Search

Effective nutrition policies require timely, accurate individual dietary consumption data; collection of such information has been hampered by cost and complexity of dietary surveys and lag in producing results. The objective of this work was to assess accuracy and cost-effectiveness of a streamlined, tablet-based dietary data collection platform for 24-hour individual dietary recalls (24HR) administered using INDDEX24 platform v. a pen-and-paper interview(PAPI) questionnaire, with weighed food record (WFR) as a benchmark. This cross-sectional comparative study included women 18–49 years old from rural Burkina Faso (n 116 INDDEX24; n 115 PAPI). A WFR was conducted; the following day, a 24HR was administered by different interviewers. Food consumption data were converted into nutrient intakes. Validity of 24HR estimates of nutrient and food group consumption was based on comparison with WFR using equivalence tests (group level) and percentages of participants within ranges of percentage error (individual level). Both modalities performed comparably estimating consumption of macro- and micronutrients, food groups and quantities (modalities’ divergence from WFR not significantly different). Accuracy of both modalities was acceptable (equivalence to WFR significant at P < 0·05) at group level for macronutrients, less so for micronutrients and individual-level consumption (percentage within ±20 % for WFR, 17–45 % for macronutrients, 5–17 % for micronutrients). INDDEX24 was more cost-effective than PAPI based on superior accuracy of a composite nutrient intake measure (but not gram amount or item count) due to lower time and personnel costs. INDDEX24 for 24HR dietary surveys linked to dietary reference data shows comparable accuracy to PAPI at lower cost.

Objective:To describe existing online, 24-h dietary recall (24-h DR) tools in terms of functionalities and ability to tackle challenges encountered during national dietary surveys, such as maximising response rates and collecting high-quality data from a representative sample of the population, while minimising the cost and response burden.Design:A search (from 2000 to 2019) was conducted in peer-reviewed and grey literature. For each tool, information on functionalities, validation and user usability studies, and potential adaptability for integration into a new context was collected.Setting:Not country-specificParticipants:General populationResults:Eighteen online 24-h DR tools were identified. Most were developed in Europe, for children ≥10 years old and/or for adults. Eight followed the five multiple-pass steps but used various methodologies and features. Almost all tools (except three) validated their nutrient intake estimates, but with high heterogeneity in methodologies. User usability was not always assessed, and rarely by applying real-time methods. For researchers, eight tools developed a web platform to manage the survey and five appeared to be easily adaptable to a new context.Conclusions:Among the eighteen online 24-h DR tools identified, the best candidates to be used in national dietary surveys should be those that were validated for their intake estimates, had confirmed user and researcher usability, and seemed sufficiently flexible to be adapted to new contexts. Regardless of the tool, adaptation to another context will still require time and funding, and this is probably the most challenging step.

Background The collection of weighed food records (WFR) is a gold standard for dietary assessment. We propose using the 24-h recall method combined with a portable camera and a food atlas (24hR-camera). This combination overcomes the disadvantages of the 24-h dietary recall method. Our study examined the validity of the 24hR-camera method against WFR by comparing the results. Methods Study subjects were 30 Japanese males, aged 31–58 years, who rarely cook and reside in the Tokyo metropolitan area. For validation, we compared the estimated food intake (24hR-camera method) and weighed food intake (WFR method). The 24hR-camera method uses digital photographs of all food consumed during a day, taken by the subjects, and a 24-h recall questionnaire conducted by a registered dietitian, who estimates food intake by comparing the participant’s photographs with food atlas photographs. The WFR method involves a registered dietitian weighing each food item prepared for the subject to consume and any leftovers. Food intake was calculated for each food group and nutrient using the 24hR-camera vs. weighed methods. Results Correlation coefficients between the estimated vs. weighed food intake were 0.7 or higher in most food groups but were low in food groups, such as oils, fats, condiments, and spices. The estimated intake of vegetables was significantly lower for the 24hR-camera method compared to the WFR method. For other food groups, the percentages of the mean difference between estimated vs. weighed food intake were -22.1% to 5.5%, with no significant differences between the methods (except for algae, which had a very low estimated intake). The correlation coefficients between the two methods were 0.774 for energy, and 0.855, 0.769, and 0.763 for the macronutrients, proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates, respectively, demonstrating high correlation coefficients: greater than 0.75. The correlation coefficients between the estimated vs. weighed for salt equivalents and potassium intake were 0.583 and 0.560, respectively, but no significant differences in intake were observed. Conclusions The 24hR-camera method satisfactorily estimated the intake of energy and macronutrients (except salt equivalents and potassium) in Japanese males and was confirmed as a useful method for dietary assessment.

Background Information on long-term dietary intake is often required for research or program planning, but surveys routinely use short-term assessments such as 24-h recalls (24HRs). Methods to reduce the impact of within-person variation in 24HRs, such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI) method, typically require extensive training and skill. Objectives We introduce the Simulating Intake of Micronutrients for Policy Learning and Engagement (SIMPLE) macro, a new tool to increase the accessibility of 24HR analysis. We explain the underlying theory behind the tool and provide examples of potential applications. Methods The SIMPLE macro connects the core NCI statistical code to estimate usual intake distributions and includes additional code to enable advanced analyses such as predictive modeling. The related SIMPLE-Iron macro applies the full probability method to estimate inadequate iron intake, and the SIMPLE-1D macro is used for descriptive or modeling analyses of data with a single 24HR per person. The macros and associated documentations are freely available. We analyzed data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the Cameroon National Micronutrient Survey to compare the SIMPLE macro to 1) the core NCI code using the Estimated Average Requirement cut point method, and 2) the IMAPP software for iron only, and to demonstrate the applications of the SIMPLE macro for estimating usual intake and predictive modeling. Results The SIMPLE macro generates identical results to the core NCI code. The SIMPLE-Iron macro also produces estimates of inadequate iron intake comparable to the IMAPP software. The examples demonstrate application of the SIMPLE macro to 1) descriptive analyses of nutrient intake from food and supplements (NHANES), and 2) analyses accounting for breast-milk nutrient intake and modeling fortification and supplementation programs (Cameroon). Conclusions The SIMPLE macros may facilitate the analysis and modeling of dietary data to inform nutrition research, programs, and policy.

OBJECTIVES: Dietary data are rarely collected in low- and middle-income countries due to complexity, cost, and time burden. To facilitate the collection and use of individual dietary data, the International Dietary Data Expansion (INDDEX) Project has developed INDDEX24, a novel dietary assessment platform to collect and analyze 24-hr dietary recall (24HR) data. This study assessed the cost and cost-efficiency (cost per respondent) of INDDEX24 compared to the traditional pen-and-paper interview (PAPI) approach to collecting and processing 24HR data. METHODS: Conducted alongside validation studies of the INDDEX24 platform in Viet Nam and Burkina Faso, we carried out activity-based costing studies to estimate and compare the cost of using INDDEX24 and PAPI to conduct a 24HR survey. We defined and costed a series of activities required to complete data collection and prepare the datasets, including development of dietary reference data, survey preparation, training, survey execution, data entry, and data cleaning and processing. RESULTS: In Viet Nam, the total economic cost of the 24HR was $111,004 ($755/respondent, n = 147) using INDDEX24 and $120,483 ($820/respondent, n = 147) using the PAPI modality. In Burkina Faso, the total cost of the 24HR using INDDEX24 was $78,043 ($538/respondent, n = 145) and $78,933 ($541/respondent, n = 146) using PAPI. The higher costs in Viet Nam were primarily driven by the preparation of dietary reference data, which was an extensive and nationally focused effort, whereas in Burkina it was regionally focused and benefited from previous development of relevant dietary data. In both countries, while INDDEX24 had higher costs associated with survey preparation (including purchasing tablets and a CommCare subscription), these costs were more than offset by the higher PAPI costs associated with data entry and data cleaning and processing. CONCLUSIONS: In two distinct contexts, the cost of conducting a 24HR was lower (Viet Nam) or approximately equivalent (Burkina Faso) using INDDEX24 than using PAPI. As the INDDEX24 dietary reference database is populated with reference data from which future users of INDDEX24 can draw, the cost of using INDDEX24 will likely decline further. FUNDING SOURCES: The INDDEX Project is implemented by the Tufts University Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy with funding from The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

