1. Does Restrictive Lung Function Affect the Exercise Capacity in Patients with Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot?
- Author
-
Chenni S. Sriram, Sanjeev Aggarwal, Roxann Smith, Michelle French, and Jyothsna Akam-Venkata
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Spirometry ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Vital capacity ,Adolescent ,Population ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,FEV1/FVC ratio ,0302 clinical medicine ,Forced Expiratory Volume ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Expiration ,education ,Lung ,Retrospective Studies ,Tetralogy of Fallot ,Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ,education.field_of_study ,Exercise Tolerance ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,VO2 max ,medicine.disease ,Respiratory Function Tests ,Cardiac surgery ,030228 respiratory system ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Exercise Test ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,circulatory and respiratory physiology - Abstract
Patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) have decreased exercise capacity (XC) and restrictive lung function (RLF). Our objective was to determine the association between RLF and impaired XC in patients with rTOF. This was a single center retrospective review of patients with rTOF who underwent a cardiopulmonary treadmill exercise testing and spirometry from 2005 to 2015. Patients with a respiratory exchange ratio ≥ 1.05 and peak heart rate > 90% of predicted value were included. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and Forced expiratory volume in 1st second of forceful expiration (FEV1) were used to classify the lung function. Exercise parameters such as peak oxygen uptake (VO2), % of predicted VO2 (%VO2), Metabolic equivalents (METS), and exercise time (ET) were compared between the two groups (i) compared patients with normal lung function (normal FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC > 80%) (ii) RLF (FVC 80%). In our cohort (n = 151, 52% male, mean age ± SD of 22.3 ± 9.1 years), patients with RLF (n = 73) compared to those with normal lung function (n = 86) had a lower peak VO2 (30.8 ± 8.6 vs. 36.6 ± 9.8 mL/kg/min; p
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF