Search

Summary Loss of p53 function contributes to the development of many cancers. While cell-autonomous consequences of p53 mutation have been studied extensively, the role of p53 in regulating the anti-tumor immune response is still poorly understood. Here, we show that loss of p53 in cancer cells modulates the tumor-immune landscape to circumvent immune destruction. Deletion of p53 promotes the recruitment and instruction of suppressive myeloid CD11b+ cells, in part through increased expression of CXCR3/CCR2-associated chemokines and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), and attenuates the CD4+ T helper 1 (Th1) and CD8+ T cell responses in vivo. p53-null tumors also show an accumulation of suppressive regulatory T (Treg) cells. Finally, we show that two key drivers of tumorigenesis, activation of KRAS and deletion of p53, cooperate to promote immune tolerance., Graphical Abstract, Highlights • Tumor-specific loss of p53 delays tumor rejection in immune-competent hosts • p53 loss increases myeloid infiltration through enhanced cytokine secretion • The increase in Treg cells in response to loss of p53 is independent of Kras mutation • Kras mutations coordinate with p53 loss to regulate myeloid recruitment, TP53 is one of the most frequently mutated genes in cancer; however, its significance in controlling tumor-immune crosstalk is not fully understood. Blagih et al. highlight a key role for tumor-associated loss of p53, a common oncogenic event, in regulating myeloid and T cell responses.

Purpose: Patients with colorectal cancer who respond to the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab often develop resistance within several months of initiating therapy. To design new lines of treatment, the molecular landscape of resistant tumors must be ascertained. We investigated the role of mutations in the EGFR signaling axis on the acquisition of resistance to cetuximab in patients and cellular models. Experimental Design: Tissue samples were obtained from 37 patients with colorectal cancer who became refractory to cetuximab. Colorectal cancer cells sensitive to cetuximab were treated until resistant derivatives emerged. Mutational profiling of biopsies and cell lines was performed. Structural modeling and functional analyses were performed to causally associate the alleles to resistance. Results: The genetic profile of tumor specimens obtained after cetuximab treatment revealed the emergence of a complex pattern of mutations in EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA genes, including two novel EGFR ectodomain mutations (R451C and K467T). Mutational profiling of cetuximab-resistant cells recapitulated the molecular landscape observed in clinical samples and revealed three additional EGFR alleles: S464L, G465R, and I491M. Structurally, these mutations are located in the cetuximab-binding region, except for the R451C mutant. Functionally, EGFR ectodomain mutations prevent binding to cetuximab but a subset is permissive for interaction with panitumumab. Conclusions: Colorectal tumors evade EGFR blockade by constitutive activation of downstream signaling effectors and through mutations affecting receptor–antibody binding. Both mechanisms of resistance may occur concomitantly. Our data have implications for designing additional lines of therapy for patients with colorectal cancer who relapse upon treatment with anti-EGFR antibodies. Clin Cancer Res; 21(9); 2157–66. ©2015 AACR.

Purpose: Targeted inhibition of EGFR with the mAbs cetuximab or panitumumab is a valuable treatment for RAS wild-type colorectal cancers. The efficacy of EGFR blockade is limited by the emergence of acquired resistance often attributed to secondary KRAS mutations. Remarkably, tumor biopsies from resistant patients show that only a fraction of the resilient cells carry KRAS mutations. We hypothesized that a paracrine cross-talk driven by the resistant subpopulation may provide in trans protection of surrounding sensitive cells. Experimental design: Conditioned medium assays and three-dimensional cocultures were used to assess paracrine networks between cetuximab-sensitive and -resistant cells. Production of EGFR ligands by cells sensitive to cetuximab and panitumumab was measured. The ability of recombinant EGFR ligands to protect sensitive cells from cetuximab was assessed. Biochemical activation of the EGFR signaling pathway was measured by Western blotting. Results: Colorectal cancer cells sensitive to EGFR blockade can successfully grow despite cetuximab treatment when in the company of their resistant derivatives. Media conditioned by resistant cells protect sensitive parental cells from cetuximab. EGFR blockade triggers increased secretion of TGFα and amphiregulin. Increased secretion of ligands by resistant cells can sustain EGFR/ERK signaling in sensitive cells. Conclusions: Colorectal cancer cells that develop resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab secrete TGFα and amphiregulin, which protect the surrounding cells from EGFR blockade. This paracrine protective mechanism might be therapeutically exploitable. Clin Cancer Res; 20(24); 6429–38. ©2014 AACR.

SummaryThere are no effective therapies for the ∼30% of human malignancies with mutant RAS oncogenes. Using a kinome-centered synthetic lethality screen, we find that suppression of the ERBB3 receptor tyrosine kinase sensitizes KRAS mutant lung and colon cancer cells to MEK inhibitors. We show that MEK inhibition results in MYC-dependent transcriptional upregulation of ERBB3, which is responsible for intrinsic drug resistance. Drugs targeting both EGFR and ERBB2, each capable of forming heterodimers with ERBB3, can reverse unresponsiveness to MEK inhibition by decreasing inhibitory phosphorylation of the proapoptotic proteins BAD and BIM. Moreover, ERBB3 protein level is a biomarker of response to combinatorial treatment. These data suggest a combination strategy for treating KRAS mutant colon and lung cancers and a way to identify the tumors that are most likely to benefit from such combinatorial treatment.

KRAS mutations are the most common oncogenic event in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression and their occurrence is associated with lack of response to anti epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted therapies. Using preclinical models and patients' samples we recently reported that the emergence of KRAS mutations but also KRAS amplification is associated with acquired resistance to the EGFR inhibitors cetuximab or panitumumab. We reasoned that KRAS amplification may also be responsible for primary resistance to these agents. Furthermore, while the prevalence of KRAS mutations has been well established in CRC, little is known about the frequency of KRAS amplification in large CRC series. We performed a screening of 1,039 CRC samples to assess the prevalence of KRAS amplification in this tumor type and further evaluated the role of this genetic alteration on the sensitivity to anti EGFR therapies. We detected KRAS amplification in 7/1,039 (0.67%) and 1/102 evaluable CRC specimens and cell lines, respectively. KRAS amplification was mutually exclusive with KRAS mutations. Tumors or cell lines harboring this genetic lesion are not responsive to anti-EGFR inhibitors. Although KRAS amplification is an infrequent event in CRC, it might be responsible for precluding response to anti-EGFR treatment in a small proportion of patients.

A main limitation of therapies that selectively target kinase signalling pathways is the emergence of secondary drug resistance. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that binds the extracellular domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is effective in a subset of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancers. After an initial response, secondary resistance invariably ensues, thereby limiting the clinical benefit of this drug. The molecular bases of secondary resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancer are poorly understood. Here we show that molecular alterations (in most instances point mutations) of KRAS are causally associated with the onset of acquired resistance to anti-EGFR treatment in colorectal cancers. Expression of mutant KRAS under the control of its endogenous gene promoter was sufficient to confer cetuximab resistance, but resistant cells remained sensitive to combinatorial inhibition of EGFR and mitogen-activated protein-kinase kinase (MEK). Analysis of metastases from patients who developed resistance to cetuximab or panitumumab showed the emergence of KRAS amplification in one sample and acquisition of secondary KRAS mutations in 60% (6 out of 10) of the cases. KRAS mutant alleles were detectable in the blood of cetuximab-treated patients as early as 10 months before radiographic documentation of disease progression. In summary, the results identify KRAS mutations as frequent drivers of acquired resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancers, indicate that the emergence of KRAS mutant clones can be detected non-invasively months before radiographic progression and suggest early initiation of a MEK inhibitor as a rational strategy for delaying or reversing drug resistance.

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) that are sensitive to the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies cetuximab or panitumumab almost always develop resistance within several months of initiating therapy. We report the emergence of polyclonal KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in CRC cells with acquired resistance to EGFR blockade. Regardless of the genetic alterations, resistant cells consistently displayed mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation, which persisted after EGFR blockade. Inhibition of MEK1/2 alone failed to impair the growth of resistant cells in vitro and in vivo. An RNA interference screen demonstrated that suppression of EGFR, together with silencing of MEK1/2, was required to hamper the proliferation of resistant cells. Indeed, concomitant pharmacological blockade of MEK and EGFR induced prolonged ERK inhibition and severely impaired the growth of resistant tumor cells. Heterogeneous and concomitant mutations in KRAS and NRAS were also detected in plasma samples from patients who developed resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies. A mouse xenotransplant from a CRC patient who responded and subsequently relapsed upon EGFR therapy showed exquisite sensitivity to combinatorial treatment with MEK and EGFR inhibitors. Collectively, these results identify genetically distinct mechanisms that mediate secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies, all of which reactivate ERK signaling. These observations provide a rational strategy to overcome the multifaceted clonal heterogeneity that emerges when tumors are treated with targeted agents. We propose that MEK inhibitors, in combination with cetuximab or panitumumab, should be tested in CRC patients who become refractory to anti-EGFR therapies.

EGF receptor (EGFR)-targeted monoclonal antibodies are effective in a subset of metastatic colorectal cancers. Inevitably, all patients develop resistance, which occurs through emergence of KRAS mutations in approximately 50% of the cases. We show that amplification of the MET proto-oncogene is associated with acquired resistance in tumors that do not develop KRAS mutations during anti-EGFR therapy. Amplification of the MET locus was present in circulating tumor DNA before relapse was clinically evident. Functional studies show that MET activation confers resistance to anti-EGFR therapy both in vitro and in vivo. Notably, in patient-derived colorectal cancer xenografts, MET amplification correlated with resistance to EGFR blockade, which could be overcome by MET kinase inhibitors. These results highlight the role of MET in mediating primary and secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer and encourage the use of MET inhibitors in patients displaying resistance as a result of MET amplification. Significance: Amplification of the MET proto-oncogene is responsible for de novo and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in a subset of colorectal cancers. As multiple anti-MET therapeutic strategies are available, these findings offer immediate novel opportunities to design clinical studies. Cancer Discov; 3(6); 658–73. ©2013 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 591

Occurence of acquired resistance constitutes one of the major limitations to tumor treatment. In colorectal cancer, the use of anti-EGFR antibodies such as cetuximab and panitumumab is effective in only 15-20% of patients, till secondary resistance to targeted treatment develops. Shedding light on the molecular basis of resistance represents then a mandatory effort in order to foster new lines of therapy. We recently showed that KRAS mutations are responsible for the emergence of secondary resistance to EGFR therapy in a subset of CRC patients (Misale et al., Nature 2012). Here we investigated the role of additional genetic alterations in the development of resistance to EGFR blockade in CRCs. We initially exploited the “liquid biopsy” approach to measure tumor derived DNA mutations in the blood of patients who initially responded and then became refractory to either cetuximab or panitumumab. We found that multiple KRAS and NRAS alleles often emerge during treatment. To better characterize the role of these genetic alterations in CRC, we generated preclinical models, by chronic treatment of several CRC cell lines with cetuximab or panitumumab until resistant derivatives emerged. The resistant populations were a mixture of clones bearing an heterogeneous panel of genetic alterations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF at various frequencies. Biochemical pathway analyses revealed that, regardless of the genetic alterations, resistant derivatives consistently displayed MEK and ERK activation, which persisted on EGFR inhibition. Collectively, these results identify genetically distinct mechanisms that mediate secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapies, all of which converge on the reactivation of ERK signaling. With this work, we provide a rational strategy to overcome the multifaceted clonal heterogeneity that emerges when tumors are treated with anti-EGFR drugs; we propose that MEK inhibitors, in combination with cetuximab or panitumumab, should be considered for the treatment of CRC patients who become refractory to anti-EGFR therapies. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):B110. Citation Format: Sabrina Arena, Sandra Misale, Simona Lamba, Giulia Siravegna, Alice Lallo, Sebastijan Hobor, Mariangela Russo, Michela Buscarino, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Katia Bencardino, Alessio Amatu, Salvatore Siena, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Alberto Bardelli. Heterogeneous genetic alterations emerge during acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B110.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting EGFR are used in the clinic to treat KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). After an initial response, secondary resistance occurs thereby limiting the clinical benefit of these drugs. Relapsed patients have no further therapeutic options, therefore, elucidating the molecular basis of resistance is a prerequisite for the development of further lines of therapy. We took advantage from a panel of CRC cell lines sensitive to EGFR inhibition by treating with cetuximab or panitumumab until resistant derivatives emerged. The resistant populations were heterogeneous mixture of cells bearing different alterations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes at various frequencies. An RNA interference (siRNA) genetic screening unveiled that suppression of MEK1/2 together with silencing of EGFR was effective in impairing the growth of the resistant cells. Combinatorial treatment with pimasertib, a selective allosteric MEK inhibitor, together with cetuximab re-sensitizes anti-EGFR resistant derivatives despite the genetic alterations heterogeneity. Combinatorial treatment was effective in vitro and in vivo both in cell derived xenografts and in an acquired resistant patient derived xenograft (xenopatient). These observations provide a rational strategy to overcome the multifaceted clonal heterogeneity that emerges when tumors are treated with targeted agents. We propose that MEK inhibitors, in combination with cetuximab or panitumumab, should be tested in clinical trials in CRC patients who become refractory to anti-EGFR therapies. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):C94. Citation Format: Sandra Misale, Sabrina Arena, Simona Lamba, Giulia Siravegna, Alice Lallo, Sebastijan Hobor, Mariangela Russo, Michela Buscarino, Andrea Sartore-Bianchi, Katia Bencardino, Alessio Amatu, Salvatore Siena, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Alberto Bardelli. Heterogeneous mechanisms of acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer are sensitive to concomitant inhibition of EGFR and MEK. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C94.

11005 Background: The anti EGFR monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab are used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer patients but their clinical efficacy is limited by the development of acquired resistance. We recently reported that secondary KRAS mutations are responsible for acquired resistance in approximately 50% of the patients who initially respond to cetuximab or panitumumab (Misale et al., Nature 2012; Diaz et al., Nature 2012). Here we studied the molecular bases of relapse in CRC patients who do not develop KRAS mutations during the course of anti-EGFR therapy. Methods: Next generation sequencing was applied to tumor biopsies to identify genetic alterations associated with relapse to cetuximab and panitumumab in mCRC patients. Detection and quantitation of genetic alterations in circulating tumor DNA was used to monitor the occurrence of KRAS mutations and MET amplification in blood samples. Results: Molecular analyses of tumor biopsies from patients who did not develop KRAS mutations during anti-EGFR therapy revealed high level of amplification of the MET proto-oncogene in 3/5 cases. Quantitative PCR, FISH and IHC analysis confirmed high level of MET amplification in the post-therapy samples but not in the matched pre-treatment tissues. We developed a PCR based assay to detect the presence of the MET amplicon in circulating, cell-free, DNA. We found that MET amplification could be detected in the blood as early as 3 months after initiation of anti EGFR therapy. To functionally evaluate the role of MET amplification on resistance to anti EGFR antibody therapies we exploited patient-derived CRC xenografts (‘xenopatients). We found that (2/2) xenopatients established from MET amplified tumors were completely refractory to cetuximab but showed sensitivity to the Met inhibitor crizotinib. Conclusions: Amplification of the MET proto-oncogene is responsible for acquired acquired resistance to anti-EGFR antibody therapy in a subset of CRCs. The emergence of MET amplification in circulating, cell-free, DNA may be used to select patients most likely to benefit from anti MET therapies.

A main limitation of therapies that selectively target kinase signaling pathways is the emergence of secondary drug resistance. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that binds the extracellular domain of EGFR, is effective in a subset of KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancers. After an initial response, secondary resistance invariably ensues, thereby limiting the clinical benefit of this drug. The molecular bases of secondary resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancer are poorly understood. Here, we show for the first time that molecular alterations (in most instances point mutations) of KRAS are causally associated with the onset of acquired resistance to anti-EGFR treatment in colorectal cancers. Expression of mutant KRAS under the control of its endogenous gene promoter was sufficient to confer cetuximab resistance but resistant cells remained sensitive to combinatorial inhibition of EGFR and MEK (Figure 1). Analysis of metastases from patients who developed resistance to cetuximab or panitumumab showed the emergence of KRAS amplification in one sample and acquisition of secondary KRAS mutations in 60 % (6/10) of the cases (Table 1). KRAS mutant alleles were detectable in the blood of cetuximab treated patients as early as 10 months prior to radiographic documentation of disease progression. In summary, the results identify KRAS mutations as frequent drivers of acquired resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancers, indicate that the emergence of KRAS mutant clones can be detected non-invasively months prior to radiographic progression and suggest early initiation of a MEK inhibitor as a rational strategy for delaying or reversing drug resistance.