1. Transbronchial Biopsy and Cryobiopsy in the Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis among Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease
- Author
-
Javier Diaz-Mendoza, Maximiliano Tamae-Kakazu, Hassan Chami, Shandra L Knight, Kevin C. Wilson, Setu Patolia, Alex R Jenkins, Abigail Chua, Abhijit Duggal, and Ganesh Raghu
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Biopsy ,Interstitial lung disease ,Lung biopsy ,Cochrane Library ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,030228 respiratory system ,Pneumothorax ,Internal medicine ,Bronchoscopy ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Differential diagnosis ,Lung Diseases, Interstitial ,business ,Complication ,Hypersensitivity pneumonitis ,Alveolitis, Extrinsic Allergic - Abstract
Rationale: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a diagnosis based on clinical, radiological, and pathological findings. The evidence supporting transbronchial forceps lung biopsy (TBBx) and transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) as sampling techniques to diagnose HP in patients with newly detected ILD has not been reviewed systematically.Objectives: A systematic review was performed to assess the diagnostic yield and complication rates of TBBx or TBLC in patients with newly detected ILD whose differential diagnosis includes HP and to inform the development of the American Thoracic Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociacion Latinoamericana del Torax clinical practice guidelines on the diagnosis of HP.Methods: Medline, Excerpta Medica Database, and the Cochrane Library were searched through October 2019. Studies that enrolled patients with ILD and reported the diagnostic yield of TBBx or TBLC were selected for inclusion. Data related to diagnostic yield and safety outcomes were extracted and then pooled across studies via meta-analysis. The quality of the evidence was appraised using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach.Results: The histopathologic diagnostic yields (number of procedures that yielded a histopathologic diagnosis divided by the total number of procedures performed) of TBBx and TBLC were 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32-42%) and 82% (95% CI, 78-86%), respectively, among patients with ILD. Among those diagnosed by TBBx, the proportion with HP could not be determined. However, among those diagnosed by TBLC, 13.4% had HP. TBBx was complicated by moderate to severe bleeding, severe bleeding, and pneumothorax in 4% (95% CI, 0-8%), 0% (95% CI, 0-1%), and 7% (95% CI, 2-13%) of patients, respectively. TBLC was complicated by any bleeding, severe bleeding, and pneumothorax in 11% (95% CI, 7-15%), 0% (95% CI, 0-1%), and 11% (95% CI, 9-14%) of patients, respectively. The quality of the evidence was very low because of the uncontrolled study designs, lack of consecutive enrollment, and inconsistent results.Conclusions: Very low-quality evidence indicated that TBLC had a higher diagnostic yield than TBBx among patients with ILD, although complications were similar.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF