1. Cost-effectiveness of the regimen proposed by the International Consortium on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
- Author
-
María del Pilar Ortíz-Vilchis, Roberta Demichelis-Gómez, María José Díaz-Huízar, Lorena Guerrero-Torres, Sergio Rodríguez-Rodríguez, and Alan Pomerantz
- Subjects
Acute promyelocytic leukemia ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cost effectiveness ,Population ,Newly diagnosed ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Second line ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Immunology and Allergy ,Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs ,Arsenic trioxide ,education ,health care economics and organizations ,Complete response ,Cost-utility ,education.field_of_study ,All-trans retinoic acid ,business.industry ,Hematology ,medicine.disease ,Regimen ,chemistry ,Original Article ,Cost-effectiveness ,RC633-647.5 ,business ,IC-APL ,030215 immunology - Abstract
Introduction We performed cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of the modified International Consortium on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia protocol in Mexico for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia. Methods We performed a three-state Markov analysis: stable disease (first line complete response [CR]), disease event (relapse, second line response and CR) and death. The modified IC-APL protocol is composed of three phases: induction, consolidation and maintenance. Cost and outcomes were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs); quality-adjusted life-years were used to calculate incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs). Results The CR was achieved in 18 patients (90%), treated with the IC-APL protocol as the first-line option; one patient (5%) died in induction, another one never achieved CR (5%); of the 18 patients that achieved CR, 1 relapsed (5.5%). The median treatment cost of the IC-APL protocol was $21,523 USD. The average life-year in our study was 7.8 years, while the average quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was 6.1 years. When comparing the ICER between the IC-APL and the all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plus arsenic trioxide (ATO) protocols, we found the different costs of $6497, $19,133 and $17,123 USD in Italy, the USA and Canada, respectively. In relation to the ICUR, we found the different costs to be $13,955 and $11,979 USD in the USA and Canada, respectively. Conclusion Taking into account the similar response rates, lower cost and easy access to the modified IC-APL regimen, we consider it a cost-effective and cost-utility protocol, deeming it the treatment of choice for our population.
- Published
- 2021