1. Efficacy of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome IIIb: A Prospective-Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
- Author
-
Sae Woong Kim, Yong Sun Choi, Ji Youl Lee, Sung-Hoo Hong, U-Syn Ha, Kang Sup Kim, Sun Tae Ahn, Woong Jin Bae, Hyuk Jin Cho, and Du Geon Moon
- Subjects
Aging ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Visual analogue scale ,business.industry ,Urology ,Health Policy ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Placebo-controlled study ,Prostatitis ,Placebo ,medicine.disease ,Perineum ,Intensity (physics) ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Reproductive Medicine ,Quality of life ,Internal medicine ,Extracorporeal shockwave therapy ,medicine ,Pharmacology (medical) ,business - Abstract
Purpose There is no definite treatment method for chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS). The purpose of this study was to compare and assess the effectiveness and safety of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) versus placebo treatment in CPPS IIIb patients. Materials and methods Thirty participants with CPPS IIIb were included and randomized in this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Li-ESWT was performed at the perineum without anesthesia once per week for 8 weeks. CPPS-related symptoms were evaluated using the National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI). Pain and erectile function were appraised using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF), respectively. The Global Efficacy Assessment Question (GEAQ) was also assessed. The parameters were evaluated immediately after the last Li-ESWT treatment and 4 weeks after Li-EWST treatment. Results Fifteen subjects each in the Li-ESWT and placebo groups completed this study. Amelioration of NIH-CPSI total, pain, and quality of life score in the Li-ESWT group was found compared to the placebo group (p=0.002, 0.02, 0.001, respectively). Improvement of the VAS score was observed in the Li-ESWT group (p=0.002). The differences in the GEAQ "Yes" responses were also significant in the Li-ESWT group. No patients experienced side effects related to ESWT during therapeutic period or follow-up duration. Conclusions Results indicated that Li-ESWT improved the NIH-CPSI score, pain, and the quality of life in CPPS IIIb patients. Li-ESWT could be an effective alternative treatment modality for CPPS IIIb.
- Published
- 2021