Search

BackgroundIn patients with metastatic cancer, the bone is the third-most common site of involvement. Radiation to painful bone metastases results in high rates of pain control and is an integral part of bone metastases management. Up to one-third of inpatient consults are requested for painful bone metastases, and up to 60% of these patients had evidence of these lesions visible on prior imaging. Meanwhile recent advances have reduced potential side effects of radiation. Therefore, there is an opportunity to further improve outcomes for patients using prophylactic palliative radiation to manage asymptomatic bone metastases.Methods/study designIn this trial, 74 patients with metastatic solid tumors and high-risk asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic bone metastases will be enrolled and randomized to early palliative radiation or standard of care. This will be the first trial to assess the efficacy of prophylactic palliative radiation in preventing skeletal related events (SREs), the primary endpoint. This endpoint was selected to encompass patient-centered outcomes that impact quality of life including pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, and intervention with surgery or radiation. Secondary endpoints include hospitalizations, Bone Pain Index, pain-free survival, pain-related quality of life, and side effects of radiation therapy.DiscussionIn this study, we propose a novel definition of high-risk bone metastases most likely to benefit from preventive radiation and use validated questionnaires to assess pain and impact on quality of life and health resource utilization. Observations from early patient enrollment have demonstrated robustness of the primary endpoint and need for minor modifications to Bone Pain Index and data collection for opioid use and hospitalizations. With increasing indications for radiation in the oligometastatic setting, this trial aims to improve patient-centered outcomes in the polymetastatic setting.Trial registrationISRCTN Number/Clinical trials.gov, ID:NCT03523351. Registered on 14 May 2018.

Purpose For patients with long bone metastases who undergo orthopedic stabilization surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT), it is unclear what extent of hardware coverage by the radiation field is needed for optimal tumor control. Methods and Materials Long bone metastases treated with surgical intervention followed by radiation between August 2011 to May 2019 from a single institution were reviewed. Local recurrence, defined as any in-bone recurrence, was identified by chart review. Accompanying demographic and treatment characteristics were recorded. Statistical analysis to evaluate factors associated with tumor recurrence included univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and propensity score matching. Results Among 138 patients with 145 long bone metastases undergoing postoperative RT with a median follow-up of 29.5 months, 36 bone metastases experienced a local recurrence. Most patients (92%) were treated with conventional RT and the median delivered dose was 30 Gy (interquarile range, 20-30 Gy). On univariate analysis, whole hardware RT field coverage and higher dose (biologically effective dose 10 ≥39 Gy) were associated with reduced local recurrence (0.44 hazard ratio [HR]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22%-0.86%; P = .017; 0.5 HR; 95% CI, 0.26%-0.96%; P = .038, respectively). Covariates of time from surgery to RT start, histology of primary tumor (categorized as resistant vs sensitive), intramedullary hardware placement, reaming procedure, and margin status did not reach statistical significance. To adjust for confounding effects, we also conducted a propensity score matched analysis which confirmed that whole hardware coverage was statistically associated with a decreased risk of recurrence on the matched dataset (0.24 HR; 95% CI, 0.07%-0.84%; P = .026). Conclusions In this analysis of mostly patients undergoing conventional radiation, coverage of the whole hardware was associated with reduced local recurrence for patients with long bone metastases, consistent with prior reports. Investigation of approaches to further reduce local recurrence, such as preoperative stereotactic radiation, may be warranted.

Purpose Local therapy for patients with nonspine bone metastases is evolving, with data supporting the use of single-fraction treatments, and more recently, showing possible benefit from stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). However, the rate of local salvage therapy (LST) after each technique has not been characterized in real-world clinic settings where patients are selected at physician discretion. We examined rates of LST in patients with nonspine bone metastases. Methods and Materials We reviewed records of RT for nonspine bone metastases at our institution from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. We defined LST as the first occurrence of RT or surgery for oncologic progression to a bone metastasis after initial RT. Cumulative incidence functions for retreatment were generated. We conducted multivariate analysis to identify variables associated with LST. Results A total of 1754 patients were analyzed, with median follow-up of 16.2 months (range, 0-36.8 months). Of all episodes of RT, 51.5% were multifraction external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), 7.0% were single-fraction EBRT, and 41.4% were SBRT. Altogether, 88 patients (5.0%) required LST, with an incidence at 6 months of 2.5%. Incidence of LST at 6 months was 2.1% for SBRT, 5.3% for single-fraction conventional regimens, and 2.4% for multifraction conventional regimens (P = .26). Patients of younger age, who had a higher Karnofsky performance status, and/or who had lesions in the pelvis had a higher risk of retreatment. Conclusions In this large institutional cohort, the rate of LST was low, with no difference between RT techniques. The findings indicated that SBRT for patients at high risk for treatment failure may reduce the rate of retreatment overall. When treatment modality was selected based on patient characteristics, rates of LST were lower than when treatment was randomly selected.

Purpose/Objective(s) Local therapy for patients with non-spine bone metastases is evolving, with recent data suggesting that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may improve pain response in the palliative setting. However, the rate of local salvage therapy (LST) after SBRT compared to conventional RT is unknown. We therefore characterized rates and risk factors for LST in patients with non-spine bone metastases. Materials/Methods We reviewed records of all courses of RT for non-spine bone metastases at our institution from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2018. LST was defined as the first occurrence of either RT or surgery for progression to a bone metastasis following initial RT. Functions of the cumulative incidence of re-treatment were generated for each RT technique. We identified associations with various predictors using the Fine and Gray method for competing risk regression. Results Of the 1,754 patients included, 2,648 bone metastases were treated with RT and analyzed with a median follow up of 15 months (IQR = 6.4 – 25.0 months). 51% of episodes were multi-fraction EBRT, 10% were single fraction EBRT, and 39% were SBRT. Of the treated metastases, 120 (4.5%) episodes required LST (median time to LST = 6.2 months, range = 0.3-35.6 months), with a cumulative incidence at 6 and 12 months of 2.4% and 3.9%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of re-treatment at 6 months was 2.6% for SBRT, 3.5% for single-fraction conventional, and 2.1% for multi-fraction conventional regimens (P = 0.76). On multivariable analysis, younger age, higher Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and location of the metastasis in the pelvis had higher hazard of re-treatment (Table 1). There was no significant difference in hazard of LST among RT techniques (P = 0.44), nor was there a significant interaction between RT technique and radioresistant histology (P = 0.33). Conclusion In our large institutional cohort, the rate of LST was low, with no difference between RT techniques. Our results suggest that judicious selection of patients at high risk for eventual treatment failure (i.e., those with longer expected survival) for SBRT may reduce the rate of retreatment rate in the population. When patients are appropriately selected for single fraction conventional RT, such as those who are older or have poor KPS, rates of LST remain low. Further studies to validate our findings are warranted to help clinicians to select the appropriate treatment technique for patients with bone metastases.