the PFDI-20. Due to the high degree of recommendation of the PFDI and PFDI-20 given by the ICI, further studies are needed to reevaluate all the measurement properties of these instruments.

Background: Obesity represents a critical health issue and it is also a risk factor for pelvic floor disorders (PFD). It is important to screen patients for obesity to assess their quality of life (QOL) and reduce health care costs. Methods: We evaluated the prevalence of PFD, such as urinary incontinence (UI), fecal incontinence (FI), constipation, rectal and female pelvic organ prolapse, and also the QOL of obese patients referred to our center. Results: The most prevalent PFD was constipation, affecting 18% (n = 71) of the patients, 11% for FI (n = 43), and 17% for UI (n = 67). The QOL, according to the Short Form-36 results, was worse in the obese group with PFD than the obese patients without PFD (p < 0.01). In only one subscale, mental health, the difference was not statistically different. Conclusions: The prevalence of PFD was almost similar between the obese and the control group. However, obese patients with PFD present a lower QOL than obese patients without PFD. This aspect is essential to investigate on embarrassing health problems, often hidden by patients, to improve QOL.

OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study were to describe patients' surgical goals and determine if goal attainment is associated with postoperative satisfaction and regret. METHODS Women undergoing surgery for pelvic floor disorders between June and December 2019 were recruited. At their initial visit, patients listed up to 4 surgical goals. Three months after surgery, patients completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, Satisfaction with Decision Scale, and Decision Regret Scale. They were also shown their initial goals and asked, "Did you achieve this goal by having surgery?" Women who achieved all goals were designated "goal achievers," and those who did not achieve even 1 goal were "goal nonachievers" (GNAs). RESULTS Ninety-nine patients listed a median of 1 (range, 1-4) goals. Goals were categorized as follows: symptom improvement (52%), treatment achievement (23%), lifestyle improvement (17%), and information gathering (6%). Ninety-one percent of patients were goal achievers, and 9% were GNAs. Goal achievers had higher Satisfaction with Decision Scale scores (5.0 [4.7-5.0] vs 4.0 [3.8-4.8], P = 0.002), lower Decision Regret Scale scores (1.0 [1.0-1.4] vs 2.0 [1.1-2.7], P = 0.001), and better Patient Global Impression of Improvement scores (1.0 [1.0-2.0] vs 2.0 [1.0-4.0], P = 0.004). In prolapse surgery patients, postoperative Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory scores were similar; however, GNAs had higher postoperative Urinary Distress Inventory scores (17.0 ± 18.0 vs 45.8 ± 20.8, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Ninety-one percent of women achieved their presurgical goals, the most common being symptom relief. Goal achievers have higher satisfaction and less regret; however, those with worsening or de novo urinary symptoms are more likely to be GNAs and be unsatisfied.

Objective The aim of the study was to validate a Spanish-translated survey assessing patients' perceptions of mesh use in pelvic floor surgery. Methods An English-language survey evaluating perceptions of mesh use underwent a process of Spanish translation and validation, using a forward-backward translation validation protocol. Self-identified bilingual Latinas with symptoms of pelvic floor disorders were recruited to participate in cognitive interviews after completing the survey in English and Spanish. κ coefficient and Cronbach α were calculated for measurement of reliability and internal consistency in responses. A P value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 30 women were randomized to complete the initial survey in either English or Spanish. Demographics for the 2 cohorts were similar. For the Spanish-translated survey overall, 86% described the questions as "somewhat easy" or "very easy" to understand, and 93% reported that it was "clear" or "very clear" that the survey aimed to investigate their thoughts regarding mesh use. Approximately 63% of the participants expressed confusion over the use of the Spanish medical term "cabestrillo," translated for "sling." There were no significant differences in the responses on cognitive interview between the 2 groups. Overall, the responses between English and Spanish versions of the survey demonstrated good reliability and internal consistency. Conclusions This study demonstrated face validity of a Spanish-translated survey assessing perceptions of mesh use in pelvic surgery in a Latina population. Participants' feedback was crucial to optimizing the quality of the survey for future studies that will evaluate Spanish-speaking patients' views of mesh implants in pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Resume Contexte La grossesse et le post-partum sont des periodes de la vie au cours desquelles peuvent apparaitre des troubles pelviperineaux (TPP). Objectif L’objectif de cette revue est de preciser les connaissances des femmes en periode perinatale sur les TPP, leurs facteurs de risques et les mesures preventives. Sources documentaires Une revue systematique a ete realisee a partir des bases de donnees PubMed, Cochrane Library, LISSA et Kinedoc et a partir des mots-cles « knowledge », « awareness », « beliefs », « pelvic floor », « post-partum », « pregnancy ». Seules les etudes, redigees en anglais ou en francais, evaluant les connaissances des femmes a l’aide d’un questionnaire, ont ete incluses dans la revue. La recherche a ete effectuee sans limitation temporelle et jusqu’au 10 mai 2020. Selection des etudes Au total, sur 240 etudes, 14 etudes transversales ont ete retenues, regroupant un echantillon de 3950 participantes. Resultats Les themes abordes dans les questionnaires ont ete l’anatomie, la fonction du plancher pelvien, l’ensemble des TPP, leurs facteurs de risque et les mesures preventives. Les scores de connaissances des femmes interrogees sur ces differents themes sont faibles. Il a egalement ete montre que l’education des femmes sur les facteurs de risque et les mesures preventives concernant la survenue des TPP etait incomplete. Conclusion Au final, les femmes en periode perinatale ont peu de connaissances sur les TPP.