OBJECTIVES: The study assessed the relative accuracy of INDDEX24, a computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) approach to conducting a 24-hour dietary recall (24HR), compared to the pen-and-paper interview (PAPI) approach against a full-day observed weighed food record (WFR) in northern Viet Nam where the diet is diverse and complex. METHODS: Women aged 18–49 from northern Viet Nam were randomly assigned to be interviewed with the CAPI or PAPI 24HR the day after other enumerators conducted a WFR. The Two One Sided T-test (TOST) assessed equivalence of each recall-benchmark method comparison using a 10% bound. A difference-in-differences approach compared the significance of differences between the CAPI vs. WFR and PAPI vs. WFR modalities. Nutrient intakes were logged to achieve a normal distribution. RESULTS: Both the PAPI and the CAPI were statistically equivalent to the WFR across indicators of average total food items, total grams of intake, energy intake, all macro- and micronutrients tested (except Vitamin A for both CAPI and PAPI). The difference-in-difference analysis showed that the CAPI diverged significantly less than PAPI from the WFR for iron (0.9 v. −1.3 mg) and PAPI diverged less from the WFR than CAPI for protein (−3.7 v. 7.9 grams). There were no other statistically significant differences and, for both PAPI and CAPI, average deviations from the WFR were small. Individual-level comparisons showed 56% of PAPI and 59% of CAPI respondents were within +/−20% of the WFR intakes, while 26% of respondents in the PAPI group and 32% of the CAPI group had energy intakes by 24HR within +/- 10% of the WFR intakes. CONCLUSIONS: INDDEX24 was an accurate method for assessing food and nutrient intake among women of reproductive age in northern Viet Nam, when compared to a WFR. INDDEX24 performed at least as well as the PAPI 24HR modality across several different group and individual level measures for energy and nutrients of interest. Digital data collection platforms facilitate standardization of data collection and may reduce survey time and costs. Given these advantages, the INDDEX24 Dietary Assessment Platform should be considered for implementing high quality, individual-level, quantitative dietary surveys in low- and middle-income countries. FUNDING SOURCES: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Background Assessment of food intake is a cornerstone of nutritional research. However, the use of minimally validated dietary assessment methods is common and can generate misleading results. Thus, there is a need for valid, precise and cost-effective dietary assessment tools to be used in large cohort studies. The objective is to validate a newly developed automated self-administered web-based 24-h dietary recall (R24W), within a population of adults taking part in fully controlled feeding studies. Methods Sixty two adults completed the R24W twice while being fed by our research team. Actual intakes were precisely known, thereby allowing the analysis of the proportion of adequately self-reported items. Association between offered and reported portion sizes was assessed with correlation coefficients and agreement with the kappa score while systematics biases were illustrated with Bland-Altman Plot. Results Participants received an average of 16 food items per testing day. They reported 89.3% of the items they received. The more frequently omitted food categories were vegetables included in recipes (40.0%) as well as side vegetables (20.0%) and represented less than 5% of the actual daily energy intake. Offered and self-reported portion sizes were significantly correlated (r = 0.80 P

Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-25T10:33:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2021-05-01 Objectives: After dialysis initiation, a high protein diet is recommended due to significant nutrient losses through dialysate and increased risk of protein energy wasting. In peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, protein intake can be assessed through different methods that have some advantages and limitations, which affect its use on routine care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the agreement between 2 different methods (24-hour dietary recall and PNA—protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance) on estimating protein intake in PD patients. Design and Methods: Patients on PD for at least 3 months, aged 18 years old or more, were enrolled. To estimate protein intake, 24-hour dietary recall and PNA was used. PNA was calculated from 24-hour urine on the same day of the 24-hour dietary recall. Results: Fifty individuals on PD were included, mean age 55.7 ± 16.2 years, and body mass index 26.0 ± 4.5 kg/m2. The average energy consumption was 1788.79 ± 504.40 kcal/day, which corresponds to 26.81 ± 9.11 kcal/kg current body weight (BW)/day and 29.82 ± 8.39 kcal/kg ideal body weight (IBW)/day. The median of total daily and normalized protein intake estimated using dietary recall was 61.43 (45.28-87.40) g/day, 0.90 (0.58-1.22) g/kg current BW/day, and 1.04 (0.77-1.32) g/kg IBW/day, respectively. Daily protein intake estimated by PNA was 55.75 (48.27-67.74) g/day, protein intake normalized by current BW was 0.81 (0.72-0.99) g/kg and 0.92 (0.83-1.06) g/kg IBW/day. Bland-Altman analysis indicates no systematic bias for the assessment of total protein intake and normalized protein intake for current and ideal BW. Significant proportionality bias was observed for both evaluations, showing there is a dispersion of the values. Conclusions: Despite the absence of systematic bias in the Bland-Altman analysis, there is no agreement in the assessment of protein intake by dietary recall and PNA, due to the existence of proportionality bias. Thus, values can be influenced biased by the magnitude of the measures. Department of Internal Medicine Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP) Medical School Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU) Department of Internal Medicine Botucatu Medical School São Paulo State University (UNESP)

Eating foods high in added sugar has recently increased among people of all ages. This is expected to negatively affect health and life quality. This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between added sugar intake and sleep quality among university students. A total of 100 randomly selected female students (19-25 years old) from Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, participated in the study after applying exclusion criteria. Sample size was calculated with expected correlation of −0.4 between sugar intake and sleep quality, a power of 90%, and a type 1 error of 5%. Participants completed the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), sleep quality questionnaire, and 24-hour dietary recall. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25, and the χ2 test was used for measuring the association between added sugar intake and sleep quality, where P

OBJECTIVES: Self-reported dietary data suffer from high measurement error and findings that rely on them are of limited value. We determined the association of diet quality related biomarkers with associated measures from Block Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24); and the association of FFQ and ASA24. METHODS: This cross-sectional single-visit study included 127 subjects (18–60 years, BMI ≥18.5 kg/m(2)). Diet quality related biomarkers were collected from pre-planned subsample (N = 33) to measure - plasma alkylresorcinol for whole grain, omega-3 index, serum fatty acid composition for dairy, serum carotenoids for fruit and vegetable, and serum selenium for seafood intake. Self-reported dietary intake data for whole grain, Omega-3 index, fatty acid, carotenoids, and selenium were calculated per instrument guidelines using FFQ and ASA24. Biomarkers were analyzed by Mass Spectrometry Facility, TTU. Outcomes with missing data were handled via multiple imputation with predictive mean matching. Spearman's correlation coefficient (using R statistical software) were used to assess the association of biomarkers with self-reported measures (N = 33), and the association between FFQ and ASA24 (N = 33, and N = 127). RESULTS: Diet quality related biomarkers were not associated with self-reported intake (all P > 0.07), except, omega-3 index was significantly correlated with reported intake in FFQ (P = 0.01). Significant associations were reported for whole grain, omega-3 index, and dairy intake between FFQ and ASA24 (P = 0.02, P = 0.01, P = 0.05 respectively; N = 33). After further analysis with N = 127 between FFQ and ASA24 significant association were reported in whole grain (P = 0.02), Omega-3 index (P = 4.90e-3), dairy (P = 1.79e-8), and seafood intake (P = 6.06e-4), but not carotenoid intake (P = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: A significant association between measures via FFQ and ASA24 suggests consistency in self-reporting and also the likelihood these measures do not capture the time-frames they purport to – but rather a self-belief/representation of habitual intake patterns. Interestingly, the association of one of the biomarkers with self-reported intake suggests the necessity of including larger sample to better determine validity of self-reported data. FUNDING SOURCES: Texas Tech University.

Objective To evaluate inter-coder (between-coder) and intra-coder (within-coder) reliability among trained data coders who enter 24-hour dietary recall data collected through Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program operations in the state of Georgia. Design This study employed multiple cross-sectional evaluations of inter-coder reliability and a short-term longitudinal evaluation of intra-coder reliability. Participants/Setting Study participants consisted of trained data coders (n = 9) who were employed during the 12-month period of evaluation. Main Outcome Measures Primary outcome measures were inter-coder and intra-coder reliability across data entered into the Web-based Nutrition Education Evaluation and Reporting System. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 24. Descriptive statistics were generated and inter-coder and intra-coder reliability were assessed using 2-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients. Results Results of this evaluation indicated good to excellent inter-coder reliability among all coders, and excellent intra-coder reliability among the majority of coders. However, some notable inconsistencies were identified within the intra-coder reliability analyses. Conclusions Future strategies to improve data quality within Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program operations might include enhanced training for data coders, implementation of error detection protocols, expansion of the Web-based Nutrition Education Evaluation and Reporting System database, and exploration of automated, computer-assisted administration of 24-hour dietary recalls.

Background: Current methods for assessing children's dietary intake, such as interviewer-administered 24-h dietary recall (24-h DR), are time consuming and resource intensive. Self-administered instruments offer a low-cost diet assessment method for use with children. The present study assessed the validity of the Portuguese self-administered, computerised, 24-h DR (PAC24) against the observation of school lunch. Methods: Forty-one, 7–10-year-old children from two elementary schools, in Lisbon, were observed during school lunch followed by completion of the PAC24 the next day. Accuracy for reporting items was measured in terms of matches, intrusions and omissions; accuracy for reporting amounts was measured in terms of arithmetic and absolute differences for matches and amounts for omissions and intrusions; and accuracy for reporting items and amounts combined was measured in terms of total inaccuracy. The ratio of the estimated weight of food consumed with the actual weight consumed was calculated along with the limits of agreement using the method of Bland and Altman. Results: Comparison of PAC24 against observations at the food level resulted in values of 67.0% for matches, 11.5% for intrusions and 21.5% for omissions. The mean for total inaccuracy was 3.44 servings. For amounts, accuracy was high for matches (−0.17 and 0.23 servings for arithmetic and absolute differences, respectively) and lower for omissions (0.61 servings) and intrusions (0.55 servings). PAC24 was found to under-estimate the weight of food on average by 32% of actual intake. Conclusions: PAC24 is a lower-burden procedure for both respondents and researchers and, with slight modification, comprises a promising method for assessing diet among children.

Objective Identify practices for the collection of the 24-hour dietary recall (24HR) as used by the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) to assess the fidelity with which dietary data are collected. Methods An electronic survey sent nationally to all 75 EFNEP coordinators to assess methodology for collection, staff training, and coding of 24HR. Results A total of 67 surveys were returned, 53 of which were usable: 57% of programs used multiple collection periods (previous day vs previous 24 hours), 36% did not use a consistent number of passes in recall collection; only 17% exclusively used the validated 5-pass method; 88% trained paraprofessionals for ≤8 hours on recall collection and >6 different training programs were used; and 86% of programs used multiple coders. Conclusions and Implications The wide variation in reported collection, training, and coding practices raises concerns about the validity of the recall data and the appropriateness of combining data from multiple programs. To improve consistency, EFNEP could establish standardized methods for training, data collection, and data entry for the 24HR. These results may encourage the national program office to establish programmatic change that will support the fidelity of collection methods across all programs.

