1. Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation and liver disease: a pooled-analysis of >20 000 patients
- Author
-
Alexandra Schratter, Feifan Ouyang, Philipp Sommer, Shaojie Chen, Yuehui Yin, Simone Zanchi, Márcio Galindo Kiuchi, Willem-Jan Acou, Martin Martinek, Jiazhi Wang, Lin Zhu, Helmut Pürerfellner, Shaowen Liu, Christian Meyer, Piotr Futyma, Julian K.R. Chun, Boris Schmidt, and Zhiyu Ling
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Administration, Oral ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Lower risk ,Brain Ischemia ,03 medical and health sciences ,Liver disease ,0302 clinical medicine ,Thromboembolism ,Internal medicine ,Atrial Fibrillation ,Humans ,Medicine ,Pharmacology (medical) ,In patient ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Patient group ,Stroke ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,business.industry ,Liver Diseases ,Anticoagulants ,Mean age ,Atrial fibrillation ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Pooled analysis ,Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Intracranial Hemorrhages - Abstract
Aims Anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease represents a clinical dilemma. We sought to evaluate the efficacy/safety of different anticoagulation, i.e. vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in such patient group. Methods and results This was a pooled-analysis enrolling up-to-date clinical data. Two subsets: subset A (VKA vs. Non-Anticoagulation) and subset B (NOACs vs. VKA) were pre-specified. The study outcomes were ischaemic stroke (IS)/thromboembolism (TE), major bleeding (MB), intracranial bleeding (ICB), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and all-cause mortality. A total of 20 042 patients’ data were analysed (subset A: N = 10 275, subset B: N = 9767). Overall mean age: 71 ± 11 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score: 4.0 ± 1.8, mean HAS-BLED score: 3.6 ± 1.2. The majority of the patients had Child-Pugh category (A-B). As compared with Non-Anticoagulation, VKA seemed to reduce the risk of IS/TE [odds ratio (OR): 0.60, P = 0.05], but heighten the risk of all-bleeding events including MB (OR: 2.81, P = 0.01), ICB (OR: 1.60, P = 0.01), and GIB (OR: 3.32, P = 0.01). When compared with VKA, NOACs had similar efficacy in reducing the risk of IS/TE (OR: 0.82, P = 0.64), significantly lower risk of MB (OR: 0.54, P = 0.0003) and ICB (OR: 0.35, P Conclusions VKA appears to reduce the risk of IS/TE but increase all-bleeding events. NOACs have similar effect in reducing the risk of IS/TE and have significantly lower risk of MB and ICB as compared with VKA. NOACs seem to be associated with better clinical outcome than VKA in patients with mild–moderate liver disease.
- Published
- 2021