Search

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of gefitinib (Iressa [ZD1839]; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE), a novel epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with pretreated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter phase II trial. Two hundred ten patients with advanced NSCLC who were previously treated with one or two chemotherapy regimens (at least one containing platinum) were randomized to receive either 250-mg or 500-mg oral doses of gefitinib once daily. RESULTS Efficacy was similar for the 250- and 500-mg/d groups. Objective tumor response rates were 18.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5 to 27.3) and 19.0% (95% CI, 12.1 to 27.9); among evaluable patients, symptom improvement rates were 40.3% (95% CI, 28.5 to 53.0) and 37.0% (95% CI, 26.0 to 49.1); median progression-free survival times were 2.7 and 2.8 months; and median overall survival times were 7.6 and 8.0 months, respectively. Symptom improvements were recorded for 69.2% (250 mg/d) and 85.7% (500 mg/d) of patients with a tumor response. Adverse events (AEs) at both dose levels were generally mild (grade 1 or 2) and consisted mainly of skin reactions and diarrhea. Drug-related toxicities were more frequent in the higher-dose group. Withdrawal due to drug-related AEs was 1.9% and 9.4% for patients receiving gefitinib 250 and 500 mg/d, respectively. CONCLUSION Gefitinib showed clinically meaningful antitumor activity and provided symptom relief as second- and third-line treatment in these patients. At 250 mg/d, gefitinib had a favorable AE profile. Gefitinib 250 mg/d is an important, novel treatment option for patients with pretreated advanced NSCLC.

Objectives Single-agent heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibition has demonstrated activity in oncogene-driven non-small cell and small cell lung cancers. SNX-5422 is an oral HSP90 inhibitor with increased activity in vitro with the addition of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Therefore, we conducted a phase 1, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate SNX-5422, carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by SNX-5422 maintenance in patients with advanced lung cancers. Materials and methods In part 1 (3 + 3 dose escalation), SNX-5422 (50/75/100-mg/m2) was dosed every other day (qod) for 21 days (28-day cycle) for ≤4 cycles; carboplatin (AUC 5)-paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) was administered once every 3 weeks for ≤6 courses. In part 2 (maintenance), subjects who achieved at least stable disease in part 1 received 100 mg/m2 SNX-5422 monotherapy qod for 21 days (28-day cycle). Results Twenty-three patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n = 20) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC, n = 3) were enrolled. The median age was 60 years and 61% (n = 14/23) had ≥1 prior treatment regimens. The maximum tolerated dose of SNX-5422 was 100 mg/m2 qod in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel. The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events (part 1/part 2) were diarrhea (26%/15%) and nausea (9%/0%). In response-evaluable patients with NSCLC, 33% (6/18) had a partial response, 56% (10/18) stable disease, and 11% (2/18) progressive disease. Patients who remained on single-agent SNX-5422 maintenance therapy ≥2 months (n = 9) had cancers enriched for oncogenic drivers (n = 3 KRAS mutation, n = 1 EGFR exon 20 mutation, n = 1 HER2 mutation, and n = 1 RET fusion). Conclusions The triplet combination of SNX-5422, carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by maintenance SNX-5422 therapy was well-tolerated and showed anti-tumor activity. Cancers for which disease control on single-agent SNX-5422 maintenance was observed were enriched for oncogene-driven NSCLCs.

Thymoma and thymic carcinoma are rare neoplasms of the anterior mediastinum [1]. They are managed with upfront surgical resection, if feasible, followed by adjuvant recommendations dictated primari...

Background The efficacy and safety of the anti–programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody atezolizumab, as compared with those of platinum-based chemotherapy, as first-line trea...

Background The genomic profile of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Asians is distinct from that of Caucasians, but comprehensive genetic profiling reports have been limited for Asian patients. We aimed to elucidate genomic characteristics of Chinese NSCLC patients and develop potential model including genomic characteristics to predict postoperative prognosis. Methods Resected tumor samples from 511 patients with stage I-IV lung cancer were subjected to targeted sequencing using a panel of 295 cancer-related genes. Based on the molecular profiles and clinical features, we established nomogram models with predictors consisting of integrated clinical and genomic characteristics to provide post-operative risk stratification. Results Compared to the TCGA population (mainly Caucasians), there was a significantly higher frequency of EGFR (53.7% vs. 14.4%) and NOTCH3 (8.4% vs. 1.3%) mutations and less mutated KRAS (11.0% vs. 32.6%), KEAP1 (4.4% vs. 17.4%) and LRP1B (16.3% vs. 29.6%) in Chinese lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD). Distinct patterns of mutually exclusive and co-occurring mutations were identified between LUAD and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), indicating the unique histology-specific tumorigenesis mechanism of each subtype. We observed alterations in pathways correlated with clinical characteristics. Additionally, we constructed nomogram model with predictors consisting of clinical and genomic characteristics, which were more accurate than models with clinical characteristics or TNM staging only both in stage I-IIIA patients and T1-2N0M0 sub-cohort. Conclusions This study revealed Chinese NSCLC patients have unique genomic profile. Furthermore, the nomogram model combining clinical features with genomic characteristics could improve risk stratification in early-stage NSCLC.

Background Adenocarcinoma is the most common subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and often harbors oncogenic driver mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Osimertinib (AZD9291), a third generation EGFR TKI, has replaced earlier generation EGFR TKIs for first line treatment of EGFR mutant lung cancer due to its improved overall survival, longer progression free survival, and better tolerability compared to earlier generation inhibitors. However, like earlier generation EGFR TKIs, only about two thirds of patients respond, indicating an unknown mechanism of intrinsic resistance for the non-responders. We previously identified overexpression of CRIPTO as a potential mechanism of intrinsic resistance to EGFR TKIs of first and second generation. Objective To determine if CRIPTO could promote drug resistance against the third generation EGFR-TKIs osimertinib. We also wanted to investigate whether this resistance was conferred by both membrane bound and secreted CRIPTO. Finally, we wanted to explore the potential of secreted CRIPTO as a non-invasive biomarker for EGFR-TKI resistance. Materials and methods HCC827 and H1975, EGFR mutant non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cell lines, were transfected with wildtype CRIPTO, two secreted variants of CRIPTO, a membrane only version of CRIPTO, and the mock backbone vector as the control. Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and in vitro viability experiments were performed. In vivo work was carried out in athymic nude mice; 2 × 106 CRIPTO overexpressing HCC827 cells were implanted per mouse. EGFR mutant NSCLC patient blood samples were collected before treatment with and EGFR-TKI, during response while on treatment, and at progression while on treatment. Results Although both membrane bound and secreted CRIPTO forms were able to activate downstream pathways such as SRC, CRIPTO was unable to elicit resistance towards osimertinib in vitro or in vivo. CRIPTO serum levels in mice were higher in larger xenograft tumors. Furthermore, CRIPTO serum levels were higher in patients with progressing lung cancer when compared to their CRIPTO serum levels during EGFR-TKI response. Conclusions CRIPTO does not cause resistance against third generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib. CRIPTO levels in serum might be a potentially useful biomarker for tumor burden in NSCLC patients.

Objective: Our aim was to validate the prognostic relevance in NSCLC of potential residual tumor (R) descriptors, including the proposed International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer definition for uncertain resection, referred to as R(un). Methods: A total of 14,712 patients undergoing resection with full R status and survival were analyzed. The following were also evaluated: whether fewer than three N2 stations were explored, lobe-specific nodal dissection, extracapsular extension, highest lymph node station status, carcinoma in situ at the bronchial resection margin, and pleural lavage cytologic examination result. Revised categories of R0, R(un), R1, and R2 were tested for survival impact. Results: In all, 14,293 cases were R0, 263 were R1, and 156 were R2 (median survivals not reached, 33 months, and 29 months, respectively). R status correlated with T and N categories. A total of 9290 cases (63%) had three or more N2 stations explored and 6641 cases (45%) had lobespecific nodal dissection, correlated with increasing pN2. Extracapsular extension was present in 62 of 364 cases with available data (17%). The highest station was positive in 942 cases (6.4%). The pleural lavage cytologic examination result was positive in 59 of 1705 cases (3.5%): 13 had carcinoma in situ at the bronchial resection margin. After reassignment because of inadequate nodal staging in 56% of cases, 6070 cases were R0, 8185 were R(un), 301 were R1, and 156 were R2. In node-positive cases, the median survival times were 70, 50, and 30 months for RO, R(un) (p < 0.0001), and R1 (p < 0.001), respectively, with no significant difference between RO and R(un) in pN0 cases. Conclusions: R descriptors have prognostic relevance, with R(un) survival stratifying between R0 and R1. Therefore, a detailed evaluation of R factor is of particular importance in the design and analyses of clinical trials of adjuvant therapies. (C) 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Background: Limited evidence is available on effectiveness of clinicoradiological follow-up of early-stage NSCLC patients. MAGRIT was a phase III adjuvant RCT conducted in surgically resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC patients, in which all participants had a prospectively defined intensive clinicoradiological follow-up. Methods: At patient-level data, we analyzed detection modality of disease recurrences and new primary lung cancer (i.e. detected by clinicoradiological scheduled exams versus by interim unscheduled exams), features associated with higher risk of locoregional and/or distant recurrence, and recurrence rates over time. Results: In the 2261 patients studied, there was a significant association between the type of recurrence and the modality of detection: 88.4% (95% CI, 84%–91%) of the locoregional recurrences and 93.2% (95% CI, 84%–99%) of the new primary lung cancers were detected by scheduled exams, whereas this was only 68.7% (95% CI, 65%–73%) for distant metastases (p < 0.001). Survival of patients with locoregional recurrence or new primary lung cancer detected by scheduled exams was significantly better as compared with those detected by unscheduled exams (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.87; p = 0.01). Survival was similarly poor in patients with distant recurrences, both with scheduled and unscheduled detection (3-year survival after recurrence 22.0% and 21.8%, respectively). Recurrence rate was the highest in the first 18 months after surgery—with a peak between month 6 and 12—decreasing thereafter. The hazard of a second primary lung cancer was constant over time. Conclusion: Intensive follow-up is effective in detecting locoregional recurrences and second primary lung cancers, with impact on patients’ survival but did not influence the detection of distant recurrences.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its evolution to inflammatory steatohepatitis (NASH) are the most common causes of chronic liver damage and transplantation that are reaching epidemic proportions due to the upraising incidence of metabolic syndrome, obesity, and diabetes. Currently, there is no approved treatment for NASH. The mitochondrial citrate carrier, Slc25a1, has been proposed to play an important role in lipid metabolism, suggesting a potential role for this protein in the pathogenesis of this disease. Here, we show that Slc25a1 inhibition with a specific inhibitor compound, CTPI-2, halts salient alterations of NASH reverting steatosis, preventing the evolution to steatohepatitis, reducing inflammatory macrophage infiltration in the liver and adipose tissue, while starkly mitigating obesity induced by a high-fat diet. These effects are differentially recapitulated by a global ablation of one copy of the Slc25a1 gene or by a liver-targeted Slc25a1 knockout, which unravel dose-dependent and tissue-specific functions of this protein. Mechanistically, through citrate-dependent activities, Slc25a1 inhibition rewires the lipogenic program, blunts signaling from peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, a key regulator of glucose and lipid metabolism, and inhibits the expression of gluconeogenic genes. The combination of these activities leads not only to inhibition of lipid anabolic processes, but also to a normalization of hyperglycemia and glucose intolerance as well. In summary, our data show for the first time that Slc25a1 serves as an important player in the pathogenesis of fatty liver disease and thus, provides a potentially exploitable and novel therapeutic target.

Systemic treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone remarkable changes in the last decade, with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. The identification of activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene (deletions in exon 19 [Del19] and point mutation L858R in exon 21) has been the first important step toward molecularly guided precision therapy in lung cancer. Several randomized trials comparing EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib) to standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and in response rate, with lower rates of adverse events (AEs) and better symptom control. However, none of these trials showed significant improvement in overall survival (OS). Despite impressive responses with EGFR-TKI, disease invariably progresses after 9 to 13 months, due to acquired resistance. Dacomitinib is a potent, irreversible, highly selective, second-generation EGFR-TKI, which inhibits the signaling from both heterodimers and homodimers of all the members of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family. Here, we review the clinical development of dacomitinib from phase I to phase III, with particular attention to its toxicity and on its activity on T790M mutation. Then, we critically examine the results of ARCHER 1050, a study that was crucial for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. ARCHER 1050 was the first randomized phase III study comparing dacomitinib with gefitinib, in first-line treatment of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Dacomitinib was superior to gefitinib in terms of primary end-point (14.7 vs 9.2 months) and OS (34.1 vs 26.8 months). The incidence of diarrhea, skin rash, mucositis and, consequently, dose reductions was higher with dacomitinib, while hepatic toxicity was higher with gefitinib. Dacomitinib constitutes one of the standard first-line options in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

BackgroundOsimertinib is an effective first-line therapy option for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, but virtually all patients develop resistance. CRIPTO, through Src activation, has been implicated in resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy. Dasatinib, a Src inhibitor, has shown preclinical synergy with EGFR-TKI therapy.MethodThis is a single-arm phase I/II trial of osimertinib and dasatinib in TKI-naïve advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC (NCT02954523). A 3 + 3 design was used in the phase I to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Osimertinib 80 mg QD was combined with dasatinib 70 mg BID (DL2), 50 mg BID (DL1), 70 mg QD (DL-1), and 50 mg QD (DL-2).ResultsTen patients (DL2: 3, DL1: 6, DL -1: 1) were enrolled. 3 (50%) of 6 patients at DL1 experienced a DLT (grade 3 headaches/body pain, neutropenia, rash, one each). Common treatment-related adverse events included pleural effusion (n=10), diarrhea (n=8), rash (n=7), transaminitis (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=7), and neutropenia (n=7). While the MTD was not determined by protocol-defined DLT criteria, DL-2 was chosen as the RP2D, considering overall tolerability. Nine (90%) patients had a PR, including 1 unconfirmed PR. Median PFS was 19.4 months and median OS 36.1 months. The trial was closed to accrual prematurely due to slow accrual after the approval of osimertinib as first-line therapy.ConclusionsThe combination of dasatinib and osimertinib demonstrated anticancer activity. The treatment was limited by chronic toxicities mainly attributed to dasatinib. To improve the safety and tolerability of Src and EGFR co-inhibition, Src inhibitors with a more favorable safety profile should be utilized in future studies.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02954523

Summary Thymic carcinoma is rare and has a poorer prognosis than thymomas. The treatment options are limited after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. We previously performed a single-center phase II study of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma, showing a 22.5% response rate. Here, we characterize the genomic and transcriptomic profile of thymic carcinoma samples from 10 patients (5 non-responders versus 5 responders) in this cohort, with the main aim of identifying potential predictors of response to immunotherapy. We find that expression of PDL1 and alterations in genes or pathways that correlated with PD-L1 expression (CYLD and BAP1) could be potential predictors for response or resistance to immunotherapy in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma. Our study provides insights into potential predictive markers/pathways to select patients with thymic carcinoma for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy., Graphical abstract, Highlights Expression of PDL1 is a predictor for response to immunotherapy in thymic carcinoma Alterations of CYLD are exclusively found in tumor samples of the responders Alterations of BAP1 are exclusively found in tumor samples of the non-responders, He et al. characterize the genomic and transcriptomic profile of thymic carcinoma samples from 10 patients treated with pembrolizumab. They find that expression of PDL1 and alterations in genes or pathways that correlated with PD-L1 expression could be potential predictors for response to immunotherapy in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma.

Thoracic high-dose radiation therapy (RT) for cancer has been associated with early and late cardiac toxicity. To assess altered rates of cardiomyocyte cell death due to RT we monitored changes in cardiomyocyte-specific, cell-free methylated DNA (cfDNA) shed into the circulation. Eleven patients with distal esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation to 50.4 Gy (RT) and concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel were enrolled. Subjects underwent fasting blood draws prior to the initiation and after completion of RT as well as 4–6 months following RT. An island of six unmethylated CpGs in the FAM101A locus was used to identify cardiomyocyte-specific cfDNA in serum. After bisulfite treatment this specific cfDNA was quantified by amplicon sequencing at a depth of &gt, 35,000 reads/molecule. Cardiomyocyte-specific cfDNA was detectable before RT in the majority of patient samples and showed some distinct changes during the course of treatment and recovery. We propose that patient-specific cardiac damages in response to the treatment are indicated by these changes although co-morbidities may obscure treatment-specific events.

In the absence of head-to-head trials of first-line treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), synthesis of available evidence is needed. We conducted a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in patients with stage IV NSCLC and high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Patients with other-stage NSCLC or without PD-L1 expression and populations with < 80% stage IV NSCLC were excluded. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events. English records from MEDLINE and Embase published through October 2020 were eligible, supplemented by hand searches of other sources. Three evidence networks were constructed based on histology (mixed, squamous, non-squamous). OS and PFS results were analyzed applying Bayesian fractional polynomial random-effects models. Hazard ratios over time with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) and expected differences in OS and PFS between each cancer immunotherapy regimen and the chemotherapy common comparator were generated. Seventeen clinical trials were included after screening 32,527 records. Heterogeneity and risk of bias were generally low across trials. In the mixed-histology network of PD-L1–high patients, expected OS was significantly longer with atezolizumab (estimated difference: 10.4 months [95% CrI: 1.9, 18.2]), pembrolizumab (7.2 [2.2, 12.3]), and cemiplimab (13.0 [4.2, 21.0]) versus chemotherapy but not with nivolumab (3.5 [−2.5, 10.6]) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (6.7 [−0.5, 14.2]) versus chemotherapy. OS improvements were not significant compared with chemotherapy for any regimen in the squamous and non-squamous networks, except pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in the non-squamous network. All regimens showed significantly longer expected PFS versus chemotherapy in the non-squamous network, whereas the increases were not significant in the mixed or squamous networks. ORR was significantly higher with pembrolizumab and cemiplimab versus chemotherapy in the mixed-histology network, with sintilimab in the non-squamous network, and with combination regimens, including pembrolizumab or atezolizumab, in the squamous and non-squamous networks, except with atezolizumab plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab. Survival and safety versus chemotherapy were generally similar across cancer immunotherapies and histology networks. These findings may support treatment decisions for patients with high PD-L1 status receiving first-line treatment for NSCLC.

The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of non-predominant micropapillary pattern in small sized invasive lung adenocarcinoma. A total of 986 lung adenocarcinoma patients with tumor size ≤3 cm were identified and classified according to the IALSC/ATS/ERS classification. Emphasis was placed on the impact of non-predominant micropapillary pattern on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The relationship between lung adenocarcinoma subtype and lymph node involvement, EGFR mutation and KRAS mutation was also evaluated. A nomogram was developed to predict the probability of 3- and 5-year OS for these patients. The concordance index and calibration plot were used to validate this model. Among all 986 patients, the percentages of lymph node involvement were: 58.1, 50.0, 33.5, 21.4, 21.1, 10.9, 0, and 0% for micropapillary predominant, solid predominant, acinar predominant, papillary predominant, invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA), lepidic predominant, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), respectively. The frequency of EGFR mutation in the cases of lepidic predominant, acinar predominant, MIA, micropapillary predominant, papillary predominant, solid predominant, IMA, and AIS were 51.1, 45.2, 44.4, 36.8, 29.3, 26.8, 8.3, and 0%, respectively. A non-predominant micropapillary pattern was observed in 344 (38.4%) invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC), and its presence predicted a poorer DFS (median: 56.0 months vs. 66.0 months, P <0.001) and OS (median: 61.0 months vs. 70.0 months, P <0.001). After propensity score matching, non-predominant micropapillary pattern retained its unfavorable effect on DFS (P = 0.007) and OS (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that non-predominant micropapillary pattern was identified as an independent prognostic factor for DFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P <0.001) in IAC. The nomogram showed good calibration and reliable discrimination ability (C-index = 0.775) to evaluated the 3- and 5-year OS. This retrospective analysis of patients with small sized IAC suggests the value of non-predominant micropapillary pattern to predict poor prognosis. A reliable nomogram model was constructed to provide personalized survival predictions.

Background Key regulators of antitumor immunity such as arginase-1 and the adenosine pathway may have an important role in modulating the effect of immunotherapy. Here, we investigated the expression profile of these immune-related biomarkers in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), 2 solid tumors where immune checkpoint inhibitors have activity. Materials and Methods Immunohistochemical staining was performed using tissue microarrays of 123 TET (110 thymoma and 13 thymic carcinoma) and 125 SCLC cases. The expression profile of the following immune-related biomarkers was assessed: arginase-1, CD39, CD73, A2AR, PD-L2, and CD15. The expression profile was also correlated with clinical data. Results No sample was positive for arginase-1. In the adenosine pathway, the prevalence of positive staining for CD39, CD73, and A2AR was 4.9%, 2.5%, and 69.2%, in TETs and 0%, 1.7%, and 50.8%, in SCLC. The multivariate analysis showed that CD39 expression was significantly associated with worse disease related survival (hazard ratio [HR], 10.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.01-53.47; P= .005) and a shorter time-to progression (HR, 11.35; 95% CI, 2.11-61.23; P = .005) in TETs. Other biomarkers were not associated with disease related survival or time to progression in TETs. No biomarker was associated with survival in SCLC. Conclusion Arginase-1 was not detectable in TETs and SCLC. Expression of markers in the adenosine pathway were present in both TETs and SCLC. CD39 expression in tumor cells may identify subsets of patients with TETs with an unfavorable prognosis.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy accounting for 15% of all diagnosed cases of lung cancer. After >15 years without any clinically relevant therapeutic advances, extensive-disease SCLC has become the second thoracic malignancy for which immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shifted the treatment paradigm to improve overall survival. Today, atezolizumab or durvalumab in combination with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy is considered the new standard of care in the first-line setting in SCLC. However, the magnitude of benefit with this immune-chemotherapy strategy in SCLC is more modest than that observed in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients. The immunosuppressive phenotype of SCLC plays an important role in hampering ICI efficacy and may explain the differences in outcomes between these two types of lung cancer. In this review, we provide a summary of recent therapeutic advances in SCLC in light of ICIs, as well as current challenges of this strategy in patients who are elderly, have poor performance status or brain metastases. We also address future perspectives of immunotherapeutic strategies currently in clinical development for these patients.

Here, we present an update of a phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced thymic carcinoma who failed previous therapies. Duration of response was approximately 3 years, and median survival was in excess of 2 years with a 5-year survival rate of 18%. The higher than expected incidence of severe autoimmune disorders (15%) did not substantially increase with a longer follow-up. Pembrolizumab induces durable responses in patients with thymic carcinoma. Careful selection of patients and monitoring of toxicities are warranted.

Background Margetuximab is an Fc-optimized anti-HER2 antibody that recognizes the same epitope as trastuzumab. Margetuximab has increased affinity for the activating CD16A Fc-receptor on NK cells and macrophages as well as decreased affinity for the inhibitory CD32B receptor compared to trastuzumab. In a Phase 1 study (NCT01148849) of 66 patients with relapsed or metastatic HER2+ cancer across multiple indications, margetuximab was well tolerated at all doses. Among 60 response-evaluable patients, confirmed partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) were seen in 7 (12%) and 30 (50%) patients, respectively. Tumor reductions occurred in 18/23 (78%) evaluable breast cancer patients. Ex-vivo analyses of patient peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples confirmed margetuximab's ability to enhance antibody dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity over that from trastuzumab. We report on 3 breast cancer patients with prior anti-HER2 therapy failure with durable (≥ 3.5 years) SD (1) or PR (2). Methods Enrolled patients had histologically/cytologically-confirmed carcinoma with documented HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (2+ or 3+) and disease progression during/following last therapy. Eligibility included life expectancy ≥3 months; performance status ≤1; measurable disease by Response Criteria for Solid Tumors 1.1; adequate bone marrow, renal, hepatic function; and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. Margetuximab was given by intravenous infusion at 0.1 – 6.0 mg/kg for 3 of every 4 weeks or once every 3 weeks (10 – 18 mg/kg). Results Three of 17 HER2 3+ metastatic breast cancer patients received long-term margetuximab. Patient 35 had 3 prior regimens (adjuvant doxorubicin+cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxol+trastuzumab; gemcitabine+vinorelbine; lapatinib+capecitabine) and received margetuximab at 10 mg/kg q3wk, 88 cycles to date, with PR achieved Cycle 1 Day 43, maintained 4.4 years. Patient 44 had 3 prior regimens for metastatic disease (docetaxel+trastuzumab+pertuzumab; doxorubicin+cyclophosphamide; lapatinib+capecitabine) and received margetuximab at 15 mg/kg q3wk, 79 cycles to date with SD for 4.3 years. Patient 50 had 4 prior regimens for recurrent/metastatic disease (tamoxifen; anastrozole; capecitabine+trastuzumab; lapatinib+capecitabine) and received margetuximab dose of 18 mg/kg q3wk with PR achieved Cycle 1 Day 43, maintained 3.5 years. Progression was noted at Cycle 57, and margetuximab continues at 63 cycles to date. No cardiac toxicities were found during long-term follow-up for these 3 patients and there were no treatment-related adverse events ≥Grade 3. Conclusions Margetuximab is well-tolerated without cardiac toxicities in long-term responders, with single-agent activity including durable responses in heavily pre-treated metastatic breast cancer. A Phase 3, randomized, multi-center clinical trial (SOPHIA; NCT02492711) is enrolling patients with metastatic breast cancer, comparing margetuximab plus chemotherapy to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients who have received 1 to 3 lines of therapy for advanced disease. Citation Format: Im S-A, Bang Y-J, Oh D-Y, Giaccone G, Bauer T, Nordstrom J, Li H, Moore P, Hong S, Baughman J, Rock E, Burris H. Long-term responders to single-agent margetuximab, an Fc-modified anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, in metastatic HER2+ breast cancer patients with prior anti-HER2 therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-11.

Background Dysregulation of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators of transcription pathway contributes to abnormal inflammatory responses and poor prognosis in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib plus pemetrexed/cisplatin first-line in patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC with systemic inflammation (modified Glasgow prognostic score [mGPS] 1/2). Patients and Methods Part 1 was an open-label, safety run-in, in which we assessed ruxolitinib (15 mg twice daily [b.i.d.]) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 intravenous, day 1) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 intravenous, day 1). Ruxolitinib dose selection for part 2 required Results Fifteen patients enrolled in part 1 (median age, 64 years; 80% male, 80% mGPS 1) received ruxolitinib 15 mg b.i.d. plus pemetrexed/cisplatin. Median treatment duration was 140 days and no DLTs occurred in 11 evaluable patients. No new safety concerns arose when ruxolitinib was combined with pemetrexed/cisplatin. At study termination, 39 patients were randomized to ruxolitinib and 37 to placebo in part 2. Median treatment duration was 43 days. Response rate was 31% (12 of 39) with ruxolitinib and 35% (13 of 37) with placebo (all partial responses). Conclusion Ruxolitinib 15 mg b.i.d. had an acceptable safety profile in combination with pemetrexed/cisplatin asfirst-line treatment of patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC and systemic inflammation. Early study termination limited the interpretation of efficacy data in the randomized phase II part of the study.

Background Before the availability of immunotherapy, chemotherapy was standard first-line therapy for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking actionable gene alterations. Preclinical evidence suggests chemotherapy is immunomodulatory, supporting chemotherapy/immunotherapy combinations. Atezolizumab, anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, blocks programmed cell death protein-1 and B7.1 interaction with PD-L1. GP28328 ( NCT01633970 ) assessed atezolizumab with chemotherapy in multiple tumours; we report results for advanced, treatment-naive NSCLC. Methods Patients received atezolizumab plus carboplatin with paclitaxel (Arm C: atezo/cb/pac), pemetrexed (Arm D: atezo/cb/pem, maintenance pemetrexed permitted), or nab-paclitaxel (Arm E: atezo/cb/nab-pac), four–six cycles, then atezolizumab maintenance. Primary end-point was safety; secondary end-points were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Seventy-six NSCLC patients were enrolled (n = 25, 25 and 26 for Arms C, D and E, respectively). Common treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events were neutropenia (36% atezo/cb/pac, 36% atezo/cb/pem, 42% atezo/cb/nab-pac) and anaemia (16% atezo/cb/pac, 16% atezo/cb/pem, 31% atezo/cb/nab-pac). Confirmed ORRs were 36% atezo/cb/pac, 68% atezo/cb/pem (one complete response [CR]) and 46% atezo/cb/nab-pac (four CRs). Median PFS was 7.1 months, (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.2–8.3), 8.4 months (95% CI: 4.7–11) and 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.4–14.8), respectively. Median OS was 12.9 months (95% CI: 8.8–21.3), 18.9 months (95% CI: 9.9–27.4) and 17.0 months (95% CI: 12.7–not evaluable), respectively. Conclusion Atezolizumab with chemotherapy was well tolerated with encouraging efficacy, though the analysis was limited by small numbers. NSCLC chemotherapy combination studies are ongoing. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01633970 .

Resistance to chemotherapy remains a critical barrier to effective cancer treatment. Although cisplatin is one of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mechanisms of resistance to this drug are not fully understood. Here, we report a novel cisplatin-resistance mechanism involving SET Domain Containing 2 (SETD2), a histone H3 lysine 36 (H3K36) trimethyltransferase, and cAMP-responsive element-binding protein 1 (CREB1). A549 cells selected in vivo to give brain metastases exhibited cisplatin resistance and decreased expression of phosphorylated CREB1. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis identified a missense mutation in SETD2 (p.T1171K), and we demonstrated that SETD2-mediated trimethylation of H3K36 (H3K36me3) and CREB1 phosphorylation are critical for cellular sensitivity to cisplatin. Moreover, we showed that suppression of SETD2 or CREB1 and ectopic expression of mutant SETD2 conferred cisplatin resistance through inhibition of H3K36me3 and ERK activation in NSCLC cells. Our results provide evidence that SETD2 and CREB1 contribute to cisplatin cytotoxicity via regulation of the ERK signaling pathway, and their inactivation may lead to cisplatin resistance.

Purpose To revise the recommendation on the use of concurrent chemotherapy (CC) with palliative thoracic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) made in the original 2011 American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline on palliative thoracic radiation for lung cancer. Methods and materials Based on a systematic PubMed search showing new evidence for this key question, the task force felt an update was merited. Guideline recommendations were created using a predefined consensus-building methodology supported by American Society for Radiation Oncology–approved tools for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. Results Although few randomized clinical trials address the question of CC combined with palliative thoracic EBRT for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a strong consensus was reached among the task force on recommendations for incurable stage III and IV NSCLC. For patients with stage III NSCLC deemed unsuitable for curative therapy but who are (1) candidates for chemotherapy, (2) have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS of 0 to 2, and (3) have a life expectancy of at least 3 months, administration of a platinum-containing chemotherapy doublet concurrently with moderately hypofractionated palliative thoracic radiation therapy is recommended over treatment with either modality alone. For patients with stage IV NSCLC, routine use of concurrent thoracic chemoradiation is not recommended. Conclusions Optimal palliation of patients with incurable NSCLC requires coordinated interdisciplinary care. Recent data establish a rationale for CC with palliative thoracic EBRT for a well-defined subset of patients with incurable stage III NSCLC. For all other patients with incurable NSCLC, data remain insufficient to support this treatment approach.

The standard-of-care for advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is chemotherapy with cisplatin+etoposide (C+E). Most patients have chemosensitive disease at the outset, but disease frequently relapses and limits survival. Efforts to improve therapeutic outcomes in SCLC and other neuroendocrine cancers have focused on epigenetic agents, including the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of the combination of belinostat (B) with C+E. Belinostat was administered as a 48-h continuous intravenous infusion on days 1–2; cisplatin was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion on day 2; and etoposide was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion on days 2, 3, and 4. Twenty-eight patients were recruited in this single-center study. The maximum tolerated dose was belinostat 500 mg/m(2)/24 h, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2), and etoposide 80 mg/m(2). The combination was safe, although some patients were more susceptible to adverse events. Hematologic toxicities were most commonly observed. Objective responses were observed in 11 (39%) of 28 patients and seven (47%) of 15 patients with neuroendocrine tumors (including SCLC). Patients carrying more than three copies of variant UGT1A1 (*28 and *60) had higher serum levels of belinostat because of slower clearance. DNA damage peaked at 36 h after the initiation of belinostat, as did global lysine acetylation, but returned to baseline 12 h after the end of infusion. The combination of B + C + E is safe and active in SCLC and other neuroendocrine cancers. Future phase II studies should consider genotyping patients for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*60 and to identify patients at an increased risk of adverse events.

BackgroundOSE2101 (Tedopi®) is an anticancer vaccine with HLA-A2+ restricted modified epitopes targeting five tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) frequently expressed in lung cancer (CEA, HER2, MAGE2, MAGE3, P53). Step-1 results of the phase III, randomized, open-label ATALANTE-1 study comparing Tedopi® vs standard treatment (SoC) showed a favorable benefit/risk of Tedopi® over SoC (HR 0.71 for overall survival OS) in HLA-A2+ NSCLC patients in 2nd or 3rd line treatment after progression on immune checkpoint blockers (ICB).1 We analyze available tumor biopsies at initial diagnosis from some patients treated with Tedopi® to determine the expression of the 5 TAAs and to identify other tumor factors associated with long-term survival.MethodsTumor biopsies were available for 8 HLA-A2+ (blood test) stage IV NSCLC patients included in the trial. Primary (ResultsHLA-class I was expressed in all tumor samples. IHC analysis revealed that P53, CEA and HER2 were expressed in 6/7, 5/7 and 0/7 patients, respectively. P53, CEA, HER2, MAGE2, and MAGE3 were detected at RNA level in 5/5 tested patients (table 1). IMMUNOSCORE® IC CD8/PDL1 analysis showed High/High, High/Low and Low/Low scores for 1/7, 1/7 and 5/7 patients, respectively. The High/High IMMUNOSCORE® with a pronounced CD8+ T-cell tumor infiltration was observed in the patient with PR. High percentage of tumor cells expressing P53 (69%–97%) and overexpression of genes associated with activated macrophages (TREM2, MARCO, SLC11A1, CHIT1, SERPINB2) were observed in the PR and SD patients. High IFN-gamma and Expanded Immune Gene Signature scores were observed in long-term survivor patients with secondary resistance to ICB, even after progressive disease.Abstract 366 Table 1Summary of clinical and translational dataCEACarcinoembryonic antigen; HER2: Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2; ICB: Immune checkpoint blocker; IHC: Immunohistochemistry; ND: Not determined; OS: Overall Survival; Patient ID: Patient identification; PDL1: Programmed death-ligand 1; PFS: Progression-free survival; ssGSEA: Single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. Blue bars = Length of overall survival; Green bars = Gene Signature upregulation; Red bars = Gene Signature downregulationConclusionsThis study shows that all HLA-A2+ patients (blood test), expressed HLA class I in the tumors at initial diagnosis. Transcriptomic data in the patients that benefited from Tedopi® showed activated macrophage pathway, high IFN-gamma and Expanded Immune Gene Signatures scores. These data will be validated on larger number of patients treated with Tedopi® after the step 2 analysis.AcknowledgementsWe thank Julie Le Boulicaut, François Montestruc and Constant Josse (eXYSTAT, Malakoff, France) for the statistical analysis, and HalioDx for the IHC and NanoString analysis.Trial RegistrationEudraCT number2015-003183-36; NCT number: NCT02654587ReferenceGiaccone, et al. Activity of OSE-2101 in HLA-A2+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after failure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI): step 1 results of phase III ATALANTE-1 randomised trial. ESMO meeting 2020, abstract #1260MO.Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol and its related documents (including the patient information and informed consent form) received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB), and the Competent Authority prior to study initiation.ConsentEach patient gave his/her written informed consent prior to study enrolment.

Background In our previous works, we demonstrated that patients’ sex affects the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with several advanced solid tumors. Here, we assessed the sex-based heterogeneity of efficacy of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1)/anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) given as monotherapy, for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing high PD-L1 levels, to evaluate if available evidence supports this therapeutic option for both women and men. Methods We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis including all randomized, controlled trials testing anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 drugs in monotherapy, as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC expressing high PD-L1 levels. The primary endpoint was the difference in efficacy of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 drugs versus chemotherapy, between men and women, measured in terms of the difference in overall survival (OS) log [hazard ratio (HR)] reported in male and female study participants. Results We analyzed four randomized, controlled trials, including 1672 patients, of whom 1224 (73.2%) were men and 448 (26.8%) were women. The pooled OS-HR comparing anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 versus chemotherapy was 0.59 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.50-0.69] for men and only 0.84 (95% CI, 0.64-1.10) for women. The pooled ratio of the OS-HRs reported in men versus women was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.52-0.98; P-heterogeneity: 0.04), indicating a significantly greater effect for men. No heterogeneity among single-study estimates was observed in either male patients (Q = 2.39, P = 0.50, I2 = 0%) or in female patients (Q = 1.13, P = 0.50, I2 = 0%). Conclusion Evidence available indicates anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 monotherapy as highly effective in men but not in women, even in NSCLCs expressing high PD-L1 levels. Prospective trials testing sex-based tailored immunotherapy strategies are needed., Highlights • Sex-based heterogeneity of efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. • Sex-tailored immunotherapy strategies. • NSCLC expressing high PD-L1 levels.

BackgroundAnti-programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents are broadly used in first-line and second-line treatment across different tumor types. While immunohistochemistry-based assays are routinely used to assess PD-L1 expression, their clinical utility remains controversial due to the partial predictive value and lack of standardized cut-offs across antibody clones. Using a high throughput immunoassay, the reverse phase protein microarray (RPPA), coupled with a fluorescence-based detection system, this study compared the performance of six anti-PD-L1 antibody clones on 666 tumor samples.MethodsPD-L1 expression was measured using five antibody clones (22C3, 28–8, CAL10, E1L3N and SP142) and the therapeutic antibody atezolizumab on 222 lung, 71 ovarian, 52 prostate and 267 breast cancers, and 54 metastatic lesions. To capture clinically relevant variables, our cohort included frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, surgical specimens and core needle biopsies. Pure tumor epithelia were isolated using laser capture microdissection from 602 samples. Correlation coefficients were calculated to assess concordance between antibody clones. For two independent cohorts of patients with lung cancer treated with nivolumab, RPPA-based PD-L1 measurements were examined along with response to treatment.ResultsMedian-center PD-L1 dynamic ranged from 0.01 to 39.37 across antibody clones. Correlation coefficients between the six antibody clones were heterogeneous (range: −0.48 to 0.95) and below 0.50 in 61% of the comparisons. In nivolumab-treated patients, RPPA-based measurement identified a subgroup of tumors, where low PD-L1 expression equated to lack of response.ConclusionsContinuous RPPA-based measurements capture a broad dynamic range of PD-L1 expression in human specimens and heterogeneous concordance levels between antibody clones. This high throughput immunoassay can potentially identify subgroups of tumors in which low expression of PD-L1 equates to lack of response to treatment.

Purpose: Acquired EGFR T790M mutations are the most frequently identified resistance mechanism to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers. ASP8273 is a third-generation EGFR TKI with antitumor activity in preclinical models of EGFR-mutant lung cancer that targets mutant EGFR, including EGFR T790M. Experimental Design: In this multicohort, phase I study (NCT02113813), escalating doses of ASP8273 (25–500 mg) were administered once daily to non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with disease progression after prior treatment with an EGFR TKI. EGFR T790M was required for all cohorts, except the dose escalation cohort. Primary endpoints were safety/tolerability; secondary endpoints were determination of the RP2D, pharmacokinetic profile, and preliminary antitumor activity of ASP8273. Evaluation of the use of EGFR mutations in circulating free DNA (cfDNA) as a biomarker of ASP8273 treatment effects was an exploratory endpoint. Results: A total of 110 patients were treated with ASP8273 across dose escalation (n = 36), response–expansion (n = 36), RP2D (300 mg; n = 19) and food–effect (n = 19) cohorts. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, constipation, vomiting, and hyponatremia. Across all doses, in patients with EGFR T790M, the response rate was 30.7% (n = 27/88; 95% CI, 19.5%–44.5%), and median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.5–10.1 months). EGFR mutations in cfDNA, both the activating mutation and EGFR T790M, became undetectable in most patients in the setting of clinical response and reemerged upon disease progression. Conclusions: ASP8273 was well tolerated and promoted antitumor activity in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer with disease progression on prior EGFR TKI therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 23(24); 7467–73. ©2017 AACR.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, mainly because of its poor prognosis. A valid mechanism-based prognostic biomarker is urgently needed. γ-hydroxy-1,N2-propanodeoxyguanosine (γ-OHPdG) is an endogenously formed mutagenic DNA adduct derived from lipid peroxidation (LPO). We examined the relationship of γ-OHPdG with hepatocarcinogenesis in two animal models and its potential role as a prognostic biomarker for recurrence in HCC patients. Bioassays were conducted in the Xeroderma pigmentosum group A knockout mice (Xpa-/-), and the diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-injected mice, both prone to HCC development. γ-OHPdG levels in the livers of these animals were determined. The effects of antioxidant treatments on γ-OHPdG and hepatocarcinogenesis were examined. Using two independent sets of HCC specimens from patients, we examined the relationship between γ-OHPdG and survival or recurrence-free survival. γ-OHPdG levels in liver DNA showed an age-dependent increase and consistently correlated with HCC development in all three animal models. Theaphenon E treatment significantly decreased γ-OHPdG levels in the liver DNA of Xpa-/- mice, and remarkably reduced HCC incidence in these mice to 14% from 100% in the controls. It also effectively inhibited HCC development in the DEN-injected mice. Using clinical samples from two groups of patients, our study revealed that higher levels of γ-OHPdG are strongly associated with low survival (p

Exportin 1 (XPO1) mediates nuclear export of many cellular factors known to play critical roles in malignant processes, and selinexor (KPT-330) is the first XPO1-selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound in advanced clinical development phase for cancer treatment. We demonstrated here that inhibition of XPO1 drives nuclear accumulation of important cargo tumor suppressor proteins, including transcription factor FOXO3a and p53 in thymic epithelial tumor (TET) cells, and induces p53-dependent and -independent antitumor activity in vitro Selinexor suppressed the growth of TET xenograft tumors in athymic nude mice via inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis. Loss of p53 activity or amplification of XPO1 may contribute to resistance to XPO1 inhibitor in TET. Using mass spectrometry-based proteomics analysis, we identified a number of proteins whose abundances in the nucleus and cytoplasm shifted significantly following selinexor treatment in the TET cells. Furthermore, we found that XPO1 was highly expressed in aggressive histotypes and advanced stages of human TET, and high XPO1 expression was associated with poorer patient survival. These results underscore an important role of XPO1 in the pathogenesis of TET and support clinical development of the XPO1 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with this type of tumors. Cancer Res; 77(20); 5614-27. ©2017 AACR.

Solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma with primary tumor location in the central nervous system accounts for less than 1% of all central nervous system tumors. Despite the relatively indolent clinical course, extracranial metastases are reported in 28% of cases. In recent years, NAB2-STAT6 gene fusion has been recognized as the pathognomonic molecular feature of solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma and STAT6 immunohistochemistry has been shown to be a sensitive and specific surrogate for the identification of the gene fusion in these patients. Here we report two cases of patients who experienced occurrence of diffuse extracranial metastases several years after successful surgery for an intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma. In the first patient, the metastases had maintained similar histological features to the primary tumor; in contrast, in the second case, a dedifferentiation occurred with loss of expression of CD34 and Bcl-2. These different histological features were associated with radically different behaviors. Whereas the first case experienced an indolent course of the disease, the second patient had a rapid disease progression and deterioration of clinical conditions. The molecular imaging findings in these two cases and the role of functional imaging for tumor detection, disease staging and monitoring in this rare cancer are also discussed. Recurrences and metastases maintained high expression of somatostatin receptors confirmed by somatostatin receptor imaging in the first case. In contrast, in the second patient, the abrupt transition into a highly aggressive form was associated with the absence of somatostatin receptors at 111In Pentetreotide scan and intense hypermetabolism at 18F-FDG PET.

Objectives The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee-Thymic Domain conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey to assess the acceptance of the TNM thymic staging system in the thoracic community. Methods A 50-item, web-based questionnaire was circulated among the members of the major thymic organizations worldwide from September to December 2018. The survey consisted of six sections (general information; overall perception of the TNM system; pretreatment staging; T category; N category; and perioperative treatments). Results In total, 217 responses were collected from 37 countries in four continents. The TNM classification was considered useful by 78% of the responders (N = 169); the Masaoka-Koga staging system was being used by 87% of the responders (N = 189). With regard to the T category, most responders (mostly surgeons) felt that the capsular and mediastinal pleural involvements should be considered separate T categories. As for the N category, 48% of the responders (N = 105) used the International Thymic Malignancies Interest Group/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer thymic nodal map, and lymph node dissection (N1/N2) was performed for 50%/21% thymomas and 66%/41% thymic carcinomas. While analyzing the results by the three continents (Europe, Asia, and Americas), responders in Asia were found to report the largest use of the TNM system, the greatest attention to the N category, and the best participation in international thymic databases. Conclusions The survey indicates that the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage classification of thymic tumors is gaining acceptance among the scientific community. The present results will guide the work of the Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee-Thymic Domain for the revision of the ninth edition of the TNM stage classification of thymic tumors.

First-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib have significant activity in NSCLC patients with activating EGFR mutations. However, EGFR-TKI resistance inevitably occurs after approximately 12 months of treatment. Acquired mechanisms of resistance, other than secondary mutations in EGFR (T790 M) which account for 50–60%, are less well understood. Here, we identified lncRNA H19 as a significantly downregulated lncRNA in vitro models and clinical specimens with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance, H19 knockdown or overexpression conferred resistance or sensitivity, respectively, both in vitro and in vivo models. H19 downregulation contributed to erlotinib resistance through interaction and upregulation of PKM2, which enhanced the phosphorylation of AKT. AKT inhibitors restored the sensitivity of erlotinib-resistant cells to erlotinib. In EGFR-mutant patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, low H19 levels were associated with a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.021). These findings revealed a novel mechanism of low-level H19 in the regulation of erlotinib resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Combination of AKT inhibitors and EGFR-TKIs could be a rational therapeutic approach for some subgroups of EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients.

Background: Single-agent pemetrexed is a treatment for recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that provides limited benefit. Preclinical studies showed promising synergistic effects when the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor sirolimus was added to pemetrexed. Methods: This was a single-institution phase I/II study of pemetrexed in combination with sirolimus. The primary endpoint for the phase I was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of the combination. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion was to determine the overall response rate at the MTD. Key eligibility criteria included recurrent, metastatic NSCLC, ECOG performance status of 0–2, and adequate organ function. Sirolimus was administered orally daily after an initial loading dose, and pemetrexed was given intravenously on day 1 of every 21-day cycle. Results: Forty-two patients with recurrent, metastatic NSCLC were enrolled, 22 in phase I and 20 in phase II. The MTD was pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, and sirolimus 10 mg on day 1, and 3 mg daily thereafter. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 38 (90.5%) patients. The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs were lymphopenia (31%) and hypophosphatemia (19%). Two treatment-related deaths occurred due to febrile neutropenia and infection, respectively. Among 27 total patients treated at the MTD, 6 (22.2%) had a partial response (PR), 12 (44.4%) had stable disease (SD) and 5 (18.5%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.4 weeks (95% CI: 7.0–29.4). Conclusions: The combination of pemetrexed and sirolimus is active in heavily-pretreated NSCLC (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00923273).