Food sources of nutrients in young children in China have been little investigated. The objective of this study was to understand feeding patterns of young children through an analysis of food sources of energy and nutrients in the diets of infants and toddlers living in urban areas in China. This study was part of the cross-sectional study, Maternal Infant Nutrition Growth (MING). One 24-h dietary recall was completed for a total of 1409 children (infants 6–11 months, younger toddlers 12–23 months, and older toddlers 24–36 months) via face-to-face interviews with the primary caregivers. All food, beverage and dietary supplements that the child consumed on the previous day were recorded and processed with a database including data from Chinese Food Composition tables. All reported foods and supplements were assigned to one of 83 food groups developed for the study. Percent contribution of each food group to nutrient intakes was calculated. Children in all 3 age groups received a majority of energy (52 to 69 %) from few foods including infant formula or growing-up (fortified) milk, rice, noodles, pork and eggs, with rice becoming the number one source of energy by 24 months. Rice and noodles were not only top sources of energy (17 to 26 %) and carbohydrate (27 to 40 %) but also top sources of protein (13 to 16 %), iron (13 to 18 %) and zinc (11 to 18 %). Supplements made substantial contributions to intakes of vitamin A, zinc, iron and calcium. Salt added during home-cooking was the main source of sodium (60 to 80 %). Few foods made up the core of the diets of infants and young toddlers living in urban areas in China. Low nutrient-dense rice and noodles were top sources of many nutrients, which could potentially lead to inadequate intakes of some key nutrients.

The study was conducted to collect information regarding food and nutrient intake of hypercholesterolemic adults (male n = 30, female n = 20). The Body Mass Index (BMI) of the respondents indicated that 70% of them had a BMI more than 26. The food intake of the respondents was recorded for three consecutive days using 24 hour dietary recall and questionnaire method. The intake of cereals, sugar and oil was significantly higher than the Recommended Dietary Intake (RDI) prescribed for Indians, whereas intake of pulses was at par with RDI. The consumption of green leafy and other vegetable and roots and tubers was significantly lower among both male and female respondents. The intake of protein was at par with recommended dietary allowance (RDA), but fat and energy intake were significantly higher in both male and female respondents. The subjects were given diet counselling and this received a good response from the respondents.

This article presents intakes of nutrients in the EPIC-Heidelberg and the EPIC-Potsdam (European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition) studies. Estimates are based on standardized 24-hour dietary recalls. Recalls from 1,013 men and 1,078 women in Heidelberg and from 1,032 men and 898 women in Potsdam were included in the analysis. The estimated nutrient intake was based on the German Food Code and Nutrient Data Base version II.3. Analyses were carried out stratified by sex and weighted for the day of the week and age. Men in Potsdam reported significantly higher intakes of energy (mean Potsdam = 10,718 kJ, mean Heidelberg = 10,387 kJ) and higher intakes of vitamins and minerals as compared with men in Heidelberg. However, Heidelberg men consumed more alcohol, α-tocopherol, phosphorus, calcium, and magnesium. Potsdam women reported lower energy (mean Potsdam = 7,537 kJ, mean Heidelberg = 7,855 kJ), alcohol, and cholesterol intakes as compared with Heidelberg women. Vitamin and mineral intakes were lower too, except for retinol and ascorbic acid. The intakes of energy and most nutrients observed in the Potsdam and Heidelberg study populations were within the range reported from other German studies. The observed differences between both study populations indicate different dietary patterns, increasing the exposure variation in the EPIC study.

This study reports the initial results of a baseline cross-sectional evaluation of the health and nutritional status of 58 old-old African Americans, 74 years of age and older, residing in low income housing complexes in metropolitan Oklahoma City. Although the population had a high overall functional status, cognitive status, and mood, there were a number of nutritional parameters suggestive of nutritional risk. In particular, 20% of subjects had relatively low serum albumin levels, 14% had serum cholesterol levels below 160 mg/dl, and a subset of the population reported low intake during 24 hour dietary recall. The National Center and Caucus on Black Aged report that 60% of African American elders live at or below the poverty level. These study findings suggest that the present cohort of African American elders may be at nutritional risk.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the quantitative agreement between a 4-day food record and a 24-hour dietary recall in young men. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy men aged 18-25 years had their food intake estimated by 4-day food record within one week following 24-hour dietary recall in a cross-sectional study. Resting metabolic rate was assessed by indirect calorimetry and Energy Expenditure was estimated by physical activity records completed simultaneously with food intake records. The validity of food records was determined by direct comparison of Energy Intake and Energy Expenditure (95% confidence interval for Energy Intake/Energy Expenditure). RESULTS: There were good agreements between the measurements of energy and macronutrient intakes by 24-hour dietary recall and 4-day food record at the group level, but not at the individual level. Compared to energy expenditure, about 20% and 9% of participants underreported their Energy Intake by 4-day food record and 24-hour dietary recall, respectively. Over 30% of underreporters of Energy Intake estimated by 24-hour dietary recall underreported Energy Intake estimated by 4-day food record. CONCLUSION: Both diet methods, 24-hour dietary recall and 4-day food record, may be used to collect data at the group level, but not at the individual level. Both methods, however, appear to underestimate Energy Intake. Underreporting may be subject-specific and appears that is more difficult to retrieve valid dietary data from some people than others. OBJETIVO: Medir a concordância qualitativa entre registros alimentares, obtidos durante 4 dias, e recordatório alimentar de 24 horas em homens jovens. MÉTODOS: Em um estudo com delineamento transversal, o consumo alimentar de 34 homens saudáveis com idades entre 18 e 25 anos foi medido por meio do recordatório alimentar de 24 horas e uma semana depois, por meio de 4 dias de registros alimentares. O gasto energético em repouso foi medido por calorimetria indireta e o gasto energético total foi medido por meio de registros de atividade física. A validade dos registros alimentares foi determinada por comparação direta do consumo energético com o gasto energético total (intervalo de confiança de 95% para consumo energético/gasto energético total). RESULTADOS: A concordância entre medidas de consumo energético e de consumo de macronutrientes, obtida por meio de registros alimentares de 4 dias e por recordatório de 24 horas, foi boa para grupos, mas não para indivíduos. Comparado com o gasto energético total, um baixo consumo energético foi observado em 20% e em 9% dos participantes, quando o consumo alimentar foi obtido por meio de registros alimentares de 4 dias e por recordatório de 24 horas, respectivamente. Mais de 30% dos participantes que tiveram baixo consumo energético, obtido com a utilização de recordatório de 24 horas, também tiveram baixo consumo energético a partir do exame dos registros alimentares de 4 dias. CONCLUSÃO: O recordatório de 24 horas é uma opção para registros alimentares de 4 dias na coleta de dados para grupos, mas não para indivíduos. Entretanto, baixo consumo alimentar, em alguns participantes, foi observado quando ambos os métodos foram utilizados na coleta de dados de consumo alimentar. É possível que a determinação de baixo consumo alimentar em alguns participantes seja específica do participante, sugerindo que pode ser mais difícil obter dados precisos de umas pessoas do que de outras.

The 24-hour dietary recall method is frequently used for dietary assessment. However, it is subject to errors by both respondent and observer bias and is largely influenced by the motivation and recall ability of the respondent. The weighment method is regarded as the gold standard for estimating nutrient intake. This study was undertaken to assess the validity of dietary recall in a group of seven maintenance hemodialysis patients, who also had corresponding weighed food records. Actual food consumed and residue were weighed separately. A dietary recall was taken on the next day. Subjects were not allowed to take any food or beverage other than that served during the study period. A good agreement was obtained between dietary recall and the weighed food record (the difference was within 10% of the results of weighment), although there was a consistent underestimate by dietary recall. The results also suggested a training effect since improved recall was noted during the later weeks of the study, although this difference was not statistically significant. Therefore, dietary recall as a method of dietary assessment may be of special value in chronic hemodialysis patients in India, who are usually a motivated and informed group.

In this paper, we address the problem of the reliability of quantitative historical estimation of nutrient intake during pregnancy. The normal physiological changes of pregnancy include changes of both nutritional requirements (1) and of the biochemical indices that serve as standards of nutritional adequacy (2). For instance, it is probable that decreasing Hb concentration more usually reflects plasma volume expansion, rather than depleted red cell mass. It is therefore not too surprising that low Hb concentration, at least above 8 g/lOO ml, has been associated with higher birthweight (3). Fat stores increase, but fat is not laid down uniformly throughout the body (4). These normal physiological changes [comprehensively reviewed by Hytten and Leitch (5)] influence strategy for nutritional assessment. It is very difficult to quantify nutrient intake among free living individuals, a necessity in studies requiring large numbers of subjects. The rapid changes of pregnancy compound such problems. The most accurate dietary techniques are not applicable to epidemiological research for several reasons. Women who will endure the intensive observational study of a metabolic ward or similar closed environment are not likely to be representative of the population from which they are drawn. Also, activity and behavior under closed conditions are probably different than when not constrained (6), and the issues of greatest import during pregnancy (for instance, the relationship of maternal nutrition to fetal growth and survival) demand much larger numbers of subjects than can possibly be studied by the techniques of the metabolic ward (7, 8). Food diaries can be kept by large numbers of free-living individuals, but only atypical, highly motivated women will keep them accurately: the participant not only must record, but must also weigh or estimate all portion sizes. In addition, the procedure probably interferes with normal food selection (9). The diet history, developed by Burke (10), and the food frequency checklist (1 1), aim to characterize typical, long-term diet intake, but suffer from inaccuracy of memory. The 24-h dietary recall has therefore become the most frequently used technique to characterize diet. Such recalls are of greater accuracy than techniques dependent on longer memory and, like other historical methods, can be integrated into standard prenatal care, minimizing the impact on participant convenience and behavior. However, they may not represent typical diet, since one day’s diet may be an invalid or unreliable estimate of long-term eating patterns. We have therefore studied the reliability of repeated 24-h diet recalls, to judge their utility as a measure of dietary intake during pregnancy. The validity of a measure is the extent to which the measure accurately reflects some underlying truth. In practice, another, presumably more accurate, measure serves as a criterion ofvalidity, since the “truth” remains unknown. Reliability has been defined as the ability of a procedure to give “the same results when used repeatedly in the same situation” (12). Data cannot be valid unless they are reliable; the obverse is not necessarily true. While our analysis addresses reliability, a brief review of studies of validity may help

The Protective Foods Recall (PFR), a new tool that includes a dietary demerit scoring system, was developed for evaluating nutrition programs for pregnant women of Mexican descent with low incomes. The tool costs less to administer than the 24‐hr, dietary recall because it takes about half the time and does not require calculation of nutrient content. The kinds and amounts of protective foods (foods with high nutrient densities) that the client recalled eating the previous day are recorded on the PFR and scored by the nutritionist during the first interview with the client. Dietary counselling based on the score can be given immediately without further calculation. When compared with the 24‐hr, dietary recall, the PFR was sensitive and specific. The study suggests that the PFR is an effective tool for evaluating nutrition programs for pregnant Hispanics with low incomes.

This study assesses the operational feasibility and validity of a unique telephone-administered 24-h dietary recall methodology. Dietary interviews were conducted by telephone with 204 low-income elderly subjects. Food portion size estimation was done using a two-dimensional food portion visual aid the that was mailed to respondents' homes. The mean intakes and distributions of nine nutrients among males and females in the research sample were compared with those reported in the 1971 to 1974 Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. After correcting for time trends in nutrient intake, the mean intake values found in the survey were very similar to those reported by the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. In testing the frequency distributions of intakes, only two nutrients for women and one for men had statistically significant differences. The telephone-administered dietary methodology thus produced acceptable estimates of the means and distributions of nutrient intakes among groups of individuals and has the potential of markedly reducing the cost, time, logistical, and personnel constraints associated with nutrition surveys.

An understanding of the diet of young children from infancy to early childhood in China is limited. The objective of this study is to evaluate nutrient intakes of young children from urban areas in China. Mothers, infants and children were recruited from maternal and child care centres as part of a cross-sectional survey of Maternal Infant Nutrition Growth (MING). One 24-h dietary recall was completed for a sample of infants and toddlers aged 6 to 35 months (n = 1409) via face-to-face interviews with the primary caregiver. Nutrient intakes were estimated using data from Chinese Food Composition tables and compared with the Adequate Intakes (AI) or Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) from China. Mean intakes of most nutrients met or exceeded AIs. Mean fat intakes (% energy) in all subgroups fell below the AIs (32 % vs. 40 % among infants; 31 % and 32 % vs. 35 % among younger and older toddlers). Mean intakes of vitamin B6, folate and selenium were below the AIs among infants (0.3 vs. 0.4 mg/d, 93 vs. 100 μg/d and 15.2 vs. 20 μg/d, respectively). A risk of inadequate iron intake was also observed in infants. Mean vitamin A intake exceeded the recommendations in all subgroups. Mean sodium intakes among toddlers significantly exceeded the AI. Based on one day dietary intake, the diets of the infants and toddlers appear to be adequate in mean intakes of most nutrients, with a few exceptions including risk of inadequate intakes of fat, vitamin B6, folate, iron and selenium among infants and risk of inadequate intake of fat, vitamin B6 and folate as well as excessive intakes of vitamin A and sodium among toddlers.

Background The extent to which psychosocial and diet behavior factors affect dietary self-report remains unclear. We examine the contribution of these factors to measurement error of self-report. Methods In 450 postmenopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study doubly labeled water and urinary nitrogen were used as biomarkers of objective measures of total energy expenditure and protein. Self-report was captured from food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), four day food record (4DFR) and 24 hr. dietary recall (24HR). Using regression calibration we estimated bias of self-reported dietary instruments including psychosocial factors from the Stunkard-Sorenson Body Silhouettes for body image perception, the Crowne-Marlowe Social Desirability Scale, and the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (R-18) for cognitive restraint for eating, uncontrolled eating, and emotional eating. We included a diet behavior factor on number of meals eaten at home using the 4DFR. Results Three categories were defined for each of the six psychosocial and diet behavior variables (low, medium, high). Participants with high social desirability scores were more likely to under-report on the FFQ for energy (β = -0.174, SE = 0.054, p

BACKGROUND: Misreporting, recalling and overestimation are common problems with dietary assessment methods currently available. The 7-day weighed food record (7DWR) method involves an individual weighing of each and every food item prior to consumption, and is considered as a reference method in many situations. The present study aims to compare the energy and nutrient intakes, estimated from 7DWR and 24-hour dietary recall (24DR), among a group of adults. METHODS: One hundred adults were randomly selected from a representative sample from Sri Lanka. The 24DRs were performed on a random day and the subjects were instructed to complete 7DWR from the next day onwards. The nutrients were analyzed using Nutrisurvey Software. In addition, qualitative data were collected from 30 participants, chosen randomly, on the feasibility of the 7DWR as a dietary assessment method. RESULTS: A total of 76 participants completed both 24DR and 7DWR. Mean (SD) values for energy and major macronutrients were significantly lower for 24DR as compared to 7DWR. However, there was no statistically significant difference in energy percentages for macronutrients, between the two methods. Several participants reported difficulties in using the 7DWR method and some reported an alteration in their diet pattern when this method was used. CONCLUSION: Results obtained from 24DR method under-estimated the nutrient intakes as compared to the 7DWFR method.

Undernutrition remains highly prevalent in African children, highlighting the need for accurately assessing dietary intake. In order to do so, the assessment method must be validated in the target population. A triple pass 24 h dietary recall with volumetric portion size estimation has been described but not previously validated in African children. This study aimed to establish the relative validity of 24-h dietary recalls of daily food consumption in healthy African children living in Mbale and Soroti, eastern Uganda compared to simultaneous weighed food records. Quantitative assessment of daily food consumption by weighed food records followed by two independent assessments using triple pass 24-h dietary recall on the following day. In conjunction with household measures and standard food sizes, volumes of liquid, dry rice, or play dough were used to aid portion size estimation. Inter-assessor agreement, and agreement with weighed food records was conducted primarily by Bland-Altman analysis and secondly by intraclass correlation coefficients and quartile cross-classification. Nineteen healthy children aged 6 months to 12 years were included in the study. Bland-Altman analysis showed 24-h recall only marginally under-estimated energy (mean difference of 149 kJ or 2.8 %; limits of agreement −1618 to 1321 kJ), protein (2.9 g or 9.4 %; −12.6 to 6.7 g), and iron (0.43 mg or 8.3 %; −3.1 to 2.3 mg). Quartile cross-classification was correct in 79 % of cases for energy intake, and 89 % for both protein and iron. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the separate dietary recalls for energy was 0.801 (95 % CI, 0.429–0.933), indicating acceptable inter-observer agreement. Dietary assessment using 24-h dietary recall with volumetric portion size estimation resulted in similar and acceptable estimates of dietary intake compared with weighed food records and thus is considered a valid method for daily dietary intake assessment of children in communities with similar diets. The method will be utilised in a sub-study of a large randomised controlled trial addressing treatment in severe childhood anaemia. This study was approved by the Mbale Research Ethics committee (Reference: 2013–050). Transfusion and Treatment of severe Anaemia in African Children: a randomized controlled Trial (TRACT) registration: ISRCTN84086586 .

Author(s): Luo, Hanqi; Dodd, Kevin W; Arnold, Charles D; Engle-Stone, Reina | Abstract: BackgroundTo estimate usual intake distributions of dietary components, collection of nonconsecutive repeated 24-h dietary recalls is recommended, but resource limitations sometimes restrict data collection to single-day dietary data per person.ObjectivesWe developed a new statistical method, the NCI 1-d method, which uses single-day dietary data and an external within-person to between-person variance ratio to estimate population distributions of usual intake of nearly-daily consumed foods and nutrients.MethodsWe used NHANES 2011-2014 data for men (n = 4938 and n = 4293 for the first and second 24-h recalls) to compare nutrient intake distributions of vitamin A, magnesium, folate, and vitamin E generated by the 1-d method (with use of only the first recall per person) with those from the NCI amount-only method (with use of all days of dietary intake per person). The within-person to between-person variance ratio from the amount-only model was used as the unbiased "external" estimate for the 1-d method. We also examined the effect of mis-specification of variance ratios on usual intake distributions.ResultsThe amount-only and 1-d methods estimated statistically equivalent median (25p, 75p): 647 (459, 890) compared with 648 (461, 886) µg retinol activity equivalents/d, 338 (268, 420) compared with 334 (266, 417) mg magnesium/d, 595 (458, 762) compared with 589 (456, 758) µg dietary folate equivalents/d, and 9.7 (7.3, 12.6) compared with 9.6 (7.3, 12.7) mg vitamin E/d. As the external variance ratios increased from 25% to 200% of the unbiased ratios, the prevalence of inadequate intake ranged from 53% to 43% for vitamin A, 57% to 55% for magnesium, 16% to 2% for folate, and 70% to 73% for vitamin E.ConclusionsThe 1-d method is a viable statistical method for estimating usual intakes of nearly-daily consumed dietary components when the variance ratio is unbiased. Results are sensitive to variance ratio selection, so researchers should still collect replicate data where possible.