Search

Background In the AWARD-7 trial of participants with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and moderate-to-severe CKD, dulaglutide (DU) treatment slowed decline in eGFR compared with insulin glargine (IG). Treatment with doses of either DU or IG resulted in similar levels of glycemic control and BP. The aim of this analysis was to determine the risk of clinical event outcomes between treatment groups. Methods Participants with T2DM and CKD categories 3–4 were randomized (1:1:1) to 0.75 or 1.5 mg DU weekly or IG daily as basal therapy, with titrated insulin lispro, for 1 year. The time to occurrence of the composite outcome of ≥40% eGFR decline, ESKD, or death due to kidney disease was compared using a Cox proportional-hazards model. Results Patients treated with 1.5 mg DU weekly versus IG daily for 1 year had a lower risk of ≥40% eGFR decline or ESKD events in the overall study population (5% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.97; P=0.04). Most events occurred in the subset of patients with macroalbuminuria, where risk of the composite outcome was substantially lower for 1.5 mg DU versus IG (7% versus 22%; hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.68; P=0.006). No deaths due to kidney disease occurred. Conclusions Treatment with 1.5 mg DU weekly was associated with a clinically relevant risk reduction of ≥40% eGFR decline or ESKD compared with IG daily, particularly in the macroalbuminuria subgroup of participants with T2DM and moderate-to-severe CKD.

Summary Background Cardiovascular outcome trials have suggested that glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists might reduce strokes. We analysed the effect of dulaglutide on stroke within the researching cardiovascular events with a weekly incretin in diabetes (REWIND) trial. Methods REWIND was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done at 371 sites in 24 countries. Men and women (aged ≥50 years) with established or newly detected type 2 diabetes whose HbA1c was 9·5% or less (with no lower limit) on stable doses of up to two oral glucose-lowering drugs with or without basal insulin therapy were eligible if their body-mass index was at least 23 kg/m2. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to weekly subcutaneous injections of either masked dulaglutide 1·5 mg or the same volume of masked placebo (containing the same excipients but without dulaglutide). Randomisation was done by a computer-generated random code with an interactive web response system with stratification by site. Participants, investigators, the trial leadership, and all other personnel were masked to treatment allocation until the trial was completed and the database was locked. During the treatment period, participants in both groups were instructed to inject study drug on the same day at around the same time, each week. Strokes were categorised as fatal or non-fatal, and as either ischaemic, haemorrhagic, or undetermined. Stroke severity was assessed using the modified Rankin scale. Participants were seen at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and then every 3 months for drug dispensing and every 6 months for detailed assessments, until 1200 confirmed primary outcomes accrued. The primary endpoint was the first occurrence of any component of the composite outcome, which comprised non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular or unknown causes. All analyses were done according to an intention-to-treat strategy that included all randomly assigned participants, irrespective of adherence. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01394952 . Findings Between Aug 18, 2011, and Aug 14, 2013, we screened 12 133 patients, of whom 9901 with type 2 diabetes and additional cardiovascular risk factors were randomly assigned to either dulaglutide (n=4949) or an equal volume of placebo (n=4952). During a median follow-up of 5·4 years, cerebrovascular and other cardiovascular outcomes were ascertained and adjudicated. 158 (3·2%) of 4949 participants assigned to dulaglutide and 205 (4·1%) of 4952 participants assigned to placebo had a stroke during follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·62–0·94; p=0·010). Dulaglutide reduced ischaemic stroke (0·75, 0·59–0·94, p=0·012) but had no effect on haemorrhagic stroke (1·05, 0·55–1·99; p=0·89). Dulaglutide also reduced the composite of non-fatal stroke or all-cause death (0·88, 0·79–0·98; p=0·017) and disabling stroke (0·74, 0·56–0·99; p=0·042). The degree of disability after stroke did not differ by treatment group. Interpretation Long-term dulaglutide use might reduce clinically relevant ischaemic stroke in people with type 2 diabetes but does not affect stroke severity. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.

Background/Introduction Diabetic kidney disease affects up to 40% of people with diabetes and is associated with higher cardiovascular (CV) risk. REWIND was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a primary outcome of first occurrence of the composite endpoint of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event [MACE]-3). Dulaglutide treatment reduced the incidence of MACE-3 in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with or without established CV disease. Purpose This REWIND post hoc subgroup analysis evaluated the effect of dulaglutide on MACE-3 in patients with an eGFR Methods Eligible patients were those ≥50 years old with T2D who had either a previous CV event or CV risk factors. Patients were randomised (1:1) to dulaglutide 1.5 mg or placebo, both in addition to standard of care. A Cox proportional hazards model with treatment, eGFR subgroup ( Results At baseline, 2,199 of 9,901 patients (22.2%) had an eGFR Conclusions Regardless of baseline eGFR or albuminuria status, dulaglutide reduces MACE-3 outcomes in patients with T2D and established CV disease or multiple CV risk factors. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Eli Lilly and Company

In patients with type 2 dibetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, dulaglutide treatment led to body weight (BW) loss and lesser eGFR decline compared to insulin glargine. As BW may affect muscle mass, creatinine-based eGFR can be altered independently of kidney function. Cystatin C-based eGFR is not affected by muscle mass. The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to determine whether the lesser eGFR decline with dulaglutide was related to BW loss. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatments ([mean ± SD] age, 64.6 ± 8.6 years; women, 48%; BW, 89.1 ± 17.7 kg; eGFR [CKD-EPI-cystatin C] 38 ± 14 mL/min/1.73m2 ). BW decreased with dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg and increased with insulin glargine ([LSM change (SE)], -2.66 [0.47] kg and -1.71 [0.45] vs 1.57 [0.43] kg; P < 0.001). Changes in eGFR were not significant with dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg, but eGFR significantly decreased with insulin glargine (eGFR-CKD-EPI-cystatin C [LSM change (95%CI)], -0.7 [-2.5, 1.0] and -0.7 [-2.4, 1.1] vs -3.3 [-5.1, -1.6] mL/min/1.73 m2 ; P ≤ 0.037 vs glargine). Changes in BW did not correlate with changes in eGFR-CKD-EPI-cystatin C (r = -0.041; n = 471; P = 0.379) or eGFR-CKD-EPI-creatinine (r = -0.074; n = 473; P = 0.106). In conclusion, the lesser decline in eGFR observed with dulaglutide was not influenced by BW loss.

Examine healthcare costs across chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages for US patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).IQVIA Real World Data Adjudicated Claims linked electronic medical records and insurance claims from January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2017 were used for this retrospective study. Adults diagnosed with T2D and comorbid CKD were included. General linear models incorporating splines were constructed, and information from these regressions were used to inform the relationship between medical costs and CKD. Multivariable analyses controlled for patient characteristics, vital signs, general health, prior medication use, prior visit to specialists, index A1c, and year of index date.There were 6,645 individuals who met the study criteria. Results generally indicate sharp increases in annual total medical costs and non-drug medical costs in the 1 year post-period for patients with Stage 4 or 5 CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 mThe investigation included only patients with medical insurance and laboratory test results, and results may not be generalizable to all T2D patients with CKD. The methodology allowed us to determine associations, not causation, and potential confounders, such as duration of diabetes, diet, exercise, or social support, could not be assessed.Results indicate there are sharp and significant increases in medical costs among T2D patients with Stage 4 and 5 CKD compared to those with earlier stages of CKD.

The AWARD-7 clinical trial demonstrated that once-weekly dulaglutide slowed the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and decreased urine albumin/creatinine ratio compared to insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). Lower levels of urinary C3M, a marker for type III collagen degradation, and increased level of plasma PRO-C6, a marker for type VI collagen formation, have been reported to correlate with CKD progression and lower eGFR. This exploratory analysis evaluated changes in urinary C3M and plasma PRO-C6 in response to treatment with dulaglutide 1.5 mg compared to insulin glargine in AWARD-7. At baseline, urinary C3M and serum PRO-C6 levels were comparable between the dulaglutide 1.5 mg and insulin glargine groups. At week 26 and 52 of treatment, urinary C3M levels were significantly higher and serum PRO-C6 levels were significantly lower in the dulaglutide 1.5 mg group compared with insulin glargine group, respectively (Table). In conclusion, dulaglutide was associated with decreased levels of biomarkers for type VI collagen formation and increased type III collagen degradation, suggesting a potential effect to reduce kidney fibrosis. These anti-fibrotic effects could be a potential mechanism for the beneficial effects observed with dulaglutide treatment on CKD in type 2 diabetes. Disclosure K.R. Tuttle: Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Bayer Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Goldfinch Bio, Novo Nordisk Inc. J.M. Wilson: Employee; Self; Lilly Diabetes. Y. Lin: None. H. Qian: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. K. Kelly-Boruff: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. F. Genovese: None. M.A. Karsdal: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Nordic Bioscience. K.L. Duffin: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Pfizer Inc. F.T. Botros: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Funding Eli Lilly and Company

In participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the REWIND trial, dulaglutide (DU) use for median follow-up of 5.4 years was associated with reduced composite renal outcomes, defined as the first occurrence of new macroalbuminuria, sustained decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥30%, or chronic renal replacement therapy. The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to evaluate the effect of dulaglutide on renal outcomes related to kidney function that are typically used in renal outcomes studies, defined as the composite endpoint of sustained eGFR decline ≥40%, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or all-cause death. Participants with T2D at cardiovascular (CV) risk were randomized (1:1) to DU 1.5 mg once-weekly or placebo. This post-hoc analysis used Cox proportional hazards modeling for time to first event to determine the risk of renal outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by replacing the all-cause death component with CV or renal death, or renal death. At baseline, treatment groups had similar eGFR (mean±SD: DU=77.2±22.7; placebo=76.6±22.8). The incidence rate of the composite endpoint was significantly lower for the DU group compared with placebo (Table). Treatment with DU 1.5 mg was associated with a 17% risk reduction in kidney function-related outcomes, suggesting potential delay in progression of diabetic kidney disease in patients with T2D at CV risk. Disclosure J.E. Shaw: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mylan, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Mylan. F.T. Botros: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. R. Malik: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. C. Atisso: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. H.M. Colhoun: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Pfizer Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Bayer AG, Roche Pharma. Other Relationship; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi. H.C. Gerstein: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Eli Lilly and Company, Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. Other Relationship; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi. Funding Eli Lilly and Company

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists lower blood glucose in type 2 diabetes (T2D) partially through glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion. The aim of this study was to investigate whether beta-cell function (as measured by HOMA2-%B) at baseline affects the glycaemic response to dulaglutide. Dulaglutide-treated patients from AWARD-1, AWARD-3 and AWARD-6 clinical studies were categorised based on their homeostatic model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA2-%B) tertiles. Changes in glycaemic measures in response to treatment with once-weekly dulaglutide were evaluated in each HOMA2-%B tertile. Patients with low HOMA2-%B had higher baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting and postprandial blood glucose, and longer duration of diabetes (P

In the AWARD-7 study, conducted in T2D and moderate-to-severe CKD, DU treatment was associated with slower decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared to IG. One-year treatment with DU 1.5 mg weekly was associated with a lower rate of CKD outcomes, including eGFR decline ≥40% or end-stage renal disease (ESRD), compared to IG at similar levels of glycemic control and blood pressure. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to determine risk of these CKD outcomes between treatments in albuminuria subgroups. Participants with T2D and CKD stages 3-4 were randomized (1:1:1) to DU 0.75 mg or 1.5 mg weekly versus titrated IG daily, added-on to titrated insulin lispro, for one year. The occurrence of the composite outcome of eGFR decline ≥40% or ESRD was compared between treatments using a Cox proportional hazards model time-to-first event analysis. At baseline, treatment groups had similar eGFR by albuminuria subgroups (Table). The majority of events occurred in patients with macroalbuminuria (Table). Compared to IG, the incidence rate of the composite endpoint was significantly lower for DU 1.5 mg in the overall study population and in those with macroalbuminuria. In conclusion, the risk of ≥40% eGFR decline or ESRD outcomes was reduced by more than half for DU 1.5 mg compared to IG, particularly in the macroalbuminuric subgroup. Disclosure K.R. Tuttle: Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Goldfinch Bio. Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. B.L. Rayner: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Servier. Other Relationship; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cipla Medpro, Novartis AG. M. Lakshmanan: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. B. Woodward: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. A. Kwan: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Employee; Spouse/Partner; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Konig: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company. F.T. Botros: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Funding Eli Lilly and Company

Digital, Background: Two glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists reduced renal outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes at risk for cardiovascular disease. We assessed the long-term effect of the GLP-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide on renal outcomes in an exploratory analysis of the REWIND trial of the effect of dulaglutide on cardiovascular disease. Methods: REWIND was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 371 sites in 24 countries. Men and women aged at least 50 years with type 2 diabetes who had either a previous cardiovascular event or cardiovascular risk factors were randomly assigned (1:1) to either weekly subcutaneous injection of dulaglutide (1·5 mg) or placebo and followed up at least every 6 months for outcomes. Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratios (UACRs) and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) were estimated from urine and serum values measured in local laboratories every 12 months. The primary outcome (first occurrence of the composite endpoint of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes), secondary outcomes (including a composite microvascular outcome), and safety outcomes of this trial have been reported elsewhere. In this exploratory analysis, we investigate the renal component of the composite microvascular outcome, defined as the first occurrence of new macroalbuminuria (UACR >33·9 mg/mmol), a sustained decline in eGFR of 30% or more from baseline, or chronic renal replacement therapy. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01394952. Findings: Between Aug 18, 2011, and Aug 14, 2013, 9901 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive dulaglutide (n=4949) or placebo (n=4952). At baseline, 791 (7·9%) had macroalbuminuria and mean eGFR was 76·9 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (SD 22·7). During a median follow-up of 5·4 years (IQR 5·1-5·9) comprising 51 820 person-years, the renal outcome developed in 848 (17·1%) participants at an incidence rate of 3·5 per 100 person-years in the dulaglutide group and in 970 (19·6%) participants at an incidence rate of 4·1 per 100 person-years in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·85, 95% CI 0·77-0·93; p=0·0004). The clearest effect was for new macroalbuminuria (HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·68-0·87; p, Ciencias Médicas y de la Salud

Dulaglutide is a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Integrated data from 9 phase II and III trials in people with T2D (N = 6005) were used to evaluate the effects of dulaglutide on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR [Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration]), urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and kidney adverse events (AEs). No significant differences in eGFR were observed during treatment for dulaglutide vs placebo, active comparators or insulin glargine (mean ± standard deviation values: dulaglutide vs placebo: 87.8 ± 17.7 vs 88.2 ± 17.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P = .075; dulaglutide vs active comparators: 89.9 ± 16.7 vs 88.8 ± 16.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P = .223; and dulaglutide vs insulin glargine: 85.9 ± 18.2 vs 83.9 ± 18.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P = .423). Lower UACR values were observed for dulaglutide vs placebo, active comparators and insulin glargine (at 26 weeks, median [Q1-Q3] values were: dulaglutide vs placebo: 8.0 [4.4-20.4] vs 8.0 [4.4-23.9] mg/g, P = .023; dulaglutide vs active comparators: 8.0 [4.4-21.2] vs 8.9 [4.4-27.4] mg/g, P = .013; and dulaglutide vs insulin glargine: 8.9 [4.4-29.2] vs 12.4 [5.3-50.5] mg/g, P = .029). AEs reflecting potential acute renal failure were 3.4, 1.7 and 7.0 events/1000 patient-years for dulaglutide, active comparators and placebo, respectively. In conclusion, dulaglutide treatment of clinical trial participants with T2D did not affect eGFR and slightly decreased albuminuria.

Dulaglutide (DU) is a once weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Glycaemic efficacy and safety characteristics of dulaglutide have been assessed in six Phase 3 studies in the AWARD program. The objective of this review article is to summarize these results from the six completed AWARD studies. At the primary endpoint, in five of the six studies, once weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg was superior to the active comparator [exenatide, insulin glargine (two studies), metformin, and sitagliptin], with a greater proportion of patients reaching glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) targets of