Introduction: Approximately 25% of women in the United States experience a symptomatic pelvic floor disorder such as urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, anal incontinence, and sexual dysfunction. Aspects associated with breast cancer treatment such a chemotherapy, oophorectomy/ovarian suppression, and endocrine therapy may predispose women to pelvic floor disorders. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders among breast cancer survivors has been cited at 18%, but unpublished cross-sectional data suggests the prevalence may be much higher. In this study, 8.5% - 11.5% of participants experienced prolapse symptoms, 56.2% experienced anal incontinence symptoms, and 43.3% - 51.2% experience urinary incontinence symptoms. While pelvic floor dysfunction is associated with lower quality of life, it is unknown if breast cancer survivors with pelvic floor disorders experience decreased quality of life. The primary aim of this study was to assess if breast cancer survivors with pelvic floor disorders experience lower quality of life. Methods: Women 18 years or older who were previously treated for breast cancer and who were enrolled in a cancer research registry were invited to complete the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and the Short Form 12. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the research registry. A participant was considered eligible for the study if she had enrolled in the cancer registry and completed all core questions (i.e. demographics, cancer diagnosis, cancer treatment, endocrine therapy, medical/surgical history, and risk factors). As per standard PFDI-20 reporting, presence of a symptom was defined as answering a 1, 2, 3, or 4 to a question, while presence of a bothersome symptom was defined as answering a 2, 3, or 4. A score of 26 or less on the FSFI was considered indicative of sexual dysfunction. Results: A total of 634 women were considered eligible for enrollment in the study. 445 were able to be contacted, and 410 women agreed to participate in the study. Of those, 303 returned the PFDI-20 questionnaire and FSFI questionnaire, and 264 returned the SF-12 for response rates of 74% and 64%, respectively. Overall, higher scores on the PFDI-20 was associated with lower scores on both the physical and mental components of the SF-12 (Rho = -0.298, p = Conclusion: Among a subset of breast cancer survivors, pelvic disorders including pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, and anal incontinence exist, and these disorders are associated with decreased mental wellbeing. All pelvic floor disorders except pelvic organ prolapse were associated with decreased physical wellbeing. None of the domains of female sexual dysfunction were associated with decreased physical or mental wellbeing among breast cancer survivors. A subset of breast cancer survivors experiences bothersome pelvic floor disorders and thus screening for these disorders can increase referrals to appropriate treatment and complement survivorship care to enhance overall quality of life. Citation Format: Jon F Pennycuff, Felice Yang, Tania Lobo, Caroline Jackman, Colleen McGuire, Ami Chitalia, Kristi Graves. Pelvic floor disorders and quality of life among breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS9-26.

Pelvic floor disorders are common and can negatively impact quality of life. Imaging of patients with pelvic floor disorders has been extremely heterogeneous between institutions due in part to variations in clinical expectations, technical considerations, and radiologist experience. In order to assess variations in utilization and technique of pelvic floor imaging across practices, the society of abdominal radiology (SAR) disease-focused panel on pelvic floor dysfunction developed and administered an online survey to radiologists including the SAR membership. Results of the survey were compared with published recommendations for pelvic floor imaging to identify areas in need of further standardization. MRI was the most commonly reported imaging technique for pelvic floor imaging followed by fluoroscopic defecography. Ultrasound was only used by a small minority of responding radiologists. The survey responses demonstrated variability in imaging utilization, patient referral patterns, imaging protocols, patient education, and interpretation and reporting of pelvic floor imaging examinations. This survey highlighted inconsistencies in technique between institutions as well as potential gaps in knowledge that should be addressed to standardize evaluation of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction.