Search

Background: With the current mass international roll out of several vaccines against SARS-Cov-2, several reports of unheeded complications have made headlines. One of which involves myocarditis with the now FDA fully approved vaccine, Pfizer, and others. We hypothesize through this study that a dysregulated micro-RNA response resulting from such type of vaccines can be involved in triggering myocarditis. Methodology: Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Central Register were used to search for specific keywords such as “mRNA COVID-19 vaccines” AND “Myocarditis” for relevant publications up to 1st of September 2021. The systematic review was performed using PRISMA protocolResults:Literature review has identified 26 cases series and reports involving the development of myocarditis from mRNA vaccines, a total of 89 patients were included. Age range was clearly identified in 66 patients. Among those 66 patients, 94% were below 50 years of age, also out of 89 patients, 94% were males. Myocarditis developed, after a median time of 72 hours of the 2nd dose. 90 of cases of myocarditis developed myocarditis after the 2nd dose, the few patients developing myocarditis after the first dose were either predisposed by a history of myocarditis or a history of previous COVID-19 infection. Conclusion:In conclusion, interpretation of the results in view of the suggested hypothesis, reveals that the micro-RNAs implicated in myocarditis in general are as well implicated in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19, this can explain why patients having a first dose with a history of COVID-19 can develop myocarditis from mRNA vaccines, also the relatively higher likelihood of this complication in males and younger aged individuals can be explained by the upregulation of key myocarditis related miRNAs in those two strata, due to higher muscle mass and suggests performing a sarcopenia index in recipients of the vaccine to correlate it with the likelihood of this complication. This could later set a cut-off of this easy bed-side index to stratify cases a higher risk of this rare complication.

BackgroundCOVID-19 is the largest outbreak to strike humanity. The wide scale of fatalities and morbidities lead to a concurrent pandemic of uncertainty in scientific evidence. Conflicting evidences are released on daily basis about the neonatal outcomes of COVID-19-positive mothers. The aim of this study was to use the relevant case reports and series to determine the percentage of newborns who test positive for COVID-19 who are born to COVID-19-positive mothers. Secondary outcomes included examining laboratory abnormalities among COVID-19-positive neonates, and any depicted placental abnormalities in COVID-19-positive mothers. For this purpose, systematic review was performed on all studies reporting primary data on fetus-mother pairs with COVID-19. Data bases were searched for studies that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria.ResultsFinal screening revealed 67 studies, from which the primary data of 1787 COVID-19 mothers were identified and had their pregnancy outcome analyzed. Only 2.8% of infants born to COVID-19-positive mothers tested positive, and this finding is identical to percentages reported in former Coronaviridae outbreaks, whereas 20% manifested with intrauterine hypoxia alongside placental abnormalities suggestive of heavy placental vaso-occlusive involvement.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that while vertical transmission is unlikely, there appears to be an underlying risk of placental insufficiency due to the prothrombotic tendency observed in COVID-19 infection. Guidelines for proper prophylactic anticoagulation in COVID-positive mothers need to be established.

Background:COVID-19 is the largest outbreak to strike humanity. The wide scale of fatalities and morbidities lead to a concurrent pandemic of uncertainty in scientific evidence. Conflicting evidences are released on daily basis about the neonatal outcomes of COVID-19 positive mothers. The aim of this study was to use the relevant case reports and series to determine the percentage of newborns who test positive in COVID-19 positive mothers. Secondary outcomes included examining laboratory and placental abnormalities among fetus-mother pairs.Methods:Systematic review was performed on all studies reporting primary data on fetus-mother pairs with COVID-19. Data bases were searched for studies that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria.Results: Final screening revealed 66 studies, from which the primary data of 1787 mother-infant pairs was obtained. Only 2.8% of mother infant pairs were tested positive, and this finding is identical to percentages reported in former coronaviridae outbreaks. Whereas, 20% manifested with intrauterine hypoxia alongside placental abnormalities suggestive of heavy placental vaso-occlusive involvement. Conclusions: These findings suggest that while vertical transmission is unlikely, there appears to be an underlying risk of placental insufficiency due to the prothrombotic tendency observed in COVID-19 infection. Guidelines for proper prophylactic anticoagulation in COVID positive mothers need to be established.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a serious illness that has rapidly spread throughout the globe. The seriousness of complications puts significant pressures on hospital resources, especially the availability of ICU and ventilators. Current evidence suggests that COVID-19 pathogenesis majorly involves microvascular injury induced by hypercytokinemia, namely interleukin 6 (IL-6). We recount the suggested inflammatory pathway for COVID-19 and its effects on various organ systems, including respiratory, cardiac, hematologic, reproductive, and nervous organ systems, as well examine the role of hypercytokinemia in the at-risk geriatric and obesity subgroups with upregulated cytokines' profile. In view of these findings, we strongly encourage the conduction of prospective studies to determine the baseline levels of IL-6 in infected patients, which can predict a negative outcome in COVID-19 cases, with subsequent early administration of IL-6 inhibitors, to decrease the need for ICU admission and the pressure on healthcare systems. Video abstract: http://links.lww.com/CAEN/A24.

ABO blood groups is a cheap and affordable test that can be immediately retrieved from COVID-19 patients at the diagnosis. There is increasing evidence that non-O blood groups have both higher susceptibility and higher severity of COVID-19 infections. The reason behind such relationship seems elusive. Regarding susceptibility, Non-O individuals have Anti-A antibodies which can prevent viral entry across ACE-2 receptors, moreover, Non-O individuals are at higher risk of autoimmunity, hypercoagulable state, and dysbiosis resulting in an augmented tendency for vascular inflammatory sequelae of COVID-19. We can conclude, on the diagnostic level, that ABO blood groups can be potentially used for risk stratification of affected COVID-19 patients, to anticipate the deterioration of patients at higher risk for complications. On a therapeutic level, plasma from normal O blood group individuals might potentially replace the use of convalescent serum for the treatment of COVID-19.