Benjamin, Maïer, Stephanos, Finitsis, Romain, Bourcier, Panagiotis, Papanagiotou, Sébastien, Richard, Gaultier, Marnat, Igor, Sibon, Cyril, Dargazanli, Caroline, Arquizan, Raphael, Blanc, Michel, Piotin, Bertrand, Lapergue, Arturo, Consoli, Francois, Eugene, Stephane, Vannier, Suzana, Saleme, Francisco, Macian, Frédéric, Clarençon, Charlotte, Rosso, Olivier, Naggara, Guillaume, Turc, Alain, Viguier, Christophe, Cognard, Valerie, Wolff, Raoul, Pop, Mikael, Mazighi, Benjamin, Gory, Thomas, Ronziere, Hôpital de la Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), UFR Médecine [Santé] - Université Paris Cité (UFR Médecine UPCité), Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes), Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Service de neurologie [CHRU Nancy], Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy), Département de Neuro-Radiologie [Bordeaux] (DNR - Bordeaux), CHU Bordeaux [Bordeaux], Service de neurologie [Bordeaux], CHU Bordeaux [Bordeaux]-Groupe hospitalier Pellegrin, Département de Neuroradiologie[Montpellier], Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier)-Hôpital Gui de Chauliac [Montpellier]-Université de Montpellier (UM), Département de neurologie [Montpellier], Service Neuroradiologie diagnostique et interventionnelle [Hôpital Foch], Hôpital Foch [Suresnes], Département de Radiologie [Rennes], Université de Rennes (UR), Service de Neurologie [Rennes] = Neurology [Rennes], CHU Pontchaillou [Rennes], Service de Neuroradiologie interventionnelle [CHU Limoges], CHU Limoges, Service de Neurologie [CHU Limoges], Service de Neuroradiologie [CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière], CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Service d'Urgences Cérébro-Vasculaires [CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière], Service de Neurologie [CH Saint-Anne], Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne [Paris], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Neurologie Vasculaire [Toulouse], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Pôle Neurosciences [CHU Toulouse], Service de Neurologie [Strasbourg], CHU Strasbourg-Hopital Civil, Département de Neuroradiologie [Strasbourg], Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (HUS), Institut de Chirurgie guidée par l'Image, and Département de neuroradiologie diagnostique et thérapeutique [CHRU Nancy]
BackgroundThe best recanalization strategy for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains unknown as no randomized controlled trial has simultaneously evaluated first-line stent retriever (SR) versus contact aspiration (CA) versus the combined approach (SR+CA).ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety profiles of SR, CA, and SR+CA in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated by MT.MethodsWe analyzed data of the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients with AIS treated by MT. Patients with M1 and intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusions between January 2015 and March 2020 in 15 comprehensive stroke centers were included. We assessed the association of first-line strategy with favorable outcomes at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2), successful recanalization rates (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b/3), and safety outcomes.ResultsWe included 2643 patients, 406 treated with SR, 1126 with CA, and 1111 with SR+CA. CA or SR+CA achieved more successful recanalization than SR for M1 occlusions (aOR=2.09, (95% CI 1.39 to 3.13) and aOR=1.69 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.53), respectively). For intracranial ICA, SR+CA achieved more recanalization than SR (aOR=2.52 (95% CI 1.32 to 4.81)), no differences were observed between CA and SR+CA. SR+CA was associated with lower odds of favorable outcomes compared with SR (aOR=0.63 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.90)) and CA (aOR=0.71 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.92)), higher odds of mortality at 3 months (aOR=1.56 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.0)) compared with CA, and higher odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR=1.59 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.3)) compared with CA.ConclusionsDespite high recanalization rates, our results question the safety of the combined approach, which was associated with disability and mortality. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these techniques.