1. Edoxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonist for Atrial Fibrillation after TAVR
- Author
-
Thomas Pilgrim, Diego López-Otero, José Luis Zamorano, James Jin, Roxana Mehran, Cathy Chen, Peter Nordbeck, Eric Boersma, Envisage-Tavi Af Investigators, Holger Thiele, Christian Hengstenberg, Rainer Hambrecht, Fayaz A. Shawl, George Dangas, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Luis Nombela-Franco, Kentaro Hayashida, Piera Capranzano, Anil Duggal, Yusuke Watanabe, Pascal Vranckx, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Raul Moreno, Usman Baber, Roland Veltkamp, Petra Laeis, Marco Valgimigli, Hyo-Soo Kim, Felix Meincke, Richard A. Anderson, Patrick Ohlmann, Irene Lang, Hans Lanz, Masanori Yamamoto, Helge Möllmann, Shigeru Saito, Martin Unverdorben, and Cardiology
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Gastrointestinal bleeding ,Vitamin K ,Pyridines ,medicine.drug_class ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Postoperative Complications ,Edoxaban ,Thromboembolism ,Internal medicine ,Atrial Fibrillation ,80 and over ,Humans ,Medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,Mortality ,610 Medicine & health ,Stroke ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,Anticoagulants ,Phenindione ,Atrial fibrillation ,4-Hydroxycoumarins ,General Medicine ,Vitamin K antagonist ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Intention to Treat Analysis ,Thiazoles ,chemistry ,Cardiology ,Female ,Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ,business ,Factor Xa Inhibitors - Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of direct oral anticoagulants as compared with vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation after successful transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) has not been well studied. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, adjudicator-masked trial comparing edoxaban with vitamin K antagonists in patients with prevalent or incident atrial fibrillation as the indication for oral anticoagulation after successful TAVR. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of adverse events consisting of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, or major bleeding. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. On the basis of a hierarchical testing plan, the primary efficacy and safety outcomes were tested sequentially for noninferiority, with noninferiority of edoxaban established if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio did not exceed 1.38. Superiority testing of edoxaban for efficacy would follow if noninferiority and superiority were established for major bleeding. RESULTS A total of 1426 patients were enrolled (713 in each group). The mean age of the patients was 82.1 years, and 47.5% of the patients were women. Almost all the patients had atrial fibrillation before TAVR. The rate of the composite primary efficacy outcome was 17.3 per 100 person-years in the edoxaban group and 16.5 per 100 person-years in the vitamin K antagonist group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.31; P���=���0.01 for noninferiority). Rates of major bleeding were 9.7 per 100 person-years and 7.0 per 100 person-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.91; P���=���0.93 for noninferiority); the difference between groups was mainly due to more gastrointestinal bleeding with edoxaban. Rates of death from any cause or stroke were 10.0 per 100 person-years in the edoxaban group and 11.7 per 100 person-years in the vitamin K antagonist group (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.11). CONCLUSIONS In patients with mainly prevalent atrial fibrillation who underwent successful TAVR, edoxaban was noninferior to vitamin K antagonists as determined by a hazard ratio margin of 38% for a composite primary outcome of adverse clinical events. The incidence of major bleeding was higher with edoxaban than with vitamin K antagonists. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; ENVISAGE-TAVI AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02943785.).
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF