Search

We identified relapse/maintenance-of-response (MOR) predictors following discontinuation of long-term atomoxetine treatment in pediatric and adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and assessed correlations between ADHD symptoms and quality of life (QoL). Post hoc analyses of data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 withdrawal studies in patients with ADHD meeting predefined response criteria before randomization. Study 1: patients (N = 163; 6-15 years) received atomoxetine (1.2-1.8 mg/kg/day) for 1 year, followed by randomization to atomoxetine (n = 81) or placebo (n = 82) for 6 months. Study 2: patients (N = 524; 18-50 years) received atomoxetine (80-100 mg/day) for ~6 months, followed by randomization to atomoxetine (n = 266) or placebo (n = 258) for ~6 months. Placebo patients were used for the analyses. Relapse: ≥50% worsening of prerandomization improvement in ADHD symptoms and ≥2 level severity increase on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale at 2 consecutive visits; MOR: retaining ≥75% of prerandomization symptom improvement and CGI-S ≤ 2 at all visits (study 1); retaining ≥70% of prerandomization symptom improvement and CGI-S ≤ 3 at all visits (study 2). In adults, statistically significantly (P ≤ .05) increased likelihood of relapse was associated with prerandomization presence of Conners' Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Investigator-Rated:Screening Version (CAARS-Inv:SV) items "difficulty awaiting turn" and "careless mistakes." In pediatric patients, less MOR was associated with prerandomization presence of ADHD Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version Investigator-Rated item "does not listen"; in adults, less MOR was associated with prerandomization presence of CAARS-Inv:SV items "loses things" and "difficulty awaiting turn." Changes in patients' QoL after withdrawal from atomoxetine moderately correlated with changes in ADHD symptoms in pediatric patients and mildly in adults.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the 52-week safety/tolerability of oral olanzapine for adolescents with schizophrenia or bipolar mania and compare effectiveness of a standard versus intense behavioral weight intervention in mitigating risk of weight gain. METHODS Patients 13-17 years old with schizophrenia (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children [BPRS-C] total score >30; item score ≥3 for hallucinations, delusions, or peculiar fantasies) or bipolar I disorder (manic or mixed episode; Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS] total score ≥15) received open-label olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/day) and were randomized to standard (n = 102; a single weight counseling session) or intense (n = 101; weight counseling at each study visit) weight intervention. The primary outcome measure was mean change in body mass index (BMI) from baseline to 52 weeks using mixed-model repeated measures. Symptomatology was also assessed. RESULTS No statistically significant differences between groups were observed in mean baseline-to-52-week change in BMI (standard: +3.6 kg/m2; intense: +2.8 kg/m2; p = 0.150) or weight (standard: +12.1 kg; intense: +9.6 kg; p = 0.148). Percentage of patients at endpoint who had gained ≥15% of their baseline weight was 40% for the standard group and 31% for the intense group (p = 0.187). Safety/tolerability results were generally consistent with those of previous olanzapine studies in adolescents, with the most notable exception being the finding of a mean decrease in prolactin. On symptomatology measures, patients with schizophrenia had a mean baseline-to-52-week change in BPRS-C of -32.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 10.8), and patients with bipolar disorder had a mean change in YMRS of -16.7 (SD = 8.9), with clinically and statistically significant improvement starting at 3-4 days for each. CONCLUSIONS Long-term weight gain was high in both groups, with no statistically significant differences between the standard or intense behavioral weight interventions in BMI or weight. Safety, tolerability, and effectiveness findings were generally consistent with the known profile of olanzapine in adolescents.

The adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) quality-of-life (AAQoL) scale was previously validated in adult patients in the USA; here, the AAQoL is validated in adult European patients. Data from a 12-week open-label acute treatment period with atomoxetine (80–100 mg/day) in adults with ADHD were used. Patients (≥18 to ≤50 years old) had a score ≥2 on ≥6 items on the inattentive or hyperactive core subscales of Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator Rated: Screening Version (CAARS-Inv:SV); a CAARS-Inv:SV 18-item total ADHD symptom score ≥20; and Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Observer: Screening Version 6-item inattentive or hyperactive core subscale scores ≥2. Data were stratified based on patients’ geographic region (Europe vs USA). Scale validation psychometric properties results were very similar between European (n = 1,217; 57.7 % male; mean age 33.0 years) and US (n = 602; 62.1 % male; mean age 33.5 years) patients, including factor loading, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and responsiveness. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed four AAQoL subscales. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.70 for all subscales). The AAQoL total score showed moderate convergent validity with CAARS-Inv:SV 18-item total ADHD symptom and clinical global impression-ADHD-severity (CGI-ADHD-S) scores; and strong convergent validity with Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function—Adult Version: Self-Report Global-Executive-Composite Index scores. Mean AAQoL total scores were significantly different among patients grouped by CGI-ADHD-S scores, suggesting good discriminant validity. The AAQoL total and subscale scores presented good responsiveness from baseline to 12 weeks. The AAQoL scale shows comparable validity in European and US adults with ADHD. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12402-014-0160-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) presents major challenges for both patients and clinicians. There is no universally accepted definition of TRD, but results from the US National Institute of Mental Health's (NIMH) STAR*D (Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression) programme indicate that after the failure of two treatment trials, the chances of remission decrease significantly. Several pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for TRD may be considered when optimized (adequate dose and duration) therapy has not produced a successful outcome and a patient is classified as resistant to treatment. Nonpharmacological strategies include psychotherapy (often in conjunction with pharmacotherapy), electroconvulsive therapy and vagus nerve stimulation. The US FDA recently approved vagus nerve stimulation as adjunctive therapy (after four prior treatment failures); however, its benefits are seen only after prolonged (up to 1 year) use. Other nonpharmacological options, such as repetitive transcranial stimulation, deep brain stimulation or psychosurgery, remain experimental and are not widely available. Pharmacological treatments of TRD can be grouped in two main categories: 'switching' or 'combining'. In the first, treatment is switched within and between classes of compounds. The benefits of switching include avoidance of polypharmacy, a narrower range of treatment-emergent adverse events and lower costs. An inherent disadvantage of any switching strategy is that partial treatment responses resulting from the initial treatment might be lost by its discontinuation in favour of another medication trial. Monotherapy switches have also been shown to have limited effectiveness in achieving remission. The advantage of combination strategies is the potential to build upon achieved improvements; they are generally recommended if partial response was achieved with the current treatment trial. Various non-antidepressant augmenting agents, such as lithium and thyroid hormones, are well studied, although not commonly used. There is also evidence of efficacy and increasing use of atypical antipsychotics in combination with antidepressants, for example, olanzapine in combination with fluoxetine (OFC) or augmentation with aripiprazole. The disadvantages of a combination strategy include multiple medications, a broader range of treatment-emergent adverse events and higher costs. Several experimental pharmaceutical treatment alternatives for TRD are also being explored in combination with antidepressants or as monotherapy. These less studied alternative compounds include pindolol, inositol, CNS stimulants, hormones, herbal supplements, omega-3 fatty acids, S-adenosyl-L-methionine, folic acid, lamotrigine, modafinil, riluzole and topiramate. In summary, despite an increasing variety of choices for the treatment of TRD, this condition remains universally undefined and represents an area of unmet medical need. There are few known approved pharmacological agents for TRD (aripiprazole and OFC) and overall outcomes remain poor. This might be an indication that depression itself is a heterogeneous condition with a great diversity of pathologies, highlighting the need for careful evaluation of individuals with depressive symptoms who are unresponsive to treatment. Clearly, more research is needed to provide clinicians with better guidance in making those treatment decisions--especially in light of accumulating evidence that the longer patients are unsuccessfully treated, the worse their long-term prognosis tends to be.

Since its first FDA approval in 2004, duloxetine has been taken by more than 5 million patients. A small fraction of patients treated with duloxetine develop elevations in liver enzymes, which generally resolve spontaneously without any change in treatment. Very rare cases (estimated 1-2 per 100,000 exposures) of idiosyncratic hepatic toxicity have been reported in patients taking duloxetine, particularly in those with substantial alcohol use and/or preexisting liver disease. In the context of more than 23,000 patients exposed during clinical trials, and more than 1.5 million patient years of exposure subsequent to product launch, the hepatic risk after exposure to duloxetine appears to be within the range identified for other therapeutic agents. Therefore, it does not warrant hepatic enzyme monitoring. As with any medication, physicians should follow prescribing guidelines and educate patients on the risks and benefits of duloxetine.

The heritable disorder ataxia telangiectasia (AT) is caused by mutations in the AT-mutated (ATM) gene with manifestations that include predisposition to lymphoproliferative cancers and hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation (IR). We investigated gene expression changes in response to IR in human lymphoblasts and fibroblasts from seven normal and seven AT-affected individuals. Both cell types displayed ATM-dependent gene expression changes after IR, with some responses shared and some responses varying with cell type and dose. Interestingly, after 5 Gy IR, lymphoblasts displayed ATM-independent responses not seen in the fibroblasts at this dose, which likely reflect signaling through ATM-related kinases, e.g., ATR, in the absence of ATM function. (Mol Cancer Res 2006;4(3):197–207)

Ataxia telangiectasia (AT) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by progressive cerebellar degeneration, immunodeficiencies, telangiectasias, sensitivity to ionizing radiation, and high predisposition for malignancies. The ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene encodes a protein (ATM) with serine/threonine kinase activity. DNA-double strand breaks are known to increase its kinase activity. While cells from individuals with AT are attenuated in their G(1)-, S- and G(2)-phase cell cycle checkpoint functions in response to gamma irradiation and oxidative stress, their response to UV irradiation appears to be equivalent to that of wild-type cells. In this study, we investigated changes in gene expression in response to gamma irradiation, oxidative stress, and UV irradiation, focusing on the dependence on ATM. Doses for all three treatments were selected that resulted in roughly an equivalent induction of a G(1) checkpoint response and inhibition of progression through S phase. To investigate gene expression changes, logarithmically growing wild-type and AT dermal diploid fibroblasts were exposed to either gamma radiation (5 Gy), oxidative stress (75 micro M t-butyl-hydroperoxide), or UV radiation (7.5 J/m(2)), and RNA was harvested 6 h after treatment. Gene expression analysis was performed using the NIEHS Human ToxChip 2.0 with approximately 1900 cDNA clones representing known genes and ESTs. All three treatments resulted in distinct patterns of gene expression changes, as shown previously. ATM-dependent and ATM-independent components were detected within these patterns, as were novel indications of involvement of ATM in regulation of transcription factors such as SP1, AP1 and MTF1.

Single-nucleotide and diplotype associations with 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD(17)) total score changes were examined, based on catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) rs165599 status in duloxetine-treated, self-identified white patients with major depressive disorder. COMT rs165737 and a diplotype containing COMT rs165599 and COMT rs165737 were associated with HAMD(17) total score changes.

In self-identified white patients with major depressive disorder (N=126) treated with open-label duloxetine (60-120 mg/d), a significant association of (P=0.020) of a composite risk score (based on SLC6A2 rs5569 [G1287A] AA, HTR1A rs6295 [C(-1019)G] GG, and COMT rs174697 AA/AG) with 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total score change from baseline to 12 weeks was observed.

An unanswered, but clinically important question is whether there are early indicators that a patient might respond to duloxetine treatment for fibromyalgia pain. To address this question, pooled data from 4 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in duloxetine-treated patients (N = 797) with primary fibromyalgia as defined by the American College for Rheumatology were analyzed. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was used to determine what level of early pain improvement as measured by the 24-hour average pain severity question on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) best predicted later response. The predictor variables tested were 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30% decrease in BPI 24-hour average pain from baseline to Week 1 and Week 2. The results of the CART analysis showed that for patients with ≥15% improvement in pain at Week 1 and ≥30% improvement at Week 2, the probability of response at 3 months was 75%. For patients with15% improvement at both Week 1 and Week 2, the probability of not responding at 3 months was 86%. Quantifiable early improvement in pain during the first 2 weeks of treatment with duloxetine was highly predictive of response or nonresponse after 3 months of treatment.This article presents early indicators that can highly predict later pain response or nonresponse in fibromyalgia patients treated with duloxetine. The results may aid clinicians to predict the likelihood of response at 3 months within the first 2 weeks of treatment.

Background Recent studies have identified associations of polymorphisms in several target genes with antidepressant treatment response of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and a tricyclic antidepressant. We sought to replicate these associations in a study of a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. Methods In 250 outpatients with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder, response to treatment with once-daily duloxetine (60 mg/day) over 6 weeks was examined for associations with polymorphisms in eight candidate genes previously associated with antidepressant response using mixed-effect model repeated-measures analysis. Treatment response was quantified on the basis of changes from baseline using 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total scores. Results Polymorphisms in PDE1A, PDE1C, PDE6A, PDE11A, ABCB1, GRIK4, SLC6A4 , and OPRM1 genes showed no statistically significant associations (uncorrected, two-tailed p > .05) with duloxetine treatment response. Conclusions Previously, described associations between polymorphisms in candidate genes and antidepressant treatment response were not replicated in this study. This result may suggest that previous associations are specific to serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Walter Deberdt1, Ilya Lipkovich2, Alexandra N Heinloth3, Lin Liu2, Sara Kollack-Walker2, Sara E Edwards2, Vicki Poole Hoffmann2, Thomas A Hardy21Eli Lilly Benelux, Eli Lilly and Company, Brussels, Belgium; 2Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 3i3Statprobe, Ingenix, Cary, NC, USAAbstract: We examined the potential risks and benefits of switching from olanzapine to quetiapine in mentally stable, obese, or overweight patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Patients receiving olanzapine were randomized to continuing olanzapine treatment (N = 68; 7.5–20 mg/day) or switching to quetiapine (N = 65; 300–800 mg/day). Time to relapse was the primary study objective; secondary objectives included changes in weight, metabolic parameters, and psychiatric symptoms, and discontinuation rates. No significant difference in time to relapse was observed (p = 0.293), but significantly more patients remained on treatment in the olanzapine group compared with the quetiapine group (70.6% vs 43.1%; p = 0.002). Olanzapine-treated patients had significantly lower rates of study discontinuation for lack of efficacy and psychiatric adverse events (AEs) compared to quetiapine (2.94% vs 15.38%, p = 0.015). Significantly more patients in the olanzapine group experienced an increase in BMI ≥1 kg/m2. Olanzapine-treated patients experienced significantly greater increases in weight from Weeks 2 through 13. Switching patients with stable disease from olanzapine to quetiapine did not significantly shorten time to relapse, but produced more frequent study discontinuations due to lack of efficacy or psychiatric AEs with moderate but variable improvement in weight and no significant between-group differences in mean changes in metabolic laboratory parameters.Keywords: antipsychotic switching, discontinuation, relapse, BMI, weight

Ataxia telangiectasia (AT) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by neuronal degeneration accompanied by ataxia, telangiectasias, acute cancer predisposition, and sensitivity to ionizing radiation (IR). Cells from individuals with AT show unusual sensitivity to IR, severely attenuated cell cycle checkpoint functions, and poor p53 induction in response to IR compared with normal human fibroblasts (NHFs). The gene mutated in AT (ATM) has been cloned, and its product, pATM, has IR-inducible kinase activity. The AT phenotype has been suggested to be a consequence, at least in part, of an inability to respond appropriately to oxidative damage. To test this hypothesis, we examined the ability of NHFs and AT dermal fibroblasts to respond to t-butyl hydroperoxide and IR treatment. AT fibroblasts exhibit, in comparison to NHFs, increased sensitivity to the toxicity of t-butyl hydroperoxide, as measured by colony-forming efficiency assays. Unlike NHFs, AT fibroblasts fail to show G(1) and G(2) phase checkpoint functions or to induce p53 in response to t-butyl hydroperoxide. Treatment of NHFs with t-butyl hydroperoxide activates pATM-associated kinase activity. Our results indicate that pATM is involved in responding to certain aspects of oxidative damage and in signaling this information to downstream effectors of the cell cycle checkpoint functions. Our data further suggest that some of the pathologies seen in AT could arise as a consequence of an inability to respond normally to oxidative damage.

We tested the hypothesis that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the catechol- O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene are associated with baseline pain levels in patients with major de- pressive disorder (MDD). Pain levels were quantified using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Data from 159 female and 93 male self-reported white patients with MDD were analyzed. The associations between a haplotype previously associated with pain sensitivity created using COMT SNPs rs6269, rs4633, rs4818, and rs4680, and the proportion of female patients with ''Pain While Awake'' and ''Overall Pain'' at baseline were statistically significant (P < .05). In male patients, no statistically sig- nificant associations between COMT haplotypes and baseline pain scores were seen. The rs165599 SNP, which has previously been associated with response of depressive symptoms to treatment in patients with MDD, did not impact baseline pain in either gender. In conclusion, baseline pain levels appear to be associated with the COMT pain sensitivity haplotype in female patients with MDD. Perspective: This article presents associations of the COMT pain sensitivity haplotype and baseline pain levels in female patients with MDD. This finding could potentially help clinicians who seek to assess how genetic polymorphisms may contribute to a patient's pain experience.