Search

Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation is performed to treat chronic pancreatitis in children. Successful islet isolation must address the challenges of severe pancreatic fibrosis and young donor age. We have progressively introduced modifications to optimize enzymatic and mechanical dissociation of the pancreas during islet isolation. We evaluated 2 islet isolation metrics in 138 children-digest islet equivalents per gram pancreas tissue (IEQ/g) and digest IEQ per kilogram body weight (IEQ/kg), using multiple regression to adjust for key disease and patient features. Islet yield at digest had an average 4569 (standard deviation 2949) islet equivalent (IEQ)/g and 4946 (4009) IEQ/kg, with 59.1% embedded in exocrine tissue. Cases with very low yield (

On December 20, 1893, 3 years after von Mering and Minkowski showed that total pancreatectomy in dogs resulted in diabetes mellitus,1 Dr. P. Watson Williams in Bristol, England, grafted three fragments of a pancreas obtained from a freshly slaughtered sheep into the subcutaneous tissue of a 15-year-old boy in extremis, 5 months after clinical onset of diabetes.2 The recipient died 3 days later, not of complications from the unsuccessful transplant but of unrelenting acidosis, a sequela of basically untreated diabetes. At autopsy, the recipient’s own pancreas was shriveled and sections showed little but fibrous stroma. According to Williams, the history and the postmortem examination left little doubt that the patient had “pancreatic diabetes” a case that “presented all the conditions that might lead one to hope for beneficial results from successful grafting of the pancreas, if anything can be hoped for in this direction at all.” He was not discouraged, and further stated that “failure was possibly due to obtaining the graft from a sheep that had been killed by bleeding....If ever I felt justified again in resorting to pancreatic grafts in a similar case, I should obtain them from a living animal anesthetized or dispense with the anesthetic altogether.”

In this study, our goal was to analyze nearly 4 decades of experience since the first living donor pancreas transplant in 1979, focusing on what constitutes optimal donor selection and ideal post donation follow-up. When combined with a living donor kidney transplant, a living donor pancreas transplant offers patients with concurrent renal failure and diabetes the option of a single procedure: a living donor simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant. Living donor SPK transplants not only can reduce the waiting time in areas where it is long but also, for highly sensitized patients, can electively identify a donor with a negative crossmatch. Although living donor pancreas (and simultaneous pancreas-kidney) transplants were initially performed open, they evolved to laparoscopic procedures in 1999. The technical failure rates have improved over the years. Guidelines for reducing donor morbidity have incorporated the use of biochemical markers and stricter donor selection criteria. Predonation assessment of donors’ beta-cell mass may help identify those at risk of developing diabetes. Living donor pancreas transplants can be performed safely and with good outcomes; they remain an important option for highly sensitized transplant candidates and can reduce waiting time in areas where it is long. For donors, stringent selection criteria, robust predonation counseling, and meticulous postdonation follow-up are essential.

To enhance selection of appropriate deceased donors for pancreas transplants, we sought to determine whether HLA matching improved posttransplantation outcomes. In this single-center study of 1219 pancreas transplants, we correlated posttransplantation outcomes with HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, and -DQ matches and mismatches. Rejection was linearly correlated with the number of mismatches. The individual number of HLA mismatches reached significance at four or more with a 2.3- to 2.9-fold increase in rejection. The effect was most predominant with HLA-B (1.8-fold with one mismatch and 2.0-fold with two mismatches) and -DR (1.9-fold with two mismatches) loci, whereas HLA-A, -C, and -DQ matches or mismatches did not independently predict acute rejection. The affect was strongest in solitary pancreas transplants, with little impact for simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK). In contrast, HLA matching did not affect graft or patient survival rates but was associated with a reduced risk of opportunistic infection. Avoidance of acute rejection saved an estimated $32 000 for solitary pancreas recipients and $52 000 for SPK recipients in hospital costs. Our data do not support the use of HLA matching for predicting pancreas graft survival but do support its significance for the reduction of acute rejection, particularly for solitary pancreas recipients.

Background/Objectives Total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplant (TP-IAT) is a potential treatment for children with severe refractory chronic pancreatitis. Cultures from the resected pancreas and final islet preparation are frequently positive for microbes. It is unknown whether positive cultures are associated with adverse outcomes in pediatric patients. Methods We reviewed the medical records of children (n = 86) who underwent TP-IAT from May 2006–March 2015 with emphasis on demographics, previous pancreatic interventions, culture results, islet yield, hospital days, posttransplant islet function, and posttransplant infections. We compared outcomes in patients with positive (n = 57) and negative (n = 29) cultures. Results Patients with positive cultures had higher rates of previous pancreas surgery ( P = 0.007) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ( P P = 1.00) or prolonged hospital length of stay ( P = 0.29). Patients with positive final islet preparation culture showed increased rates of graft failure at 2 years posttransplant ( P = 0.041), but not when adjusted for islet mass transplanted ( P = 0.39). Conclusions Positive cultures during pediatric TP-IATs do not increase the risk of posttransplant infections or prolong hospital length of stay. Endocrine function depends on islet mass transplanted.

Pancreas retransplantation is associated with increased rates of technical failure and rejection compared to other organ transplants. As such, it is not routinely done, and outcomes are mostly known through registry data. Here we analyze the outcomes of primary versus retransplant for all pancreas transplants done in our program over nearly 35 years.Donor and recipient characteristics and outcomes data were prospectively gathered and recorded in our institutional database. Outcomes of primary and retransplants were reported overall, and then subgrouped by number (second, third, fourth). An in-depth analysis of transplants done after 2003 was included. Rates of technical failure, 1 year acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival were compared.Two thousand one hundred forty-five pancreas transplants were performed at our institution between 1978 and 2012. Four hundred fifteen of these were retransplants. Improvements were seen in technical failure rates and graft survival for both primary and retransplants over time. There were no significant differences in technical failure or patient survival for primary versus retransplants overall, or by transplant number (second, third, fourth). Modern era retransplants had more acute rejection in the first year after transplantation. Retransplants (vs primary) had decreased mid-term death censored graft survival. Transplant type continues to be an important driver of outcome.Retransplant outcomes have improved over time, yet increased rejection and immunologic graft loss rates remain associated with pancreas retransplantation. In contrast, risk of technical failure and patient death for primary versus retransplants are similar. Therefore, pancreas retransplantation in highly selected candidates should be considered in experienced centers.

Pancreas transplantation provides the only proven method to restore long-term normoglycemia in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Although many studies describe the very important risk factors for short-term survival of a pancreas transplant, there is not a lot of information available about factors that distinguish short-term from long-term graft function.The analysis of 18,159 pancreas transplants from the International Pancreas Transplant Registry, performed from 25 July 1978 to 31 December 2005, showed an improvement not only in short-term but also in long-term graft function. Most recent 5-year, 10-year and 20-year graft function for transplants with the appropriate follow-up time showed 80, 68 and 45%, respectively, for simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplants; 62, 46 and 16%, respectively, for pancreas after kidney; and 59, 39 and 12%, respectively, for pancreas transplants alone. Important factors influencing long-term function were factors that described the quality of the deceased donor. Pancreas transplants in younger or African-American recipients showed a higher risk of graft failure. Anti-T-cell induction therapy had a significant impact on long-term survival in solitary transplants.With a careful donor selection, not only short-term but also long-term pancreas graft function and, therefore, good metabolic control can be achieved for the diabetic patient.

Previously, recurrence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus after pancreas transplants was only sporadically reported. Newer data, however, indicate recurrence rates as high as 5%. After identical-twin pancreas transplants, diabetes recurs in the absence of immunosuppressive therapy - strong evidence that it is an autoimmune disease. After deceased donor pancreas transplants, immunologic markers (autoantibodies, autoreactive T cells) herald recurrence. Selective destruction of β cells, still relatively uncommon, is not restricted to MHC compatibility. The development of diabetes in living pancreas donors is rare; it can be largely avoided by meticulous metabolic evaluation before donation and prevention of obesity after donation.

Background Using standard density gradient (SDG) ranges for human islet purification frequently results in islet loss and transplantation of lower islet mass. Measuring the densities of islet and acinar tissue beforehand to customize the gradient range for the actual COBE 2991 cell processor (COBE) purification is likely to maximize the recovery of islets. We developed an analytical test gradient system (ATGS) for predicting pancreatic tissue densities before COBE purification to minimize islet loss during purification. Methods Human islets were isolated from deceased donor (n=30) and chronic pancreatitis pancreata (n=30). Pancreatic tissue densities were measured before purification by the ATGS, and the density gradient range for islet purification in a COBE was customized based on density profiles determined by the ATGS. The efficiency of custom density gradients (CDGs) to recover high islet yield was compared with predefined SDGs. Results Pancreatic tissue densities from autografts were significantly higher than in allograft preparations. In allograft purifications, a higher proportion of islets were recovered using ATGS-guided CDGs (85.9%±18.0%) compared with the SDG method (69.2%±27.0%; P=0.048). Acinar contamination at 60%, 70%, and 80% cumulative islet yield for allografts was significantly lower in the CDG group. In autograft purifications, more islets were recovered with CDGs (81.9%±28.0%) than SDGs (55.8%±22.8%; P=0.03). CDGs effectively reduced islet loss by minimizing islet sedimentation in the COBE bag. Conclusions Using ATGS-guided CDGs maximizes the islet recovery for successful transplantations by reducing acinar contamination in allograft preparations and by reducing sedimentation of islets in the COBE bag in autograft preparations.

OBJECTIVES: The probability of insulin independence after intraportal islet autotransplantation (IAT) for chronic pancreatitis (CP) treated by total pancreatectomy (TP) relates to the number of islets isolated from the excised pancreas. Our goal was to correlate the islet yield with the histopathologic findings and the clinical parameters in pediatric (age

The advantages of living donor pancreas transplants for the recipient include good HLA matching, lower immunologic risk, less immunosuppression, lower risk of infection and of posttransplant malignancies, and shorter pancreas graft preservation time. In 2008, a total of 155 segmental pancreas transplants using living donors were reported to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry from six countries. Pancreas living donors need to undergo a thorough pretransplant endocrinologic workup in order to minimize the risk of metabolic complications. The pretransplant workup has evolved over time, after initial reports showed that up to 25% of living donors had elevated hemoglobin A(1c) levels after donation. Avoiding obesity after donation diminishes the risk of long-term metabolic complications. The risk of surgical complications for the donor (such as pancreatitis, pancreatic leak or fistula, pancreatic abscess, and pancreatic pseudocyst) is less than 5%. If both the donor and recipient operations are technically successful, the long-term graft survival rate is significantly higher for living (versus deceased) donor pancreas transplant recipients. Future long-term studies of metabolic function in living donors are warranted to determine whether living donor pancreas transplants can safely be applied more widely and whether living donors can be used for islet transplants.

The ultimate goal of clinical transplantation is for the recipients to achieve long-term survival, with continuing graft function, that is equivalent to that of the age-matched general population. We studied subsequent outcome in kidney transplant recipients with 10 years of graft function. In all, 2202 kidney transplant recipients survived with graft function10 years. For 10-year survivors, the actuarial 25-year patient survival rate for primary transplant living donor (LD) recipients was 57%; graft survival, 43%. For primary transplant deceased donor (DD) recipients, the actuarial 25-year patient survival rate was 39%; graft survival, 27%. The two major causes of late graft loss were death (with graft function) and chronic allograft nephropathy (tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis). The two major causes of death with function were cardiovascular disease (CVD) and malignancy. For nondiabetic recipients, the mean age at death with function from CVD was 54 +/- 13 years; for diabetic recipients, 53 +/- 7 years. By 20 years posttransplant, morbidity was common:40% recipients had skin cancer (mean age for nondiabetic recipients, 53 +/- 13 years; for diabetics, 49 +/- 8 years),10% had non-skin cancer (mean age for nondiabetic recipients, 53 +/- 16 years; for diabetics, 46 +/- 9 years), and30% had CVD (mean age for nondiabetic recipients, 53 +/- 15 years; for diabetics, 47 +/- 9 years). We conclude that long-term transplant recipients have a high rate of morbidity and early mortality. As short-term results have improved, more focus is needed on long-term outcome.

We examined a group of SPK recipients that had early (

Background A total pancreatectomy is the last resort in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis because it results in complete endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. More than 50% of total pancreatectomy patients experience severe glucose control problems, which cause up to 50% of late deaths. Study Design Between June 1, 1986, and May 15, 2007, we performed 26 pancreas allotransplants (18 primary, 8 retransplants) in 18 patients who had previously undergone a total pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis. All patients had a history of labile diabetes mellitus with hypoglycemic unawareness; secondary diabetic complications developed in 12. The median time interval from the total pancreatectomy to the pancreas allotransplant was 5 years (range 9 months to 22 years). Of the 26 transplants, 6 were performed in the cyclosporine (CSA) era, 15 in the tacrolimus (TAC) era, and 5 in the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free era. Results Patient survival rates at 1 and 3 years in both the CSA and TAC eras were 100% and 100%; in the CNI-free era, at 1 year, the survival rate was 40%. Pancreas graft survival rates in the CSA era were 67% and 50% at 1 and 3 years, respectively; in the TAC era, 73% and 51%, respectively; and in the CNI-free era, at 1 year, 40% (p=0.13). The mean number of rejection episodes in the CSA era was 2.1; in the TAC era, 1.4; and in the CNI-free era, 0.6. Conclusions Our series of pancreas allotransplants in patients with a previous total pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis showed that pancreas graft survival rates of more than 70% can be achieved with TAC-based immunosuppression; pancreas transplants can successfully treat both endocrine and exocrine insufficiency; and sequential pancreas allotransplants should be considered a treatment option in patients with pancreatectomy-induced brittle diabetes mellitus or with progression of secondary complications of diabetes mellitus.

Background. A pancreas transplant alone (PTA) in a nonuremic patient with brittle diabetes mellitus remains a rare procedure because the tradeoff for insulin independence is lifelong immunosuppression. Methods. Herein we report our results at the University of Minnesota of 513 PTAs from December 17, 1966, through December 31, 2006. Of these recipients, 87% had previously experienced hypoglycemic unawareness and 23% experienced coma and/or seizures. These transplants spanned four immunosuppressive eras: pre-cyclosporine A (pre-CsA) era (16%), CsA era (23%), tacrolimus (TAC) era (47%), and calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-free era (14%). Results. The overall patient survival rate at 1 year posttransplant was about 95%; at 5 years, it was 90%. The pancreas graft survival rate at 1 year increased significantly from the pre-CsA era (31%) to the TAC era (75%), thanks to a significant decline in immunologic and technical failures. The CNI-free protocol, because of its high infection and hematologic infection rate, did not further improve outcome. Risk factors for subsequent kidney failure (13% at 5 years posttransplant) were serum creatinine levels > 1.5 mg/dl at the time of the pancreas transplant and recipient age

A total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplant (TPIAT) offers substantial pain relief and improved quality of life for children who are severely affected by chronic or recurrent acute pancreatitis and for whom the usual medical and endoscopic therapies have failed. The pancreas is entirely resected, and the pancreatic islets are isolated from the pancreas and infused back into the patient’s liver. Because this is an autologous transplant, no immunosuppression is required. Over several months, the islets engraft in the liver; the patient is then slowly weaned off insulin therapy. Slightly more than 40 % of patients become and remain insulin independent, yet even among patients who remain on insulin, most have some islet function, permitting easier diabetes control. The majority of patients experience pain relief, with significant improvements in health-related quality of life. A TPIAT should be considered for children who are significantly disabled by chronic pancreatitis.

Chronic pancreatitis is a painful and often debilitating disease. Total pancreatectomy with intra-portal islet autotransplantation (TP-IAT) is a treatment option that allows for pain relief and preservation of beta-cell mass, thereby minimizing the complication of diabetes mellitus. Cultures of harvested islets are often positive for bacteria, possibly due to frequent procedures prior to TP-IAT, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), stenting, or other operative drainage procedures. It is unclear if these positive cultures contribute to post-operative infections.We hypothesized that positive cultures of transplant solutions will not be associated with increased infection risk.We reviewed retrospectively the sterility cultures from both the pancreas preservation solution used to transport the pancreas and the final islet preparation for intra-portal infusion of patients who underwent TP-IAT between April 2006 and November 2012. Two hundred fifty-one patients underwent total, near-total, or completion pancreatectomy with IAT and had complete sterility cultures. All patients received prophylactic peri-operative antibiotics. Patients with positive pancreas preservation solution or islet sterility cultures received further antibiotics for 5-7 d. Patients' medical records were reviewed for post-operative infections and causative organisms.Of the 251 patients included, 151 (61%) had one or more positive bacterial cultures from the pancreas preservation solution or final islet product. Seventy-three of the 251 patients (29%) had an infectious complication. Thirty-four of the 73 (22%) patients with a post-operative infectious complication also had positive cultures. Only seven of 151 patients with positive cultures (4.7%) had an infectious complication caused by the same organism as that isolated from their pancreas or islet cell preparation.In autologous islet preparations, isolation solutions frequently have positive cultures, but this finding is associated infrequently with clinical infection.

As of December 31, 2004, more than 23,000 pancreas transplant had been reported to the IPTR,17,000 in the US and almost 6000 from outside the US. An analysis of US pancreas transplants performed between 1988 and 2003 showed a progressive improvement in outcome, with pancreas transplant graft survival rates (GSRs) going from 75% at 1 yr for 1988/1989 to 85% for 2002/2003 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) cases, from 55 to 78% for pancreas after kidney (PAK) cases, and from 45 to 77% for pancreas transplants alone (PTA) cases. The improvements were due both to decreases in technical failure (TF) rates (from 12 to 6% in SPK, 13-8% in PAK, and 24-7% in PTA) and immunological failure rates (going from 7 to 2% for SPK, from 28 to 7% for PAK, and from 38 to 8% for PTA cases). These results are even more impressive under the aspect that during the same time the rate of potential risk factors increased and the duct management techniques changed from bladder to enteric drainage. The improvement in outcome allowed also an increase in the number of solitary pancreas transplants from initially 12% to now 35%. Contemporary primary deceased donor pancreas transplant outcomes were calculated separately for 2000-2004 US and non-US cases. The US patient survival rates at 1 yr were95% in each recipient category, with 1 yr primary pancreas GSRs of 85% for SPK, 78% for PAK, and 76% for PTA (p0.0001). The immunological graft failure rates for 2000-2004 technically successful (TS) SPK, PAK, and PTA cases were 2, 8, and 10% at 1 yr (p = 0.0001). In the majority of all transplants ED was used for duct management (81% of SPK, 67% of PAK, and 56% for PTA cases). Of the ED transplants, venous drainage via the portal system was used for 20% of SPK, 23% of PAK, and 35% of PTA cases. Duct management technique did not have a significant impact on overall pancreas graft function in the univariate or the multivariate model. The outcomes of ED and BD transplants are comparable with 85 vs. 87% at 1 yr for SPK, 77 vs. 80% for PAK, and 72 vs. 79% for PTA. The overall TF rate was higher in ED pancreas transplants but this difference did reach significance only in SPK. In addition, in technically successful PTA the immunological graft loss rate was higher in ED vs. BD transplants (15 vs. 5% at 1 yr). The different vascular management techniques did not seem to have an impact on the outcome of the pancreas transplants. Kidney GSRs were not significantly different for ED vs. BD SPK cases, 93 and 91% at 1 yr (p = 0.24). The overall conversion rate from BD to ED was 9% at 1 yr and 17% at 3 yr post-transplant. The most influential factor for patient survival in SPK and PAK in the multivariate and the univariate models was the status of the transplanted organ. The hazard ratio (HR) for a failed kidney was 14.99 in SPK and 9.17 in PAK (p = 0.0001). The HR for a failed pancreas graft was 3.51 in SPK and 4.17 for PAK (p = 0.0001). In PTA a failed pancreas graft did not have a direct impact on patient survival. SPK and PAK patients older than 44 yr at the time of transplants also showed an increased mortality risk, but at the same time the risk of immunological graft loss was significantly decreased for those patients. TACMMF remained the dominant maintenance immunosuppressant for 2000-2004 US cases (approximately two-third) in all three categories and with this regime 1-year GSRs wereor =80% in all three recipient categories. The results were comparable (or =83% 1-year GSR) for patients (approximately 10%) treated with Sirolimus (SIR) under various protocols. In regard to non-US pancreas transplants, even for 2000-2004 the overwhelming majority continued to be in the SPK category (91%), with 1-year patient, kidney and pancreas survival rates of 94, 92, and 87%. Solitary transplants are still very rarely done outside the US. Non-US PAK GSR at 1 yr was 85%, non-US PTA GSR at 1 yr was 76%. In summary, with the new advancements in immunosuppression and changes in surgical techniques the outcomes in patient survival and pancreas transplant graft function continue to improve even with an increasing proportion of high risk patients in all three categories.

Background Total pancreatectomy to treat chronic pancreatitis is associated with severe diabetic control problems in 15% to 75% of patients, causing up to 50% of deaths late postoperatively. We report our experience with islet autotransplants at the time of, or with pancreas allotransplants after, total pancreatectomy. Study design Between February 1, 1977, and June 30, 2003, we performed 112 islet autotransplants at the time of total pancreatectomy; we also performed 20 pancreas allotransplants in 13 patients who had already undergone total pancreatectomy months to years earlier. Results Islet autotransplants at the time of total pancreatectomy in patients who had not had previous operations on the body and tail of the pancreas were associated with a high islet yield (>2,500 islet equivalents/kg body weight), and >70% of the recipients achieved complete insulin independence. In contrast, a previous distal pancreatectomy or a Puestow drainage procedure was associated with a low islet yield in 75% of them and with complete insulin independence in A pancreas allotransplant after total pancreatectomy was not associated with any transplant-related mortality at 1 and 3 years posttransplant. The pancreas graft survival rate at 1 year posttransplant was 77% with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression (versus 67% with cyclosporine). Enteric (over bladder) drainage was preferred to manage exocrine graft secretions, to cure pancreatectomy-induced endocrine and exocrine insufficiency. Conclusions Our series shows that pancreas allotransplants can be performed without transplant-related mortality and, when tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is used, with 1-year pancreas graft survival rates >75%. In contrast to a simultaneous islet autotransplant, a pancreas allotransplant has the disadvantage of requiring lifelong immunosuppression, but the advantage of not only curing endocrine but also exocrine insufficiency. Both transplant options, if successful, improve the recipient's quality of life.

Objective. With newer immunosuppressive agents, acute rejection and graft loss resulting from acute rejection have become less common for pancreas transplant recipients. As long-term graft survival rates have improved, an increasing number of grafts are being lost to chronic rejection (CR). We studied the incidence of CR and identified risk factors. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed all cadaver pancreas transplants performed at the University of Minnesota between June 19, 1994, and December 31, 2002. We determined the causes of graft loss, the incidence of graft loss to CR and, using multivariate techniques, the major risk factors for CR. Results. A total of 914 cadaver pancreas transplants were performed in the following three categories: simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) (n=321), pancreas after kidney (PAK) (n=389), and pancreas transplant alone (PTA) (n=204). The mean recipient age was 41.3 years and the mean donor age was 30.1 years. Of the 914 pancreas grafts, 643 (70.3%) continue to function (mean length of follow-up, 39 months). The most common cause of graft loss was technical failure, accounting for 118 (12.9%) of the failed grafts. The second most common cause was CR, accounting for 80 (8.8%) of the failed grafts. The incidence of graft loss to CR was highest for PTA (n=23 [11.3%]) and PAK (n = 45 [11.6%]) recipients and lowest for SPK recipients (n=12 [3.7%]) (P=0.002). By multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factors for graft loss to CR were a previous episode of acute rejection (relative risk [RR]=4.41, P

BACKGROUND Ensuring sufficient islet yield from preserved pancreases is a critical step in clinical islet transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pancreatic ductal injection, performed at procurement, using a small volume of preservation solution before cold storage (ductal preservation method) would improve islet yield and function from rat pancreases preserved for 6 and 24 hr. MATERIALS AND METHODS Islets were isolated from Lewis rats. Pancreases were classified into five groups: fresh (group 1); preserved for 6 hr in University of Wisconsin solution without and with ductal preservation (groups 2 and 3); and preserved for 24 hr in University of Wisconsin solution without and with ductal preservation (groups 4 and 5). We assessed islet yield, function, and viability of pancreatic ductal cells. RESULTS Islet yields per pancreas in groups 1 to 5 were 2010+/-774, 674+/-450, 1418+/-528, 527+/-263, and 1655+/-618 (islet equivalent) (+/-SD), respectively. Stimulation indices in groups 1 to 5 were 11.97+/-3.17, 6.48+/-4.04, 12.44+/-5.65, 2.56+/-2.03, and 5.55+/-2.71. Functional success rates in groups 1 to 5 were 100%, 0%, 100%, 0%, and 66.7%. Percentages of nonviable pancreatic duct cells in groups 1 to 5 were 3.8+/-2.7%, 59.7+/-4.4%, 19.5+/-7.3%, 64.7+/-4.5%, and 17.2+/-2.6%. In all experiments, the differences were significant between the groups without versus the groups with ductal preservation (P

Background. As short-term transplant results improve, it has become difficult to use patient or graft survival or acute rejection as clinical trial endpoints, except in large, multicenter studies. Despite better outcomes, graft failure continues over time.Methods. We studied 6- and 12-month creatini

The pancreas was the first extrarenal organ to be successfully transplanted with use of a living donor. The goal at that time, in the azathioprine and cyclosporine eras, was to improve graft survival rates after solitary pancreas transplants. But today, in the tacrolimus era, most living donor pancreas transplants are with a simultaneous living donor kidney transplant because of the cadaver kidney donor shortage. The evolution of stringent selection criteria for living pancreas donors has significantly reduced the incidence of surgical complications and adverse metabolic changes. In contrast to kidney and liver transplants with use of living donors, the donor mortality rate after more than 140 living donor pancreas transplants has remained 0%. The introduction of laparoscopic donor hemipancreatectomy, with its rapid recovery time, makes living pancreas donation more attractive. Patient and graft survival rates for living donor pancreas recipients are now greater than 85%. Living donor pancreas (with or without a simultaneous living donor kidney) transplants decrease the number of deaths of diabetic patients on dialysis and on the waiting list, help overcome the organ shortage, reduce morbidity, and improve the quality of life for patients formerly on dialysis or with debilitating side effects of diabetes. Meticulous donor workup remains key to a low metabolic and surgical complication rate.

Background. Healthy human volunteers occasionally elect to undergo surgical removal of the distal half of their pancreas for donation to a relative with type 1 diabetes. This provides the unusual opportunity to study segments of the same pancreas in two markedly different environments, i.e., the normal one of the donor and the unusual one of the ectopically transplanted recipient who is receiving immunosuppressant drugs that can diminish insulin secretion and cause insulin resistance. Methods. We studied eight donor/recipient pairs 9 to 18 years after the original surgery to assess the hypothesis that beta-cell mass is the primary determinant of glucose homeostasis. We measured levels of fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1c, intravenous glucose disappearance rates, acute insulin and C-peptide responses, and beta-cell secretory reserve. Results. Comparisons of the mean data between the two groups revealed no significant differences in fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, fasting insulin or C-peptide, acute insulin or C-peptide responses to arginine and to glucose, or beta-cell secretory reserve. Eight patients were obese; this subgroup contained all patients who developed mild diabetes (four donors and two recipients). Conclusion. The within-pairs metabolic outcomes support the primacy of pancreatic mass in determining glucose homeostasis, but the discordancy within pairs for developing postoperative diabetes implicates variables, especially obesity, as important secondary determinants in the risk of developing diabetes in donors and recipients. Our data suggest that obesity should be a contraindication to donation of pancreatic segments and that donors should assiduously avoid becoming obese.

Recent changes to pancreas graft allocation policy have increased the number of organs available for regional and distant sharing, which results in a corresponding increase in preservation time. We sought to systematically assess the impact of cold ischemia time (CIT) on outcomes post-transplant. A retrospective review of 1253 pancreas transplants performed at a single transplant center was performed to correlate CIT to transplant outcomes. The rate of technical failure (TF) increased with 20+ hours of CIT, with a 2.7-fold to 6.2-fold increased rate of TF for pancreas after kidney (PAK), simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK), and pancreas transplants overall. Long-term graft survival was best with12 hours of CIT; graft failure increased 1.2-fold to 1.4-fold with 12-24 hours of CIT and 2.2-fold with 24+ hours. CIT had less influence on the pancreas transplant alone category than either SPK or PAK and had markedly more influence on grafts from older (age25 years) and overweight (body mass index25) donors. In the final analysis, grafts with12 hours of CIT performed the best overall, and strategies that reduce CIT (such as early allocation, pre-recovery cross-matching, and chartered flights for organs) should be considered whenever possible.

In this issue of the CJASN , Sampaio et al. ([1][1]) present an analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry data on outcomes of simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) primary transplants, done between 2000 and 2007, in patients who had uremia and were classified as having insulin

Porcine islet xenotransplantation is emerging as a potential alternative for allogeneic clinical islet transplantation. Optimization of porcine islet isolation in terms of yield and quality is critical for the success and cost-effectiveness of this approach. Incomplete pancreas distention and inhomogeneous enzyme distribution have been identified as key factors for limiting viable islet yield per porcine pancreas. The aim of this study was to explore the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a tool to investigate the homogeneity of enzyme delivery in porcine pancreata. Traditional and novel methods for enzyme delivery aimed at optimizing enzyme distribution were examined. Pancreata were procured from Landrace pigs via en bloc viscerectomy. The main pancreatic duct was then cannulated with an 18-g winged catheter and MRI performed at 1.5-T. Images were collected before and after ductal infusion of chilled MRI contrast agent (gadolinium) in physiological saline. Regions of the distal aspect of the splenic lobe and portions of the connecting lobe and bridge exhibited reduced delivery of solution when traditional methods of distention were utilized. Use of alternative methods of delivery (such as selective re-cannulation and distention of identified problem regions) resolved these issues, and MRI was successfully utilized as a guide and assessment tool for improved delivery. Current methods of porcine pancreas distention do not consistently deliver enzyme uniformly or adequately to all regions of the pancreas. Novel methods of enzyme delivery should be investigated and implemented for improved enzyme distribution. MRI serves as a valuable tool to visualize and evaluate the efficacy of current and prospective methods of pancreas distention and enzyme delivery.

Pancreas transplants using living donors (LDs) can be done safely and successfully in carefully selected donors and recipients. Worldwide, since 1979, more than 150 LD pancreas transplants have been done; over the last decade, the overall 1-year graft survival rates have exceeded 85%. A meticulous donor workup, per standard evaluation criteria, remains key to a low rate of metabolic and surgical complications in LDs. Such transplants should be considered for (i) candidates with an identical twin or a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling or (ii) candidates with high panel-reactive antibody levels and a suitable LD. The use of LDs decreases the number of deaths of diabetic patients on the waiting list, helps to overcome the organ shortage, reduces mortality and morbidity posttransplant, and improves the quality of life for recipients who, pretransplant, suffered debilitating side effects of diabetes. In addition, the use of LDs (vs. deceased donors) reduces the risk of graft loss from rejection. An LD pancreas transplant remains relatively rare, done under very specific circumstances.

A characteristic critical to the success of cell-based regenerative medicine approaches to treatment of disease is the ability of cells or tissue to engraft. Successful islet autotransplantation (IAT) following near-total or total pancreatectomy (TP) was the first clear proof that human islet tissue could engraft at an ectopic site and maintain insulin independence. This clinical observation holds promise for other regenerative medicine strategies aimed at treating diabetes. Follow-up observations have documented that if early insulin independence is achieved, then long-term function, 10 years or longer, is possible, indicating that intrahepatic β-cell residence is durable. Clinically, if pancreatectomy is to be done for benign diseases of the pancreas, IAT should accompany it, as the risks of surgical diabetes outweigh the risks of IAT. Surmounting the differences between IAT and allogeneic islet transplant may improve the therapeutic potential of cellular based replacement treatments for type 1 diabetes.

Given the constant flux in caseload and the number of personnel available in the OR, waiting for a final XM often prolongs organ preservation time (a room available at the time a XM is started is not available when the XM is completed). Longer preservation is associated with increased DGF and decreased graft survival. We have shown in a retrospective analysis that final XMs on 0% PRA recipients were always negative (Transplantation, 1999). We now describe a policy of: a) not doing screening XM and b) proceeding to the OR without a XM, in situations where the recipients's PRA has been documented to be 0% and when there have not been any interim transfusions (and the OR is ready before XM completion). Final XM is completed after the transplant. All patients send sera every 6 weeks for PRA (antiglobulin technique). If > o r=3 consecutive PRAs are 0%, no donor-specific screening XM is done prior to calling the patient in for tx (UNOS allocation algorithm used). If there have not been any interim transfusions, we have proceeded to tx prior to completion of the final XM. Between 1/1/98-12/31/99, we did 109 CAD kidney (K) and 79 simultaneous kidney pancreas (SPK) tx; 67 (61%) K and 56 (71%) SPK had 0% PRA. Of the 0% PRA, 25/67 (37%) K and 28/56 (50%) SPK had no pre-tx XM. For K with no XM, cold ischemia was shorter (13.2+/-0.2 vs. 18+/-0.9 hrs, p=0.01) and DGF less (12% vs. 24%, p=0.3); for SPK with no XM, cold ischemia was shorter (15.2+/-2 vs. 18+/-0.9 hrs, p=0.1); no diff in DGF. All post-XM were negative and there were no hyperacute rejections; there was no diff in acute rejection episodes. Actuarial 1 yr graft survival: no XM-K=87.5%, SKP=82%; Yes XM-K=88%, SKP=86% (NS). Our data suggests it is safe, in select circumstances, to proceed to the OR without a XM. Elimination of the screening XM for 0% PRA candidates saves money. Proceeding of the OR (if available) without a final XM shortens cold ischemia time.

To determine outcome in diabetic pancreas transplant recipients according to risk factors and the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols that evolved during a 33-year period at a single institution.Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is associated with a high incidence of management problems and secondary complications. Clinical pancreas transplantation began at the University of Minnesota in 1966, initially with a high failure rate, but outcome improved in parallel with other organ transplants. The authors retrospectively analyzed the factors associated with the increased success rate of pancreas transplants.From December 16, 1966, to March 31, 2000, the authors performed 1,194 pancreas transplants (111 from living donors; 191 retransplants): 498 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and 1 simultaneous pancreas-liver transplant; 404 pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants; and 291 pancreas transplants alone (PTA). The analyses were divided into five eras: era 0, 1966 to 1973 (n = 14), historical; era 1, 1978 to 1986 (n = 148), transition to cyclosporine for immunosuppression, multiple duct management techniques, and only solitary (PAK and PTA) transplants; era 2, 1986 to 1994 (n = 461), all categories (SPK, PAK, and PTA), predominantly bladder drainage for graft duct management, and primarily triple therapy (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone) for maintenance immunosuppression; era 3, 1994 to 1998 (n = 286), tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil used; and era 4, 1998 to 2000 (n = 275), use of daclizumab for induction immunosuppression, primarily enteric drainage for SPK transplants, pretransplant immunosuppression in candidates awaiting PTA.Patient and primary cadaver pancreas graft functional (insulin-independence) survival rates at 1 year by category and era were as follows: SPK, era 2 (n = 214) versus eras 3 and 4 combined (n = 212), 85% and 64% versus 92% and 79%, respectively; PAK, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 61) versus 3 (n = 84) versus 4 (n = 92), 86% and 17%, 98% and 59%, 98% and 76%, and 98% and 81%, respectively; in PTA, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 72) versus 3 (n = 30) versus 4 (n = 40), 77% and 31%, 99% and 50%, 90% and 67%, and 100% and 88%, respectively. In eras 3 and 4 combined for primary cadaver SPK transplants, pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher with bladder drainage (n = 136) than enteric drainage (n = 70), 82% versus 74% at 1 year (P =.03). Increasing recipient age had an adverse effect on outcome only in SPK recipients. Vascular disease was common (in eras 3 and 4, 27% of SPK recipients had a pretransplant myocardial infarction and 40% had a coronary artery bypass); those with no vascular disease had significantly higher patient and graft survival rates in the SPK and PAK categories. Living donor segmental pancreas transplants were associated with higher technically successful graft survival rates in each era, predominately solitary (PAK and PTA) in eras 1 and 2 and SPK in eras 3 and 4. Diabetic secondary complications were ameliorated in some recipients, and quality of life studies showed significant gains after the transplant in all recipient categories.Patient and graft survival rates have significantly improved over time as surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols have evolved. Eventually, islet transplants will replace pancreas transplants for suitable candidates, but currently pancreas transplants can be applied and should be an option at all stages of diabetes. Early transplants are preferable for labile diabetes, but even patients with advanced complications can benefit.

Background. How the localization of antigen to the liver, through means such as oral ingestion, induces tolerance is poorly understood. Methods. To elucidate potential mechanisms we used an adoptive transfer system wherein ova-specific T cells were infused into a syngeneic host, and antigen-specific T-cell responses after delivery of soluble antigen into the liver were monitored. Results. After infusion of antigen into the portal vein, the frequency of antigen-specific T cells in lymph nodes draining the liver was lower than the frequency in peripheral lymph nodes. These findings were the reverse of what is typically observed after subcutaneous injection of antigen with adjuvant. Infusion of antigen with adjuvant into the portal vein did not alter this pattern of antigen-specific T-cell localization; however, an increased frequency of T cells, compared with antigen alone, was observed in peripheral lymph nodes and spleen. After exposure to antigen via the portal vein, T cells isolated from lymph nodes draining the liver and challenged with antigen in vitro exhibited a diminished proliferative response compared with T cells isolated from nondraining lymph nodes. This hyporesponsiveness was not observed when the antigen was administered with adjuvant. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that the influence of the liver on immune responses might reflect two processes: (1) loss of antigen-specific T cells after primary antigen injection, and (2) hyporesponsiveness on reexposure to antigen. These mechanisms may contribute to the prevention of undesirable immune responses to foods and enteric bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. Furthermore, these results underscore the importance of minimizing inflammation in circumstances such as islet transplantation, if endogenous mechanisms of tolerance induction are to be maximized.

Background: Vascular thrombosis early after a kidney transplant is an infrequent but devastating complication. Often, no cause is found. These recipients are generally felt to be good candidates for a retransplant. However, their ideal care at the time of the retransplant and their outcomes have not been well documented. We studied outcomes in 16 retransplant recipients who had lost their first graft early posttransplant ( < 1 month) to vascular thrombosis. Methods: Of 2003 kidney transplants between 1 January 1984 and 30 September 1998, we identified 32 recipients who had lost their first graft early posttransplant to vascular thrombosis. Of these 32 recipients, 16 were subsequently retransplanted and detailed chart reviews were done. Results: Of the 16 retransplant recipients, 12 lost their first graft to renal vein thrombosis and 4 to renal artery thrombosis. Thrombosis generally occurred early (mean, 3.6 d). Five recipients underwent a complete hematologic workup to rule out a thrombophilic disorder before their retransplant: 4 had a positive result (presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, n = 3; increased homocysteine levels, n = 1). These 4 recipients, along with 1 other recipient who had a strong family history of thrombosis, underwent thrombosis prophylaxis at the time of their retransplant. Prophylaxis consisted of low-dose heparin for the first 3-5 d posttransplant, followed by acetylsalicylic acid or Coumadin. Of the 16 retransplant recipients, none developed thrombosis. Of the 5 who underwent thrombosis prophylaxis, none had significant bleeding complications. At a mean follow-up of 5.4 yr, 10 (63%) recipients have functioning grafts. Causes of graft loss in the remaining 6 recipients were death with function (n = 5, 31%) and acute rejection (n = 1, 6%). Graft and patient survival rates after these 16 retransplants were equivalent to results after primary transplants. The incidence of acute and chronic rejection was also no different (p = ns). Conclusion: Vascular thrombosis in the absence of obvious technical factors should prompt a workup for a thrombophilic disorder before a retransplant. Recipients with an identified disorder should undergo prophylaxis at the time of the retransplant. Results in these retransplant recipients are equivalent to those seen in primary transplant recipients.

