Search

Summary Background PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are active in metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but positive randomised data supporting their use as a first-line treatment are lacking. In this study we assessed outcomes with first-line pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with previously untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma. Methods KEYNOTE-361 is a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial of patients aged at least 18 years, with untreated, locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of up to 2. Eligible patients were enrolled from 201 medical centres in 21 countries and randomly allocated (1:1:1) via an interactive voice-web response system to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for a maximum of 35 cycles plus intravenous chemotherapy (gemcitabine [1000 mg/m2] on days 1 and 8 and investigator's choice of cisplatin [70 mg/m2] or carboplatin [area under the curve 5] on day 1 of every 3-week cycle) for a maximum of six cycles, pembrolizumab alone, or chemotherapy alone, stratified by choice of platinum therapy and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS). Neither patients nor investigators were masked to the treatment assignment or CPS. At protocol-specified final analysis, sequential hypothesis testing began with superiority of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the total population (all patients randomly allocated to a treatment) for the dual primary endpoints of progression-free survival (p value boundary 0·0019), assessed by masked, independent central review, and overall survival (p value boundary 0·0142), followed by non-inferiority and superiority of overall survival for pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in the patient population with CPS of at least 10 and in the total population (also a primary endpoint). Safety was assessed in the as-treated population (all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment). This study is completed and is no longer enrolling patients, and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02853305 . Findings Between Oct 19, 2016 and June 29, 2018, 1010 patients were enrolled and allocated to receive pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n=351), pembrolizumab monotherapy (n=307), or chemotherapy alone (n=352). Median follow-up was 31·7 months (IQR 27·7–36·0). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy did not significantly improve progression-free survival, with a median progression-free survival of 8·3 months (95% CI 7·5–8·5) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 7·1 months (6·4–7·9) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·78, 95% CI 0·65–0·93; p=0·0033), or overall survival, with a median overall survival of 17·0 months (14·5–19·5) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 14·3 months (12·3–16·7) in the chemotherapy group (0·86, 0·72–1·02; p=0·0407). No further formal statistical hypothesis testing was done. In analyses of overall survival with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy (now exploratory based on hierarchical statistical testing), overall survival was similar between these treatment groups, both in the total population (15·6 months [95% CI 12·1–17·9] with pembrolizumab vs 14·3 months [12·3–16·7] with chemotherapy; HR 0·92, 95% CI 0·77–1·11) and the population with CPS of at least 10 (16·1 months [13·6–19·9] with pembrolizumab vs 15·2 months [11·6–23·3] with chemotherapy; 1·01, 0·77–1·32). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event attributed to study treatment was anaemia with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (104 [30%] of 349 patients) or chemotherapy alone (112 [33%] of 342 patients), and diarrhoea, fatigue, and hyponatraemia (each affecting four [1%] of 302 patients) with pembrolizumab alone. Six (1%) of 1010 patients died due to an adverse event attributed to study treatment; two patients in each treatment group. One each occurred due to cardiac arrest and device-related sepsis in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group, one each due to cardiac failure and malignant neoplasm progression in the pembrolizumab group, and one each due to myocardial infarction and ischaemic colitis in the chemotherapy group. Interpretation The addition of pembrolizumab to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy did not significantly improve efficacy and should not be widely adopted for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Funding Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Purpose Immune checkpoint programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor therapy has shown response in metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We evaluated the safety and tolerability of atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1) in combination with trimodal therapy in patients with localized MIBC. Methods and Materials A prospective nonrandomized phase 1 study using a 3 + 3 design was conducted in patients with localized MIBC (T2-T4a N0M0) treated on a bladder preservation program. After transurethral resection of bladder tumor, patients received concurrent radiation therapy at a fixed dose of 50 Gy in 20 fractions, gemcitabine (100 mg/m2, intravenously once weekly for 4 weeks) and atezolizumab (1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for 16 cycles). The primary endpoint was safety/toxicity profile. Results Between May 2018 and March 2019, 8 patients (6 male and 2 female) were enrolled. The first 5 patients received atezolizumab at 1200 mg, 3 of whom developed grade 3 side effects (2 of them dose-limiting toxicity). Atezolizumab dose was reduced to 840 mg for 3 additional patients. The study was terminated due to the presence of 3 grade 3 adverse events (2 of which were dose-limiting toxicity) despite the reduced atezolizumab dose. Gastrointestinal events were the main toxicity. No grade 4 to 5 adverse effects were observed. Conclusions Concurrent administration of atezolizumab with concomitant hypofractionated radiation therapy and gemcitabine appears to be associated with unacceptable gastrointestinal toxicity. Although the numbers studied are small, our results suggest considerable caution with its concurrent use with trimodal therapy for MIBC.

Since just after the year 2000 in Quebec, the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mcrpc) has evolved considerably, with the inclusion of docetaxel-based chemotherapy, bone-targeted therapies (zoledronic acid and denosumab), and more recently, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and cabazitaxel for docetaxel-refractory patients. In the present study, we aimed to analyze contemporary mcrpc management patterns and therapy utilization trends in Quebec. The study cohort consisted of patients dying of prostate cancer (pca) between January 2001 and December 2013, selected from Quebec public health care insurance databases. Patient selection was based on death from a pca-related cause or therapy used according to the Canadian Urological Association guidelines on mcrpc management. Treatments included chemotherapy (mitoxantrone before 2005 and docetaxel after 2005), abiraterone, bone-targeted therapy (zoledronic acid or denosumab, or both), and palliative radiation therapy (rt). During the study period, neither enzalutamide nor cabazitaxel was publicly reimbursed in Quebec, and as a result, no capture of their use was possible for this study. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the probability of receiving chemotherapy, bone-targeted therapies, and palliative rt before death from pca. Overall, the database search identified 3106 patients who died of pca between January 2001 and December 2013. Median age of death was 78 years. Of those 3106 patients, just 2568 (83%) received mcrpc-specific treatments: chemotherapy, abiraterone, palliative rt, or bone-targeted therapy, the other 17% of the patients were managed solely with maximum androgen blockade (androgen deprivation therapy plus anti-androgens) despite a record of pca-related death. Logistic regression analyses indicate that patients dying after 2005 were more likely to have received chemotherapy [odds ratio (or): 1.51, 95% ci: 1.22 to 1.85] and bone-targeted therapy (or: 1.97, 95% ci: 1.64 to 2.37). Age was a significant predictor for the use of chemotherapy, bone-targeted therapy, and palliative rt (ors in the range 0.96&ndash, 0.98, p < 0.05). Patient age seems to be a strong determinant in the of selection mcrpc therapy, affecting the probability of the use of chemotherapy, bone-targeted therapy, or palliative rt. Although chemotherapy is still used only in a small percentage of patients, the introduction of new therapies&mdash, such as bone-targeted therapy, docetaxel, and abiraterone&mdash, affected treatment selection over time. The availability of enzalutamide since February 2014 will likely produce additional changes in mcrpc management.

Background: Local control following trimodality therapy (TMT) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) requires further optimization. Objective: Evaluating the biologic endpoint, feasibility, and toxicity of integrating everolimus to TMT in patients with MIBC. Methods: This was a phase I trial in patients with MIBC who were not surgical candidates or who refused cystectomy. Following maximal transurethral tumor resection, patients were treated by radiotherapy (50 Gy/20 fractions), gemcitabine (100 mg/m2/weekly) and escalating doses of everolimus (2.5–5.0 mg/day). Everolimus was given daily for one month prior to radiation, during treatment, and one month post-radiation. Toxicity assessment followed the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria. Biologic endpoint with downregulation of phospho-S6 (pS6) was assessed using immunohistochemistry. Local response was evaluated with imaging and bladder biopsy post-therapy. Results: 10 patients were recruited; 8 males, 2 females. Median age was 78 years (range: 63–85). Four patients entered everolimus 2.5 mg cohort. Six other patients entered everolimus 5.0 mg cohort. Toxicities were encountered in 2 patients (Grade I), 6 patients (Grade II), 9 patients (Grade III) and 1 patient (Grade IV), with some experiencing more than one toxicity. Most Grade III and IV toxicities were encountered from everolimus alone prior to combination testing. Trial was terminated early due to toxicity. Interestingly, 6/10 patients (60%) achieved a complete response with negative post-treatment biopsies. Significant decrease of pS6 was demonstrated post-therapy (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Although combining everolimus with TMT achieved a biological endpoint and complete response in a significant number of patients with MIBC and negative prognostic factors, it was associated with unacceptable increased toxicity.

Background Docetaxel-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of the management of symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) since 2004. This study aimed to describe how real-world clinical practice was changed with the public funding of novel hormonal agents (abiraterone and enzalutamide) in Quebec. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study in two McGill University hospitals. Hospital-based cancer registries were used to select mCRPC patients in medical oncology departments from January 2010 to June 2014. Two groups according to mCRPC diagnosis year were built, with 2012 chosen as the cut-off year, corresponding to the year abiraterone was approved for public reimbursement in second-line in Quebec. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate time to first docetaxel prescription since mCRPC diagnosis before and after 2012. Cox regression was used to identify predictive factors of docetaxel and novel hormonal agent use. Results In our cohort, 308 patients diagnosed with mCRPC were selected with 162 patients in the pre-2012 group and 146 patients in the post-2012 group. The median age at mCRPC was 74.0 years old. At 12 months from diagnosis, 69% of patients received a prescription for docetaxel in the pre-2012 group comparatively to 53% in the post-2012 group. Factors that decreased the likelihood of docetaxel utilization were: age older than 80 at mCRPC diagnosis (HR: 0.5; 95%CI: 0.3–0.7), mCRPC diagnosis after 2012 (HR: 0.6; 95%CI: 0.4–0.8), and asymptomatic disease at mCRPC diagnosis (HR: 0.5; 95%CI: 0.3–0.7). Conclusion The introduction of novel hormonal agents reduced first-line and overall docetaxel utilization and delayed time to its initiation.

Purpose The TAXYNERGY trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01718353) evaluated clinical benefit from early taxane switch and circulating tumor cell (CTC) biomarkers to interrogate mechanisms of sensitivity or resistance to taxanes in men with chemotherapy-naïve, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to docetaxel or cabazitaxel. Men who did not achieve ≥ 30% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline by cycle 4 (C4) switched taxane. The primary clinical endpoint was confirmed ≥ 50% PSA decline versus historical control (TAX327). The primary biomarker endpoint was analysis of post-treatment CTCs to confirm the hypothesis that clinical response was associated with taxane drug-target engagement, evidenced by decreased percent androgen receptor nuclear localization (%ARNL) and increased microtubule bundling. Results Sixty-three patients were randomly assigned to docetaxel (n = 41) or cabazitaxel (n = 22); 44.4% received prior potent androgen receptor–targeted therapy. Overall, 35 patients (55.6%) had confirmed ≥ 50% PSA responses, exceeding the historical control rate of 45.4% (TAX327). Of 61 treated patients, 33 (54.1%) had ≥ 30% PSA declines by C4 and did not switch taxane, 15 patients (24.6%) who did not achieve ≥ 30% PSA declines by C4 switched taxane, and 13 patients (21.3%) discontinued therapy before or at C4. Of patients switching taxane, 46.7% subsequently achieved ≥ 50% PSA decrease. In 26 CTC-evaluable patients, taxane-induced decrease in %ARNL (cycle 1 day 1 v cycle 1 day 8) was associated with a higher rate of ≥ 50% PSA decrease at C4 ( P = .009). Median composite progression-free survival was 9.1 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 11.7 months); median overall survival was not reached at 14 months. Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included fatigue (13.1%) and febrile neutropenia (11.5%). Conclusion The early taxane switch strategy was associated with improved PSA response rates versus TAX327. Taxane-induced shifts in %ARNL may serve as an early biomarker of clinical benefit in patients treated with taxanes.

Introduction: Clinical trial data has shown pazopanib to be noninferior in overall survival (OS) compared to sunitinib as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes and compare dose-modifying toxicities of mRCC patients treated with suntinib or pazopanib in the real-world setting.Methods: Data were collected on mRCC patients using the prospective Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System (CKCis) database from January 2011 to November 2015. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox regression adjusted for several risk factors and the Kaplan-Meier method.Results: We identified 670 patients treated with sunitinib (n=577) and pazopanib (n=93). There were no significant differences in International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups (p=0.807). Patients treated with sunitinib had improved OS compared with pazopanib (median 31.7 vs. 20.6 months, p=0.028; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38‒0.94). Time to treatment failure (TTF) was numerically, but not statistically, improved with sunitinib (medians 11.0 vs. 8.4 months, p=0.130; aHR 0.87; 95% CI 0.59‒1.28). Outcomes with individualized dosing on sunitinib were unavailable for this analysis. Patients treated with sunitinib had a higher incidence of mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, and gastroesophageal reflux disease; patients treated with pazopanib had a higher incidence of hepatotoxicity.Conclusions: In Canadian patients with mRCC, treatment with sunitinib appears to be associated with an improved OS compared to pazopanib in the first-line setting. Patient selection factors and the contemporary practice of individualized dosing with sunitinib may contribute to these real-world outcomes and warrant further investigation.

Background Abiraterone acetate was introduced in Quebec in 2012 for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in patients who had received chemotherapy with docetaxel. This study describes abiraterone use in the early postapproval period and its clinical effectiveness in Quebec, for both patients who had received docetaxel chemotherapy and those who could not receive docetaxel therapy owing to medical reasons. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Quebec public health care administrative databases. Our cohort consisted of patients with mCRPC who received abiraterone between January 2012 and June 2013. Treatment groups were defined as patients who received abiraterone following docetaxel chemotherapy and those who received abiraterone without having had chemotherapy, under the "exception patient" measure. Study outcomes included overall survival, duration of abiraterone therapy and number of hospital days. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the effectiveness of abiraterone adjusted for several covariates. Results Our cohort consisted of 303 patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone (99 after chemotherapy and 204 as exception patients). The median age at initiation of abiraterone therapy was 75.0 for the postchemotherapy group and 80.0 for the exception patient group. The corresponding median survival values were 12 and 14 months (log-rank test p = 0.8). Risk of death was similar in the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.57-1.38]). Interpretation The effectiveness of abiraterone in older patients who were ineligible for chemotherapy was similar to that of patients with prior docetaxel exposure. Overall, the real-world survival benefits of abiraterone were similar to those in the COU-AA-301 trial.

Background We analyzed renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastasis (BM) risk factors and compared BM occurrence in metastatic RCC (mRCC) treated with or without anti-angiogenic agents (AA). Methods Data from all consecutive metastatic RCC patients (patients) treated in a french cancer center between 1995 and 2008 were reviewed. Patients had histologically confirmed advanced RCC without synchronous BM at the time of metastasis diagnosis. AA were sorafenib, sunitinib and bevacizumab. We also included patients treated with mTor inhibitors, temsirolimus and everolimus, as they also demonstrated anti-angiogenic activities. Characteristics of the two groups treated with or without AA were compared with a Fisher exact test. Impact of AA on overall survival (OS) and cumulative rate of brain metastasis (CRBM) was explored by Kaplan-Meier method. Results One hundred and ninety-nine patients with advanced RCC were identified, 51 treated with AA and 148 without AA. The median follow-up duration was 40 months. BM occurred in 35 patients. Characteristics between AA treated and non-AA treated groups were unbalanced and favoring better prognostic factors in AA treated group. Median OS was 24 months. AA treatment was not associated with a lower CRBM (HR=0.58 [0.26-1.30], P =0.187). Median survival free of BM was 11.8 months, CI95% (4.95-18.65) in the group without AA treatment and 28.9 months in the AA group, CI95% (18.64-39.16). Alkaline phosphatase (AP) was an independent prognostic factor for BM ( P =0.05). In multivariate Cox model, after adjustment to AP, AA did not improve the CRBM (aHR=0.53 [0.22-1.32]). Conclusion In this retrospective study, AA did not decrease significantly the CRBM. Elevated AP was a predictive factor for BM in mRCC.

Background: To evaluate the antitumour activity and safety of metronomic cyclophosphamide vs megestrol acetate in progressive and advanced cancer patients having exhausted all effective therapies under standard care. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive orally metronomic cyclophosphamide (50 mg b.i.d) or megestrol acetate (160 mg only daily) until intolerance or progression (RECIST 1.0). The primary efficacy end point was a 2-month progression-free rate (PFR2m). According to Optimal Simon's design and the following assumptions, namely, P0=5%, P1=20%, α=β=10%, the treatment is considered as effective if atleast 5 out of 44 patients achieved PFR2m. Results: Between September 2006 and January 2009, 88 patients were enrolled. Two patients experienced grade 3–4 toxicities in each arm (4%). One toxic death occurred in the megestrol acetate arm as a consequence of thrombosis. The metronomic cyclophosphamide arm reached the predefined level of efficacy with a PFR2m rate of 9 out of 44 and a PFR4m rate of 5 out of 44. The MA arm failed to achieve the level of efficacy with a PFR2m of 4 out of 44 and a PFR4m of 1 out of 44. The median overall survival was 195 and 144 days in the metronomic cyclophosphamide arm and megestrol acetate arm, respectively. Conclusion: Metronomic cyclophosphamide is well tolerated and provides stable disease in such vulnerable and poor-prognosis cancer patients. This regimen warrants further evaluations.

Lamellarin D (LAM-D) is a marine alkaloid endowed with potent cytotoxic activities against various tumor cells, in particular human prostate cancer cells and leukemia cells. Its cytotoxic action is dependent, at least in part, to its capacity to inhibit topoisomerase I. P388CPT5 murine leukemia cells resistant to the reference topoisomerase I poison camptothecin (CPT) are cross-resistant to LAM-D but the relative resistance index (RRI) is significantly reduced with LAM-D (RRI=21) compared to CPT (RRI=103). To comprehend further the mechanism of action of this novel marine antitumor agent, we have investigated the influence of the P glycoprotein (Pgp) on the cytotoxicity of LAM-D and the proapoptotic effects induced by the alkaloid. P388CPT5 cells, expressing a mutated top1 gene, display a functional Pgp, as judged from cytometry experiments performed with cells treated with rhodamine 123 or calcein-ester whereas no Pgp activity was detected with the parental P388 cells. P388CPT5 cells are also cross-resistant to the topoisomerase II poisons doxorubicin and etoposide but the resistance is abolished in the presence of verapamil or quinine (at non toxic concentrations) which reverse the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype. In contrast, the RRI measured with LAM-D and CPT remain unchanged in the presence of the two MDR reversal agents. The effects of LAM-D on the cell cycle progression were different in the parental P388 cells compared with the CPT-resistant which were blocked in the S and subsequently G2-M phases of the cell cycle. Cytometry experiments with the JC-1 fluorescent marker revealed that LAM-D and CPT promoted apoptosis in parental P388 cells via an activation of the mitochondrial pathway. In contrast, a massive depolarisation of the mitochondrial membrane potential and a nuclear fragmentation were detected only with LAM-D on P388CPT5 cells. This in vitro work identifies LAM-D as a potent pro-apoptotic agent and its cytotoxic action is fully maintained in multidrug-resistant cells compared to the sensitive parental cell line.

468 Background: Recent analysis using CKCis, a prospective database, showed that mRCC patients receiving first-line sunitinib (S) had better survival than patients receiving pazopanib (P) and greater than expected absolute survival in the real world setting. We conducted further analyses to see if an individualized approach (treatment starting at standard dose/schedule with subsequent schedule/dose alterations based on toxicity) using S results in better outcomes in mRCC patients. Methods: Patients within CKCis diagnosed with clear cell mRCC treated with first-line S or P between January 2011 to December 2015 were analyzed by three treatment groups: 1) S as per individualized approach (SI), 2) S as per product monograph (SS), or 3) P as per product monograph (PS). Overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) were calculated. Cox regression analysis allowed for adjustment of International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria with age as a continuous variable. Results: A total of 573 patients were identified, 261 patients in SI, 201 patients in SS, and 111 patients in PS. Differences in baseline characteristics were noted (Table). Median OS was improved in SI vs. SS (40.8 vs. 22.6 months (m), p

134 Background: A better understanding of taxane sensitivity/resistance in mCRPC is needed to optimize treatment. Preclinically, taxane efficacy has been linked to the ability of microtubules (MT) to inhibit AR nuclear trafficking. In this prospective biomarker study, we used circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from patients (pts) in TAXYNERGY to perform real-time analysis of AR nuclear localization (ARNL) and MT stabilization (bundling; MTB) in order to predict taxane sensitivity. Methods: TAXYNERGY (NCT01718353) is a phase 2 trial randomizing chemo-naïve mCRPC pts 2:1 to docetaxel or cabazitaxel, with a switch to the alternative taxane in the absence of a ≥ 30% PSA drop by C4. Here we present the co-primary biomarker endpoints. CTCs at baseline (C1D1) were compared to CTCs after 1 week of taxane treatment (C1D8), and were analyzed by multiplex confocal microscopy for %ARNL (integrated AR intensity in the cell and nuclear areas) and MTB (assessed for increase compared to C1D1 on a scale from 0–3 from no to most MTB increase). Associations between %ARNL and MTB with clinical outcomes were sought. Results: Of 63 randomized pts, 26 had evaluable CTCs both at C1D1 and C1D8. At C1D8, mean %ARNL was significantly lower in pts achieving a ≥ 50% PSA drop by C4 vs those without (44% vs 64%; p = 0.004). A taxane-induced decrease in mean %ARNL (C1D8 vs C1D1) was associated with a higher rate of ≥ 50% PSA response (73% vs 13%; p = 0.009); mean %ARNL decreased by 18% in responders and increased by 2% in non-responders (p = 0.02). Finally, a taxane-induced increase in mean MTB trended higher in pts achieving a ≥ 30% PSA drop by C4 vs those without (0.69 vs 0.09; p = 0.09); increase in mean MTB score was indicative of response and observed in pts who did not require a taxane switch after C4 (0.75 vs 0.09; p = 0.06). Conclusions: We provide the first prospective data suggesting that taxane-induced shifts in ARNL and MTB (measured in CTCs) may serve as an early biomarker of taxane sensitivity. Consistent with preclinical data, AR nuclear exclusion caused by microtubule bundling may be a clinically-actionable marker of taxane efficacy. Funding: Sanofi Genzyme. Clinical trial information: NCT01718353.

5007Background: TAXYNERGY (NCT01718353), a randomized phase II trial, evaluated early taxane switch with CTC biomarkers to study mechanisms of sensitivity/resistance in men with chemo-naive mCRPC. ...

265 Background: Measuring quality of care is required to improve patient outcomes. There are 23 established Quality Indicators in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) (Wood LA et al, JOP 2013) including initiating targeted therapy (TT) at full dose. It is recognized that the dose of TT is important to optimize clinical outcomes. Methods: The Canadian Kidney Cancer Information System (CKCis) is a prospectively maintained database of RCC pts from 14 Canadian academic centers. CKCis data was used to determine the use of TT in metastatic pts, the initial dose in the first line setting, and factors influencing whether pts initiated full dose TT. Descriptive statistics were performed to characterize current practices and a multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of initiating full dose TT. Results: Between 2006 and 2014, 560 pts received first-line TT and make up the study cohort. 92% received VEGF TT (81% sunitinib; 9% pazopanib; 2% sorafenib) and 8% received mTOR TT (5% everolimus; 3% temsirolimus). All pts receiving mTOR inhibitors received full dose and are excluded from further analysis. Full dose VEGF TT was initiated in 87% on sunitinib, 78% on pazopanib, and 92% on sorafenib. The sunitinib schedule was 4/2 in 81%, 2/1 in 12%, and other in 7%. Pts were less likely to initiate full dose TT if they were older (OR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.15), female (OR: 2.23, 95% CI 1.09-4.55) or had a worse ECOG PS (2,3,4 vs 0,1) (OR: 2.30, 95% CI 0.95-5.59). Data on initial versus final dose of TT will also be presented. Conclusions: Maximizing exposure to TT is important in metastatic RCC which is why initiating full dose TT was prioritized as a key QI in RCC. In this study, 87% of pts were initiated on full dose VEGF TT in the first line setting, and 100% of pts on mTOR TT which is higher than predicted. Those less likely to start on full dose VEGF TT were older, female and had a lower ECOG PS. The gender discrepancy will be explored in future studies.

Background For Canadian men, prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer and the 3rd leading cause of cancer mortality. Men dying of PCa do so after failing castration. The management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is complex and the associated drug treatments are increasingly costly. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost of drug treatments over the mCRPC period, in the context of the latest evidence-based approaches. Methods Two Markov models with Monte-Carlo microsimulations were developed in order to simulate the management of the disease and to estimate the cost of drug treatments in mCRPC, as per Quebec’s public healthcare system. The models include recently approved additional lines of treatment after or before docetaxel (i.e. abiraterone and cabazitaxel). Drug exposure and survival were based on clinical trial results and clinical practice guidelines found in a literature review. All costs were assigned in 2013 Canadian dollars ($). Only direct drug costs were estimated. Results The mean cost of mCRPC drug treatments over an average period of 28.1 months was estimated at $48,428 per patient (95% Confidence Interval: $47,624 to $49,232). The mean cost increased to $104,071 (95% CI: $102,373 - $105,770) per patient when one includes abiraterone initiation prior to docetaxel therapy. Over the mCRPC period, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa) prescribed to maintain castrate testosterone levels accounted for 20.4% of the total medication cost, whereas denosumab prescribed to decrease bone-related events accounted for 30.5% of costs. When patients received cabazitaxel in sequence after abiraterone and docetaxel, the mCRPC medications cost per patient per month increased by 60.2%. The total cost of medications for the treatment of each annual Canadian cohort of 4,000 mCRPC patients was estimated at $ 193.6 million to $416.3 million. Conclusions Our study estimates the direct drug costs associated with mCRPC treatments in the Canadian healthcare system. Recently identified effective yet not approved therapies will become part of the spectrum of mCRPC treatments, and may potentially increase the cost.

A 22-year-old woman presented in June 2006 with a massive hemoptysis, revealing a large pulmonary right tumour. An urgent right pneumectomy was required with a pericardiectomy extended to the left auricle. Brain, chest and abdominal CT-scan and 18 F-fl uorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) did not reveal metastatic extension. The initial histopathology report showed a 12 cm pulmonary blastoma biphasic subtype with no lymph node involvement and the resection was complete. A second histological examination confi rmed the pulmonary blastoma diagnosis, well-differentiated with rhabdomyoblastic, chondroid, and osteoid differentiation. As the margins were clear, no adjuvant treatment was offered. On November 2006, CT-scan, PET scan and liver MRI showed a massive local recurrence with liver extension through diaphragm (Figure 1, size 44 mm x 39 mm). The fi rst-line treatment consisted of six cycles of combined chemotherapy (Ifosfamide 2.5 g/m 2 on day 1 plus Doxorubicin 20 mg/m 2 once daily for three consecutive days every 21 days with lenograstim support d6 to d13). Successive tumour assessments demonstrated major tumour shrinkage. After the sixth cycle, the size of the residual tumour was 21 mm x 14 mm (Figure 2). The patient then received two additional cycles of doxorubicin (70 mg/m 2 /d q3wks) followed with stereotactic radiotherapy on the residual tumour (40 Gy). At the end of radiotherapy, the largest size of the residual mass was 11 mm without FDG-fi xation. Nevertheless, a second local relapse with thoracic vertebra and scapula involvement was diagnosed in May 2008. The patient received three successive ineffective lines of chemotherapy (Carboplatin Vincristine/ Cyclophosphamide Actinomycine-D/docetaxel gemcitabine). She died in November 2008.

e15044 Background: We have previously identified Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5FU (DCF) as a highly effective regimen in the neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced adenocarcinoma (ADC) of the esophagus and esophago-gastric junction (EGJ). However there is ongoing debate whether chemotherapy alone provides adequate local or regional control. We hypothesized that DCF combined with enhanced local surgical control would result in a low rate of local or regional recurrence. Methods: A prospective entered database of all esophageal/EGJ ADC pts resected at a high volume referral center was reviewed for cases treated with neoadjuvant DCF (Docetaxel 75mg/m2, Cisplatin 75mg/m2, 5FU 750mg/m2x120 hrs CIV) Q3weeks x3, followed by en-bloc resection with extended lymphadenectomy (D2). Follow up included physical exam Q3m x 2 yrs then Q6m, and endoscopy and CT chest/abdo/pelvis performed Q6 m. Recurrence was defined as: Local = biopsy on endoscopy; Regional = regional lymph nodes; Distant = distant organ or non-regional lymph nodes. Data presented as Median (Range). Results: Of 281 pts in the database, 89 (75%male, 63yrs(24-80)) underwent pre-op DCF and resection for locally advanced ADC (cT3 93%;cN+ 73%) of the EGJ (51%) or distal esophagus (49%) from 3/07-10/12. After overall follow-up of 37(6-72) months, 37 (42%) have recurred at 15(6-33) months. Sites of recurrence include Distant only in 29/37, Regional only in 5/37, and Regional and Distant in 3/37. First site of distant recurrence was peritoneum (14/37), liver (10/37), non-regional lymph nodes (10), brain/ovary/pleura (2 each), and bone(1). No patient had local recurrence alone. 3/5 patients with regional recurrence underwent salvage chemoradiotherapy and are alive without disease at 36 months (30-47) after recurrence. Conclusions: En-bloc resection with extended lymphadenectomy after DCF for locally advanced ADC of the esophagus and EGJ is associated with a low rate of local and regional recurrence. As vast majority of recurrences are distant, our data supports the notion that efforts to improve outcomes in these pts should concentrate on enhancing systemic, rather than local, therapy.

394 Background: We analyzed renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastasis (BM) risk factors and compared BM occurrence in advanced RCC treated with or without antiangiogenic agents (AAA). Methods: Data from all consecutive metastatic RCC patients (pts) treated in the Northern France Cancer Center (Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille) between 1995 and 2008 were reviewed. Eligible pts had histologically confirmed advanced RCC without synchronous BM at the time of metastasis diagnosis. Bellini duct and neuroendocrine carcinoma and sarcoma were excluded. AAA were sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab, temsirolimus, and everolimus. Characteristics of the two groups, treated with or without AAA, were compared with a Fisher exact test. Impact of AAA on overall survival (OS) and BM-free survival (BMFS) was explored by Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted to confounders parameters in a Cox model. Results: A total of 199 pts with advanced RCC were identified, 51 treated with AAA and 148 treated without AAA. The median follow-up duration was 40 months. BM occurred in 35 pts. As expected in this retrospective analysis, characteristics between AAA treated and non AAA treated groups were unbalanced for 11 parameters including age, Motzer prognostic factors, performance status and favoring better prognostic factors in the AAA treated group. The median overall survival was 24 months. Overall survival was higher in patients with AAA versus patients without AAA (31 versus 18 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.67 [0.45–0.97], p=0.038). The AAA were not associated with better BMFS (HR=0.58 [0.26–1.30], p=0.187). The alkaline phosphatase was an independent prognostic factor for BM (p=0.05). In multivariate cox model, AAA treatment improved the OS (adjusted HR 0.60 [0.38–0.94] but not the BMFS (adjusted HR 0.53 [0.22–1.32]. Conclusions: In this retrospective single center study, elevated alkaline phosphatase is a predictive factor for brain metastasis in metastatic RCC. AAA significantly improved overall survival in advanced RCC without any significant impact on brain-metastasis-free survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.