Search

Purpose Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) includes chronic bronchitis, small airways disease, and emphysema. Diagnosis of COPD requires spirometric evidence and may be normal even when small airways disease or emphysema is present. Emphysema increases the risk of exacerbations, and is associated with all-cause mortality and increased risk of lung cancer. We evaluated the prevalence of emphysema in participants with and without a prior history of COPD. Methods We reviewed a prospective cohort of 52,726 subjects who underwent baseline low dose CT screening for lung cancer from 2003 to 2016 in the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program. Results Of 52,726 participants, 23.8%(12,542) had CT evidence of emphysema. Of these 12,542 participants with emphysema, 76.5%(9595/12,542) had no prior COPD diagnosis even though 23.6% (2258/9595) had moderate or severe emphysema. Among 12,542 participants, significant predictors of no prior COPD diagnosis were: male (OR = 1.47, p Conclusion Emphysema was identified in 23.8% participants undergoing LDCT and was unsuspected in 76.5%. LDCT provides an opportunity to identify emphysema, and recommend smoking cessation.

Purpose: To address the prevalence of lung cancer in high and low-risk people according to their smoking history, age, and CT findings of emphysema. Methods: We reviewed the baseline low-dose CT scans of 62,124 current, former and never smokers, aged 40-90 to determine the prevalence of lung cancer. We performed logistic regression analysis of the prevalence of lung cancer to determine the odds ratio (OR) for emphysema, conditionally on age, female gender, and ethnicity. Results: The prevalence of lung cancer was 1.4% (95% CI: 1.3-1.6) for current smokers, 1.1% (95% CI: 1.0-1.2) for former smokers, and 0.4% (95% CI: 0.3-0.6) for never smokers. Emphysema was identified in 28.5% (6,684), 20.6% (5,422), and 1.6% (194) of current, former, and never smokers, respectively. The prevalence of lung cancer among current smokers was 1.1% for those without emphysema vs. 2.3% for those with emphysema (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-2.2) and the corresponding difference for former smokers was 0.9% vs. 1.8% (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3-2.2), and for never smokers, it was 0.4% vs. 2.6% (OR: 6.3; 95% CI: 2.4-16.9). Conclusions: Identification of emphysema in low-dose CT scans increases the risk of lung cancer and is important in determining follow-up of current, former, and never smokers. © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

BACKGROUND One of the goals of a noninvasive test for bladder carcinoma screening would be to reduce surveillance cystoscopies among patients with a history of bladder carcinoma. In addition, an accurate bladder carcinoma marker could be used to screen a high-risk population. The authors examined the efficacy of the hyaluronic acid–hyaluronidase (HA-HAase) and BTA-Stat tests to detect and predict bladder carcinoma recurrence and tested their specificity for bladder carcinoma screening. METHODS Over a four year period, the authors prospectively collected 225 urine specimens from 70 bladder carcinoma patients and analyzed them by the HA-HAase test. Tumors were identified during 178 visits, and in 47 specimens there was no evidence of disease (NED). Twenty six of these 70 patients were randomly selected to have the BTA-Stat test (111 surveillance visits). In a separate study, 401 former Department of Energy (DOE) workers, who are likely to be at a higher risk for bladder carcinoma, were screened by the HA-HAase and BTA-Stat urine tests. RESULTS The HA-HAase test had an approximately 91.0% sensitivity, 70% specificity, 87% accuracy, 92% positive predictive value (PPV), and 67% negative predictive value (NPV) in the 70 bladder carcinoma patients. There were 14 false-positives; however, 6 of these had recurred in approximately 5 months. Only 4 out of 33 NED cases recurred in that time period (chi-square = 5.43; degrees of freedom [DF] = 1; P = 0.0198). Thus, a false-positive HA-HAase test carried a significant risk of recurrence within five months (relative risk [RR] = 3.5; odds ratio [OR] = 5.44). In a direct comparison, the HA-HAase and BTA-Stat had 94% and 61% sensitivity, 63% and 74% specificity, 87% and 64% accuracy, 89% and 88% PPV, and 77% and 38% NPV, respectively. While 6 of the 10 false-positive on the HA-HAase test recurred in 5 months (chi-square = 9.6; DF = 1; P = 0.004), only 1 of the 7 false-positives on the BTA-Stat test recurred in that time period (chi-square = 0.096; DF = 1; P = 0.756). The RR and OR for the HA-HAase test were 10.2 and 24, and for the BTA-Stat, 1.4 and 1.5, respectively. In the DOE worker screening study, the HA-HAase and BTA-Stat had 14% (56 out of 401) and 16.7% (67 out of 401) positive rates, respectively. Sixty three percent of the positives on the BTA-Stat test, but only 25% of the positives on the HA-HAase test, had benign urologic conditions. None of the biomarker positive cases with clinical follow-up (n = 29) had evidence of bladder carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS The HA-HAase test is efficient and superior to the BTA-Stat for detecting and predicting bladder carcinoma recurrence. Noninvasive tests with low false positive rates could be used for bladder carcinoma screening in high-risk populations (e.g., those with occupational exposure to carcinogens or smokers). Cancer 2002;95:61–72. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10652

As the debate over health care reform continues, costs have become a critical measure in the many plans and proposals to come before us. Knowing costs is important because it allows comparisons across such disparate health conditions as AIDS, Alzheimer's disease, heart disease, and cancer. This book presents the results of a major study estimating the large and largely overlooked costs of occupational injury and illness--costs as large as those for cancer and over four times the costs of AIDS.The incidence and mortality of occupational injury and illness were assessed by reviewing data from national surveys and applied an attributable-risk-proportion method. Costs were assessed using the human capital method that decomposes costs into direct categories such as medical costs and insurance administration expenses, as well as indirect categories such as lost earnings and lost fringe benefits. The total is estimated to be $155 billion and is likely to be low as it does not include costs associated with pain and suffering or of home care provided by family members.Invaluable as an aid in the analysis of policy issues, "Costs of Occupational Injury" "and Illness" will serve as a resource and reference for economists, policy analysts, public health researchers, insurance administrators, labor unions and labor lawyers, benefits managers, and environmental scientists, among others.J. Paul Leigh is Professor in the School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of California, Davis. Stephen Markowitz, M.D., is Professor in the Department of Community Health and Social Medicine, City University of New York Medical School. Marianne Fahs is Director of the Health Policy Research Center, Milano Graduate School of Management and Urban Policy, New School University. Philip Landrigan, M.D., is Wise Professor and Chair of the Department of Community Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York.