Search

Introducción: Diferentes vacunas frente a SARS-CoV-2 están actualmente en el mercado y se recomiendan en pacientes con Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal (EII). No tenemos suficiente evidencia sobre la aceptación de este tipo de vacunas. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la aceptación de la vacuna frente a SARS-CoV-2 por parte de gastroenterólogos y pacientes con EII. Métodos: Se realizó una encuesta online a 8000 pacientes de ACCU-España y 1000 miembros de GETECCU. Se enviaron tres invitaciones entre Octubre-Diciembre 2020. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo, comparando las respuestas de médicos y pacientes. Resultados: 144 gastroenterólogos [63% mujeres, edad media 43 años (DE 9,5)], y1302 pacientes [72% mujeres, edad media 43 años (DE 12)] respondieron a la encuesta. 95% de los médicos recomendaban la vacuna frente a SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con EII, 87% consideraron que su estrategia de vacunación frente a diferentes vacunas no había cambiado tras la pandemia frente al 12% que consideraban que actualmente remitían más pacientes a vacunación. En cuanto a los pacientes con EII, sólo 43% aceptaban la vacunación frente a SARS-CoV-2, frente a 43% que no estaban seguros. El sexo masculino (p

Background Hepatotoxicity secondary to therapy for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is a common complication that may lead to treatment interruption. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) exerts a hepatoprotective effect by repleting glutathione stores and enhancing the cellular antioxidant defense mechanism. NAC has been found to be protective against liver toxicity in animals treated for MTB infection. Randomized controlled trials have shown that its use in humans also decreases the risk of hepatotoxicity associated with anti-MTB treatment but there is minimal data regarding its utility for treatment of liver toxicity. Methods Patients who received NAC from January 2012 to March 2018 for prophylaxis and treatment of increasing liver function tests (LFTs) while on isoniazid (INH) were included. A retrospective review of the medical record system was performed. Results Nineteen patients were included. Eight received NAC for treatment. The average age was 49 years. Seventy percent of patients were male. The mean BMI was 25. Five patients had underlying liver cirrhosis and two had hepatic steatosis. Eleven patients had Hepatitis C (HCV) and one had active Hepatitis B infection. Ten patients had MTB pulmonary infection, thee had latent TB infection, two meningitis, and three had disseminated disease. One patient was treated for atypical mycobacterial infection. The dose of NAC used was 600 mg oral twice daily and the duration was variable. The prophylaxis group had stable LFTs during treatment, except for two patients whose enzymes increased more than three times the upper limit of normal. These two patients had underlying HCV and liver cirrhosis. Only one required discontinuation of INH. This group received NAC for an average of 47 days. The treatment group had a favorable trend of liver enzymes after NAC initiation, with levels significantly improving by day 14 (Figures 1 and 2). Three patients did not require discontinuation of antibiotics. INH was stopped prior to NAC initiation in four patients. No side effects of NAC were documented in any patient. Conclusion NAC is a safe and effective measure to prevent and treat hepatotoxicity secondary to INH therapy. More studies are needed to determine its optimal dose and duration for this indication. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Arsenic trioxide (As2O3) exhibits potent antineoplastic effects and is used extensively in clinical oncology for the treatment of a subset of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although As2O3 is known to regulate activation of several signaling cascades, the key events, accounting for its antileukemic properties, remain to be defined. We provide evidence that arsenic can directly bind to cysteine 299 in AMPKα and inhibit its activity. This inhibition of AMPK by arsenic is required in part for its cytotoxic effects on primitive leukemic progenitors from patients with AML, while concomitant treatment with an AMPK activator antagonizes in vivo the arsenic-induced antileukemic effects in a xenograft AML mouse model. A consequence of AMPK inhibition is activation of the mTOR pathway as a negative regulatory feedback loop. However, when AMPK expression is lost, arsenic-dependent activation of the kinase RSK downstream of MAPK activity compensates the generation of regulatory feedback signals through phosphorylation of downstream mTOR targets. Thus, therapeutic regimens with As2O3 will need to include inhibitors of both the mTOR and RSK pathways in combination to prevent engagement of negative feedback loops and maximize antineoplastic responses. Mol Cancer Ther; 14(1); 202–12. ©2014 AACR.

Arsenic compounds exert important biological effects and arsenic trioxide has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Much of arsenic’s actions in cells reflect its ability to bind thiol groups in cellular proteins or to affect the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to the engagement and regulation of several cellular signaling pathways. Arsenic has been also shown to degrade abnormal fusion proteins found in myeloid leukemias. It has also been shown to effect NFκB, MAPK, mTOR and Hedgehog pathways which can modulate the viability of cancer cells. Many clinical trials have been performed to examine the clinical efficacy of arsenic trioxide alone or in combination with other agents in the treatment of various hematological malignancies. The continuous advances in basic and translational research and the better understanding of the mechanisms of action of arsenic should lead to more effective combinations with other agents that could result in better clinical outcomes.