Body weight (BW) changes may affect muscle mass and thus creatinine (Cr) levels. Estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by Cr-based equations may not accurately reflect changes in kidney function when BW changes. Dulaglutide (DU) treatment was associated with BW loss and lesser eGFR (Cr-CKD-EPI) decline in people with T2D and moderate to severe CKD compared to insulin glargine (IG) (Table). The aim was to evaluate if the lesser eGFR decline observed with DU is related to BW loss. eGFR was evaluated with Cr-based equations (MDRD, CKD-EPI) compared to cystatin C-CKD-EPI equation. Cystatin C is not affected by muscle mass changes. CrCL was evaluated with the Cockcroft-Gault equation. BL characteristics were similar between treatments ([mean±SD] eGFR (Cr-CKD-EPI): 38.3±12.8 mL/min/1.73m2, A1c: 8.6±1.0%, age: 64.6±8.6 y, T2D duration: 18.1±8.7 y). All equations consistently show that eGFR remained stable with DU, but significantly decreased with IG regardless of BW loss in DU or gain in IG (Table). Since BW is a factor in CrCL calculations, compared to eGFR equations, BW loss in DU led to bias toward greater reductions in CrCL. This bias disappeared when using lean BW (Table). In conclusion, compared to IG, DU was associated with lesser eGFR decline in people with T2D and moderate to severe CKD regardless of BW changes. Disclosure K.R. Tuttle: Consultant; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Inc. M. Lakshmanan: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Spouse/Partner; Eli Lilly and Company. B.L. Rayner: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Novartis AG, Servier. Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca. R.S. Busch: Speaker's Bureau; Self; AbbVie Inc., AstraZeneca. Research Support; Self; Bayer AG, Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Amgen Inc.. Research Support; Self; Sanofi US. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Research Support; Self; Amarin Corporation. A.G. Zimmermann: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Employee; Spouse/Partner; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Spouse/Partner; Eli Lilly and Company. B. Woodward: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. F.T. Botros: Employee; Self; Eli Lilly and Company.

Purpose The aims of this study were to use real-world treatment results to compare changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated treatment with dulaglutide or insulin glargine and to determine the proportions of patients with renal impairment who initiate each treatment. Methods The study used data from the Practice Fusion electronic health records database from October 2013 through June 2017. Adults with type 2 diabetes who initiated dulaglutide or insulin glargine therapy and had multiple recorded serum creatinine and/or HbA1c laboratory test results were included in the study. The dulaglutide cohort (n = 1222) was matched to the insulin glargine cohort (n = 13,869) using Mahalanobis distance matching with propensity score calipers. Multivariable analyses of the matched cohorts of individuals with serum creatinine results (n = 1183 dulaglutide and 1183 insulin glargine) examined the association between intent-to-treat therapy and changes in eGFR. In addition, multivariable analyses were also conducted on a subset of these patients who also had recorded HbA1c tests (n = 1088 dulaglutide and 1088 insulin glargine) to examine the association between changes in HbA1c during the 1 year postperiod. Findings Among patients who initiated dulaglutide therapy, only 0.9% of patients had an index eGFR Implications In clinical practice, the use of dulaglutide was relatively more limited in patients with a higher degree of renal impairment compared with use of insulin glargine. However, initiation of dulaglutide therapy, compared with insulin glargine therapy, was associated with a significantly smaller decrease in eGFR and a larger reduction in HbA1c during the 1 year postperiod.

Summary Background Many antihyperglycaemic drugs, including insulin, are primarily cleared by the kidneys, restricting treatment options for patients with kidney disease. Dulaglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist that is not cleared by the kidneys, and confers a lower risk of hypoglycaemia than does insulin. We assessed the efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease. Methods AWARD-7 was a multicentre, open-label trial done at 99 sites in nine countries. Eligible patients were adults with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (stages 3–4), with an HbA 1c of 7·5–10·5%, and who were being treated with insulin or insulin plus an oral antihyperglycaemic drug and were taking a maximum tolerated dose of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks. Insulin glargine and lispro doses were titrated as per an adjustment algorithm; dulaglutide doses were masked to participants and investigators. The primary outcome was HbA 1c at 26 weeks, with a 0·4% non-inferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). The primary analysis population was all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one post-randomisation HbA 1c measurement. The safety population was all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had any post-dose data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01621178. Findings Between Aug 15, 2012, and Nov 30, 2015, 577 patients were randomly assigned, 193 to dulaglutide 1·5 mg, 190 to dulaglutide 0·75 mg, and 194 to insulin glargine. The effects on HbA 1c change at 26 weeks of dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 0·75 mg were non-inferior to those of insulin glargine (least squares mean [LSM] −1·2% [SE 0·1] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg [183 patients]; −1·1% [0·1] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg [180 patients]; −1·1% [0·1] with insulin glargine [186 patients]; one-sided p≤0·0001 for both dulaglutide doses vs insulin glargine). The differences in HbA 1c concentration at 26 weeks between dulaglutide and insulin glargine treatments were LSM difference −0·05% (95% CI −0·26 to 0·15, p 1c -lowering effects persisted to 52 weeks (LSM −1·1% [SE 0·1] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg; −1·1% [0·1] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg; −1·0% [0·1] with insulin glargine). At 52 weeks, eGFR was higher with dulaglutide 1·5 mg (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation by cystatin C geometric LSM 34·0 mL/min per 1·73 m 2 [SE 0·7]; p=0·005 vs insulin glargine) and dulaglutide 0·75 mg (33·8 mL/min per 1·73 m 2 [0·7]; p=0·009 vs insulin glargine) than with insulin glargine (31·3 mL/min per 1·73 m 2 [0·7]). At 52 weeks, the effects of dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 0·75 mg on UACR reduction were not significantly different from that of insulin glargine (LSM −22·5% [95% CI −35·1 to −7·5] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg; −20·1% [–33·1 to −4·6] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg; −13·0% [–27·1 to 3·9] with insulin glargine). Proportions of patients with any serious adverse events were similar across groups (20% [38 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg, 24% [45 of 190] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, and 27% [52 of 194] with insulin glargine). Dulaglutide was associated with higher rates of nausea (20% [38 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 14% [27 of 190] with 0·75 mg, vs 5% [nine of 194] with insulin glargine) and diarrhoea (17% [33 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 16% [30 of 190] with 0·75 mg, vs 7% [14 of 194] with insulin glargine) and lower rates of symptomatic hypoglycaemia (4·4 events per patient per year with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 4·3 with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, vs 9·6 with insulin glargine). End-stage renal disease occurred in 38 participants: eight (4%) of 192 with dulaglutide 1·5 mg, 14 (7%) of 190 with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, and 16 (8%) of 194 with insulin glargine. Interpretation In patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, once-weekly dulaglutide produced glycaemic control similar to that achieved with insulin glargine, with reduced decline in eGFR. Dulaglutide seems to be safe to use to achieve glycaemic control in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease. Funding Eli Lilly and Company.

Dulaglutide glycaemic efficacy has been demonstrated in the AWARD clinical trial programme. The objective of the present analysis was to determine the major baseline factors associated with the reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in response to dulaglutide. Baseline covariates from patients receiving dulaglutide in six phase III studies (n = 2806) were analysed using a gradient-boosting method to assess their relative influence on the change in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment. Influential variables (relative influence >5%) were further evaluated in univariate and multivariable modelling. The gradient-boosting analysis showed that the top influential baseline factors associated with HbA1c reduction were: HbA1c (48.8%), age (9.1%), fasting serum glucose (FSG; 8.2%), fasting serum insulin (FSI; 6.7%) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; 5.4%). Multivariable regression showed that higher baseline HbA1c was the major factor associated with greater HbA1c reduction [coefficient estimates: -0.6% (-6.6 mmol/mol); p < 0.0001]. Age ≤65 years, lower FSG level, FSI level ≤55 pmol/L and eGFR ≤100 mL/min/1.73 m2 were associated with greater decreases in HbA1c, but the effect was very small [coefficient estimates: -0.05% to -0.2% (-0.6 to -2.2 mmol/mol)]. These data indicate that higher baseline HbA1c, reflecting poor glycaemic status, is the major factor associated with greater reduction in HbA1c in response to dulaglutide treatment.

Recently, the focus of interest on the role of the renin angiotensin system in the pathophysiology of hypertension has shifted towards greater emphasis on new developments in local renin angiotensin systems in specific tissues. We have focused our recent investigations on the role of the intrarenal-intratubular RAS in hypertension. All of the components needed for angiotensin II generation are present within the various compartments in the kidney. This brief review is focused on recent evidence that inappropriate activation of renin in distal nephron segments, by acting on angiotensinogen generated in the proximal tubule cells and delivered to the distal nephron may contribute to increased distal intrarenal angiotensin II formation, sodium retention and development and progression of hypertension.

Increase in heme oxygenase-1 levels ameliorates renovascular hypertension Background The heme oxygenase system (HO-1 and HO-2) catalyzes the conversion of heme to free iron, carbon monoxide (CO), a vasodepressor, and biliverdin, which is further converted to bilirubin, an antioxidant. HO-1 induction has been shown to suppress arachidonic acid metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP450) monooxygenases and cyclooxygenases (COX), and to decrease blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). The Goldblatt 2K1C model is a model of renovascular hypertension in which there is increased expression of COX-2 in the macula densa and increased renin release from the juxtaglomerular apparatus of the clipped kidney. We examined whether HO-1 overexpression, as a prophylactic approach, would attenuate renovascular hypertension and evaluated potential mechanisms that may account for its effect. Methods 2K1C rats were treated with cobalt protoporphyrin (CoPP) or tin mesoporphyrin (SnMP) one day before surgery and weekly for three weeks thereafter. We measured systolic blood pressure, HO activity, HO-1, HO-2, COX-1 and COX-2 protein expression, heme content, and nitrotyrosine levels as indices of oxidative stress. Urinary prostaglandin excretion (PGE 2 ), plasma renin activity (PRA), and plasma aldosterone levels were also measured. Results CoPP administration induced renal HO-1 expression by 20-fold and HO activity by 6-fold. This was associated with a reduction in heme content, nitrotyrosine levels, COX-2 expression and urinary PGE 2 excretion, and attenuation of the development of hypertension in the 2K1C rats. There was no decrease in plasma renin activity; however, plasma aldosterone levels were significantly lower. In the 2K1C SnMP-treated rats, blood pressure was significantly higher than that of untreated 2K1C rats throughout the study, and the difference in the size of the smaller left clipped kidney compared to the nonclipped right kidney was significantly increased. Conclusion These findings define an action of prolonged HO-1 induction to interrupt and counteract the influence of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) to increase in blood pressure in the 2K1C model of renovascular hypertension. Multiple mechanisms include a decrease in oxidative stress as indicated by the decrease in cellular heme and nitrotyrosine levels, an anti-inflammatory action as evidenced by a decrease in COX-2 and PGE 2 , interference with the action of angiontensin II (Ang II) as evidenced by an increase in PRA in the face of a decrease in PGE 2 and aldosterone, as well as the inhibition of aldosterone synthesis.

Background Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a substantial increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease and associated mortality than those without diabetes. Dulaglutide is a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist that is approved for treatment of T2D. Methods This meta-analysis evaluates the CV risk in patients with T2D treated with dulaglutide in 9 randomized safety and efficacy trials. Mean (median) treatment duration was 333 (358) days. Reported CV events were independently adjudicated by a treatment-blinded clinical endpoint committee. The primary measure was a 4-component major adverse CV event (4-component MACE) composite endpoint of death due to CV causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina. Additional pre-specified endpoints included adjudicated coronary revascularizations, hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause mortality. A Cox proportional hazards regression model (stratified by study) was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval (CI). Tests of treatment effects for the primary endpoint were conducted at a 2-sided alpha level of 0.0198 and a corresponding 98.02 % CI was calculated. Statistical heterogeneity between the strata (studies) was tested by including in the Cox model an interaction term between treatment and strata. Results The analysis included 6010 randomized patients [dulaglutide: 3885; comparator therapy (active or placebo): 2125]; cumulative exposure to dulaglutide or comparator therapy was 3941 and 2223 patient-years, respectively. The demographic and baseline CV disease characteristics were similar across groups. Twenty-six (0.67 %) patients in the dulaglutide group versus 25 (1.18 %) in the comparator group experienced a primary 4-component MACE (HR 0.57; adjusted 98.02 % CI 0.30, 1.10). Results for the 3-component MACE (composite endpoint of death due to CV causes, nonfatal MI or stroke), 6-component MACE (composite endpoint of death due to CV causes, nonfatal MI or stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure, or coronary revascularizations) and all-cause mortality were consistent with the primary analysis (HR