Background: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab has significantly improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pre-treatment biomarkers and clinical parameters such as body mass index (BMI), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), albumin, and antibiotic exposure have been shown to be prognostic factors in other immunotherapy-treated cancers. Here we report an association between these biomarkers and survival outcomes in metastatic NSCLC patients who received first-line treatment with pembrolizumab-based regimens. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, 3-center study using electronic medical record data for patients with NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to describe our primary end-points, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after initiation of immunotherapy. Log-rank test was used to compare the PFS and OS for antibiotics usage one month prior to therapy initiation. Univariate analysis and Cox proportional modeling were used to analyze pre-treatment BMI, NLR, and albumin relative to PFS and OS. Results: 136 patients were identified in our cohort. 50 (36.8%) patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy, and 86 (63.2%) patients received pembrolizumab with chemotherapy. 95 (69.9%) patients had exposure to antibiotics one month prior to therapy initiation, 40 (29.4%) patients had no exposure, and 1 (0.7%) patient had no reported data on antibiotics usage. Mean NLR was 7.61 (n=135), mean albumin was 3.27 g/dL (n=133), and mean BMI was 25.89 (n=134). On univariate analysis, exposure to antibiotics (log-rank p-value = 0.03), higher NLR (hazard ratio = 1.027; p-value = 0.021), and lower albumin (hazard ratio = 0.385; p-value < 0.001) have significant associations with worse PFS. Furthermore, univariate analysis showed that elevated NLR (hazard ratio = 1.036; p-value = 0.004), lower albumin (hazard ratio = 0.440; p-value = 0.002), and lower BMI (hazard ratio = 0.952; p-value = 0.032) are associated with worse OS. Cox proportional modeling revealed that lower albumin maintains a significant association with worse PFS (hazard ratio = 0.412; p-value Conclusion: Exposure to antibiotics within one month of pembrolizumab initiation, higher baseline NLR, and lower baseline albumin are associated with worse PFS. Elevated baseline NLR, lower baseline albumin, and lower BMI are associated with poorer OS. These results enhance our understanding of how these biomarkers may predict efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with NSCLC. Larger prospective studies should further investigate the clinical utility of these biomarkers. Citation Format: Ishani Joshi, Monica Peravali, Xue Geng, Jiahua Zhang, Giuseppe Giaccone, Chul Kim. Association between pre-treatment biomarkers and survival in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 372.

Heat shock proteins (Hsps) are part of a complex network of chaperone proteins that are critically involved in the conformational maturation of intracellular proteins and regulate their degradation via the proteasome system Hsps (especially Hsp70 and Hsp90) are upregulated in many cancers and are potentially attractive therapeutic targets. Ganetespib is a potent non-geldanamycin analogue, and avoids the toxicities associated with older analogues due to its small molecular weight, lipophilicity and the absence of the benzoquinone moiety; strong pre-clinical data support its evaluation in lung cancer, especially small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Areas covered: The chemical structure of ganetespib, the biology of Hsp90 in cancer and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data related to ganetespib are summarized; data from preclinical studies and multiple Phase I-III clinical trials, with a focus on its evaluation in SCLC are reviewed. Expert opinion: Recent progress made in the treatment of refractory SCLC with immune checkpoint inhibitors and DLL3-directed antibody-drug conjugate have made the development of ganetespib particularly challenging in SCLC. Hsp90 remains a critical therapeutic target. Hsp90 inhibitors with a wider therapeutic index and combinations with drugs targeting iHsp90 co-chaperones such as Cdc37 or Protein Kinase 2 may need to be explored in the future.

OBJECTIVES: Advanced thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) lack adequate treatment options in part due to absence of well characterized tumor-specific antigens. Mesothelin, a cell surface antigen, has been used successfully as a target for tumor-directed therapy. We sought to determine tumor expression and serum levels of mesothelin in patients with TETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tissue samples were obtained from 71 patients with histologically confirmed, unresectable advanced TETs and evaluated for mesothelin expression by immunohistochemistry. The evaluation was blinded for clinical data and outcome. Mesothelin expression and its association with clinico-pathological parameters and survival were assessed. RESULTS: Thymic carcinoma, thymoma, and thymic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) accounted for 34 (48%), 29 (41%), and 8 (11%) cases respectively. Mesothelin expression was seen in a significantly larger proportion of thymic carcinoma (27/34, 79%) than thymoma (3/29, 10%) (P50% of tumor cells) had significantly improved overall survival (median not reached, n=19) compared to patients with no or low mesothelin expression (1.60 years; 95% CI: 1.24 to 4.94 years; n=15; HR=4.46, 95% CI: 1.55 to 12.80; p=0.0026). CONCLUSION: Mesothelin expression is frequently observed in advanced thymic carcinomas, infrequently in thymomas and is absent in thymic NETs. Due to strong, membranous expression mesothelin is a potential therapeutic target in thymic carcinoma.

Introduction This phase I study investigated the activity of the irreversible pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor dacomitinib in combination with the mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib in advanced non–small cell lung cancer. Methods Patients with progression after at least one line of chemotherapy or targeted therapy received dacomitinib once daily and crizotinib once daily or twice daily, with doses escalated until intolerable toxicity; the expansion cohorts received the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. The primary objective was to define the recommended phase II dose; secondary objectives included assessment of safety and activity of the combination in epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-resistant patients and correlation with tumor biomarkers. Results Seventy patients were treated in the dose-escalation (n = 33) and expansion phases (n = 37), with the maximum tolerated dose defined as dacomitinib, 30 mg once daily, plus crizotinib, 200 mg twice daily. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 43% of patients: the most common were diarrhea (16%), rash (7%), and fatigue (6%). There were 16 deaths; none were considered treatment related. One patient (1%) had a partial response; 46% had stable disease. Most of the tumor samples analyzed had activating epidermal growth factor receptor gene ( EGFR ) mutations (18 of 20 [90%]); 50% (10 of 20) had a concurrent resistance mutation. Only one sample showed MMNG HOS Transforming gene ( MET ) amplification (the patient had progressive disease), whereas 59% (13 of 22) and 47% (14 of 30) had high levels of expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor on the basis of H-scores, respectively. There was no apparent association between biomarker expression and antitumor activity. Conclusion The combination of dacomitinib and crizotinib showed limited antitumor activity in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer and was associated with substantial toxicity.

Introduction Patients with lung cancer who harbor multiple pulmonary sites of disease have been challenging to classify; a subcommittee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee was charged with developing proposals for the eighth edition of the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) classification to address this issue. Methods A systematic literature review and analysis of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer database was performed to develop proposals for revision in an iterative process involving multispecialty international input and review. Results Details of the evidence base are summarized in other articles. Four patterns of disease are recognized; the clinical presentation, pathologic correlates, and biologic behavior of these suggest specific applications of the TNM classification rules. First, it is proposed that second primary lung cancers be designated with a T, N, and M category for each tumor. Second, tumors with a separate tumor nodule of the same histologic type (either suspected or proved) should be classified according to the location of the separate nodule relative to the index tumor—T3 for a same-lobe, T4 for a same-side (different lobe), and M1a for an other-side location—with a single N and M category. Third, multiple tumors with prominent ground glass (imaging) or lepidic (histologic) features should be designated by the T category of the highest T lesion, the number or m in parentheses (#/m) to indicate the multiplicity, and a collective N and M category for all. Finally, it is proposed that diffuse pneumonic-type lung cancers be designated by size (or T3) if in one lobe, T4 if involving multiple same-side lobes, and M1a if involving both lungs with a single N and M category for all areas of involvement. Conclusion We propose to tailor TNM classification of multiple pulmonary sites of lung cancer to reflect the unique aspects of four different patterns of presentation. We hope that this will lead to more consistent classification and clarity in communication and facilitate further research in the nature and optimal treatment of these entities.

Despite the paucity of therapeutic advances in SCLC, considerable progress in understanding the biology, molecular biology, model systems and potential therapeutic targets has been made. Studies of early lung and neuroendrocrine cell development models have provided insights into the cell of origin for SCLC. New GEMMs have illustrated the universal importance of TP53 and RB1 gene mutations in the pathogenesis and the potential role of additional genetic changes as well as changes in transcription factor expression. PDXs and CDXs provide new means for preclinical testing of new therapies. Molecular studies have identified the high mutation burden found in SCLC and have identified differences between SCLC, carcinoids and large cell neuroendocrine tumors. Potential therapeutic targets including EZH2, PARP, CDK1, MCL1, BCL2, BIM, SHH (Sonic Hedgehog), WNT, NOTCH1, Aurora Kinase, FGFR, PIK3CA, RET, THZ1, JAK-STAT, FAK, CXCR4, PD-L1, Fuc-GM1, CD56 and CD47. Ongoing and future clinical trials have to show which of these candidates can be translated into an effective targeted therapy. Thus, the future of improving outcomes for SCLC patients appears promising but there are still a number of unanswered questions which need to be addressed in the future and these are outlined below. Small Cell Lung Cancer Major Questions of Translational Relevance What are the mechanisms underlying the universal development of chemoresistance? SCLC is in nearly every case very sensitive to platinum-etoposide chemotherapy with dramatic clinically beneficial responses. However, in nearly every case the tumors become resistant to this chemotherapy. What is the mechanism of this resistance, are there ways to avoid it, and what are additional therapies that could kill such resistant tumor cells? What are the mechanisms of highly metastatic behavior in SCLC? SCLC is in nearly every case highly metastatic from the time of clinical diagnosis. What are the most important mechanisms responsible for the metastatic behavior and can these be therapeutically targeted? A subset of this question, is that SCLC appear to be much enriched in cancer stem cells (“tumor initiating cells”, TICs) and does targeting stem cell signaling pathways provide effective therapy for primary and metastatic sites of SCLC? Are there therapeutic targets of “acquired vulnerability” associated with RB1 or TP53 mutations in SCLC? Tumor suppressor genes RB1 and TP53 abnormalities are essentially universal in SCLCs. Are there acquired vulnerabilities associated with changes in these two genes that can be therapeutically targeted? Do the many other mutations occurring in human SCLC (but not in GEMMs) provide therapeutic targets – “acquired vulnerabilities for human SCLC?” Current evidence indicates that human SCLCs have many other genetic (mutations) and epigenetic changes besides those involving the key oncogenic drivers (such as TP53, RB1, LMYC, NFIB). By contrast, mouse GEMM SCLC have very few additional changes. Presumable the differences in mutation rates result from exposure to cigarette carcinogens in humans but not in mice. Do the other mutations in human SCLC provide acquired vulnerabilities of therapeutic vulnerabilities, do any these represent “synthetic lethalities” with the main driver oncogene changes, and are there several vulnerabilities common across multiple SCLCs or are these vulnerabilities “private” and found in only individual tumors? Can we develop therapeutic strategies targeting important SCLC driver transcription factors? Several transcription factors appear to be very important in the growth and survival of SCLC including ASCL1, NeuroD1, myc family members, and SOX2). Are there therapeutic strategies that can be directed against these key transcription factors and do they provide quantitatively multiple logs of tumor cell kill to allow development of curative strategies? What are the important differences in human preclinical models of SCLC that influence discovery and validation of new therapies? Currently there are several types of human preclinical models of SCLC including SCLC lines, SCLC cell line xenografts (CDXs), patient derived SCLC xenografts (PDXs), and circulating SCLC tumor cells isolated from peripheral blood of SCLC patients. While these all share common genetic abnormalities found in SCLC (such as TP53, RB1, myc family members), we need to know what are the molecular differences between these different models and SCLC tumor samples and whether preclinical therapeutic responses are similar or different between these models. Can we continue to use all of the models for development of new therapies or do we need to only use one type of preclinical model? Are the differences between human SCLC and GEMM of SCLC that influence the discovery and validation of new therapies? Genetically engineered mouse models of lung cancer (GEMMs) appear to be very similar to human SCLC. However, it appears that mouse GEMM SCLC do not appear to be sensitive to platin-etoposide chemotherapy. What are the differences between human and the GEMM models of SCLC that explain this discrepancy? Are there important differences between human and GEMM preclinical models that could influence the discovery and validation of new SCLC therapies? What are the biologic reasons for SCLCs expressing ASCL1 vs NeuroD1 as a lineage oncogene? The majority of human SCLCs have ASCL1 as the major neuroendocrine lineage driver gene. However, a subset of human SCLCs express high levels of NeuroD1 and not ASCL1. Currently, there is no evidence that mouse lung neuroendocrine cells can express Neuro D1. This raises the question of whether small cell cancers predominantly expressing NeuroD1 arise in the human lung or in some other primary site. Do genetic abnormalities in histologically normal epithelium of SCLC patients provide diagnostic and chemopreventative targets? There appear to be a much greater frequency of genetic abnormalities in the histologically normal epithelium of patients with SCLC compared to those with NSCLC. Does this information provide ways for early diagnosis or implementation of chemoprevention strategies for SCLC using these genetic alterations as molecular biomarkers? Most recently the US National Cancer Institute released a Request for Application (RFA) (PAR-16-049, PAR-16-050, PAR-16-051) for grants specifically focusing on SCLC, and hopefully through these grants many of the above questions will be addressed.

Background KRAS mutations in NSCLC are associated with a lack of response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) is an oral selective MEK kinase inhibitor of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway. Patients and methods Advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients failing one to two prior regimens underwent KRAS profiling. KRAS wild-type patients were randomized to erlotinib (150 mg daily) or a combination of selumetinib (150 mg daily) with erlotinib (100 mg daily). KRAS mutant patients were randomized to selumetinib (75 mg b.i.d.) or the combination. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) for the KRAS wild-type cohort and objective response rate (ORR) for the KRAS mutant cohort. Biomarker studies of ERK phosphorylation and immune subsets were carried out. Results From March 2010 to May 2013, 89 patients were screened; 41 KRAS mutant and 38 KRAS wild-type patients were enrolled. Median PFS in the KRAS wild-type arm was 2.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–3.7] for erlotinib alone and 2.1 months (95% CI 1.8–5.1) for the combination. The ORR in the KRAS mutant group was 0% (95% CI 0.0% to 33.6%) for selumetinib alone and 10% (95% CI 2.1% to 26.3%) for the combination. Combination therapy resulted in increased toxicities, requiring dose reductions (56%) and discontinuation (8%). Programmed cell death-1 expression on regulatory T cells (Tregs), Tim-3 on CD8+ T cells and Th17 levels were associated with PFS and overall survival in patients receiving selumetinib. Conclusions This study failed to show improvement in ORR or PFS with combination therapy of selumetinib and erlotinib over monotherapy in KRAS mutant and KRAS wild-type advanced NSCLC. The association of immune subsets and immune checkpoint receptor expression with selumetinib may warrant further studies.

Background: Anti-PD-(L)1-directed therapy following radiotherapy or following concurrent chemoradiation is associated with significantly longer PFS and OS in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, including those with locally advanced inoperable tumors. KEYNOTE-867 (NCT03924869) evaluates the efficacy and safety of SBRT with or without pembrolizumab in patients with inoperable stage I/IIA NSCLC. Trial Design: In this phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study, approximately 530 adult patients with previously untreated, medically inoperable, histologically/cytologically confirmed stage I/IIA NSCLC are randomized 1:1 to receive thoracic SBRT to primary tumors for ≤2 wk (Table) and either pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 wk for 17 cycles (approximately 1 year) or until disease recurrence, development of unacceptable AEs, SBRT not started for any reason, or study withdrawal. Randomization is stratified by disease stage (I/IIA), ECOG PS (0-1/2), and geographic region (East Asia/other). Imaging assessment by blinded independent central review (BICR) occurs at 12 wk (≥10 wk after SBRT completion), followed by every 16 wk for 3 y, and then every 6 mo. Primary endpoints are event-free survival (EFS) by BICR and OS. Secondary endpoints include time to death or distant metastases and safety; exploratory endpoints are time to subsequent treatment, disease-specific survival, and time to recurrence/progression on subsequent line of therapy. AEs are monitored throughout the trial until 30 d after last dose (90 for serious AEs) and graded according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0. EFS and OS are analyzed by the nonparametric Kaplan-Meier method, treatment differences by stratified log-rank test, and hazard ratios by stratified Cox proportional hazard model with Efron's method of tie handling. Enrollment started on June 17, 2019, at 131 sites. Table.Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy RegimenUnit Dose Strength(s)Peripheral tumors3×15 Gy or 3×18 Gy fractions (preferred regimens); 4×12 Gy or 5×10 Gy fractions (acceptable regimens)Tumors abutting the chest wall4×12 Gy fractions or 5×10 Gy fractionsCentral tumors5×10 Gy fractions Citation Format: Salma K. Jabbour, Baerin Houghton, Andrew G. Robinson, Xavier Quantin, Thomas Wehler, Dariusz Kowalski, Myung-Ju Ahn, Mustafa Erman, Giuseppe Giaccone, Hossein Borghaei, Jessica McLean, Jin Zhang, Fabricio Souza, Roy Decker. Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with or without pembrolizumab in patients with inoperable stage I/IIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): KEYNOTE-867 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT288.

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are a group of rare tumors (0.13 per 100,000 persons), comprised of thymomas and thymic carcinoma, arising from the epithelial cells of the thymus. The biology of these tumors is not well understood, and there are no approved targeted therapies against TETs. One promising drug target is mesothelin (MSLN), which is a surface glycoprotein that is cleaved to produce two proteins: mature MSLN (mMSLN) and megakaryocyte potentiating factor (MPF). In normal physiology, expression of MSLN is limited to mesothelial cells lining the pleura, pericardium, and peritoneum. Its expression is also present in various cancers, including thymic carcinoma, where it is expressed in 79% of cases. In this study, we investigate the ability of the MSLN targeting, fully human monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) anetumab ravtansine (ARav) to inhibit growth of thymic carcinoma in in-vitro and in-vivo models. We utilized immunoblotting and RT-qPCR to characterize MSLN expression in human thymoma and thymic carcinoma derived cell lines. Binding of anetumab, the antibody moiety in ARav, to thymoma and thymic carcinoma cell lines was assessed by flow cytometry. In-vitro, ARav's effect on cell proliferation was tested against MP57 cells (thymic carcinoma), stably transfected with MSLN, utilizing CellTiter-Glo. ARav's activity in-vivo as a monotherapy, and as a combination therapy with cisplatin, was tested against MSLN expressing T1889 xenograft tumors in athymic nude mice and compared to vehicle, isotype control ADC, and standard-of-care (SoC) cisplatin. Using the anetumab antibody, thymoma (T1682) and thymic carcinoma (T1889) cell lines were shown to express MSLN on the cell surface. In-vitro, ARav was effective at inhibiting growth of MP57 cells stably transfected with mMSLN. In-vivo, 15 mg/kg ARav inhibited T1889 xenograft tumor growth more efficaciously than vehicle, the isotype control ADC (all given every 2 weeks), and 4 mg/kg cisplatin (given every week). Combining ARav at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg with 4 mg/kg cisplatin yielded an additive effect on inhibiting tumor growth. MSLN is expressed in thymoma and thymic carcinoma derived cell lines. Anetumab ravtansine inhibits growth of MSLN positive thymic carcinoma in our preclinical model; when combined with SoC cisplatin, ARav confers enhanced tumor growth inhibition. Citation Format: Vincent Chen, Anette Sommer, Christoph Schatz, Sabine Zitzmann-Kolbe, In-Kyu Kim, Giuseppe Giaccone. Exploring anetumab ravtansine in a preclinical model of thymic carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1776.

BackgroundLutathera is a 177Lutetium-labeled somatostatin analog approved for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Somatostatin receptors are expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, may act synergistically with lutathera to generate antitumor immunity. We conducted a phase I study of lutathera plus nivolumab in patients with advanced NETs of the lung.MethodsPatients with relapsed/refractory extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC), non-progressing ES-SCLC after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, or advanced grade I-II pulmonary NETs were eligible. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The phase I portion followed a standard 3+3 design, assessing two dose levels (dose level 1: lutathera 3.7 GBq every 8 weeks for four doses with nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks; dose level 2: lutathera 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks for four doses with nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks).ResultsNine patients were enrolled (six ES-SCLC, two pulmonary atypical carcinoid, one high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at dose level 1. At dose level 2, one patient with refractory ES-SCLC developed a DLT (grade 3 rash). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were lymphopenia (n=7), thrombocytopenia (n=4), anemia (n=3), and nausea (n=3). The most common grade 3 TRAE was lymphopenia (n=4). Among the seven patients with measurable disease, one patient with ES-SCLC had a partial response. Two patients with pulmonary atypical carcinoid had stable disease lasting 6 months. The RP2D was dose level 2.ConclusionsLutathera plus nivolumab was well tolerated and showed signs of antitumor activity. This combination warrants further exploration.Trial registration numberNCT03325816

In the last few years, meaningful advances have been made in the knowledge of the biology of Thymic Epithelial Tumors (TETs). Data available suggest that in most cases, the different histological subtypes could be distinct biological entities, characterized by specific molecular aberrations, rather than representing a histological continuum of diseases. Recurrent gene mutations in Thymomas and Thymic Carcinoma have been identified, but we still do not know the exact role played by these mutations in TETs pathogenesis. Relevant new data are now available on the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the association between TETs and autoimmune diseases that warrant further investigations for the potential therapeutic implications. The progress in knowledge of the molecular pathways involved in TETs pathogenesis, allowed to identify and to test target therapies potentially active in such diseases. Platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard first line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic TETs. However, some promising data have been reported on the activity of new target therapies, including anti-angiogenic drugs, Cycline Dependent Kinases and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors, as well as of Immune-checkpoint inhibitors. A number of new drugs and combinations are currently under evaluation. The efficacy of new drugs should be balanced with their toxicity profiles, in such complex patients that seem to be more susceptible to develop drug-related toxicities, in particular with immunotherapies.

e21114 Background: Patients (pts) with advanced B3 thymoma (B3T) and thymic carcinoma (TC) resistant to chemotherapy have limited treatment options. Treatment with Anti-PD1 showed not negligible toxicity and limited activity, and anti-VEGFR drugs obtained limited and short lasting antitumor responses. No data on combined anti-PD1/PD-L1 with antiangiogenic drugs are available in B3T/TC. We report preliminary results on safety and activity of avelumab combined with axitinib in this pts population. Methods: The CAVEATT is a single arm, multicentric, phase II trial in immunotherapy-naive pts with advanced B3T or TC, progressing after at least one line of platinum based chemotherapy. Prior therapy with antiangiogenic drugs is allowed. Pts received Avelumab 10 mg/kg iv every 2 weeks and Axitinib 5 mg twice a day until progression or toxicity. The primary objective of the study is overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1; secondary endpoints include ORR by irRC and ITMIG, and QoL by EORTC QLQ-C30. An interim futility analysis is planned after the enrollment of the first 18 patients. If at least 5 out of 18 patients will obtain a PR, the accrual will continue to reach the total number of 33 pts, according with a Simon’s minimax design. Tumor and blood samples are collected at baseline and whenever feasible at disease progression, to identify predictive biomarkers of response and mechanisms of resistance to treatment. Results: 1 pt with B3T and 12 with TC were enrolled from April 2019 to January 2020. Median age was 59 years (range 33-77). 8 pts received ≥2 previous line of therapies, and 6 pts were pretreated with an antiangiogenic drug. The median follow-up was 5.1 months. 10 pts were evaluable for response. The proportions of patients who achieved a partial response (PR) or a stable disease (SD) were respectively 40% (95% CI 17%–69%) and 60% (95% CI 30%–83%). The median PFS was 7.9 months (95% CI 2.5–NA) 12 pts were evaluable for toxicity. Treatment-related adverse events (AE) of grade 1 or 2 occurred in 7 (58%) pts, and the most common was diarrhea (3 pts). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 2 (17%) pts: 1 had G3 hyperthension and 1 G3 hand foot syndrome, both leading to axitinib drug reduction. No immune-related AEs (irAEs) were observed. No patient stopped treatment for toxicity, 5 pts stopped for progressive disease, and 8 pts are still on treatment. Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest promising antitumor activity and a good toxicity profile of the combination of axitinib and avelumab in pts with advanced B3T and TC. Accrual is ongoing to reach the target of 33 pts Clinical trial information: 2017-004048-38 .

e21623 Background: IMpower110 evaluated atezo mono in PD-L1–selected, chemo-naive patients (pts) with nonsquamous (nsq) or squamous (sq) NSCLC. At the interim analysis, IMpower110 met its primary OS endpoint, with a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement for atezo vs chemo in TC3 or IC3 wild-type ( EGFR/ALK-negative) pts. We report on the safety profile of atezo vs chemo in IMpower110. Methods: 572 pts with stage IV nsq or sq NSCLC, PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% on TC or IC and ECOG PS 0-1 were randomized 1:1 to receive atezo (1200 mg IV q3w) or chemo (4 or 6 21-day cycles). In the chemo arm, nsq pts received cisplatin (cis) 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin (carbo) AUC 6 + pemetrexed (pem) 500 mg/m2 IV q3w; sq pts received cis 75 mg/m2 + gemcitabine (gem) 1250 mg/m2 or carbo AUC 5 + gem 1000 mg/m2 IV q3w. Safety was assessed in all treated pts (safety evaluable [SE] population [pop]), regardless of PD-L1 expression or EGFR/ALK status. AEs were summarized per MedDRA v22.0 and severity graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. Immune-mediated AEs (imAEs) were defined per a sponsor-specified list of terms, regardless of whether the events led to systemic glucocorticoid, endocrine therapy, or other immunosuppressants use. Results: At data cutoff (Sep 10, 2018) within the ITT pop, treatment (tx) was ongoing in 90 (atezo: 31.6%) and 25 (chemo: 8.7%) pts, with 13.7 mo of follow-up. Within the SE pop (atezo: n = 286, chemo: n = 263), atezo pts had longer tx exposure (5.3 mo) vs chemo pts (pem, 3.5 mo; gem, 2.6 mo; carbo, 2.3 mo; cis, 2.1 mo). Atezo had a favorable safety profile vs chemo (table); safety data were consistent with data from a pooled atezo mono pop. imAEs occurred in 40.2% (atezo) and 16.7% (chemo) of pts and were Grade (Gr) 3-4 in 6.6% and 1.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Atezo was better tolerated than chemo and imAEs were generally low grade. Overall, the safety experience with atezo mono in IMpower110 was consistent with its known safety profile; no new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT02409342. [Table: see text]

Pharmacogenetics studies have identified several allelic variants with the potential to reduce toxicity and improve treatment outcome. The present study was designed to determine if such findings are reproducible in a heterogenous population of patients with lung cancer undergoing therapy with paclitaxel. We designed a prospective multi-institutional study that recruited n = 103 patients receiving paclitaxel therapy with a 5-year follow up. All patients were genotyped using the Drug Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters (DMET) platform, which ascertains 1931 genotypes in 235 genes. Progression-free survival (PFS) of paclitaxel therapy and clinically-significant paclitaxel toxicities were classified and compared according to genotype. Initial screening revealed eleven variants that are associated with PFS. Of these, seven variants in ABCB11 (rs4148768), ABCC3 (rs1051640), ABCG1 (rs1541290), CYP8B1 (rs735320), NR3C1 (rs6169), FMO6P (rs7889839), and GSTM3 (rs7483) were associated with paclitaxel PFS in a multivariate analysis accounting for clinical covariates. Multivariate analysis revealed four SNPs in VKORC1 (rs2884737), SLC22A14 (rs4679028), GSTA2 (rs6577), and DCK (rs4643786) were associated with paclitaxel toxicities. With the exception of a variant in VKORC1, the present study did not find the same genetic outcome associations of other published research on pharmacogenetics variants that affect paclitaxel outcomes. This finding suggests that prior pharmacogenomics research findings may not be reproduced in the most frequently-diagnosed malignancy, lung cancer.

Immune-checkpoint blockade has emerged as a powerful therapeutic strategy in lung cancer. However, the molecular mechanisms associated with response are still poorly understood. Using lung cancer as a model system, we employed protein pathway activation mapping and multiplex immunofluorescence to explore pathway-centered signaling events and tumor-immune spatial interactions associated with response to Nivolumab. Signaling data were collected from laser dissected tumor epithelia and the surrounding tumor-stroma interface (TSI) of 28 lung cancer patients treated with Nivolumab using the Reverse Phase Protein Microarray. As expected, quantitative PD-L1 measurements associated with response to treatment. Pathway-centered analysis revealed increased TLR4-based signaling events, pro-inflammatory molecules, and tumor-associated antigens in patients that benefitted from treatment. CD68+/PD-L1+ antigen-presenting cells spatial distribution was also associated with response to treatment. Taken together, these results suggest that a tumor ecology that favors immune activation may play a primary role in modulating response to compounds targeting the tumor-immune axis.