Search

Epigenetic dysregulation leads to aberrant DNA hypermethylation and is common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). A large number of clinical trials in AML, MDS, and other hematologic malignancies have assessed hypomethylating agents (HMAs), used alone or in combination with other drugs, in the frontline, maintenance, relapsed/refractory, and peritransplant settings. Effective maintenance therapy has long been a goal for patients with AML in remission. Previous large, randomized clinical trials of maintenance with HMAs or other agents had not shown meaningful improvement in overall survival. Oral azacitidine (Oral-AZA [CC-486]) is approved in the United States, Canada, and European Union for treatment of adult patients with AML in first complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) following intensive induction chemotherapy who are ineligible for hematopoietic cell transplant. Regulatory approvals of Oral-AZA were based on outcomes from the randomized, phase III QUAZAR AML-001 trial, which showed a median overall survival advantage of 9.9 months with Oral-AZA versus placebo. Oral-AZA allows convenient extended AZA dosing for 14 days per 28-day treatment cycle, which is not feasible with injectable AZA. Focusing on AML and MDS, this report reviews the rationale for the use of orally bioavailable AZA and its potential use in all-oral combination therapy regimens; the unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of Oral-AZA compared with injectable AZA; the clinical safety and efficacy of Oral-AZA maintenance therapy in patients with AML in first remission and for treatment of patients with active MDS; and ongoing Oral-AZA clinical trials.

TP53 gene mutations are common in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Previous studies have reported their detrimental effects on patient survival. However, current treatment strategies mainly based on hypomethylating agent therapy (HMA) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) still leave a lot to be desired. And there is also a lack of studies on large sample with a view to the refinement of specific characteristics and disease progression. So we performed a meta-analysis including 20 studies compromising 5067 patients to assess the prognostic impact and clinical characteristics of TP53 mutations in MDS patients. The overall hazard ratio for overall survival (OS) was 2.14 (95% confidence interval 1.94-2.37, P.00001) compared with patients with MDS without TP53 mutations. Lower progression-free survival and leukemia-free survival were associated with TP53 mutations. Subgroup analysis revealed that TP53 mutations were significantly associated with high levels of blast cells and karyotypic aberrations. And among Asian population, the adverse impact on OS of TP53 mutations seemed worse than those in Western countries. (HR 2.87 vs. 2.02, P = .01). In addition, TP53 mutations had no effect on response to HMA therapy, and HSCT improved OS in patients carrying TP53 mutations.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma that is classified as Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)-positive or virus-negative. Epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation, can alter gene expression and influence cancer progression. However, patterns of DNA methylation and the therapeutic efficacy of hypomethylating agents have not been fully explored in MCC. We characterized genome-wide DNA methylation in 16 MCC cell lines from both molecular subclasses in comparison to other cancer types, and found that the overall profile of MCC is similar to small cell lung carcinoma. Comparison of virus-positive and -negative MCC revealed 2,260 differentially methylated positions. The hypomethylating agent decitabine (DAC) upregulated expression of antigen-presenting machinery in MCC cell lines and stimulated membrane expression of HLA-A in virus-positive and virus-negative MCC xenograft tumors. DAC also induced prominent caspase- and large T antigen-independent cell death in virus-positive MCC, whereas virus-negative MCC cell lines displayed decreased proliferation without increased cell death. In mouse xenografts, decitabine significantly decreased the size of virus-positive tumors, but not virus-negative tumors. Our findings indicate that viral status predicts genomic methylation patterns in MCC, and that DAC may be therapeutically effective against MCC via anti-proliferative effects, cell death, and increased immune recognition.

Resistance to standard immunochemotherapy remains an unmet challenge in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and aberrant DNA methylation may contribute to chemoresistance. Promising early-phase results were reported with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) plus subcutaneous azacitidine, a hypomethylating agent. In this phase 1 study, we evaluated CC-486 (oral azacitidine) plus 6 cycles of R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated intermediate- to high-risk DLBCL or grade 3B/transformed follicular lymphoma. CC-486 doses of 100, 150, 200, or 300 mg given 7 days before cycle 1 and on days 8-21 of cycles 1-5 were evaluated; additional patients were enrolled in the expansion phase to examine preliminary efficacy. The primary objectives were to determine the safety and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CC-486 in combination with R-CHOP. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were hematologic, including neutropenia (62.7%) and febrile neutropenia (25.4%); grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon (

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are aggressive but sensitive to cisplatin‐based chemotherapy. Alternative therapies are needed for tumors refractory to cisplatin with hypomethylating agents providing one possibility. The mechanisms of cisplatin hypersensitivity and resistance in TGCTs remain poorly understood. Recently, it has been shown that TGCTs, even those resistant to cisplatin, are hypersensitive to very low doses of hypomethylating agents including 5‐aza deoxy‐cytosine (5‐aza) and guadecitabine. We undertook a pharmacogenomic approach in order to better understand mechanisms of TGCT hypomethylating agent hypersensitivity by generating a panel of acquired 5‐aza‐resistant TGCT cells and contrasting these to previously generated acquired isogenic cisplatin‐resistant cells from the same parent. Interestingly, there was a reciprocal relationship between cisplatin and 5‐aza sensitivity, with cisplatin resistance associated with increased sensitivity to 5‐aza and 5‐aza resistance associated with increased sensitivity to cisplatin. Unbiased transcriptome analysis revealed 5‐aza‐resistant cells strongly downregulated polycomb target gene expression, the exact opposite of the finding for cisplatin‐resistant cells, which upregulated polycomb target genes. This was associated with a dramatic increase in H3K27me3 and decrease in DNMT3B levels in 5‐aza‐resistant cells, the exact opposite changes seen in cisplatin‐resistant cells. Evidence is presented that reciprocal regulation of polycomb and DNMT3B may be initiated by changes in DNMT3B levels as DNMT3B knockdown alone in parental cells resulted in increased expression of H3K27me3, EZH2, and BMI1, conferred 5‐aza resistance and cisplatin sensitization, and mediated genome‐wide repression of polycomb target gene expression. Finally, genome‐wide analysis revealed that 5‐aza‐resistant, cisplatin‐resistant, and DNMT3B‐knockdown cells alter the expression of a common set of polycomb target genes. This study highlights that reciprocal epigenetic changes mediated by DNMT3B and polycomb may be a key driver of the unique cisplatin and 5‐aza hypersensitivity of TGCTs and suggests that distinct epigenetic vulnerabilities may exist for pharmacological targeting of TGCTs., Alternative therapies are needed for testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) refractory to cisplatin. Recent preclinical and clinical studies suggest that cisplatin refractory TGCTs are distinctly sensitive to hypomethylating agents. The current study suggests a reciprocal relationship between cisplatin and hypomethylation agent sensitivity in TGCTs involving DNMT3B and the polycomb pathway that could lead to biomarkers for future clinical trials.

Oncofetal protein SALL4 is critical for cancer cell survival. Targeting SALL4, however, is only applicable in a fraction of cancer patients who are positive for this gene. To overcome this limitation, we propose to induce a cancer vulnerability by engineering a partial dependency upon SALL4. Following exogenous expression of SALL4, SALL4-negative cancer cells became partially dependent on SALL4. Treatment of SALL4-negative cells with the FDA-approved hypomethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (DAC) resulted in transient upregulation of SALL4. DAC pretreatment sensitized SALL4-negative cancer cells to entinostat, which negatively affected SALL4 expression through a microRNA, miRNA-205, both in culture and in vivo. Moreover, SALL4 was essential for the efficiency of sequential treatment of DAC and entinostat. Overall, this proof-of-concept study provides a framework whereby the targeting pathways such as SALL4-centered therapy can be expanded, sensitizing cancer cells to treatment by transient target induction and engineering a dependency. Significance: These findings provide a therapeutic approach for patients harboring no suitable target by induction of a SALL4-mediated vulnerability.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW The antitumor activity of macrophages is regulated by a balance of prophagocytic and antiphagocytic signals. Cluster of differentiation 47 (CD47), the dominant macrophage immune checkpoint ('do not eat me' signal), interacts with its receptor signal-regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) to suppress phagocytic activities. This axis plays a pivotal role in immune evasion in myeloid malignancies as well as multiple cancers providing strong rationale for therapeutic exploitation. RECENT FINDINGS Preclinical studies have revealed overexpression of CD47 on leukemic stem cells and myeloblasts from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which contributes to immune surveillance evasion and is associated with poor outcomes. Blockade of CD47 with different approaches has demonstrated proof-of-concept antitumor activities mainly through phagocytic clearance. Early phase clinical trials combining the anti-CD47 mAb magrolimab with the hypomethylating agent azacitidine have showed synergistic activities, deep and durable responses, as well as a tolerable safety profile in these patients, including those with TP53 mutations. SUMMARY Targeting CD47/SIRPα axis, in combination with other therapeutic agents, represents a promising treatment approach for patients with myeloid malignancies, particularly the challenging TP53-mutated subgroup.

Хронічні мієлопроліферативні неоплазми (МПН), що трансформуються в гострий мієлоїдний лейкоз (ГМЛ)/мієлодиспластичний синдром (МДС), МПН у фазі акселерації або первинний мієлофіброз (ПМФ) високого ризику характеризуються рефрактерністью до терапії і дуже короткою тривалістю життя хворих. У патогенезі пухлинного процесу важливу роль відіграють епігенетичні зміни головних генів-супресорів пухлинного росту. Опубліковані дані щодо дослідження активності інгібітору ДНК метилтрансферази (5-азацитидину). У 54 пацієнтів із МПН (включаючи 21 пацієнта з есенціальною тромбоцитемією (ЕТ), 21 пацієнта з істинною поліцитемією (ІП), 7 пацієнтів із первинним мієлофіброзом і 5 пацієнтів із некласифікованими) розвинувся бластний криз або мієлодиспластичний синдром (n = 28). Пацієнти отримували 5-азацитидин у дозі 75 мг/м2 підшкірно щодня протягом 7 днів кожні 4 тижні. Загальна відповідь зареєстрована у 52 % пацієнтів (у 24 % — повна ремісія, у 11 % — часткова ремісія, у 8 % — кістковомозкова або ремісія з цитопенією, у 9 % — гематологічне поліпшення). Тривалість медіан відповіді становила 9 місяців. Повернення в хронічну фазу захворювання спостерігалося у 39 % пацієнтів, які відповіли на лікування. Медіана загальної виживаності становила 11 місяців. Мієлосупресія була головним небажаним ефектом, із 3–4-м ступенем нейтропенії у 10 (29 %) пацієнтів. Представлений перший власний позитивний досвід використання 5-азацитидину (Виндуза, компанія «Др. Реддіс Лабораторіз») у пацієнта С. із бластним кризом. Часткова ремісія розвинулася у пацієнта після 3 курсів 5-азацитидину і триває протягом 4 місяців спостереження.

Review objective There have been several advances in the field of myelodysplastic syndromes over the past year, yielding two new US Food and Drug Administration drug approvals. The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, therapeutic use, adverse effects, clinical use controversies, product description, and upcoming trials for myelodysplastic syndromes novel agents luspatercept-aamt and decitabine/cedazuridine are reviewed. Data sources This review article utilized primary information obtained from both the published studies involved in the approval of luspatercept-aamt and decitabine/cedazuridine and package inserts for the respective medications. This review article utilized secondary information obtained from National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines using filters and keywords to sustain information relevancy as well as key studies using the keywords, “luspatercept-aamt, myelodysplastic syndromes, decitabine, cedazuridine, hypomethylating agent, ASTX727” from scholarly journal database PubMed. Data summary Myelodysplastic syndromes consist of myeloid clonal hemopathies with a diverse range of presentation. Until recently, there have been relatively few new therapies in the myelodysplastic syndromes treatment landscape. On April 3, 2020 the US Food and Drug Administration approved Reblozyl®(luspatercept-aamt), then on July 7, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved INQOVI® (decitabine and cedazuridine). Luspatercept-aamt acts as a erythroid maturation agent through differentiation of late-stage erythroid precursors. The safety and efficacy of luspatercept-aamt was demonstrated in the MEDALIST trial, a phase III trial in patients with very low-intermediate risk refractory myelodysplastic syndromes and ring sideroblasts. Luspatercept-aamt met both primary and secondary endpoints of transfusion independence of 8 weeks or longer and transfusion independence of 12 weeks or longer, respectively. Decitabine/cedazuridine has a unique mechanism of action in which decitabine acts as a nucleoside metabolic inhibitor promoting DNA hypomethylation and cedazuridine then prevents degradation of decitabine. The safety and efficacy of decitabine/cedazuridine was shown in the ASCERTAIN study, a phase III trial in patients with intermediate or high risk myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. The primary outcome evaluated was 5-day cumulative area under the curve between decitabine/cedazuridine and IV decitabine as well as additional outcomes including safety. Decitabine/cedazuridine met primary outcome and had a similar safety profile to IV decitabine. Conclusion The novel myelodysplastic syndromes agents luspatercept-aamt and decitabine/cedazuridine provide a clinical benefit in the studied populations.

Despite improvements in first‐line treatment of T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T‐ALL), the outcome of relapsed T-ALL remains dismal with less than 7% achieving a long-term survival. Thus, there is an unmet need for new treatment strategies to improve outcomes in this setting. Suppression of apoptosis is one of the hallmarks of anticancer drug resistance. Hence, over the past few years, antiapoptotic proteins have become an attractive target for therapeutic intervention in several hematologic malignancies. Venetoclax (ABT-199) is a novel, orally bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), a key regulator of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Recent preclinical studies have suggested that inhibition of BCL-2 may be a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with T-ALL. Herein, we report a case of clinical response to venetoclax in combination with a hypomethylating agent in a patient with relapsed T-ALL after allogeneic stem cell transplant and review the existing literature.

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is upregulated in cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34)+ bone marrow cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Hypomethylating agent (HMA) treatment results in further increased expression of these immune checkpoints. We hypothesised that combining an anti-PD-1 antibody with HMAs may have efficacy in patients with MDS. To test this concept, we designed a phase II trial of the combination of azacitidine and pembrolizumab with two cohorts. In the 17 previously untreated patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 76%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 18% and median overall survival (mOS) not reached after a median follow-up of 12·8 months. For the HMA-failure cohort (n = 20), the ORR was 25% and CR rate was 5%; with a median follow-up of 6·0 months, the mOS was 5·8 months. The most observed toxicities were pneumonia (32%), arthralgias (24%) and constipation (24%). Immune-related adverse events requiring corticosteroids were required in 43%. Overall, this phase II trial suggests that azacitidine and pembrolizumab is safe with manageable toxicities in patients with higher-risk MDS. This combined therapy may have anti-tumour activity in a subset of patients and merits further studies in the front-line setting.

Azacitidine (AZA), a hypomethylating agent, is the standard treatment for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, responses are generally transient in approximately 50% of patients. Cytomorphology and immunophenotyping are widely used in the treatment of MDS. Therefore, the present study investigated the relationship between immunophenotyping and the outcomes of MDS patients administered AZA as first-line therapy. We retrospectively examined the relationship between immunophenotyping and the outcomes of 118 MDS patients administered AZA as first-line therapy. The response to AZA was poorer in patients with a CD33/CD34 ratio > 1 than in those with a CD33/CD34 ratio 1 as independent adverse prognostic factors for overall survival. A Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that a CD33/CD34 ratio > 1 was associated with poor survival. In the present study, a CD33/CD34 ratio > 1 in blast cells was associated with poor survival in MDS patients administered AZA as first-line therapy.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are usually associated with poor outcomes, especially in high‐risk AML/MDS. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) is the only curative option for patients suffering from high‐risk AML/MDS. However, many patients relapse after allo‐HSCT. Novel therapy to prevent relapse is urgently needed. Both the BCL‐2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) and the hypomethylating agent decitabine (DEC) possess significant antitumor activity effects against AML/MDS. Administration of DEC has been shown to ameliorate graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) and boost the graft‐versus‐leukemia (GVL) effect post‐transplantation. We therefore conducted a prospective study (ChiCTR1900025374) to examine the tolerability and efficacy of a maintenance therapy of low‐dose decitabine (LDEC) plus VEN to prevent relapse after allo‐HSCT for high‐risk AML/MDS patients. Twenty patients with high‐risk AML (n = 17) or high‐risk MDS (n = 3) post‐transplantation were recruited. Approximately day 100 post‐transplantation, all patients received LDEC (15 mg/m2 for 3 d) followed by VEN (200 mg) on d 1‐21. The cycle interval was 2 mo, and there was 10 cycles. The primary end points of this study were rates of overall survival (OS) and event‐free survival (EFS). The secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), incidences of acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and incidences of viral infection after allo‐HSCT. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan‐Meier analysis. The median follow‐up was 598 (149‐1072) d. Two patients relapsed, 1 died, and 1 is still alive after the second transplant. The 2‐y OS and EFS rates were 85.2% and 84.7%, respectively. The median 2‐y EFS time was 525 (149‐1072) d, and 17 patients still had EFS and were alive at the time of this writing. The most common AEs were neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenic fever, and fatigue. Grade 2 or 3 AEs were observed in 35% (7/20) and 20% (4/20) of the patients, respectively. No grade >3 AEs were observed. aGVHD (any grade) and cGVHD (limited or extensive) occurred in 55% and 20% of patients, respectively. We conclude that LDEC + VEN can be administered safely after allo‐HSCT with no evidence of an increased incidence of GVHD, and this combination decreases the relapse rate in high‐risk AML/MDS patients. This novel maintenance therapy may be a promising way to prevent relapse in high‐risk AML/MDS patients., The results of the current study suggest that maintenance treatment with LDEC combined with VEN introduced nearly 3 mo after allo‐HSCT is efficacious, with an acceptable toxicity profile and impressive long‐term disease control.

Patients with Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have few therapy options for sustainable responses in the frontline setting, and even less after hypomethylating agent (HMA) failure in relapsed and refractory setting. The only potential cure is an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant which is an unrealistic option for the majority of MDS patients. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibition, CAR-T cells, and vaccine therapy few have shown promise in a variety cancer and have now been tested in patients with MDS. Most trials have focused on AML patients and included small numbers of MDS patients. Until now, a dedicated review of immunotherapy outcomes in MDS patients has been lacking. Thus, herein we review outcomes of MDS patients after immunotherapies on a variety of clinical trials reported to date.

Venetoclax (Ven) combined with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) has now emerged as an effective treatment regimen for acute myeloid leukemia, in both de novo and relapsed/refractory setting. The current multicenter study retrospectively examined Ven + HMA treatment outcome among 32 patients (median age 69 years; 59% males) with blast‐phase myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN‐BP). Pre‐leukemic phenotype included essential thrombocythemia (ET)/post‐ET myelofibrosis (34%), polycythemia vera (PV)/post‐PV myelofibrosis (38%) and primary myelofibrosis (28%). Twenty‐nine study patients were fully annotated cytogenetically and molecularly (NGS): 69% harbored complex karyotype and/or mutations, including TP53 (41%), IDH1/2 (21%), ASXL1 (21%), N/KRAS (14%), SRSF2 (10%), EZH2 (10%) and U2AF1 (7%). All patients received Ven combined with either azacitidine (n = 12) or decitabine (n = 20); either up front (n = 23) or after failing another induction therapy (n = 9). Complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery was achieved in 14 (44%) patients and was more likely to occur in the absence of pre‐leukemic PV/post‐PV myelofibrosis phenotype (p

Background Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a very rare condition, develops both in patients with other hematological neoplasms, and as isolated tumor. MS of the gynecologic tract is extremely rare. An available literature data about diagnosis and management of MS is summarized in the article. The role of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery and bone marrow transplantation in the treatment is discussed. Polychemotherapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation were suggested to be the optimal treatment strategy of MS of the gynecological tract. The use of new targeted agents results in promising clinical data. Case presentation We are presenting a rare clinical case of a MS of the uterine cervix with concomitant bone marrow involvement and describe all the peculiarities of the clinical course, diagnosis, and treatment. The patient received chemotherapy followed by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The pre-transplant therapy allowed us to perform allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with the deepest response possible: complete PET-negative and MRD-negative remission of the disease. Conclusions MS remains a subject of discussion regarding its diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. The use of novel targeting agents can be perspective option for patient with extramedullary disease.

Accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms are advanced stages of the disease with historically a poor prognosis and little improvement in outcomes thus far. The lack of responses to standard treatments likely results from the more aggressive biology reflected by the higher incidence of complex karyotype and high-risk somatic mutations, which are enriched at the time of transformation. Treatment options include induction chemotherapy (7 + 3) as that used on de novo acute myeloid leukemia or hypomethylating agent-based therapy, which has shown similar outcomes. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only potential for cure.

CPX-351, a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin/cytarabine in a synergistic 1:5 molar ratio, is approved for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed, therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC). In a pivotal phase 3 study, patients aged 60 to 75 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk/secondary AML were randomized to receive CPX-351 or conventional 7+3 chemotherapy. In the primary endpoint analysis, CPX-351 demonstrated significantly prolonged median overall survival (OS) vs 7+3. These exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses evaluated the impact of achieving complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery (CRi) with CPX-351 (73/153 [48%]) vs conventional 7+3 (52/56 [33%]) on outcomes. CPX-351 improved median OS vs 7+3 in patients who achieved CR or CRi (25.43 vs 10.41 months; hazard ratio = 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.31, 0.77). Improved median OS was seen across AML subtypes (t-AML, AML-MRC), age subgroups (60 to 69 vs 70 to 75 years), patients with prior hypomethylating agent exposure, and patients who did not undergo transplantation. Patients who achieved CR or CRi with CPX-351 also had a higher rate of transplantation, a longer median OS landmarked from the date of transplantation (not reached vs 11.65 months; hazard ratio = 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.21, 0.89), and a safety profile that was consistent with the known safety profile of 7+3. These results suggest deeper remissions may be achieved with CPX-351, leading to improved OS. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01696084.

Background Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent the most common type of acquired bone marrow failure in adults and is characterized by ineffective maturation of myeloid precursor cells and peripheral cytopenias associated with higher rates of infection, bleeding and transfusion dependence. In higher-risk patients with MDS who relapse or do not respond after standard hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy, the 2-year survival rate is 15%. Methods Here the authors report the feasibility and safety of a novel experimental T-cell therapy called personalized adoptive cell therapy, which selects, immunizes and expands T cells against MDS-specific mutations and is targeted to patient-specific tumor cell neoantigens. Somatic mutations serve as the pathogenic drivers of cancer, including MDS, as these transformative genetic mutations may generate novel immunogenic proteins (i.e., neopeptides and possible neoantigens) that may be targeted therapeutically. Results The authors demonstrate that the adaptive immune system can be trained ex vivo to recognize neopeptides as neoantigens and that the infusion of culture-expanded, neoantigen-immunized autologous T cells has been feasible and safe in the three patients treated to date. Discussion The authors report on early results from their first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial that aims to assess the safety and tolerability of this novel form of adoptive T-cell immunotherapy for HMA-refractory patients with higher-risk MDS.

Purpose Despite the availability of new drugs, many patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) do not achieve remission and outcomes remain poor. Venetoclax is a promising new therapy approved for use in combination with a hypomethylating agent or with low‐dose cytarabine for the treatment of newly diagnosed older AML patients or those ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. 225Actinium‐lintuzumab (225Ac‐lintuzumab) is a clinical stage radioimmunotherapy targeting CD33 that has shown evidence of single‐agent activity in relapsed/refractory AML. Increased expression of MCL‐1 is a mediator of resistance to venetoclax in cancer. Experimental design Here we investigated the potential for 225Ac‐lintuzumab‐directed DNA damage to suppress MCL‐1 levels as a possible mechanism of reversing resistance to venetoclax in two preclinical in vivo models of AML. Results We demonstrated that 225Ac‐lintuzumab in combination with venetoclax induced a synergistic increase in tumor cell killing compared to treatment with either drug alone in venetoclax‐resistant AML cell lines through both an induction of double‐stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) and depletion of MCL‐1 protein levels. Further, this combination led to significant tumor growth control and prolonged survival benefit in venetoclax‐resistant in vivo AML models. Conclusions There results suggest that the combination of 225Ac‐lintuzumab with venetoclax is a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of patients with venetoclax‐resistant AML. Clinical trial of this combination therapy (NCT03867682) is currently ongoing., Long‐term survival of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unsatisfactory.We describe the results of a mechanistic and efficacy study combining venetoclax (ABT‐199), a recently approved BCL2 inhibitor, and the clinical stage CD33‐targeting antibody radiolabeled with 225Actinium (225Ac‐lintuzumab) in two venetoclax‐resistant AML models in vitro and in vivo. The study demonstrated dramatic synergy of these two drugs both in vitro and in vivo due to the decrease in BCL‐2 and MCL‐1 levels and induction of double DNA strand breaks. Since both venetoclax and 225Ac‐lintuzumab are already used in patients, we anticipate that rapid translation of this combination approach into the clinic will benefit patients with AML.

To evaluate hypomethylating agent (HMA) persistence in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and examine its association with healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A total of 2,400 adults diagnosed with MDS initiating HMAs were included from IBM MarketScan databases during 1/1/2011–3/31/2018. The index date was HMA initiation following MDS diagnosis. Patients were classified according to their persistence status by the end of a fixed ‘landmark period’ of 4 months post-index. Median persistence to HMAs was 5.6 months (95% CI: 5.2, 6.1); HMA non-persistence increased with time. Non-persistent patients had a significantly higher non-HMA-related HRU burden than persistent patients [adjusted incidence rate ratios, outpatient visits: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.14); inpatient visits: 1.48 (95% CI: 1.30, 1.69); emergency department visits 1.30 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.50); all p-values < 0.001]. All-cause and HMA-related outpatient visits were lower among non-persistent patients, likely because of fewer HMA administration-related visits. The incidence rate of AML was numerically, although not significantly, higher in non-persistent patients, when starting follow-up at the end of the landmark period. When follow-up began at the index date, non-persistent patients had a significantly higher rate of AML [adjusted hazard ratio, 1.88 (95% CI: 1.53, 2.32); p-value < 0.001]. HMA non-persistence, which increased over time, was associated with significantly higher non-HMA-related HRU, and numerically higher AML progression in MDS patients initiating HMAs. Future studies should evaluate predictors of HMA non-persistence in this patient population.

The utility of the International Working Group (IWG) 2006 response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) as a surrogate endpoint for outcomes is unclear. We assessed the validity of the IWG 2006 response criteria in a large cohort of higher‐risk MDS patients (pts) treated at centers from the MDS Clinical Research Consortium. The best overall response rate (ORR) by IWG 2006 criteria to first‐line therapy among 597 evaluable pts was 38% and include complete response (CR) 16%, marrow CR (mCR) 2%, partial response (PR) 10%, hematological improvement (HI) 10%, stable disease (SD) 33%, and progressive disease (PD) 24%. CR was associated with a better overall survival (OS) compared to all other response groups (P, In higher risk MDS patients responses associated with restoration of effective hematopoiesis namely complete remission (CR) are associated with better outcomes.Marrow CR without hematological improvement outside context of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant should not be included in response criteria assessing new therapeutic agents in MDS.

Background Newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who receive induction with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) are often neutropenic with an increased risk for invasive fungal infections (IFIs). This study analyzed the incidence and risk factors for IFIs in these patients, evaluated clinical patterns in antifungal prophylaxis, and assessed the diagnostic utility of tests in this setting. Patients and Methods We studied 117 newly diagnosed patients with AML treated with HMAs at our center, divided into groups based on concern for IFI (cIFI: all possible, probable, and proven IFIs) versus no concern for IFI. The Fisher exact test compared patients with cIFI versus without, and a multivariable logistic regression model estimated odds for cIFI. Results Sixty-seven (57%) patients had cIFI, with 48 possible IFIs, 17 probable, and 2 proven cases. There was no difference in incidence based on home zip code, but the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was highly associated with cIFI (P = .001), as was male gender (P = .01). Neutropenia at treatment initiation was borderline in significance (P = .08). In diagnostics, 9% of patients had positive serum fungal markers, and 30 patients underwent bronchoscopy, with only 27% of cases yielding positive results. There was a difference in treatment regimens between patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with mold coverage versus without mold coverage with respect to cIFI (P = .04). Conclusions cIFI in patients with AML treated with HMAs remains significant, especially in males and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, who were found to be at higher risk. This may prompt clinicians to consider anti-mold prophylaxis in this setting.

The combination of hypomethylating agents with the selective Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax (HMA-VEN) has emerged as a highly active regimen in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in both the upfront and relapsed/refractory (r/r) settings. We report our early experience with a cohort of patients who were able to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) after HMA-VEN therapy. Thirty-two patients with AML (19 r/r and 13 de novo) with a median age of 62 years underwent alloHCT after HMA-VEN therapy. Twenty-two (68.8%) were in complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery at time of HCT. With a median follow up of 14.4 months, the 1-year overall survival (OS) was 62.5%, and disease-free survival was 43.8%. The 1-year nonrelapse mortality rate was 18.8%, and the cumulative incidence of relapse was 37.5%. Among patients who underwent alloHCT in CR, the 1-year OS was 77.3%, and the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 9.1%. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease was 43.8%. We conclude that alloHCT after HMA-VEN is therapy associated with favorable allogeneic HCT outcomes in newly diagnosed older patients with AML, as well as those with r/r AML.

Spurred by better understanding of disease biology, improvements in molecular diagnostics, and the development of targeted therapies, the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has undergone significant evolution in recent years. Arguably, the most exciting shift has come from the success of treatment with the B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor venetoclax. When given in combination with a hypomethylating agent or low dose cytarabine, venetoclax demonstrates high response rates, some of which are durable. In spite of this, relapses after venetoclax treatment are common, and much interest exists in elucidating the mechanisms of resistance to the drug. Alterations in leukemic stem cell metabolism have been identified as a possible escape route, and clinical trials focusing on targeting metabolism in AML are ongoing. This review article highlights current research regarding venetoclax treatment and resistance in AML with a focus on cellular metabolism.

Abnormal DNA methylation orchestrates many of the cancer‐related gene expression irregularities such as the inactivation of tumour suppressor genes through hypermethylation as well as activation of prometastatic genes through hypomethylation. The fact that DNA methylation abnormalities can be chemically reversed positions the DNA methylation machinery as an attractive target for anti‐cancer drug development. However, although in vitro studies suggested that targeting concordantly hypo‐ and hypermethylation is of benefit in suppressing both oncogenic and prometastatic functions of breast cancer cells, this has never been tested in a therapeutic setting in vivo. In this context, we investigated the combined therapeutic effects of an approved nutraceutical agent S‐adenosylmethionine (SAM) and FDA‐approved hypomethylating agent decitabine using the MDA‐MB‐231 xenograft model of breast cancer and found a pronounced reduction in mammary tumour volume and lung metastasis compared to the animals in the control and monotherapy treatment arms. Immunohistochemical assessment of the primary breast tumours showed a significantly reduced expression of proliferation (Ki‐67) and angiogenesis (CD31) markers following combination therapy as compared to the control group. Global transcriptome and methylome analyses have revealed that the combination therapy regulates genes from several key cancer‐related pathways that are abnormally expressed in breast tumours. To our knowledge, this is the first preclinical study demonstrating the anti‐cancer therapeutic potential of using a combination of methylating (SAM) and demethylating agent (decitabine) in vivo. Results from this study provide a molecularly founded rationale for clinically testing a combination of agents targeting the epigenome to reduce the morbidity and mortality from breast cancer.

For most patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) the hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine and decitabine remain the mainstay of therapy. However, the prognosis mostly remains poor and aside from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation no curative treatment options exist. Unlike acute myeloid leukemia, which has seen a dramatic expansion of available therapies recently, no new agents have been approved for MDS in the United States since 2006. However, various novel HMAs, HMA in combination with venetoclax, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and targeted therapies for genetically defined patient subgroups such as APR-246 or IDH inhibitors, have shown promising results in early stages of clinical testing. Furthermore, the wider availability of genetic testing is going to allow for a more individualized treatment of MDS patients. Herein, we review the current treatment approach for HR-MDS and discuss recent therapeutic advances and the implications of genetic testing on management of HR-MDS.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are potentially devastating monoclonal deviations of hematopoiesis that lead to bone marrow dysplasia and variable cytopenias. Predicting severity of disease progression and likelihood to undergo acute myeloid leukemia transformation is the basis of treatment strategy. Some patients belong to a low-risk cohort best managed with conservative supportive care, whereas others are included in a high-risk cohort that requires decisive therapy with hematopoietic cell transplantation or hypomethylating agent administration. Risk scoring systems for MDS prognostication were traditionally based on karyotype characteristics and clinical factors readily available from chart review, and validation was typically conducted on de novo MDS patients. However, retrospective analysis found a large subset of patients incorrectly risk-stratified. In this review, the most commonly used scoring systems are evaluated, and pitfalls therein are identified. Emerging technologies such as personal genomics and machine learning are then explored for efficacy in MDS risk modeling. Barriers to clinical adoption of artificial intelligence-derived models are discussed, with focus on approaches meant to increase model interpretability and clinical relevance. Finally, a guiding set of recommendations is proposed for best designing an accurate and universally applicable prognostic model for MDS, which is supported by more than 20 years of observation of traditional scoring system performance, as well as modern efforts in creating hybrid genomic-clinical scoring systems.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive but potentially curable malignancy; however, cure is highly dependent on the ability to deliver intensive, anthracycline-based chemoimmunotherapy. Nearly one third of cases of DLBCL occur in patients over age 75 years, and advanced age is an important adverse feature in prognostic models. Despite this incidence in older patients, there is no clear accepted standard of care due to under-representation of this group in large randomized clinical trials. Furthermore, insufficient assessments of baseline frailty and prediction of toxicity hamper clinical decision-making. Here, we present an ongoing randomized study of R-miniCHOP chemoimmunotherapy with or without oral azacitidine (CC-486, Onureg) for patients age 75 and older with newly diagnosed DLBCL and associated aggressive lymphomas. The incorporation of an oral hypomethylating agent is based on increased tumor methylation as a biologic feature of older patients with DLBCL and a desire to minimize the injection burden for this population. This is the first randomized study in this population conducted in North America by the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) and will enroll up to 422 patients including 40 patients in a safety run-in phase. This study incorporates an objective assessment of baseline frailty (the FIL Tool) and a serial comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Key correlative tests will include circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays at pre-specified timepoints to explore if ctDNA quantity and methylation patterns correlate with response. S1918 has the potential to impact future trial design and to change the standard of care for patients 75 years and older with aggressive lymphoma given its randomized design, prospective incorporation of geriatric assessments, and exploration of ctDNA correlatives. Trial registration: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier NCT04799275

Myelodysplastic syndromes are hematological malignancies characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and a high risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs), azacitidine and decitabine, are standard of care therapy for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. However, outcomes reported for real-world studies fall short of those achieved in clinical trials. We conducted a targeted literature review exploring real-world utilization, persistence and outcomes with intravenous and subcutaneous HMA therapies to better understand barriers to achieving optimal outcomes in clinical practice. The potential benefits of oral HMA therapy were also explored. Underutilization and poor persistence with HMA therapy are associated with suboptimal outcomes, highlighting the need for approaches to improve utilization and persistence, so that patients achieve the optimum benefit from HMA therapy.Lay abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are bone marrow disorders affecting the production of blood cells. In some patients, MDS can progress to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an aggressive blood cancer with poor prognosis. Patients with higher-risk MDS are often treated with a type of chemotherapy called hypomethylating agents (HMAs). Studies conducted in real-world clinical practice have shown HMAs to be less effective than has been found in clinical trials. We reviewed available studies exploring real-world utilization, persistence and outcomes with current HMA therapies to better understand any barriers to patients achieving the best outcomes. Two important factors were found to be the underuse of HMAs and poor persistence with HMA therapy, highlighting the need for approaches to improve HMA utilization and persistence.

Methylation profiling in myeloid malignancies such as Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) has demonstrated the ability to define distinct biological and clinical subgroups, including predicting which patients will respond to therapy with a hypomethylating agent (HMA). The Philadelphia-chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) carry an inherent risk of progression to an accelerated-phase disease (AP; 10-19% blasts in the peripheral blood or bone marrow), as well as to blast phase disease (BP; ≥ 20% blasts in the peripheral blood or bone marrow), which is associated with a poor prognosis. It is unknown whether the methylation profiles of MPN-AP/BP cases may further help identify distinct biological, genomic, and clinical subgroups, including identifying patients more likely to respond to HMA. We recently carried out a phase I/II study to test the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) and the HMA Decitabine (DAC) in patients with MPN-AP/BP (MPD-RC 109 study; NCT02076191). A total of 46 patients were accrued to the phase I and II studies. 37 patients were evaluable for response. Complete response (CR) occurred in 10%, Complete Response with incomplete count recovery (CRi) in 24%, Partial Response in 24%. 42% of patients had no response to therapy. Using samples available from the MPD-RC 109 study, we sought to assess whether the baseline global methylation profile predicts for response to this regimen. Further, we sought to utilize this dataset to determine if IDH2 mutations (amongst the most common mutations in MPN-AP/BP) are associated with a distinct methylation profile, as has been demonstrated in de novo AML. We carried out a pilot study of 11 MPN-AP/BP patients from the MPD-109 phase I/II trial and performed Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing (ERRBS) for DNA methylation quantification at ~3M CpG sites across the genome. Baseline DNA methylation profiles were compared between Responder (R) and Non-responder (NR) patients. Notably, unsupervised analysis using correspondence analysis (COA) demonstrated an almost complete separation of the two groups of patients (Fig 1A), while supervised analysis using a beta binomial model identified 134 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) (FDR25%) between the two groups at diagnosis (Fig 1B). Similar to our prior observation in CMML, response-associated DMRs were depleted from promoter regions (p We next carried out a pilot study to characterize the epigenetic abnormalities of IDH2-mutant MPN-AP/BP cases. For this purpose, we compared the genome-wide DNA methylation profiles of 12 IDH2-mutant to 7 IDH1/2 wild type MPN-AP/BP cases using ERRBS. Unsupervised analysis based on the DNA methylation profiles alone showed a strong trend to naturally segregate mutant from wild-type cases, indicating strong underlying epigenetic differences (Fig.1D). A supervised analysis using the beta binomial method identified 1,477 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between the two groups (average absolute methylation difference ≥25% and FDR Our data demonstrate that the methylation profile of MPN-AP/BP may predict for response to HMA-based therapy. Such data could be used to guide therapeutic decisions and select patient for whom HMA has the highest likelihood of procuring a response. As well, these findings indicate that IDH2-mutant MPN-AP/BP are epigenetically distinct, and given the preferred targeting of regulatory elements, these epigenetic differences may play a functional role in disease biology. Further validation of these observations is required. Updated data, including analysis of further cases, and RNA-sequencing analysis of gene-expression and pathway enrichment of genes differentially methylated between responders and non-responders, and IDH2 mutated and wildtype cases will be presented at the conference. Disclosures Rampal: Constellation: Research Funding; Pharmaessentia: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Galecto: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Blueprint: Consultancy; Stemline: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mascarenhas:Celgene, Prelude, Galecto, Promedior, Geron, Constellation, and Incyte: Consultancy; Incyte, Kartos, Roche, Promedior, Merck, Merus, Arog, CTI Biopharma, Janssen, and PharmaEssentia: Other: Research funding (institution). Levine:Morphosys: Consultancy; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Imago: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; C4 Therapeutics: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Isoplexis: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Loxo: Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Qiagen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria. Hoffman:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Protagonist: Consultancy; Forbius: Consultancy; Dompe: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

INTRODUCTION: The outcome of patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory AML (R/R AML) or MDS after failing hypomethylating agents (HMA) and/or BCL-2 inhibitor combinations is poor. CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for newly diagnosed therapy related AML or AML with myelodysplastic related changes. GO is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 antibody directed against CD33 and conjugated to the DNA toxin calicheamicin, also approved by the FDA for the treatment of newly diagnosed or R/R CD33-positive AML. We have hypothesized that the combination of CPX-351 and GO could induce superior antitumor efficacy compared to either agent alone for this patient population. GOALS: To determine the safety and efficacy of CPX-351 in combination with GO in relapsed refractory pts with AML and post-HMA failure HR-MDS. METHODS: This is a single arm and single institution, pilot study (NCT03672539) enrolling patients with CD33 positive R/R AML, post-HMA failure High-Risk MDS (>10% blasts), and pts with newly diagnosed secondary AML after receiving HMA therapy. Patients received induction cycle CPX-351 (daunorubicin 44 mg/m2 and cytarabine 100 mg/m2) administered via intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 3, and 5. GO was administered at a dose of 3 mg/m2 (capped at one 4.5 mg vial) IV on day 1. Pts not attaining complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) after 1 cycle, could receive a 2nd induction cycle of CPX-351 at the same dose, but only on days 1 and 3 with GO 3 mg/m2 on day 1. Patients attaining CR/CRi could receive up to 2 consolidation cycles, after a minimum of 4 weeks from the start of the last cycle with CPX-351 (daunorubicin 29 mg/m2 and cytarabine 65 mg/m2) IV on days 1 and 3, and GO at 3 mg/m2 on day 1. GO was only administered during the second consolidation cycle if there was evidence of minimal residual disease (+MRD). GO could also be administered as a single agent for maintenance treatment on day 1 every 6 weeks, in case of persistent detection of MRD. RESULTS: Twenty pts have been enrolled between November 2018 and July 2019. At the time of data cut off 19 pts were evaluable for response, with one patient too early to assess for response. Patient characteristics are summarized on Table 1; of note 14 (70%) pts had previously been treated with venetoclax in different combinations with HMA's and/or chemotherapy. We observed an overall response rate (ORR) of 42% (n=8), including CR (n=5), CRi (n=1) and PR (n=2). Responses are summarized in Table 2. Among the eight responders there were 4 pts with MRD negative (by flow cytometry) remission. One patient who was considered in CR was taken off study on day 40 because of an underlying invasive fungal sinus infection and concerns of myelosuppression. This patient was transitioned to a lower intensity regimen and remains in remission. Four pts completed 2 inductions, 5 pts received consolidation and 2 pts received GO maintenance before progressing. Unfortunately, none could be transitioned to transplantation due to age or comorbidities. Among responders, median time to ANC >500 was 39 days (30-56) and PLT >50k was 40 days (33-46), median time to ANC >1K was 40 days (31-74) and PLT >100K was 43 days (34-53) after induction (Table 3). With a median follow up of 18.6 months, median OS is 9.1 months (Figure 1) and median duration of response was 10.5 months (figure 2). Adverse events regardless of causality (Table 4) were mainly due to infectious complications. We have not observed treatment related grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity. Thirty-day mortality was 10% (n=2); both pts died from complications of septicemia. Three additional pts (15%) died within 60 days of treatment, including 2 pts with progressive disease and 1 patient on day 58 after withdrawing care due to infections and 2 aplastic bone marrow examinations on days 14 and 46 of treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary report, the combination of CPX-351 and GO appears to be active with acceptable toxicities in this high-risk disease population. There are concerns for significant myelosuppression and infectious complications. Disclosures Kadia: Cyclacel: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pulmotec: Research Funding; Cellenkos: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Faderl:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sasaki:Pfizer Japan: Consultancy; Otsuka: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Daver:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novimmune: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Trovagene: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Trillium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. DiNardo:Syros: Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MedImmune: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Notable Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; ImmuneOnc: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jabbour:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; BMS: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding. Pemmaraju:Stemline Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pacylex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Plexxikon: Research Funding; MustangBio: Honoraria; Roche Diagnostics: Honoraria; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; DAVA Oncology: Honoraria; Cellectis: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Other: Grant Support, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria; SagerStrong Foundation: Other: Grant Support; Celgene: Honoraria; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria. Konopleva:AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kisoji: Consultancy; Calithera: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceutical Inc.;: Patents & Royalties: patents and royalties with patent US 7,795,305 B2 on CDDO-compounds and combination therapies, licensed to Reata Pharmaceutical; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann La-Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ablynx: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Acceleron Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Helsinn Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Andreeff:Daiichi-Sankyo; Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Celgene; Amgen; AstraZeneca; 6 Dimensions Capital: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Centre for Drug Research & Development; Cancer UK; NCI-CTEP; German Research Council; Leukemia Lymphoma Foundation (LLS); NCI-RDCRN (Rare Disease Clin Network); CLL Founcdation; BioLineRx; SentiBio; Aptose Biosciences, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo; Breast Cancer Research Foundation; CPRIT; NIH/NCI; Amgen; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ravandi:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Orsenix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Alvarado:MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Research Funding; FibroGen: Research Funding; BerGenBio ASA: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

The prognosis for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients who fail to respond or become resistant to hypomethylating agents (HMA) is dismal, and there is a compelling unmet medical need for novel ...

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) comprise a heterogeneous group of aggressive lymphoproliferative disorders almost all of which are associated with poor clinical outcomes. Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and some peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) have similarities to normal CD4+ T-cell subsets in their gene expression profiles. A cell of origin model is, therefore, emerging and is likely to be refined in the future. Follicular helper (Tfh) T cells are now established as the cell of origin of AITL and about 20% of PTCL-NOS. Sequencing studies have identified recurrent genetic alterations in epigenetic modifiers, T-cell receptor signalling pathway intermediates or RHOA, most commonly a specific mutation leading to RHOA G17V. While PTCL-NOS remains a diagnosis of exclusion, advances in genomics have identified subgroups expressing transcription factors TBX 21 (Th1-like origin) and GATA3 (Th2-like origin). These findings suggest new biomarkers and new therapeutic avenues including the hypomethylating agent azacytidine, or inhibitors of proximal T-cell receptor (TCR) signalling and potentially certain monoclonal antibodies. The advances over the past few years, therefore, prompt stratified medicine approaches to test biologically based treatments and determine the clinical utility of the new disease classifications.

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) showed overall survival (OS) benefits in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) in clinical trials. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data of patients ≥66 years diagnosed with refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB), a proxy for HR-MDS, in 01/2001–04/2004 (pre-period) or 01/2006–12/2011 (post-period). Association between post-period diagnosis and OS was examined using propensity scores (PS)-matched samples. Among 1,876 RAEB patients, median OS was 9 months and 30.8% received HMAs (3.6% in pre-period; 43.0% in post-period) with no association between post-period diagnosis and OS. In the top PS quartile, post-period diagnosis was associated with a 74% lower risk of death (Hazard ratio [HR]=0.26, 95%-CI: 0.10–0.69, P=0.007), while outcomes were worse in the lowest PS quartile (HR=2.80, 95%-CI: 1.06–7.36, P=0.037). HMA lead to a 3-month OS benefit for patients most likely to receive HMA but not for unselected RAEB cohort.

The combination of venetoclax with hypomethylating agents (VEN-HMAs) showed promising activity in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment with VEN-HMAs results in prolonged cytopenia, thereby exposing patients to invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Here, we retrospectively studied a cohort of 119 AML patients treated with VEN-HMAs and analyzed the occurrence of IFIs, as well as our practice of antifungal prophylaxis, with the aim to identify the nature and risk factors for IFIs and their association with the type of antifungal prophylaxis used. The intended antifungal prophylaxis was micafungin in 38% of patients, azoles in 41% of patients, and none in 21% of patients. Older age was associated with no antifungal prophylaxis or micafungin use and lesser use of azoles (P = .043). We recorded 15 (12.6%) patients who developed probable or proven IFIs, with a median onset of 72 days (range, 35-281) after starting therapy. IFIs were more common among nonresponders compared with responders to VEN-HMA therapy (22% vs 6%, P = .0132) and in r/r compared with newly diagnosed AML (19% vs 5%, P = .0498); however, the antifungal prophylaxis used, patient age, hypomethylating agent schedule, history of prior allogeneic transplant, and initial neutropenia duration did not influence the development of IFIs during therapy. We conclude that the overall risk of IFIs during VEN-HMA therapy is low. The risk of IFIs is higher in nonresponders and in those who were treated in the r/r setting; these patients need reevaluation of their antifungal prophylaxis to minimize the risk of IFIs during therapy.

Population level survival of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA) is inferior to clinical trials. Using SEER-Medicare data, we identified 2,086 MDS patients diagnosed in 2004–13, aged ≥66 years at diagnosis, and receiving ≥1 HMA cycle. We used multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models to assess the impact of provider experience on persistent HMA therapy and overall survival (OS), respectively. Median number of HMA cycles was 4 and median OS was 10 months. 32% of patients were treated by providers with ≥1 prior HMA initiation in the last 2 years and were more likely to receive ≥4 cycles of HMA therapy (OR=1.29, 95%-CI: 1.06–1.57; P=.01). No significant association was found between MDS or HMA initiation volume and survival. In conclusion, while HMA initiation volume was associated with persistent HMA treatment, neither MDS nor HMA initiation volumes were associated with OS in older MDS patients.

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are standard of care for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, less than half of patients achieve objective responses and most eventually lose their response. Pracinostat is a pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor with demonstrated activity in advanced myeloid malignancies. This phase II study explored the benefit of adding pracinostat to HMAs in MDS patients who did not respond to single-agent HMA treatment. The goal was to estimate the clinical improvement rate [complete remission (CR), marrow CR, partial response (PR) and haematological improvement]. Group 1 included patients with primary/secondary HMA failures; Group 2 included those who did not achieve response but had stable disease (SD) after single-agent HMAs. Forty-five patients (39 Group 1, 6 Group 2) received a median of 3 cycles. Among all patients, 1 (2%) had CR, 7 (16%) had marrow CR and 18 (40%) had SD; disease progression occurred in 3 (7%). Median overall survival was 5·7/5·6 months for Group 1/2. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 38 patients (84%) leading to treatment discontinuation in 12 (33%). Adding pracinostat to HMAs did not improve outcomes in patients previously treated with HMAs. Frequent dose modifications/early discontinuation resulted in suboptimal drug exposure. A reduced pracinostat dose may improve tolerability and efficacy.

The objective of this research was to characterize the venetoclax exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships and determine its optimal dose in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving venetoclax in combination with low intensity therapies (hypomethylating agent [HMA; azacitidine or decitabine] or low-dose cytarabine [LDAC]). A total of 212 patients from the HMA study and 92 patients from the LDAC study were included in the exposure-safety analyses. Those who received at least one dose of venetoclax and had at least one measurable response (201 and 83 in the HMA and LDAC studies, respectively) were included in the exposure-efficacy analyses. The probability of response based on International Working Group (IWG) for AML response criteria, adverse events of grade 3 or worse neutropenia or infection or a serious adverse event was modeled using logistic regression analyses to characterize the venetoclax exposure-response relationships. In combination with an HMA, increasing concentrations of venetoclax, up to those associated with a less than or equal to 400-mg once daily (QD) dose, were associated with a higher probability of response, with a trend for flat or decreasing probabilities of response thereafter. In combination with LDAC, increasing concentrations of venetoclax were associated with higher probabilities of response, with no plateau observed. Increasing concentrations of venetoclax were not associated with increasing probability of any safety event except for a slight increase in grade 3 or worse infections with HMAs; however, tolerability issues were observed at doses of greater than or equal to 800 mg QD in each study. Exposure-response analyses support the use of venetoclax 400 mg QD in combination with an HMA and 600 mg QD in combination with LDAC (ie, the next highest dose evaluated below 800 mg in each combination) to safely maximize the probability of response in elderly patients with newly diagnosed AML.

Many cancer therapies operate by inducing double-strand breaks (DSBs) in cancer cells, however treatment-resistant cells rapidly initiate mechanisms to repair damage enabling survival. While the DNA repair mechanisms responsible for cancer cell survival following DNA damaging treatments are becoming better understood, less is known about the role of the epigenome in this process. Using prostate cancer cell lines with differing sensitivities to radiation treatment, we analysed the DNA methylation profiles prior to and following a single dose of radiotherapy (RT) using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip platform. DSB formation and repair, in the absence and presence of the DNA hypomethylating agent, 5-azacytidine (5-AzaC), were also investigated using γH2A.X immunofluorescence staining. Here we demonstrate that DNA methylation is generally stable following a single dose of RT; however, a small number of CpG sites are stably altered up to 14 d following exposure. While the radioresistant and radiosensitive cells displayed distinct basal DNA methylation profiles, their susceptibility to DNA damage appeared similar demonstrating that basal DNA methylation has a limited influence on DSB induction at the regions examined. Recovery from DSB induction was also similar between these cells. Treatment with 5-AzaC did not sensitize resistant cells to DNA damage, but rather delayed recruitment of phosphorylated BRCA1 (S1423) and repair of DSBs. These results highlight that stable epigenetic changes are possible following a single dose of RT and may have significant clinical implications for cancer treatment involving recurrent or fractionated dosing regimens.

The outcome of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients treated with 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) in the real-life setting remains largely unknown. We evaluated 110 MDS patients (IPSS intermediate 2/high) treated outside of clinical trials at a single institution between September 2003 and January 2017. Median duration of therapy was 9.5 cycles. The overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort was 66.1% at 1 year and 38.3% at 2 years. No differences in terms of OS were observed with regard to gender (p = 0.622) and age at baseline ( 65 years, 65-75, and 75 years, p = 0.075). According to the IPSS-R, the very high-risk group had an inferior 2-year OS (17%) compared with intermediate-group patients (64%, p 0.001). Transfusion independency at baseline was identified as a favorable prognostic factor on 1-year (66.8%) and 2-year OS (43.4%) (p 0.001). After four cycles, the persistence of bone marrow blasts 10% identified patients with a worse outcome, with a 2-year OS of 9.4% (p = 0.002). The occurrence of an infection during the first four cycles impacted on the 2-year OS (31.6% vs 58.3% in patients without infections, p = 0.032). Patients receiving at least 24 cycles of the drug have a 5-year OS of 38.2%. This analysis allowed to identify features at baseline or during treatment with 5-AZA associated with a different 2-year OS.

Summary Background Guadecitabine is a next-generation hypomethylating agent whose active metabolite decitabine has a longer in-vivo exposure time than intravenous decitabine. More effective hypomethylating agents are needed for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. In the present study, we aimed to compare the activity and safety of two doses of guadecitabine in hypomethylating agent treatment-naive or relapsed or refractory patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Methods This phase 2 part of the phase 1/2, randomised, open-label study enrolled patients aged 18 years or older from 14 North American medical centres with International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-1-risk, intermediate-2-risk, or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia. They were either hypomethylating agent treatment-naive or had relapsed or refractory disease after previous hypomethylating agent treatment as determined by the investigators' judgment. Eligible patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer algorithm for dynamic randomisation to subcutaneous guadecitabine 60 or 90 mg/m2 on days 1–5 of a 28-day treatment cycle. Treatment was stratified by previous treatment with hypomethylating agents and neither patients nor investigators were masked. The primary endpoint was overall response (a composite of complete response, partial response, marrow complete response, and haematological improvement) assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01261312. Findings Between July 9, 2012, and April 7, 2014, 105 patients were enrolled: 55 (52%) were allocated to guadecitabine 60 mg/m2 (28 patients were treatment-naive and 27 had relapsed or refractory disease after previous hypomethylating agent treatment) and 50 (48%) patients to 90 mg/m2 (23 patients were treatment-naive and 27 had relapsed or refractory disease). Three (3%) patients of 105 did not receive study treatment and were excluded from analyses. Median follow-up was 3·2 years (IQR 2·8–3·5). The proportion of patients achieving an overall response did not significantly differ between dose groups (21 of 53 [40%, 95% CI 27–54] with 60 mg/m2 and 27 of 49 [55%, 95% CI 40–69] with 90 mg/m2; p=0·16). 25 of 49 (51%, 95% CI 36–66) patients who were treatment-naive and 23 of 53 (43%, 30–58) patients with relapsed or refractory disease achieved an overall response. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in both groups, regardless of relationship to treatment, were thrombocytopenia (22 [41%] of 53 patients in the 60 mg/m2 group and 28 [57%] of 49 in the 90 mg/m2 group), neutropaenia (21 [40%] and 25 [51%]), anaemia (25 [47%] and 24 [49%]), febrile neutropaenia (17 [32%] and 21 [43%]), and pneumonia (13 [25%] and 15 [31%]). Seven (7%) of 102 patients died due to adverse events (three with 90 mg/m2 and four with 60 mg/m2), and all except one were in the relapsed or refractory cohort. Two deaths were deemed treatment related (septic shock with 60 mg/m2; pneumonia with 90 mg/m2). Interpretation Guadecitabine was clinically active with acceptable tolerability in patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Responses and overall survival in the relapsed or refractory cohort offer the potential of a new therapeutic option for patients for whom currently available hypomethylating agents are not successful. We therefore recommend guadecitabine at a dose of 60 mg/m2 on a 5-day schedule for these patients. Funding Astex Pharmaceuticals and Stand Up To Cancer.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an integral therapy for patients with hematological malignancies, myelodysplasia, and bone marrow failure. Its use has been increasing over the past decade, as understanding of the treatment and its related toxicities has led to changes in patient selection, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant care. Older (age ≥65 years) patients are often considered unfit for transplantation; however, more recent data suggest that older patients, when selected appropriately, tolerate transplantation well. We report our institutional experience with HSCT in patients aged ≥70 years. A cohort of 22 patients underwent HSCT. Median overall survival was 5.16 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5–8.7 years], and median post-transplant survival was 2.2 years (myelodysplastic syndrome: median 1.3 years, 95% CI: 4.7 months–2.2 years; acute myeloid leukemia: median not reached). Thirty-day mortality following HSCT was 9.5% (n = 2). These data provide further support for the use of HSCT in selected older patients, and highlight the impact of HSCT on overall survival among a patient cohort primarily of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia. Keywords: Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant, Bone Marrow Transplant, FLT-3, Hypomethylating agent, Induction Chemotherapy, Leukemia, Myelodysplastic syndrome, Targeted therapy

Hypomethylating agent (HMA) failure myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients have poor outcomes and urgent need for novel therapies. Hedgehog pathway signaling upregulation plays a central role in myeloid neoplasm pathogenesis and leukemia stem cell survival. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the smoothened inhibitor glasdegib in HMA-failure MDS (n = 35, median age 73 years). According to the International Prognostic Scoring System and the MD Anderson Global Risk Model, 54% and 77% had higher risk disease, respectively. Overall response was 6% (n = 2), and best response was marrow complete remission with hematologic improvement in both patients. Median OS and median follow-up were 10.4 and 42.8 months, respectively. Drug response/stable disease (SD) resulted in better OS than treatment failure (20.6 [95% CI, 10.4-] vs 3.9 months [95% CI, 0.7–9.1]; P < .0001). Response/SD was confirmed to be an independent covariate for improved OS (P < .0001). Grade 3 or higher infections occurred in 11% of patients (n = 4); non-hematologic toxicities were rare. Early mortality (< 30 days) occurred in 11% of patients (n = 4). Glasdegib was well tolerated among HMA-failure MDS patients, although single-agent activity was limited. SD or better resulted in notably superior OS. These results support further investigation of glasdegib, potentially in novel drug combinations, in MDS patients.

High expression of ecotropic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) has been associated with a poor prognosis in leukemia patients, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Aberrant expression of microRNAs plays critical roles in leukemia development. MiR-9 is a putative potential target of EVI1. We have investigated the regulating mechanism of miR-9 by EVI1 in leukemia cells. We first examined the relationship between miR-9 and EVI1 expression levels in nine leukemia cell lines by RT-PCR. Then we forced high expression of EVI1 in UoCM1 and K562 cells to confirm the downregulation of miR-9 by EVI1. Methylation of the miR-9 promoter region was detected by DNA bisulfite sequencing. We treated the EVI1-overexpressing cells with the hypomethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-AZA) to reverse EVI1-induced hypermethylation of miR-9. EVI1 and miR-9 expression was negative related. Forced expression of EVI1 downregulated miR-9 by inducing hypermethylation of the miR-9 promoter. 5-AZA reversed high EVI1-induced hypermethylation of the miR-9 promoter and restored the expression of miR-9. 5-AZA induced extensive apoptosis and inhibited proliferation through cell cycle arrest in EVI1-overexpressing leukemia cells. Our results suggest that EVI1 may be involved in leukemia cell proliferation and apoptosis via the regulation of miR-9 promoter methylation. 5-AZA may represent a promising therapeutic option for EVI1-high leukemia patients.

We evaluated the outcome of αβ T cell-depleted haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in a cohort of children with chemorefractory acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Twenty-two patients with either primary refractory (n = 10) or relapsed refractory (n = 12) AML in active disease status received a transplant from haploidentical donors. The preparative regimen included cytoreduction with fludarabine and cytarabine and subsequent myeloablative conditioning with treosulfan and thiotepa. Antithymocyte globulin was substituted with tocilizumab in all patients and also with abatacept in 10 patients. Grafts were peripheral blood stem cells engineered by αβ T cell and CD19 depletion. Post-transplantation prophylactic therapy included infusion of donor lymphocytes, composed of a CD45RA-depleted fraction with or without a hypomethylating agent. Complete remission was achieved in 21 patients (95%). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 18%, and the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 23%. At 2 years, transplantation-related mortality was 9%, relapse rate was 42%, event-free survival was 49%, and overall survival was 53%. Our data suggest that αβ T cell-depleted haploidentical HSCT provides a reasonable chance of long-term survival in a cohort of children with chemorefractory AML and creates a solid basis for further improvement.

Introduction There is limited understanding concerning the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Due to an overlap of symptoms, it can be difficult to separate disease versus treatment-related effects. Study objectives were to understand the impact of factors that might influence patients’ HRQoL, assess the degree of concordance in symptom reporting by patients and physicians, and assess the impact of any discordance on HRQoL in AML patients. Methods Physicians in the USA captured demographics, current AML treatment and symptoms for 82 AML patients who completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu), 5-Dimension EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ). Effect size (ES) and clinically meaningful differences between AML subgroups were assessed, as was the impact of disagreement between patients and physicians regarding symptom recognition. Results Clinically meaningful lower overall FACT-Leu scores were observed for: relapsed/refractory versus non-relapsed/refractory AML patients (92.5 vs. 103.7; P = 0.09; ES = 0.439), hypomethylating agent (HMA) monotherapy versus other therapies in patients with low treatment intensity (89.9 vs. 112.9; P = 0.0021; ES = 0.971) and presence/absence of FLT3-ITD mutation (85.5 vs. 100; P = 0.148; ES = 0.816). Differences in health state were also clinically meaningful between patients with/without FLT3-ITD; EQ-5D-Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (47.6 vs. 63.7; P = 0.0428; ES = 0.816). Patients were more likely than physicians to report bruising (κ = 0.1292), fatigue (κ = 0.0836), bleeding (κ = 0.0177), weight loss (κ = 0.0821) and appetite loss (κ = − 0.0246). FACT-Leu was associated with patient-physician discordance on bleeding (difference − 14.12; P = 0.046), weight loss (− 21.22; P = 0.001) and appetite loss (− 12.58; P = 0.027). Conclusions HRQoL is generally low for AML patients, especially for particular subgroups. Discordance in symptom reporting between patients and physicians was common and associated with further negative impacts on HRQoL. There may be many reasons for this but better communication between physicians and patients may lead to shared objectives and improvement in patients’ HRQoL. Funding Astellas Pharma, Inc. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40487-019-0094-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Purpose To test the hypothesis that combination treatment with lenalidomide and prednisone will yield a higher erythroid response rate in patients with non-del(5q) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes compared to the historical clinical trial data with lenalidomide monotherapy, which reported a 26% transfusion independence rate. Patients and Methods The study enrolled 25 patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes by the International Prognostic Scoring System who were transfusion dependent or who had symptomatic anemia and prior erythroid stimulating agent failure or low chance of response. The planned dose of lenalidomide was 10 mg per day. Prednisone dose was 30 mg by mouth, daily cycle 1 tapered by 10 mg after each cycle to 5 mg by mouth every other day for those with response beyond cycle 6. The primary objective was best response (hematologic improvement–erythroid, HI-E) by International Working Group 2006 criteria within 24 weeks. Results The HI-E rate was 20% (5/25) and was 22% (5/23) for patients with evaluable data. All those with response became red blood cell–transfusion independent (5/23). The median time to response was 57 days. The median duration of response was 80 days (95% confidence interval, 69–91). Three of 5 of those with response did not have prior hypomethylating agent, while 14 of 20 those without response received a hypomethylating agent. Conclusion The combination was relatively well tolerated, with no additional observed toxicity to single-agent lenalidomide.

Preclinical models have shown that blocking PD-1/PD-L1 pathways enhances antileukemic responses. Azacitidine upregulates PD-1 and IFNγ signaling. We therefore conducted this single-arm trial, in which patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were treated with azacitidine 75 mg/m2 days 1 to 7 intravenously or subcutaneously with nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 14, every 4 to 6 weeks. For the seventy patients who were treated, the median age was 70 years (range, 22–90) and the median number of prior therapies received was 2 (range, 1–7). The overall response rate (ORR) was 33%, including 15 (22%) complete remission/complete remission with insufficient recovery of counts, 1 partial response, and 7 patients with hematologic improvement maintained >6 months. Six patients (9%) had stable disease >6 months. The ORR was 58% and 22%, in hypomethylating agent (HMA)–naïve (n = 25) and HMA-pretreated (n = 45) patients, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 8 (11%) patients. Pretherapy bone marrow and peripheral blood CD3 and CD8 were significantly predictive for response on flow cytometry. CTLA4 was significantly upregulated on CD4+ Teff in nonresponders after 2 and 4 doses of nivolumab. Azacitidine and nivolumab therapy produced an encouraging response rate and overall survival in patients with R/R AML, particularly in HMA-naïve and salvage 1 patients. Pretherapy bone marrow aspirate and peripheral blood CD3 percentage may be biomarkers for patient selection. Significance: Azacitidine in combination with nivolumab appeared to be a safe and effective therapy in patients with AML who were salvage 1, prior hypomethylator-naïve, or had increased pretherapy CD3+ bone marrow infiltrate by flow cytometry or IHC. Bone marrow CD3 and CD8 are relatively simple assays that should be incorporated to select patients in future trials. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 305