1. Feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced four dimensional (4D) MRA in head and neck tumors, comparison with contrast-enhanced 4D MRA
- Author
-
Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Till Illies, Souichirou Tateishi, Jens Fiehler, Nadine Jerusel, Noriyuki Tomiyama, Masato Uchikoshi, Katsuyuki Nakanishi, and Mio Sakai
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Non-contrast-enhanced MRA ,Hemodynamics ,Vascular architecture ,Magnetic resonance angiography ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Head and neck tumor ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Vascularity ,Medicine ,Contrast (vision) ,Non contrast enhanced ,media_common ,Multidisciplinary ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Research ,Head and neck tumors ,Curve pattern ,Time-resolved MRA ,Radiology ,medicine.symptom ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background Information of tumor vascular architecture and hemodynamics is important in treating patients with head and neck tumors (HNTs). The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced four-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography (non-CE 4DMRA) using arterial spin labeling for anatomical and hemodynamic evaluation of vascularity of head and neck tumors. Results Non-CE 4DMRA images of 15 patients with HNTs were compared with those of contrast-enhanced 4DMRA (CE 4DMRA) by two independent observers. For qualitative evaluation, overall image quality, visualization of arterial branches and main arterial tumor feeders were assessed. For hemodynamic evaluation, signal-intensity-over-time curves within the tumors were compared. The sensitivity of non-CE 4DMRA for the identification of arterial branches and the main arterial tumor feeders was 75 and 20 %, respectively (interobserver agreement, κ = 0.56 and 0.54, respectively), while that of CE 4DMRA was 99 and 95 %, respectively (interobserver agreement, κ = 0.62 and 0.70, respectively). All three arterial/hypervascularized tumors determined on CE 4DMRA showed distinct signal-intensity-over-time curve pattern on non-CE 4DMRA, with distinct peak and wash out phases. Other tumors showed no wash out on non-CE 4DMRA. Conclusions Use of non-CE 4DMRA for the anatomical and hemodynamic evaluation of vascularity of head and neck tumors is feasible, although the technique needs to be improved.
- Published
- 2016