The two-layer method [University of Wisconson solution (UW)/perfluorochemical plus O2] for pancreas preservation has been demonstrated to be superior to simple UW storage alone in the canine model. For the first time, we applied the two-layer method to clinical whole-pancreas transplantation.Pancreases were placed in the two-layer method in 10 cases and UW alone in 44 cases before transplant. The mean cold ischemic time was 16.5 hr in the two-layer group versus 18.1 hr in the UW group (P=NS). We compared the condition of graft at the time of reperfusion, and then 3 months posttransplant graft function and complications.At the time of reperfusion, no grafts in the two-layer group were edematous, compared with 10(23.3%) of 43 in the UW group (P=0.18). Seven (70%) of 10 grafts in the two-layer group obtained the best overall quality score, compared with 24(57.1%) of 42 in the UW group (P=0.72). Nine (90%) of 10 recipients in the two-layer group became insulin-independent during hospitalization, compared with 31(70.5%) of 44 in the UW group (P=0.26). Time to insulin independence was no different between the two groups. No pancreas grafts preserved by the two-layer method suffered acute rejection. Conclusions. The two-layer preservation method is feasible in human clinical transplantation. It was at least equivalent and may be superior to UW alone in both morphologic and functional assessment of the transplanted pancreas.

Background. Given the severe organ shortage and the documented superior results obtained with living (vs. cadaver) donor kidney transplants, we have adopted a very aggressive policy for the use of living donors. Currently, we make thorough attempts to locate a living related donor (LRD) or a living unrelated donor (LURD) before proceeding with a cadaver transplant. Methods. We compared the results of our LURD versus LRD transplants to determine any significant difference in outcome. Results. Between 1/1/84 and 6/30/98, we performed 711 adult kidney transplants with non-HLA-identical living donors. Of these, 595 procedures used LRDs and 116 used LURDs. Immunosuppression for both groups was cyclosporine-based, although LURD recipients received 5–7 days of induction therapy (antilymphocyte globulin or antithymocyte globulin), whereas LRD recipients did not. LURD recipients tended to be older, to have inferior HLA matching, and to have older donors than did the LRD recipients (all factors potentially associated with decreased graft survival). Short-term results, including initial graft function and incidence of acute rejection, were similar in the two groups. LURD recipients had a slightly higher incidence of cytomegalovirus disease (P =NS). We found no difference in patient and graft survival rates. However, the incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection was significantly lower among LURD recipients (16.7% for LRD recipients and 10.0% for LURD recipients at 5 years posttransplant;P =0.05). LRD recipients also had a greater incidence of late (>6 months posttransplant) acute rejection episodes than did the LURD recipients (8.6% vs. 2.6%, P =0.04). The exact reason for these findings is unknown. Conclusion. Although LURD recipients have poorer HLA matching and older donors, their patient and graft survival rates are equivalent to those of non-HLA-identical LRD recipients. The incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection is lower in LURD transplants. Given this finding and the superior results of living donor (vs. cadaver) transplants, a thorough search should be made for a living donor—LRD or LURD—before proceeding with a cadaver transplant.

Prolonged preservation of the donor organ may result in delayed graft function or nonfunction after most organ transplants. We studied whether or not prolonged preservation increases surgical complications after pancreas transplants.Between January 1, 1994, and September 30, 1998, a total of 294 recipients underwent cadaver pancreas transplants at our institution. Recipients were analyzed in 2 groups: those with pancreas preservation timeor = 20 hours (n = 211) versus20 hours (n = 83).Demographic data were similar between the 2 groups, except that mean donor age in the prolonged preservation group was significantly lower. Despite use of younger donors, prolonged preservation was associated with an increased incidence of surgical complications, most notably leaks, thrombosis, and wound infections. Grafts with prolonged preservation were more often noted by the transplant surgeon to be edematous after reperfusion, although the incidence of hyperamylasemia posttransplant did not differ between the 2 groups. Graft and patient survival rates also did not differ between the 2 groups. The incidence of early graft loss (3 months) was, however, higher in the prolonged preservation group (20.5% versus 9.0%, P = .04).Prolonged preservation of the donor organ increases the incidence of surgical complications after pancreas transplants. All attempts should be made to minimize preservation time, keeping it below 20 hours, if possible.

Background. Transplant candidates frequently ask whether they should, based on information available at the time, accept a cadaver kidney or wait for a potentially better one.Methods. We analyzed 937 first and second cadaver transplants done between January 1, 1984 and December 31, 1997 to determine if information available at the time an offer is made could be used to predict long-term graft survival.Results. By Cox regression, risk factors for worse long-term graft survival were older donor age, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular cause of donor death, and delayed graft function (DGF). HLA-ABDR mismatch was marginally significant. Whether DGF will occur is not known at the time of an offer, but risk factors can be determined; we found these to be older donor age and> 10% panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) at transplantation (by Cox regression). Using these variables (PRA, ABDR mismatch, donor age, and donor cause of death) known at the time of an offer, we calculated the relative risk of worse long-term graft survival for each subgroup ( Table 3 in manuscript). In general, older age and donor death from cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease were associated with worse outcome. Kidneys from donors of

Hi s t o r i c a l l y, patients with diabetes have expended tremendous eff o rt in pursuing a re t u rn to norm o g l y c e m i a . The relatively recent results of the Diabetes C o n t rol and Complications Trial (DCCT), demonstrating an approximate 50% re d u ction in eye, nerve, and kidney complications in a group of patients re c e i v i n g intensive treatment for hyperglycemia (1), have made this pursuit even more intense. Successful pancreas and islet transplantations are currently the only therapies that re p roducibly achieve normoglycemia by reestablishing endogenous insulin secretion responsive to normal feedback re g u l ation. This re p o rt briefly considers the h i s t o ry, techniques, clinical results, and risk-benefit relationship of successful panc reas and pancreatic islet transplantations in hyperglycemic patients with long-standing diabetes. PANCREAS T R A N S P L A N TAT I O N — P a n c re a t i c transplantation was first used for the tre a tment of type 1 diabetes in humans in 1966 (2). In that early era, the rates of graft and patient survival were low, so very few proc e d u res were perf o rmed until 1978. Important steps toward improving surgical re s u l t s included the introduction of impro v e d i m m u n o s u p p ressive regimens, especially the use of cyclosporine and anti‐T- c e l l agents, new surgical techniques, and the selection of healthier recipients. In the past decade, the number of pro c e d u res perf o rmed has steadily increased each year (3). By the end of 1997, nearly 10,000 panc reatic transplantations had been re c o rd e d in the International Pancreas Tr a n s p l a n t R e g i s t ry, and in that year alone, more than 1,200 pro c e d u res were re p o rted. The results from diff e rent centers vary depending on operative experience and patient selection. The 1994‐1997 data from the I n t e rnational Pancreas Transplant Registry (3) indicate an overall 1-year patient survival rate of 90% (Fig. 1). The 1-year rate of graft survival (defined as total fre e d o m f rom insulin therapy, normal fasting blood glucose concentrations, and normal or only slightly elevated HbA 1 c values) was 82% when a pancreas and a kidney were transplanted simultaneously (SPK), 71% when a p a n c reas was transplanted after kidney transplantation (PAK), and 62% when a p a n c reas was transplanted alone (PTA ) . Most pancreatic transplantations in diabetic patients with renal failure are perf o rmed at the same time as or after kidney transplantation. The objectives in this instance are to render the patient free of exogenous insulin therapy, to arrest the p ro g ress of ongoing secondary complications, to protect the transplanted kidney f rom hyperglycemia, and to improve quality of life. In unusual circumstances, the p a n c reas is transplanted alone, but the decision to do so is more difficult. In these patients, kidney transplantation and i m m u n o s u p p ression are not already indicated, and survival of pancreas grafts when transplanted alone is lower than when transplanted simultaneously with a kidn e y. Inclusion criteria for PTA include that the patient is severely metabolically unstable, has severe autonomic dysfunction, or generally has a very poor quality of life because of the effects of chronic diabetes. Although the success rate of PTA is lower, this may be due to the lack of a marker for p a n c reas rejection that is as sensitive as s e rum creatinine is as a marker for kidney transplant rejection. Hence, rejection is m o re difficult to detect and anti-re j e c t i o n t reatment is initiated later. Technique

Background. Both antigen-dependent (immunologic) and non-antigen-dependent (nonimmunologic) factors have been implicated in long-term renal allograft loss. Differentiating between these two factors is important because prevention strategies differ. Methods. To isolate the importance of these 2 factors, we studied long-term actuarial graft survival in a cohort of adult kidney recipients who underwent transplants at a single institution between January 1, 1984 and October 31, 1998. Excluded were recipients with graft loss as a result of death with function, technical failure, primary nonfunction, and recurrent disease, leaving 1587 recipients (757 cadaver [CAD], 830 living donor [LD]) who would be at risk for graft loss secondary to both immunologic and nonimmunologic factors. These recipients were analyzed in the following 2 groups: those treated for a previous episode of acute rejection (AR) (Group1; n=588; 328 CAD, 260 LD) and those with no AR (Group 2: n=999; 429 CAD, 570 LD). Actuarial graft survival and causes of graft loss were determined for each group. Presumably, graft loss in Group 1 would be caused by immunologic and nonimmunologic factors; graft loss in Group 2 would be caused primarily by nonimmunologic factors. Results. The 10-year graft survival rate (censored for death with function, technical failure, primary non-function, and recurrent disease) in Group 2 was 91%. In contrast, the 10-year graft survival rate in Group 1 was 45% (P

background: Small duct chronic pancreatitis is associated with intractable pain and failure to thrive, usually unresponsive to conventional management approaches. Total pancreatectomy is considered after failure of medical intervention. The major morbidity following total pancreatectomy is diabetes mellitus with its associated complications. This adverse outcome can be mitigated through autotransplantation of islets recovered from the pancreatectomy specimen. This approach has been limited historically owing to the absence of an on-site islet processing facility. We present the results from 5 pancreatectomized patients whose islets were prepared 1,500 miles away. methods: Five patients (4 women, 1 man, average age 42 years) who failed medical therapy and were not candidates for longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy underwent total/completion pancreatectomy (4 total, 1 completion) for intractable symptoms from idiopathic small duct chronic pancreatitis. The resected pancreata were preserved in ViaSpan solution and were transferred to an islet processing laboratory by commercial airliner and returned. The dispersed pancreatic islet tissue was infused into a portal vein tributary through an operatively placed catheter after systemic heparinization. results: All 5 patients experienced complete relief from pancreatic pain; 2 had significant residual discomfort from underlying Crohn’s disease. Three of the 5 patients had minimal or no insulin requirement after autotransplantation (median follow-up of 23 months); 1 patient continued with glycemic control difficulties related to Crohn’s disease. One patient died 17 months following autotransplantation from an unrelated pneumonia. conclusion: Total pancreatectomy with autologous islet transplantation can offer patients with idiopathic small duct chronic pancreatitis pain relief without the sequelae of diabetes mellitus and can be performed without an on-site islet processing facility. All patients undergoing total/completion pancreatectomy should be considered candidates for this procedure.

With the advances in technique and immunosupression, not only the short- but the long-term outcomes of pancreas transplantation have improved significantly. This retrospective study describes the long-term outcomes of simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplants, pancreas after kidney (PAK), and pancreas transplants alone (PTA). An overall analysis was performed for all deceased donor (DD) primary pancreas transplants performed in the United States between 1988 and 1999. In addition, the long-term outcome for pancreas transplants performed at the University of Minnesota (UM) was analyzed. For SPK transplants performed in the United States between 1998 and 1999, the half-life of the pancreas was almost 12 years, and was 12.5 years for kidneys. For SPK cases where the pancreas was functioning at 1 year, the half-lives of both the pancreas and the kidney grafts extended more than 14 years. The half-lives of solitary pancreas transplants were between 7 years for PAK and 9 years for PTA cases. For US solitary transplants with at least 1 year of graft function, the half-lives extended to almost 9 years. Pancreas transplants performed at the UM showed the same significant improvements over time. Of special interest is the excellent long-term graft function of pancreas transplants from a living donor, which in the early years clearly surpassed that of solitary DD pancreas transplants. A multivariate analysis showed that the factor with the highest impact on long-term graft function in all three transplant categories was the use of a young donor. In SPK cases, the most frequent reason for late graft loss was death with a functioning graft. In solitary pancreas transplants, most late graft losses were still due to immunological reasons.

Background: Bladder drainage is the most common technique for managing the exocrine secretions of pancreaticoduodenal grafts. However, bladder drainage can cause urinary, pancreatic, and metabolic complications that may require conversion to enteric drainage. With enteric drainage, urinary amylase levels cannot be monitored as a marker for rejection. After enteric conversion, rejection is the major cause of graft loss. Timing the conversion to reduce immunologic graft loss would greatly improve patient and graft survival rates. Our study was designed to assess the incidence of, indications for, and complications of converting from bladder to enteric drainage after pancreaticoduodenal transplantations. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 80 recipients who underwent enteric conversion. We studied the recipient category, the interval from transplantation to conversion, the interval from the last rejection episode to conversion, the indications for conversion, the type of enteric drainage at conversion (loop versus Roux-en-Y), the results of the conversion, and postconversion complications. Results: The major indications for conversion were metabolic acidosis (n = 26, 33%), recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) (n = 16, 20%), reflux pancreatitis (n = 15, 19%), and hematuria (n = 12, 15%). For most recipients, their symptoms resolved after conversion (n = 76, 95%). The cumulative probability of undergoing conversion was 13% at 12 months, 21% at 36 months, and 25% at 60 months. Of the recipients with surgical complications after conversion (n = 12, 15%), one lost his graft as a result of pancreatitis. Overall, of the 80 recipients who underwent conversion, 12 (15%) lost their graft, most due to rejection (n = 8, 75%). Immunologic graft loss was highest for recipients of pancreas transplants alone who underwent conversion ≤6 months after transplantation or ≤1 year after their last rejection episode. Conclusions: Enteric conversion is safe and therapeutic in recipients with complications related to the exocrine secretions of bladder-drained pancreas grafts. After conversion, rejection accounted for 75% of the grafts lost. However, waiting at least 1 year after the last rejection episode significantly reduced immunologic graft loss. (Surgery 1998;124:883-93.)

Background: Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation has become a recognized therapy for type I diabetes mellitus patients with diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy. In the vast majority of these procedures, both grafts are placed intraperitoneally, which reduces posttransplant morbidity. Recently, in some of our recipients, we noted renal dysfunction related to complications of the renal pedicle. Our objectives in this study were to identify the cause of this renal dysfunction and to prevent its occurrence in future recipients. Study Design: We undertook a retrospective chart review of simultaneous kidney-pancreas recipients who experienced renal dysfunction related to renal pedicle complications. Results: We found four recipients with renal dysfunction related to renal pedicle torsion, diagnosed by serial ultrasound scans and kidney graft biopsies. Early diagnosis allowed salvage of three kidney grafts, but one was lost after late diagnosis. Conclusions: A high level of suspicion is needed to diagnose renal pedicle torsion. If simultaneous kidney-pancreas recipients have recurrent renal dysfunction, and rejection has been excluded, serial ultrasound scans with color flow Doppler examinations are needed. Once the diagnosis is made, a nephropexy to the anterior abdominal wall is indicated to prevent further torsion and save the kidney graft. We recommend prophylactic nephropexy of left renal grafts if the renal pedicle is ≥5 cm long and if there is a 2 cm or more discrepancy between the length of the artery and the vein.

Background. Discordant islet xenografts are immediately nonfunctional in nonimmunosuppressed recipients other than the mouse, a process called primary nonfunction. Although at present it is unknown whether complement is involved, complement might participate in the induction of primary nonfunction through a number of mechanisms. We investigated the potential role of the membrane attack complex of complement in primary nonfunction of transplanted xenoislets. Methods. Canine islets were transplanted into both nonimmunosuppressed and immunosuppressed normocomplementemic and C6-deficient (C6D) PVG rats. Cyclosporine, rapamycin, deoxyspergualin, and mycophenolate mofetil were used for immunosuppression from day -3 to cessation of islet cell function. Serum glucose was measured at 6 hr after transplant and daily thereafter. Xenograft tissue sections were obtained at various times after transplant and stained for inflammatory cells and insulin. Results. Canine islets grafted in nonimmunosuppressed C6D rats and normocomplementemic rats underwent primary nonfunction in all animals. The incidence of primary nonfunction in animals receiving a four-drug immunosuppressive regimen was 33% in the normocomplementemic rats but only 10% in the C6D rats. The mean functional islet survival time was 1.57±0.33 days in the normocomplementemic group and 2.70±0.67 days in the C6D group (P=0.38). The islet xenografts showed little difference in degree and composition of cell infiltration between normocomplementemic and C6D rats. Conclusion. The membrane attack complex does not appear to play a major role in primary nonfunction of canine islet xenografts in nonimmunosuppressed PVG rats. However, there was a lower incidence of primary nonfunction and a longer posttransplant survival time in immunosuppressed C6D rats, suggesting the membrane attack complex may play a minor role in recipients that are heavily immunosuppressed.

Background. The most common cause of graft failure after technically successful pancreas transplants is rejection. Laboratory parameters for detecting pancreas graft rejection are not consistently reliable and can lead to unnecessary antirejection treatment. Histopathologic evaluation is the gold standard in the differential diagnosis of pancreas graft dysfunction. Four biopsy techniques have been described: cystoscopic transduodenal (CB), percutaneous computed tomography scan-guided (PB), open, and laparoscopic biopsy. Methods. We studied the two most common techniques, CB and PB, in pancreas transplant recipients with presumed rejection. Group 1 comprised 103 attempts at CB in 82 recipients (53 men, 29 women) with bladder-drained (BD) pancreas transplants, at 1 to 80 (median, 14) months after transplant. Group 2 comprised 93 attempts at PB in 68 recipients (41 men, 27 women), at 0.5 to 64 (median, 14) months after transplant. Results. In group 1, of 103 attempts at CB, adequate tissue was obtained in 90 (87%): pancreas alone in 23 (22%), pancreas + duodenum in 35 (34%), duodenum alone in 32 (31%). Of the 58 pancreas biopsies, 23 (40%) showed acute rejection. Of the 67 duodenal biopsies, 16 (24%) showed acute rejection. Complications of CB included macrohematuria in 4 recipients (4%) and microhematuria in 32 (31%). We noted no biopsy-related pancreatitis. The mean cost of CB was $2561±246. In group 2, of 93 attempts at PB, adequate tissue (all pancreas) was obtained in 67 (72%); of these, 29 (43%) showed acute rejection. Of 23 inaccessible pancreases, 9 (39%) underwent CB; pancreatic tissue was obtained in four (45%), and results were consistent with rejection in all four. Complications of PB included biopsy-related pancreatitis (serum amylase ≥25%) in five (7%) recipients, macrohematuria in one (1%), and abdominal hemorrhage in two (3%). The mean cost of PB was $1038±78. (1) CB and PB prevented unnecessary antirejection treatment in 44% of our recipients with successful biopsies; (2) CB had a higher success rate for obtaining tissue (including duodenal specimens) and a lower rate of major complications; (3) PB was easier and cheaper, did not require general anesthesia, and was performed as an outpatient procedure. Conclusions. We conclude that PB should become the biopsy technique of choice in recipients with presumed pancreas graft rejection. If PB fails, recipients with bladder-drained pancreas transplants should undergo CB. If CB fails, or in recipients with enteric-drained or duct-injected pancreas transplants, a laparoscopic or open biopsy should be considered.

Background Defining tolerable warm ischemia (WI) is mandatory before nonheartbeating cadavers can be used to enlarge the donor pool. No studies to date have precisely evaluated the effect of pancreatic WI on islet yield and viability in a large animal model. Methods. We used mongrel dogs in our study at the University of Minnesota. Excised pancreases were left in situ for a designated period (0, 30, 45, and 60 min in groups 1 to 4, respectively) of WI. Then, they were digested by the automated collagenase digestion method of Ricordi, purified on Euro-Ficoll discontinuous gradients with the COBE cell processor, and autotransplanted into the liver via a mesenteric vein. We compared the four groups in terms of islet yield, expressed as islet equivalents (IE; diameter standardizing to 150 Can) per pancreas weight (IE/g pancreas), and viability, assessed by functional success (maintenance of normoglycemia for 2 weeks) after transplant. Results. Mean islet yield (± SD) and the functional success rate after transplant were as follows: 6200±1800 IE/g pancreas and 4 of 4 (100%) in group 1; 6300±4400 and 4 of 4 (100%) in group 2; 3800±2600 and 2 of 4 (50%) in group 3; and 1400±1300 and 0 of 4 (0%) in group 4 (P=0.01 vs. group 1). Conclusions. With 30 min or less of WI, there are no deleterious effects on islet yield and viability. However, with periods of WI longer than 30 min, the loss in islet yield is severe, resulting in functional failure after autotransplantation. The limit of WI that is tolerable for islets is shorter than for a whole pancreas.

OBJECTIVE: In this first report of a clinical series of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPKs) from live donors, the authors assess donor and recipient outcome as well as the spectrum of surgical and metabolic complications. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The rationale for live (vs. cadaveric) donation includes an immunologic advantage (better matching, decreased drugs, and fewer rejection episodes) and elimination of waiting time. Only sequential kidney and pancreas or pancreas transplants alone from live donors had been done until the authors' current series. METHODS: Between March 15, 1994, and March 15, 1997, the authors performed 20 SPKs from live donors (6 human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings, 14 mismatched relatives [5 parents, 7 siblings, 1 daughter, 1 aunt]). Of the 20 donors, 13 were women, and 7 were men; median age was 43 years (range, 30-58 years). All donors underwent standardized metabolic workup, including oral glucose tolerance tests, determination of hemoglobin A1 c levels, and tests to study insulin secretion and functional insulin secretory reserve. Of the 20 recipients, 12 were women, and 8 were men; median age was 34 years (range, 14-50 years). Management of exocrine pancreatic secretions was with bladder drainage in 17 and duct injection in 3 recipients. Median follow-up was 9 months (range, 1-36 months). RESULTS: Currently, all 20 kidney grafts are functioning. Of the 20 pancreas grafts, 15 are functioning, 3 thrombosed, but 2 of those patients underwent immediate retransplantation from a cadaveric donor, and their grafts currently are functioning. Recipient complications included three anastomotic leaks and three intra-abdominal abscesses. Donor complications included four splenectomies, two peripancreatic fluid collections, one pseudocyst, and one intra-abdominal abscess; two donors underwent reoperation. Three donors had impaired glucose metabolism postdonation. Using tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for mainstay immunosuppression, only 8 of 20 recipients experienced > or =1 rejection episode; only 1 pancreas graft was lost to rejection. Donor and recipient mortality was 0%. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants from live donors can be done with no mortality and good graft outcome. With stringent donor criteria, this approach could become another surgical alternative for endocrine replacement therapy in selected patients with uremic type I diabetes.

Background. The most common type of pancreas transplantation is whole pancreaticoduodenal (with bladder drainage) from a cadaver donor. Complications can arise not only from the pancreas itself but also from the simultaneously transplanted duodenum. The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of duodenal complications and their impact on patient and pancreas graft survival rates. Methods. Our retrospective study is based on 425 pancreaticoduodenal transplantations performed between July 1, 1986, and June 30, 1994. Complications pertaining to the duodenal segment were labeled early if they occurred within the first postoperative month and late otherwise. Mean follow-up was 55 months (range, 13 to 108 months). Results. We noted 85 (20%) duodenal complications: duodenal leaks (n = 42), hematuria (n = 26), recurrent urinary tract infections (n = 9), duodenal ulceration or necrosis (n = 6), and bladder stones (n = 2). Of these complications, 40 (48%) required surgical intervention. In all, duodenal complications resulted in 14 (16%) enteric conversions and eight (9%) pancreas graft losses (six because of duodenal leak and 2 because of hematuria). The mortality rate from duodenal complications was 0%. Conclusions. Duodenal complications were common, but they were not associated with a high rate of pancreas graft loss (only 9%). With early diagnosis and treatment, morbidity can be reduced and death avoided in pancreas transplant recipients.