1. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with hiatal hernia: clinical outcome and patterns of recurrence
- Author
-
Ashten N. Omstead, Kristy L. Chovanec, Ali H. Zaidi, Shahin Ayazi, Yoshihiro Komatsu, Nobel Chowdhury, Toshitaka Hoppo, Blair A. Jobe, and Ping Zheng
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Magnetic sphincter augmentation ,030230 surgery ,2019 SAGES Oral ,Esophageal Sphincter, Lower ,Hiatal hernia ,Magnetics ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Patient satisfaction ,Recurrence ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Hernia ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Reflux ,Proton Pump Inhibitors ,Middle Aged ,Hepatology ,Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) ,Hernia repair ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Hernia, Hiatal ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Patient Satisfaction ,Quality of Life ,Sphincter ,Female ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business ,Abdominal surgery - Abstract
Introduction Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is an effective treatment for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. In early studies, patients with a hiatal hernia (HH) ≥ 3 cm were excluded from consideration for implantation and initially the FDA considered its use as “precautionary” in this context. This early approach has led to an attitude of hesitance among some surgeons to offer this therapy to patients with HH. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of HH status on the outcome of MSA and to report the rate of HH recurrence after MSA. Methods and procedures This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent MSA between June 2013 and August 2017. Baseline clinical and objective data were collected. Patients were divided into four groups based on HH status: no HH, small HH (
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF