Search

In the wide phenotypic spectrum of cardiomyopathies, sudden cardiac death (SCD) has always been the most visible and devastating disease complication. The introduction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for SCD prevention by the late 1980s has moved the question from how to whom we should protect from SCD, leaving clinicians with a measure of uncertainty regarding the most reliable option to guide identification of the highest-risk patients. In this review, we will go through all the available evidence in the field of arrhythmic expression and arrhythmic risk stratification in the different phenotypes of cardiomyopathies to provide practical suggestions in daily clinical management.

Aims Although increasingly recognized as a distinct pathological entity, left bundle branch block‐induced cardiomyopathy (LBBB‐ICMP) is not included among the possible aetiologies of acquired dilated cardiomyopathies (DCM). While diagnostic criteria have been proposed, its recognition remains principally retrospective, in the presence of clinical and instrumental red flags. We aimed to assess the prevalence and clinical and instrumental features of LBBB‐ICMP in a large cohort of patients with DCM. Methods and results We analysed a cohort of 242 DCM patients from a two‐centre registry. Inclusion criteria were age > 18, non‐ischaemic or non‐valvular DCM, and LBBB on electrocardiogram. LBBB‐ICMP was defined according to previously proposed diagnostic criteria: (i) neither family history nor clinically identifiable potential causes for DCM; (ii) negative genetic testing; (iii) echocardiographic features including non‐severe chamber dilation, normal absolute and relative wall thickness, marked dyssynchrony, and normal right ventricular function; and (iv) absence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). From the entire cohort, we identified 30 subjects (similar in terms of New York Heart Association class I or II in 80% vs. 75%, P = 0.56; QRS width of 150 ± 22 vs. 151 ± 24 ms, P = 0.82; and cardiac remodelling of baseline end‐diastolic diameter 66 ± 8 vs. 65 ± 10 mm, P = 0.53) with a comprehensive dataset including CMR and genetic testing, required to verify the presence of the diagnostic criteria proposed for LBBB‐ICMP. The main characteristics of this subgroup were 73% males, age 45 ± 13 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 30 ± 10%, LGE in 38% of patients, and QRS complex of 150 ± 22 ms. Patients were under guideline‐directed medical therapy, and 57% of them were treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Two patients (6.67%, 50% males, age 53 ± 13 years) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria proposed for LBBB‐ICMP. After a follow‐up of 44 (12–76) months, LVEF was normal and QRS width significantly reduced (from 154 ± 25 to 116 ± 52 ms) in patients with LBBB‐ICMP. Both patients were under optimal medical treatment, and one was implanted with CRT‐D. Neither of the two patients experienced death, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, or heart failure hospitalization at follow‐up. Conclusions Left bundle branch block‐induced cardiomyopathy emerges as a distinct pathological entity, promptly identifiable in a minority but not negligible proportion of patients with newly diagnosed DCM and LBBB, using a series of diagnostic criteria including CMR and genetic testing. Further studies are needed to better elucidate the clinical course of LBBB‐ICMP.

Aims: To analyze temporal trends (2001 -2017) of Pacemakers (PM) and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICD) procedures in Italy, according to the national Hospital Discharge Database (HDD). Methods: Frequency and implant rate (IR) in the Italian population were analyzed by age groups (

The aim of this document is the management and organization of patients in need of urgent access to electrophysiology (EP) and pacing procedures during the COVID-19 emergency. Specifically, non-deferrable procedures or irreplaceable with a drug therapy prior to the resolution of the COVID-19 virus emergency [pacemaker (PM) implant/replacement/urgent defibrillator (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, ICD) or arrhythmic storm or other indication of non-deferrable ablation]. The pacing and electrophysiological procedures urgent as they may be, less and less frequently represent situations of emergency, therefore for almost all cases, it is possible to perform a swab test to determine the positivity to COVID-19 of the patient. In cases where this is not possible, due to situations of emergency, the recommendations and procedures we have indicated are advisable, if not mandatory, in order to avoid the spreading of the virus to healthcare personnel and other patients.

Objective The objective was to provide an exhaustive characterization of ECG features in a large cohort of dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs) and then investigate their possible prognostic role in the long term. Background ECG is an accessible, reproducible, low-cost diagnostic and prognostic tool. However, an extensive description of ECG features and their long-term prognostic role in a large cohort of DCM is lacking. Methods All available baseline ECGs of DCM patients enrolled from 1992 to 2013 were systematically analysed. Patients underwent to a complete clinical-laboratory evaluation. The study outcome measures were death or heart transplant (D/HT) and sudden death or malignant ventricular arrhythmias (SD/MVA). Results Four hundred and fourteen DCM patients were enrolled. During a median follow-up of 125 months, 55 and 57 patients experienced D/HT and SD/MVA, respectively. At multivariate analysis, left ventricular hypertrophy (P = 0.017), heart rate (HR, P = 0.005) and anterolateral T-wave inversion (P = 0.041) predicted D/HT. Regarding SD/MVA, S wave amplitude in V2 (P = 0.008), R wave amplitude in DIII (P = 0.007), anterolateral T-wave inversion (P = 0.017) emerged as predictors. At receiver-operating curve analyses, the addition of ECG models to the clinical-laboratory evaluation significantly increased the area under the curve both for D/HT (from 0.68 to 0.74, P = 0.042) and SD/MVA (from 0.70 to 0.77, P = 0.048). Conclusion The exhaustive systematic evaluation of ECG has an incremental impact in the prognostication of a large cohort of DCM patients, also regarding the arrhythmic stratification.

AIMS: Arrhythmic risk stratification is a challenging issue in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), particularly when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is more than 35%. We studied the prevalence and predictors of sudden cardiac death or malignant ventricular arrhythmias (SCD/MVAs) in DCM patients categorized at low arrhythmic risk because of intermediate left ventricular dysfunction under optimal medical treatment (OMT). METHODS: DCM patients considered at low arrhythmic risk (LVEF >35% and New York Heart Association class I-III after 6 ± 3 months of OMT) were analysed. An arrhythmogenic profile was defined as the presence of at least one among a history of syncope, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, at least 1000 premature ventricular contractions/24 h, at least 50 ventricular couplets/24 h at Holter ECG monitoring. SCD/MVAs was considered as the study end-point. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 152 months (interquartile range 100-234), 30 out of 360 (8.3%) patients at low arrhythmic risk (LVEF 47 ± 7%) experienced the study end-point [14 (3.9%) SCD and 16 (4.4%) MVA]. Compared with survivors, patients who experienced SCD/MVAs had more frequently an arrhythmogenic profile and a larger left atrium. Their LVEF at the last available evaluation before the arrhythmic event was 36 ± 12%. At multivariable analysis, left atrial end-systolic area [hazard ratio 1.107; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.039-1.179, P = 0.002 for 1 mm increase] and arrhythmogenic profile (hazard ratio 3.667; 95% CI 1.762-7.632, P = 0.001) emerged as predictors of SCD/MVAs during follow-up. CONCLUSION: A consistent quota of DCM patients with intermediate left ventricular dysfunction receiving OMT experienced SCD/MVA during follow-up. Left atrial dilatation and arrhythmogenic pattern were associated with a higher risk of SCD/MVA.

Background Sleep apnea, as measured by polysomnography, is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure. The DASAP-HF (Diagnosis and Treatment of Sleep Apnea in Patient With Heart Failure) study previously demonstrated that the respiratory disturbance index (RDI) computed by the ApneaScan algorithm (Boston Scientific) accurately identifies severe sleep apnea in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients. Objective The purpose of the long-term study phase was to assess the incidence of clinical events after 24 months and investigate the association with RDI values. Methods Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% implanted with an ICD were enrolled and followed-up for 24 months. The RDI calculated at 1 month after implantation was used to stratify patients (below or above 30 episodes/h). The endpoints were all-cause death and a combination of all-cause death or cardiovascular hospitalization. Results Of the 265 enrolled patients, 224 had usable RDI values. Severe sleep apnea (RDI ≥30 episodes/h) was diagnosed in 115 patients (51%). These patients were more frequently male (84% vs 72%; P = .030) and had higher creatinine levels. During median follow-up of 25 months, 19 patients (8%) died. Cardiovascular hospitalizations were reported in 19 patients (8%). The risk of all-cause death was higher in patients with RDI ≥30 episodes/h (hazard ratio [HR] 3.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35–8.21; P = .023), as well as the risk of all-cause death or cardiovascular hospitalization (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.01–3.76; P = .048). At multivariate analysis, independent predictors of death were RDI ≥30 episodes/h (HR 4.02; 95% CI 1.16–13.97; P = .029) and creatinine levels (HR 2.36; 95% CI 1.26–4.42; P = .008). Conclusion In heart failure patients implanted with an ICD, higher RDI values are associated with death and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Device-detected severe sleep apnea independently predicts death.

Aims We developed and validated an algorithm for prediction of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations using remote monitoring (RM) data transmitted by implanted defibrillators. Methods and results The SELENE HF study enrolled 918 patients (median age 69 years, 81% men, median ejection fraction 30%) with cardiac resynchronization therapy (44%), dual-chamber (38%), or single-chamber defibrillators with atrial diagnostics (18%). To develop a predictive algorithm, temporal trends of diurnal and nocturnal heart rates, ventricular extrasystoles, atrial tachyarrhythmia burden, heart rate variability, physical activity, and thoracic impedance obtained by daily automatic RM were combined with a baseline risk-stratifier (Seattle HF Model) into one index. The primary endpoint was the first post-implant adjudicated HF hospitalization. After a median follow-up of 22.5 months since enrolment, patients were randomly allocated to the algorithm derivation group (n = 457; 31 endpoints) or algorithm validation group (n = 461; 29 endpoints). In the derivation group, the index showed a C-statistics of 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83–0.95] with 2.73 odds ratio (CI 1.98–3.78) for first HF hospitalization per unitary increase of index value (P Conclusion With the developed algorithm, two-thirds of first post-implant HF hospitalizations could be predicted timely with only 0.7 false alerts per patient-year.

A 64-year-old man underwent catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) assistance. As the probe was advanced toward the right atrium, sudden abdominal pain was felt by the patient with hypotension and tachycardia requiring fluids and vasopressors for hemodynamic stabilization. The inferior vena cava (IVC) was injured by the passing probe and open repair was then performed. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of symptomatic IVC laceration by the probe used for ICE during CA.

Background: Little is known about the role of different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We investigated the epidemiological and prognostic impact of different types of AF in DCM during long-term follow-up. Method: We evaluated consecutive DCM patients enrolled in the Trieste Muscle Heart Disease Registry. Uni- and multivariable, extended Kaplan-Meier and propensity score-matching analyses were performed for a composite outcome including death/heart transplantation/ventricular-assist device implantation. Results: Out of 1181 DCM patients (71% males, age 49 ± 15 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 33 ± 11%), 46 (3.9%) had baseline permanent AF (permAF), while 66 (5.6%) had a history of paroxysmal/persistent AF. Compared with sinus rhythm (SR) patients, permAF patients were older (48 ± 15 vs. 61 ± 11 respectively, p = 0.001), were more frequently in NYHA class III-IV (18% vs. 30%, p = 0.002) and had larger left atrium diameter (40 ± 8 vs. 50 ± 10 mm, respectively). Paroxysmal/persistent AF patients had intermediate characteristics between permAF and SR. During a median follow-up of 135 (75–210) months, 63 patients developed permAF (0.45 new cases/100patients/year). At multivariable analysis, permAF as a time-dependent variable was an independent outcome predictor (HR 2.45; 95% C.I. 2.61–3.63, p < 0.001), together with creatinine, NYHA class, restrictive filling pattern and moderate-severe mitral regurgitation, while paroxysmal/persistent AF was neutral. Propensity score-matching analysis confirmed the higher rate of primary outcome events in patients with baseline or incident permAF versus patients without permAF during a very long-term follow-up (70% vs. 20%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: PermAF in a large DCM cohort had low prevalence and incidence but had a relevant. prognostic role on hard outcomes.

Aim: Contemporary survival trends in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) are largely unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate clinical descriptors, survival trends and the prognostic impact of aetiological characterization in DCM patients. Methods and results: Dilated cardiomyopathy patients were consecutively enrolled and divided into four groups according to the period of enrolment (1978-1984; 1985-1994; 1995-2004; and 2005-2015). A subset of patients with DCM of specific aetiology, enrolled from 2005 to 2015, was also analysed. Over a mean follow-up of 12 ± 8 years, 1284 DCM patients (52 in the 1978-1984 group, 326 in the 1985-1994 group, 379 in the 1995-2004 group, and 527 in the 2005-2015 group) were evaluated. Despite older age (mean age 51 ± 15, 43 ± 15, 45 ± 14, and 52 ± 15 years for the 1978-1984, 1985-1994, 1995-2004, and 2005-2015 groups, respectively; P < 0.001), most of the baseline clinical characteristics improved in the 2005-2015 group, suggesting a less advanced disease stage at diagnosis. Similarly, at competing risk analysis, the annual incidence of all outcome parameters progressively decreased over time (global P < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, the last period of enrolment emerged as independently associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality/heart transplantation (HTx)/ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation (1.46 events/100 patients/year), cardiovascular death/HTx/VAD implantation (0.82 events/100 patients/year) and sudden cardiac death (0.15 events/100 patients/year). Lastly, in 287 patients with DCM of specific aetiology, patients with environmental, toxic, or removable factors appeared to have different phenotypes and prognosis compared to those with genetic, post-myocarditis, or idiopathic DCM (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Contemporary survival trends in DCM significantly improved, mainly due to a reduction of cardiovascular events. Appropriate aetiological characterization might help in prognostication of DCM patients.

Sudden cardiac death and arrhythmia-related events in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM) have been significantly reduced over the last couple of decades as a result of evidence-based pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies. Nevertheless, the arrhythmic stratification in patients with NICM remains extremely challenging, and the simple indication based on left ventricular ejection fraction appears to be insufficient. Therefore, clinicians need to go beyond the current criteria for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in the direction of a multiparametric evaluation of arrhythmic risk. Several parameters for arrhythmic risk stratification, ranging from electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, imaging-derived and genetic markers, are crucial for proper arrhythmic risk stratification and a multiparametric evaluation of risk in patients with NICM. In particular, integration of cardiac magnetic resonance parameters (mostly late gadolinium enhancement) and specific genetic information (ie, presence of LMNA, PLN, FLNC mutations) appears fundamental for proper implementation of the current arrhythmic risk stratification. Finally, a novel approach focused on both arrhythmic risk and prediction of left ventricular reverse remodelling during follow-up might be useful for effective multiparametric and dynamic arrhythmic risk stratification in NICM. In the future, a complete and integrated evaluation might be mandatory to implement arrhythmic risk prediction in patients with NICM and to discriminate the competing risk between heart failure-related events and life-threatening arrhythmias.

Aims Primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is not generally recommended in New York Heart Association (NYHA) I class patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). This study sought to assess the competing risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in DCM patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≤35% and NYHA I class. Methods A total of 272 DCM patients with EF ≤35% and NYHA class I–III after ≥3 months of guideline-directed medical therapy were included. The risk of SCD and SCD/malignant ventricular arrhythmias (MVA) was assessed in NYHA I vs. NYHA II and NYHA III groups by competing risk analysis. Results NYHA I patients were younger, had higher EF and smaller left atrium, were less likely receiving mineral corticoid receptor antagonists. The cumulative incidence of SCD (p = 0.92) and SCD/MVA (p = 0.42) did not differ between NYHA I vs NYHA II–III classes. NYHA class did not influence the association between ICD and SCD risk (p for interaction = 0.125). Conclusions In this cohort of DCMs, patients with EF ≤35% and NYHA I class were exposed to a risk of SCD and life-threatening arrhythmias not different from NYHA II–III. Therefore, inclusion of asymptomatic patients with DCM and systolic dysfunction should be strongly considered in future randomized studies on primary prevention ICD.

N/A

Background The traditional technique for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation, which involves three incisions and a subcutaneous pocket, is associated with possible complications, including inappropriate interventions. The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an alternative intermuscular two-incision technique for S-ICD implantation. Methods The study population included 36 consecutive patients (75% male, mean age 44 ± 12 years [range 20–69]) who underwent S-ICD implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique. This technique avoids the superior parasternal incision for the lead placement and consists of creating an intermuscular pocket between the anterior surface of the serratus anterior and the posterior surface of the latissimus dorsi muscles instead of a subcutaneous pocket. Results All patients were successfully implanted in the absence of any procedure-related complications with a successful 65-J standard polarity defibrillation threshold testing, except in one, who received a second successful shock after pocket revision. During a mean follow-up of 10 months (range 3–30), no complications requiring surgical revision were observed. At device interrogation, stable sensing without interferences was observed in all patients. Two patients (5.5%) experienced appropriate and successful shock on ventricular fibrillation and in four patients (11%), a total of seven nonsustained self-terminated ventricular tachycardias were correctly detected. No inappropriate interventions were observed. Conclusions Our experience suggests that the two-incision intermuscular technique is a safe and efficacious alternative to the current technique for S-ICD implantation that may help reducing complications including inappropriate interventions and offer a better cosmetic outcome, especially in thin individuals.

Device interrogation and management are time consuming, representing a relevant burden for pacing centers. In several situations, patients' management requires additional follow up visits.Remote Monitoring (RM) allows an optimal recall management and a rapid diagnosis of device or lead failure, without the need of additional in office visits. Further it allows a significant delay reduction between the adverse event and the reaction to the alarm, shortening the time needed to make a clinical decision. A role in risk-predicting patient-related outcomes has also been shown. RM permits detection of the arrhythmia from 1 to 5 months in advance compared to in-office visits. Importantly, by using specific algorithms with multiparametric analysis, RM has been studied as a potential instrument to identify early patients on risk of worsening HF using specific algorithms. Although the use of RM in HF setting remains controversial, it has been proposed to improve HF clinical outcomes and survival in clinical trials. In this sense, RM success could require a standardization of process within a management model, that may involve different health care professionals. In this review, we examine recent advances of RM providing an update of this tool through different clinical scenarios. Keywords: Implantable devices, Heart failure, Atrial fibrillation, Remote telemonitoring

Background Left bundle branch block (LBBB) negatively affects prognosis in heart failure patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Less is known about the prognostic role of LBBB in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with intermediate LVEF (between 36% and 50%). We sought to assess the role of LBBB in optimally treated DCM patients with mildly to moderately reduced LVEF and to determine the possible variables associated with subsequent LVEF reduction. Methods We retrospectively analyzed DCM patients with LVEF >35% after 3-to-9 months of optimal medical treatment (OMT) consecutively evaluated from 1990 to 2010. All-cause mortality or heart transplantation (D/HTx) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) or major ventricular arrhythmias (MVA) were considered as outcome measures. LVEF deterioration during follow-up was also considered. Results Among 280 (49%) patients that met the study criteria, 76 had LBBB (27%). During a mean follow-up of 151 months, the rates of D/HTx and SCD/MVA were similar between LBBB and not LBBB patients (p value = 0.52 and p = 0.39, respectively). Twenty-six out of 76 (34%) patients with LBBB experienced LVEF deterioration below 36%. The persistence of moderate-severe mitral regurgitation (MR), left atrial end-systolic area index and LV end-diastolic volume index emerged as independent predictors of LVEF deterioration and were associated with an increased risk of D/HTx during follow-up. Conclusions LBBB does not affect mortality in DCM patients with intermediate LVEF after OMT. However, among these patients those with persistent significant MR, left atrial and LV remodeling carries a higher risk of LVEF deterioration during follow-up.

Aims Remote monitoring is an effective strategy to improve patients' outcomes and reduce hospitalization in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. However, data on patients' satisfaction are scarce. The aim of the current study was to assess patients' satisfaction, ease of use and impact on daily activities of the remote monitoring and to investigate whether there are differences among different devices and different manufacturers. Methods A modified Home Monitoring Acceptance and Satisfaction Questionnaire telephone survey on the perceived quality of the different systems was performed with all patients followed with remote monitoring for at least 3 months. Results Among 604 patients with remote monitoring screened by telephone, 466 patients (77%) answered the questionnaire [142 patients (30.5%) had a pacemaker, 317 patients (68%) had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and seven patients (1.5%) had an implantable loop recorder]. Ninety-seven percent of patients were satisfied by the remote monitoring system during the entire follow-up and found it easy to use. Similarly, 85% of patients did not experience any restriction in daily activities, and for 99% of patients it did not affect their privacy. Importantly, for the vast majority of patients, remote monitoring gave a great (56.7%) or moderate (33.4%) sense of security. Conclusion Daily impact of cardiac implantable electronic devices still remains a challenging issue for caregivers. The introduction of remote monitoring allowed closer follow-up and improved outcomes. Our results highlighted patients' satisfaction, who also felt safer, with the remote monitoring, its ease of use, and the absence of any disturbances in patients' everyday activities or in their privacy.

In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), it is possible to find a broad range of bradyrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias. Bradyrhythmias and supraventricular arrhythmias can frequently occur in some familial forms such as lamin A/C mutations. Nonsustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are observed in about 40% of patients with DCM, but their prognostic role is not clear, and conflicting data have been published in the last 30 years. Multiple mechanisms can explain atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias in DCM. Reentry is associated with slow conduction across surviving muscle bundles within regions of interstitial fibrosis, but other mechanisms can be involved, as nonuniform anisotropy of impulse propagation, ion channel dysfunction, and reduced gap junction function.

Background Implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators ( ICDs ) are widely employed for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Despite technological improvements, patients often need to undergo generator replacement, which entails the risk of periprocedural complications. Our aim was to estimate the service life of ICD s over a 10‐year interval and to assess the main causes of replacement on the basis of data from the National ICD Registry of the Italian Society of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC). Methods and Results The registry includes data from over 400 hospitals in Italy. We included all patients who underwent device replacement from calendar years 2007 to 2016. The median service life of the ICD s and its trend over the years was estimated across the 3 types of devices (single‐chamber, dual‐chamber, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator) and the indication to implantation. The causes of replacement were also analyzed. We included 29 158 records from 27 676 patients (80.9% men; mean age at device replacement 65.8±12.0 years). The median service life was 57.3 months (interquartile range 27.8 months). Over the years, service life showed an increasing trend. The majority of patients underwent elective replacement because of battery end of life, and over the years there was a significant reduction of replacement for recalls, erosion/infections, and cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrading. Conclusions Our data from a large single‐nation population showed that the trend of ICD service life, independently from ICD type, indication, and settings, significantly improved over time. Moreover, there was a striking reduction of interventions for upgrading and infection/erosion. This favorable trend has important clinical, organizational, and financial implications.

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) have a pivotal role in preventing major arrhythmic events in patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Device replacement strategy is still controversial in patients without severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the end of battery life. Objective: To evaluate the long-term arrhythmic outcome of patients with ICD or and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) with normal or intermediate LVEF at the time of device replacement. Methods: All consecutive patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure, both from ischemic and non-ischemic origin, implanted with ICD or CRT-D for primary prevention from 2002 to 2009, were considered. The study population included patients without previous ICD interventions and without severe dysfunction (i.e. LVEF ≥ 35%) 60 [53–65] months after implantation (average battery duration). The outcome measure was the occurrence of appropriate ICD interventions in the long-term. Results: Among the 255 patients (150 ICDs; 105 CRT-D) evaluated, 45 (18%) had LVEF ≥ 35% without ICD interventions 5-year follow-up after implantation (15 ICD [10%]; 30 CRT-D [29%]). In the long term, ICD interventions were 4 (27%) in the ICD group and 5 (17%) in the CRT-D group. Conclusions: Despite the absence of severe left ventricular dysfunction at the time of battery replacement, a not negligible number of patients with ICD and CRT-D maintained a high risk of appropriate interventions in the long term, suggesting the opportunity of replacing the ICD regardless the amount of LV dysfunction. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.

Aims: Despite continuous efforts in improving the selection process, the rate of non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains high. Recent studies on intraventricular blood flow suggested that the alignment of hemodynamic forces (HDFs) may be a reproducible biomarker of mechanical dyssynchrony. We aimed to explore the relationship between pacing-induced realignment of HDFs and positive response to CRT. Methods and results: We retrospectively analyzed 38 patients from the CRT database of our institution fulfilling the inclusion criteria for HDFs-related echocardiographic assessment early pre and post CRT implantation, with available mid-term follow-up (≥ 6 months) evaluation. Standard echocardiographic and deformation parameters early pre and post CRT implantation were integrated with the measurement of HFDs through novel methods based on speckle-tracking analysis. At midterm follow-up 71% of patients were classified as responders (reduction of Left Ventricular Systolic Volume Indexed ≥ 15%). Patients did not display significant changes between close evaluations pre and post-implant in terms of ejection fraction and strain metrics. A significant reduction of the ratio between the amplitudes of transversal and longitudinal force components was found. The variation of this ratio strongly correlates (R2 =0.60) with Left Ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume variation at mid-term follow up. Conclusion: Pacing-induced realignment of HDFs is associated with CRT efficacy at follow up. These preliminary results claim for dedicated prospective clinical studies testing the potential impact of HDFs study for patient selection and pacing optimization in CRT.

Introduction The recently developed second‐generation subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD) and the intermuscular two‐incision implantation technique demonstrate potential favorable features that reduce inappropriate shocks and complications. However, data concerning large patient populations are lacking. The aim of this multicentre prospective study was to evaluate the safety and outcome of second‐generation S‐ICD using the intermuscular two‐incision technique in a large population study. Methods and Results The study population included 101 consecutive patients (75% male; mean age, 45 ± 13 years) who received second‐generation S‐ICD (EMBLEM; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) implantation using the intermuscular two‐incision technique as an alternative to the standard implantation technique. Twenty nine (29%) patients were implanted for secondary prevention. Twenty four (24%) patients had a previously implanted transvenous ICD. All patients were implanted without any procedure‐related complications. Defibrillation testing was performed in 80 (79%) patients, and ventricular tachycardia was successfully converted at less than or equal to 65 J in 98.75% (79/80) of patients without pulse generator adjustments. During a median follow‐up of 21 ± 10 months, no complications requiring surgical revision or local or systemic device‐related infections were observed. Ten patients (9.9%) received appropriate and successful shocks for ventricular arrhythmias. Three (2.9%) patients experienced inappropriate shocks due to oversensing the cardiac signal (n = 1), noncardiac signal (n = 1), and a combination of both cardiac and noncardiac signals (n = 1), with one patient requiring device explantation. No patients required device explantation due to antitachycardia pacing indications. Conclusions According to our multicentre study, second‐generation S‐ICD implanted with the intermuscular two‐incision technique is an available safe combination and appears to be associated with a low risk of complications, such as inappropriate shocks.

Background Sleep apnea (SA) is a relevant issue in the management of patients with heart failure for risk stratification and for implementing treatment strategies. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) the performance of the respiratory disturbance index (RDI) computed by the ApneaScan algorithm (Boston Scientific Inc., Natick, MA) as a discriminator of severe SA. Methods ICD-indicated patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% were enrolled. One month after implantation, patients underwent a polysomnographic study. We evaluated the accuracy of the RDI for the prediction of severe SA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥30 episodes/h) and the agreement between RDI and AHI during the sleep study night. Results Two hundred sixty-five patients were enrolled to obtain the required sample of 173 patients with AHI and RDI data for analysis. The mean AHI was 21 ± 15 episodes/h and severe SA was diagnosed in 38 patients (22%), while the mean RDI was 33 ± 13 episodes/h. On the basis of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of RDI values, the area under the curve was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–0.83; P < .001). At an RDI value of 31 episodes/h, severe SA was detected with 87% (95% CI 72%–96%) sensitivity and 56% (95% CI 48%–66%) specificity. RDI closely correlated with AHI recorded during the same night (r = 0.74; 95% CI 0.57–0.84; P < .001), and the Bland-Altman agreement analysis revealed a bias of 11 episodes/h, with limits of agreement being −10 to 32 episodes/h. Conclusion The RDI accurately identified severe SA and demonstrated good agreement with AHI. Therefore, it may serve as an efficient tool for screening patients at risk of SA.

Arrhythmic risk stratification in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) remains a major concern. As the ventricles remodel in time, risk factors for arrhythmic death may change. A cohort of 710 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, without previous ventricular arrhythmias, was retrospectively studied to understand how risks vary in time. The primary end point was a composite of sudden cardiac death, ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions. The prediction of the arrhythmic outcome was assessed dynamically through landmark analysis. Patients were assessed at baseline, short term (12 months, interquartile range 6 to 18), and long-term (72 months, interquartile range 60 to 84). The strongest risk predictors at each evaluation were combined in 3 multivariate models. During a median follow-up of 102 months, 80 patients (11%) experienced the primary end point. At baseline, QRS duration (p = 0.008), disease duration (p

Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalization and a significant medical burden in our society. Implantable medical devices are nowadays established therapies in heart failure patients that not only provide cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) therapy but are also able to continuously and remotely monitor diagnostic information of various physiologic parameters. The value of combining individual diagnostic variables to predict worsening of heart failure is still largely unclear but could eventually become a valuable tool towards a better heart failure management.SELENE HF (Selection of potential predictors of worsening Heart Failure) is an observational, multicentre study designed to prospectively collect follow-up and home monitoring data trends from a population of individuals with ICDs with or without resynchronization therapy (CRT-D), to document heart failure hospitalizations and deaths and to correlate these events with Home Monitoring data in order to identify the combination with the greatest sensitivity and specificity in predicting heart failure events.The purpose of this study is to describe the design of the study focusing on the Heart Failure Predicting model and statistical approach that will be used to analyse the data.The results of the SELENE HF study could help to select and define potential predictors of worsening heart failure in patients with remotely monitored ICD or CRT-D devices.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01836510.

Background Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is associated with reduced survival in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve FMR. We sought to identify the predictors of FMR improvement after CRT in DCM. Methods From January 2003 to December 2013, 430 DCM patients consecutively enrolled were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were successful CRT implantation in the presence of conventional indications (i.e., left bundle branch block, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, New York Heart Association functional class ≥II) and moderate-to-severe FMR at the time of procedure. Early echocardiographic evaluation after CRT implantation (median 2.5 days) has been performed in each patient. Improvement in FMR (absent/mild) at midterm (7 months; interquartile range 4–10) was considered as the primary study end point. Results A total of 44 patients (10% of the overall cohort) were included. A significant reduction in FMR severity was observed in 21 patients (48%) at midterm after CRT (median time 7 months). No preimplantation variables predicted FMR evolution, but FMR improvement at midterm was strongly predicted by an acute favorable hemodynamic response (persistence/development of normal right ventricular function and 10-mm Hg decrease or normalization [≤35 mm Hg] of systolic pulmonary artery pressure) at postimplantation echocardiography (odds ratio: 13.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.27–42.8; P = 0.016). FMR improvement at midterm was stable during follow-up and was associated with superior long-term transplant-free survival (P = 0.022). Conclusions Stable FMR improvement frequently occurs after CRT implantation in DCM and is associated with improved transplant-free survival. Echocardiographic evaluation of acute hemodynamic response to CRT is helpful to early identification of the favorable FMR evolution.

There has been a significant increase in cancer patients with implanted electronic devices which have been exposed to the risk of malfunction when undergoing radiotherapy in the last few years. In this review, we provide a short summary of radiotherapy principles, later analyzing in vitro and in vivo data and recent recommendations, in order to present the current evidence on predictive factors, risk stratification, and management of patients with implanted electronic devices requiring radiotherapy. The risk of device failure is usually transient, seldom permanent and mainly related to patients' characteristics and cumulative doses administrated during radiotherapy. The strongest predictive factors of implanted electronic device malfunction are higher radiation doses and higher beam energy. Indeed, energy

Aims ACE-inhibitors, β-blockers, implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improved prognosis of heart failure. We sought to analyse the long-term prognostic impact of evidence-based integrated therapeutic strategies in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM). Methods and results From 1978 to 2007, 853 IDCM patients (45 ± 15 years, 72% males) were enrolled and classified as follows: Group 1, 110 patients (12.8%) enrolled during 1978–1987; Group 2, 376 patients (44.1%) enrolled during 1988–1997; Group 3, 367 patients (43.1%) enrolled during 1998–2007. ACE-inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers were administered in 34%, 93%, and 93% (P

Aims Several trials demonstrated the life saving role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The aim was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and 4-year outcome of consecutive patients treated in clinical practice by prophylactic ICD implantation on the basis of class I recommendations and up-to-date ICD programming. Methods and results IRIDE multi-center, prospective and observational study enrolled 604 consecutive patients (mean age: 66±10years) treated by ICD between 01/01/2006 and 30/06/2010. Main characteristics were similarly distributed among the inclusion criteria of MADIT II (24%), SCD-HeFT (24%), COMPANION (26%) and MADIT-CRT (18%) trials, while a small number of patients met the MUSTT and MADIT (7%) inclusion criteria. Single-chamber ICDs were implanted in 168 (28%) patients, dual-chamber in 167 (28%) and biventricular in 269 (43%) patients. ATP programming was activated in 546 (90%) patients. Overall survival and rate of appropriate ICD intervention by ATP and/or shock at 12–24–36–48months of follow-up were 94%, 89%, 80%, 75% and 16%, 28%, 37% and 50%, respectively. No difference in mortality rate between the groups who received or did not receive appropriate ICD interventions was demonstrated (p=ns). Conclusions The IRIDE study confirms the effectiveness in real world practice of ICD implantation in patients at risk of SCD. The life saving role of ICD therapy increases as the duration of follow-up is prolonged and the survival benefit is similar in patients who received or did not receive appropriate device treatment, thus suggesting a beneficial effect of up-to-date device programming.

Objectives The study sought to provide an insight into the prevalence, characterization and possible reliable indicators of early sudden cardiac death/malignant ventricular arrhythmias (SCD/MVAs) in a large cohort of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Background DCM generally affects young individuals and is characterized by an unpredictable prognosis with a non-negligible risk of SCD/MVAs, particularly in early stages of disease. Methods From 1988 to 2014, 952 patients with DCM were consecutively included in the Heart Muscle Disease Registry of Trieste. Results Globally, 20 patients (2.1% of the overall population) experienced SCD/MVAs within the first 6 months after enrollment (primary endpoint). At baseline they showed a worse functional class (New York Heart Association functional class III to IV 42% vs. 22%, p = 0.038), a longer QRS complex duration (127 ± 41 ms vs. 108 ± 33 ms; p = 0.013) and a larger indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESVI) (82 ± 49 ml/m 2 vs. 67 ± 34 ml/m 2 ; p = 0.049), as compared to patients without early SCD/MVAs. Beta-blockers were less tolerated (59% vs. 83% in patients with no early SCD/MVAs; p = 0.008), mostly due to hemodynamic intolerance. At multivariate analysis, LVESVI (odds ratio [OR]: 1.012; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.000 to 1.024; p = 0.043) and QRS complex duration (OR: 1.017; 95% CI: 1.003 to 1.030; p = 0.015) were independently associated with the primary endpoint, whereas beta-blockers demonstrated a protective effect (OR: 0.169, CI: 0.048 to 0.593; p = 0.006). Conclusions Patients with DCM present a significant risk of major arrhythmic events in the first phase of the disease. Baseline LVESVI, QRS duration, and intolerance to beta-blocker therapy might be useful tools in the arrhythmic early risk assessment.

A 42 years old woman was admitted to the Cardiology Department for heart failure. The woman had a diagnosis of Idiopathic Restrictive Cardiomyopathy. At the age of 29 she underwent a variant of the traditional intervention of Heterotopic Heart Transplantation (HHT). The donor Left Ventricular (dLV)was implanted towork as a biologic left ventricular device in series with the recipient Left Ventricular (rLV). This variant of the traditional intervention (Fig. 1 Panel A; G; H) was necessary to prevent the failure of the donor Right Ventricular (dRV) because the patient at the time of transplantation had a pulmonary resistance of 12Wood Unit. The patient had an abdominal pacemaker with three epicardial electrodes to allow the counter pulsation of the two hearts (Fig. 1 Panel A; B; C; D; F). The atrial electrode was added four years after the transplantation because the patient developed a third-degree atrioventricular block in the native heart. At the echocardiography examination the donor heart showed a severe hypertrophy (maximum 30 mm; anterior-septum; Video 1; transthoracic echocardiography) and a severe hypertrophy of papillary muscles, maximum 26 mm (Video 2; transesophageal echocardiography). The angiography showed normal coronary arteries. The patient underwent endomyocardial biopsy specimens that reveal no evidence of active myocarditis or amyloid but myocardial fiber disarray (Fig. 1 Panel I). Inside the heterogeneity of presentation of heart failure after HHT, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the donor heart can be a possibility which needs a knowledge of the type of intervention (traditional or variant) for a proper evaluation and a correct diagnosis.

Benign thyroid nodules are an extremely common occurrence. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is gaining ground as an effective technique for their treatment, in case they become symptomatic. Here we review what are the current indications to RFA, its outcomes in terms of efficacy, tolerability, and cost, and also how it compares to the other conventional and experimental treatment modalities for benign thyroid nodules. Moreover, we will also address the issue of treating with this technique patients with cardiac pacemakers (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), as it is a rather frequent occurrence that has never been addressed in detail in the literature.

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has proved to be very effective in improving morbidity and mortality in patients affected with severe congestive heart failure. Its efficacy has been shown to be greater in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). The aim of our study was to verify if newly proposed criteria for true LBBB identify patients with a better clinical and instrumental response to CRT. Methods: Between May 2007 and April 2011, 111 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and LBBB morphology received a CRT device and were divided into two groups according to QRS morphology. Group 1 (61 patients) consisted of patients with “true” LBBB morphology; group 2 (50 patients) consisted of patients with “false” LBBB. The primary endpoint was the utility of criteria for true LBBB to predict a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and hospital admission with heart failure. The secondary endpoint was the utility of the same criteria to predict an absolute increase in LVEF ≥ 10%. Results: “False” LBBB morphology and a dose of bisoprolol

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of nonsustained ventricular tachycardias (NSVT) for the prediction of major ventricular arrhythmias (MVA) in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) after optimization of medical treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred nineteen consecutive DCM patients were evaluated after adequate stabilization on optimal angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (88%) and beta-blocker (82%) therapy. Frequency, length, and rate of NSVT at 24-hour Holter monitoring were analyzed to assess their values in predicting MVA (unexpected sudden death, SVT, ventricular fibrillation, and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator interventions). During follow-up (median 96 months, 1(st)-3(rd) interquartile range 52-130), MVA incidence was low, and not statistically different between patients with and without NSVT (3 and 2 per 100 patient-years, respectively, P = nonsignificant [NS] at log-rank analysis). At multivariable analysis, the number of NSVT was predictive of MVA only if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was > 0.35 (two NSVT/day vs no NSVT/day: hazard ratio [HR] 5.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59-17.85 in LVEF > 0.35 vs HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.3-2.81 in LVEF < or = 0.35). Consequently, in patients with LVEF < or = 0.35, MVA incidence rates were similar regardless of NSVT (3.6 and 4.1 patient-years, respectively, in those with and without NSVT, P = NS), while in patients with LVEF > 0.35, MVA incidence (3.1 per 100 patient-years vs 0.9 per 100 patient-years, P = 0.003) was significantly higher when NSVT were present. CONCLUSIONS: After medical stabilization, NSVT did not increase the risk of MVA in patients with DCM and LVEF < or = 0.35. Conversely, the number and length of NSVT runs were significantly related to the occurrence of MVA in the patients with LVEF > 0.35.

Because of the increasing number of patients treated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), as pacemakers (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), their management in case of emergent surgery is becoming a scenario frequently observed in the clinical practice. A deep knowledge of the CIED and how they work is rare, not only among non-cardiologist physicians facing emergencies but, not infrequently, even among consultant cardiologists. In the emergency setting, the presence of the CIED can be completely ignored or, on the contrary, causes unnecessary delays of the proper treatment of the emergency. Some notions about the management of patients with CIED who need emergent/urgent surgery are provided, starting from general to more detailed information both directed to first-line physicians, who must face the emergency (surgeons, anesthesiologists, and emergency physicians), and the consultant cardiologist, who should consider the relationship between the specific patients and the CIED. Finally, a practical algorithm, considering most guidelines and some specific issues of the emergency, is proposed.

Prognosis of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) was once considered ominous. However, in the last 30 years, advancements in knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF), earlier diagnosis, systematic long-term follow-up, and—mostly—the use of effective pharmacological and nonpharmacologic treatments have contributed to substantially improved survival rates. Evaluating left ventricular (LV) dimensions, systolic and diastolic function, and contractile reserve with echocardiography and/or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can help in prognostic stratification. In the near future, the possibility of genotyping all patients could have a prognostic importance, allowing identification of some malignant mutations with higher mortality risk. A critical and still unresolved issue is early stratification of risk of sudden death (SD) and indication to implantable device therapy. SD can also occur in some apparently stable DCM patients. In this sense, some technologies such as T-wave alternans analysis and QT dynamicity are emerging but require further evidence before being routinely applied in clinical practice.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a genetic disease characterized by myocyte loss and fibrofatty tissue replacement. It primary affects the RV, but it may involve the left ventricle (LV) and lead to biventricular heart failure (HF), life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death (SD). Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are increasingly used in patients with ARVC who have survived SD (secondary prevention). However, few data are available to help identifying ARVC patients in whom prophylactic implantation of an ICD is truly warranted. Several risk factors have a proven clinical utility. All data reported may be useful in risk stratification and may help in deciding the correct clinical management of ARVC patients. Conclusive data on the prognostic value of each factor are still lacking.

This retrospective four-centre study assessed the current indications for dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) at implant and during a medium-term follow-up period in a group of patients treated by single-chamber ICD in the pre dual-chamber ICD era.The study population consisted of 153 consecutive patients (127 males, mean age 58 +/- 6 years) treated by single-chamber ICD for ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation. Definite indications for having a dual-chamber ICD included the presence of sinus node dysfunction and of second- or third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, while possible indications were represented by paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter and first-degree AV block. At implant, dual-chamber ICD would appear definitely indicated in 10.5% of cases, and possibly indicated in an additional 17.5% of cases. During 12 +/- 10 months follow-up, such percentages remained stable (11 and 19.5%, respectively). Inappropriate ICD intervention was documented in five of 13 patients (38%), with episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter.In this non-selected study population, a dual-chamber ICD would have potentially benefited approximately 30% of the patients. During medium-term follow-up, there was no progression towards increasing dual-chamber ICD indications. The 15% cumulative incidence of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias justifies the activation of dedicated detection algorithms.

AIMS: To evaluate the long-term changes of clinical and echocardiographic parameters, the incidence of cardiac events and parameters associated with late cardiac events in 'super-responders' to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with [CRT defibrillator (CRT-D)] or without defibrillator back-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: In all consecutive patients treated with CRT in two Italian centres (Trieste and Udine) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤0.35 at implantation (Timp) and LVEF > 0.50 1 and/or 2 years (Tnorm) after implantation, the long-term outcome and the evolution of echocardiographic parameters were assessed; factors associated with a higher risk of cardiac events, defined as hospitalization or death for heart failure (HF), sudden death, or CRT-D appropriate interventions, were also analysed. Among the 259 patients evaluated, 62 (24%) had LVEF ≥ 0.50 at Tnorm (n = 44 with at 1 year, n = 18 at 2 years). During a mean follow-up of 68 ± 30 months, one cardiac death (for HF) and eight cardiovascular events (two hospitalization for HF and six appropriate CRT-D interventions) occurred. At the last echo evaluation (Tfup) performed 51 ± 26 months after Timp, LVEF was 0.45 in four of them). At univariable analysis, only LV end-systolic volume evaluated at Tfup was associated with a higher risk of cardiac events during follow-up. CONCLUSION: In 'super-responders' to CRT long-term outcome is excellent. However, cardiac events, mainly CRT-D appropriate interventions, can occur despite the persistence of LVEF > 0.50. Early identification of these patients is still an unsolved issue

[Figure][1] [![Graphic][3] ][3][![Graphic][4] ][4] A 17-year-old asymptomatic boy was referred to our hospital for family screening because of his father's unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The father received a pacemaker at 35 years of age for sick sinus syndrome

Background: Some controlled clinical trials showed a beneficial effect of beta-blockers on symptoms, exercise tolerance, and left ventricular function in dilated cardiomyopathy. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there are clinical variables at baseline that could predict a favorable response to long-term metoprolol therapy.

There are no parameters predicting the individual probability of "full response" to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this work was to find prognostic factors of full clinical and echocardiographic responses (i.e., ≥50\% left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] and New York Heart Association class I) after 1 year of CRT. This was a prospective follow-up study that involved 2 hospitals. Patients (n = 75) with advanced heart failure (64 ± 9 years of age, 87\% men, LVEF 24 ± 7\%) who received CRT were followed for 17 ± 9 months. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify predictors of full CRT response. A nomogram predicting the individual probability of full CRT response during follow-up was calculated. There were 13 patients with restoration of normal LVEF versus 62 without (mean LVEF 56\% ± 5\% vs 31\% ± 8\%, respectively, p 75\% probability of restoration of normal LVEF. In conclusion, our nomogram using a combination of cause, baseline QRS width, and degree of QRS shortening in response to CRT allows assessment of individual probability of full response. This observation awaits further confirmation from larger series.

Background Few data are available in the literature regarding the characteristics and prognosis of asymptomatic patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Aim To determine the frequency with which patients affected by DCM are diagnosed in the asymptomatic state as well as to evaluate the natural history of such patients and the factors influencing their outcome. Moreover, we sought to compare the outcome of asymptomatic patients with that of patients with signs of overt heart failure at the time of first evaluation. Methods and results We analyzed the data of 747 patients with DCM enlisted in the Heart Muscle Disease Registry of Trieste from 1978 to 2007. We divided our population into four groups; group 1 comprised 118 asymptomatic [New York Heart Association (NYHA) I] patients without a history of congestive symptoms (16%), group 2 comprised 102 asymptomatic (NYHA I) patients (14%) with a positive anamnesis for heart failure stabilized in medical therapy, group 3 comprised 327 patients (44%) with signs of mild heart failure (NYHA II) and group 4 comprised 200 patients (26%) in NYHA III–IV. During the follow-up of 112 ± 63 months, 46 (21%) of 220 asymptomatic patients with DCM died or underwent heart transplantation. By Cox proportional model, left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% or less was a unique independent predictor either for death/heart transplantation (hazard ratio 3.15, 95% confidence interval 1.5–6.7, P = 0.003) or for sudden death/major ventricular arrhythmias (hazard ratio 3.9, 95% confidence interval 1.7–9.3, P = 0.002). Patients from group 1 had a trend for a better outcome with respect to those from group 2 (P = 0.06). In comparison with the asymptomatic patients, those with signs of overt heart failure at baseline had a worse prognosis. Conclusion The proportion of asymptomatic patients with DCM at the moment of first evaluation at our center is significant (30%). Among them, those without a previous history of heart failure had a less advanced disease and a trend for a better long-term outcome on optimal medical treatment. Therefore, early diagnosis may offer better long-term quality of life and even better survival. Further studies on larger populations are indicated.

Attempting a careful evaluation of the incidence of sudden death (SD) in congestive heart failure is inevitably a complex and imprecise task. In particular, this is due to the difficulties in defining and understanding the baseline mechanisms underlying SD. “Sudden” death is commonly regarded as a synonym of “cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation,” which is in turn considered to be a merely arrhythmic phenomenon occurring during apparent wellbeing, and without any precipitating cause other than an extrasystole or a sustained ventricular tachycardia. Cardiac arrest may also be the terminal event during refractory pulmonary edema and/or cardiogenic shock in a patient with end-stage heart failure, a pulmonary embolism in a patient with severe biventricular dysfunction, bradyarrhythmia due to advanced atrioventricular (AV) block, electrical asystole, ventricular fibrillation secondary to myocardial ischemia or infarction, or secondary to a noncardiac event such as a cerebro vascular accident or a ruptured aortic aneurysm. Pratt et al.[1] analyzed a population of 834 patients with an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implanted for ventricular tachycardia or sustained ventricular tachycardia. During follow-up 109 patients died (17 died “suddenly”). Autopsy findings revealed a nonarrhythmic cause (pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, stroke, acute myocardial infarction) in 7/17 patients. Postmortem analysis of the ICD memory revealed ventricular tachyarrhythmias preceding death in only 7/17 patients.

To analyse the characteristics and outcome of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DC) considered at high risk of sudden death (SD) and treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) for primary prevention (Group A) in comparison with patients treated with ICDs because of previous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias or syncope (Group B).Group A consisted of 27 patients with at least two of the following criteria: left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD)or =70 mm (74%), LV ejection fraction (LVEF)or =30% (78%), non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (56%), long history of disease (or =48 months since diagnosis, 85%) and family history of SD (11%). Group B consisted of 27 patients treated with ICDs because of sustained VT/fibrillation (n=18) or syncope (n=9).NYHA class, LVEF, LVEDD and amiodarone treatment were similar in the two groups. Patients in group A were younger (46+/-15 vs 59+/-17 years, P=0.0008), were more often treated with beta-blockers (89% vs 62%; P=0.02) and had a longer interval since diagnosis (86+/-60 vs 40+/-50 months; P=0.004). Twelve month rates of appropriate intervention (AI) were 41% in Group A and 57% in group B (P NS). In group A, after a mean follow-up of 21+/-14 months, patients showing the combination of LVEFor =30% and LVEDDor =70 mm had the highest frequency of AI (76% vs 10%, P=0.005). In group B, after a mean follow-up of 33+/-23 months, 78% of patients with syncope had AI. Total and sudden deaths were 11% and 4% in group A and 19% and 4% in group B (P NS).Patients with idiopathic DC treated with ICD for primary prevention because they were considered at high risk of SD according to clinical criteria showed a high rate of AI, similar to that of patients treated for secondary prevention. The highest rate of AI was seen in patients with both severe dysfunction and dilatation and in those with previous syncope.

Objectives. We sought to assess the prognostic implications of the evolution of restrictive left ventricular filling pattern (RFP) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).Background. Previous work has demonstrated that a RFP in DCM is associated with a poor prognosis. Few data are available on the prognostic implications of the evolution of this pattern.Methods. The evolution of left ventricular filling was studied by Doppler echocardiography in 110 patients with DCM. According to the left ventricular filling pattern at presentation and after 3 months of treatment, the patients were classified into three groups: Group 1A (n = 24) had persistent restrictive filling; Group 1B (n = 29) had reversible restrictive filling; and Group 2 (n = 57) had nonrestrictive filling.Results. During follow-up (41 ± 20 months), mortality plus heart transplantation was significantly higher in Group 1A than in Groups 1B and 2 (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, the model incorporating E wave deceleration time at 3 months was more powerful at predicting mortality with respect to this variable at baseline (p = 0.0039). Clinical improvement at 1 and 2 years was significantly more frequent in Groups 1B and 2 than in Group 1A (p < 0.0001 at 2 years).Conclusions. In patients with DCM, the persistence of restrictive filling at 3 months is associated with a high mortality and transplantation rate. The patients with reversible restrictive filling have a high probability of improvement and excellent survival. Doppler echocardiographic reevaluation of these patients after 3 months of therapy gives additional prognostic information with respect to the initial study.(J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:604–12)